Visible spectrum explained

The visible spectrum is the band of the electromagnetic spectrum that is visible to the human eye. Electromagnetic radiation in this range of wavelengths is called visible light (or simply light). The optical spectrum is sometimes considered to be the same as the visible spectrum, but some authors define the term more broadly, to include the ultraviolet and infrared parts of the electromagnetic spectrum as well, known collectively as optical radiation.[1]

A typical human eye will respond to wavelengths from about 380 to about 750 nanometers.[2] In terms of frequency, this corresponds to a band in the vicinity of 400–790 terahertz. These boundaries are not sharply defined and may vary per individual.[3] Under optimal conditions these limits of human perception can extend to 310 nm (ultraviolet) and 1100 nm (near infrared).[4] [5] [6]

The spectrum does not contain all the colors that the human visual system can distinguish. Unsaturated colors such as pink, or purple variations like magenta, for example, are absent because they can only be made from a mix of multiple wavelengths. Colors containing only one wavelength are also called pure colors or spectral colors.[7]

Visible wavelengths pass largely unattenuated through the Earth's atmosphere via the "optical window" region of the electromagnetic spectrum. An example of this phenomenon is when clean air scatters blue light more than red light, and so the midday sky appears blue (apart from the area around the Sun which appears white because the light is not scattered as much). The optical window is also referred to as the "visible window" because it overlaps the human visible response spectrum. The near infrared (NIR) window lies just out of the human vision, as well as the medium wavelength infrared (MWIR) window, and the long-wavelength or far-infrared (LWIR or FIR) window, although other animals may perceive them.

Spectral colors

See main article: Spectral color. Colors that can be produced by visible light of a narrow band of wavelengths (monochromatic light) are called pure spectral colors. The various color ranges indicated in the illustration are an approximation: The spectrum is continuous, with no clear boundaries between one color and the next.[8]

History

In the 13th century, Roger Bacon theorized that rainbows were produced by a similar process to the passage of light through glass or crystal.[9]

In the 17th century, Isaac Newton discovered that prisms could disassemble and reassemble white light, and described the phenomenon in his book Opticks. He was the first to use the word spectrum (Latin for "appearance" or "apparition") in this sense in print in 1671 in describing his experiments in optics. Newton observed that, when a narrow beam of sunlight strikes the face of a glass prism at an angle, some is reflected and some of the beam passes into and through the glass, emerging as different-colored bands. Newton hypothesized light to be made up of "corpuscles" (particles) of different colors, with the different colors of light moving at different speeds in transparent matter, red light moving more quickly than violet in glass. The result is that red light is bent (refracted) less sharply than violet as it passes through the prism, creating a spectrum of colors.

Newton originally divided the spectrum into six named colors: red, orange, yellow, green, blue, and violet. He later added indigo as the seventh color since he believed that seven was a perfect number as derived from the ancient Greek sophists, of there being a connection between the colors, the musical notes, the known objects in the Solar System, and the days of the week.[10] The human eye is relatively insensitive to indigo's frequencies, and some people who have otherwise-good vision cannot distinguish indigo from blue and violet. For this reason, some later commentators, including Isaac Asimov,[11] have suggested that indigo should not be regarded as a color in its own right but merely as a shade of blue or violet. Evidence indicates that what Newton meant by "indigo" and "blue" does not correspond to the modern meanings of those color words. Comparing Newton's observation of prismatic colors with a color image of the visible light spectrum shows that "indigo" corresponds to what is today called blue, whereas his "blue" corresponds to cyan.[12] [13] [14]

In the 18th century, Johann Wolfgang von Goethe wrote about optical spectra in his Theory of Colours. Goethe used the word spectrum (Spektrum) to designate a ghostly optical afterimage, as did Schopenhauer in On Vision and Colors. Goethe argued that the continuous spectrum was a compound phenomenon. Where Newton narrowed the beam of light to isolate the phenomenon, Goethe observed that a wider aperture produces not a spectrum but rather reddish-yellow and blue-cyan edges with white between them. The spectrum appears only when these edges are close enough to overlap.

In the early 19th century, the concept of the visible spectrum became more definite, as light outside the visible range was discovered and characterized by William Herschel (infrared) and Johann Wilhelm Ritter (ultraviolet), Thomas Young, Thomas Johann Seebeck, and others.[15] Young was the first to measure the wavelengths of different colors of light, in 1802.[16]

The connection between the visible spectrum and color vision was explored by Thomas Young and Hermann von Helmholtz in the early 19th century. Their theory of color vision correctly proposed that the eye uses three distinct receptors to perceive color.

Limits to visible range

The visible spectrum is limited to wavelengths that can both reach the retina and trigger visual phototransduction (excite a visual opsin). Insensitivity to UV light is generally limited by transmission through the lens. Insensitivity to IR light is limited by the spectral sensitivity functions of the visual opsins. The range is defined psychometrically by the luminous efficiency function, which accounts for all of these factors. In humans, there is a separate function for each of two visual systems, one for photopic vision, used in daylight, which is mediated by cone cells, and one for scotopic vision, used in dim light, which is mediated by rod cells. Each of these functions have different visible ranges. However, discussion on the visible range generally assumes photopic vision.

Atmospheric transmission

The visible range of most animals evolved to match the optical window, which is the range of light that can pass through the atmosphere. The ozone layer absorbs almost all UV light (below 315 nm).[17] However, this only affects cosmic light (e.g. sunlight), not terrestrial light (e.g. Bioluminescence).

Ocular transmission

Before reaching the retina, light must first transmit through the cornea and lens. UVB light (< 315 nm) is filtered mostly by the cornea, and UVA light (315–400 nm) is filtered mostly by the lens.[18] The lens also yellows with age, attenuating transmission most strongly at the blue part of the spectrum.[18] This can cause xanthopsia as well as a slight truncation of the short-wave (blue) limit of the visible spectrum. Subjects with aphakia are missing a lens, so UVA light can reach the retina and excite the visual opsins; this expands the visible range and may also lead to cyanopsia.

Opsin absorption

Each opsin has a spectral sensitivity function, which defines how likely it is to absorb a photon of each wavelength. The luminous efficiency function is approximately the superposition of the contributing visual opsins. Variance in the position of the individual opsin spectral sensitivity functions therefore affects the luminous efficiency function and the visible range. For example, the long-wave (red) limit changes proportionally to the position of the L-opsin. The positions are defined by the peak wavelength (wavelength of highest sensitivity), so as the L-opsin peak wavelength blue shifts by 10 nm, the long-wave limit of the visible spectrum also shifts 10 nm. Large deviations of the L-opsin peak wavelength lead to a form of color blindness called protanomaly and a missing L-opsin (protanopia) shortens the visible spectrum by about 30 nm at the long-wave limit. Forms of color blindness affecting the M-opsin and S-opsin do not significantly affect the luminous efficiency function nor the limits of the visible spectrum.

Different definitions

Regardless of actual physical and biological variance, the definition of the limits is not standard and will change depending on the industry. For example, some industries may be concerned with practical limits, so would conservatively report 420–680 nm,[19] [20] while others may be concerned with psychometrics and achieving the broadest spectrum would liberally report 380–750, or even 380–800 nm.[21] [22] The luminous efficiency function in the NIR does not have a hard cutoff, but rather an exponential decay, such that the function's value (or vision sensitivity) at 1,050 nm is about 109 times weaker than at 700 nm; much higher intensity is therefore required to perceive 1,050 nm light than 700 nm light.[23]

Vision outside the visible spectrum

Under ideal laboratory conditions, subjects may perceive infrared light up to at least 1,064 nm. While 1,050 nm NIR light can evoke red, suggesting direct absorption by the L-opsin, there are also reports that pulsed NIR lasers can evoke green, which suggests two-photon absorption may be enabling extended NIR sensitivity.

Similarly, young subjects may perceive ultraviolet wavelengths down to about 310–313 nm,[24] [25] [26] but detection of light below 380 nm may be due to fluorescence of the ocular media, rather than direct absorption of UV light by the opsins. As UVA light is absorbed by the ocular media (lens and cornea), it may fluoresce and be released at a lower energy (longer wavelength) that can then be absorbed by the opsins. For example, when the lens absorbs 350 nm light, the fluorescence emission spectrum is centered on 440 nm.[27]

Non-visual light detection

In addition to the photopic and scotopic systems, humans have other systems for detecting light that do not contribute to the primary visual system. For example, melanopsin has an absorption range of 420–540 nm and regulates circadian rhythm and other reflexive processes.[28] Since the melanopsin system does not form images, it is not strictly considered vision and does not contribute to the visible range.

In non-humans

See also: Evolution of color vision. The visible spectrum is defined as that visible to humans, but the variance between species is large. Not only can cone opsins be spectrally shifted to alter the visible range, but vertebrates with 4 cones (tetrachromatic) or 2 cones (dichromatic) relative to humans' 3 (trichromatic) will also tend to have a wider or narrower visible spectrum than humans, respectively.

Vertebrates tend to have 1-4 different opsin classes:[17]

Testing the visual systems of animals behaviorally is difficult, so the visible range of animals is usually estimated by comparing the peak wavelengths of opsins with those of typical humans (S-opsin at 420 nm and L-opsin at 560 nm).

Mammals

Most mammals have retained only two opsin classes (LWS and VS), due likely to the nocturnal bottleneck. However, old world primates (including humans) have since evolved two versions in the LWS class to regain trichromacy.[17] Unlike most mammals, rodents' UVS opsins have remained at shorter wavelengths. Along with their lack of UV filters in the lens, mice have a UVS opsin that can detect down to 340 nm. While allowing UV light to reach the retina can lead to retinal damage, the short lifespan of mice compared with other mammals may minimize this disadvantage relative to the advantage of UV vision.[29] Dogs have two cone opsins at 429 nm and 555 nm, so see almost the entire visible spectrum of humans, despite being dichromatic.[30] Horses have two cone opsins at 428 nm and 539 nm, yielding a slightly more truncated red vision.[31]

Birds

Most other vertebrates (birds, lizards, fish, etc.) have retained their tetrachromacy, including UVS opsins that extend further into the ultraviolet than humans' VS opsin.[17] The sensitivity of avian UVS opsins vary greatly, from 355–425 nm, and LWS opsins from 560–570 nm.[32] This translates to some birds with a visible spectrum on par with humans, and other birds with greatly expanded sensitivity to UV light. The LWS opsin of birds is sometimes reported to have a peak wavelength above 600 nm, but this is an effective peak wavelength that incorporates the filter of avian oil droplets.[32] The peak wavelength of the LWS opsin alone is the better predictor of the long-wave limit. A possible benefit of avian UV vision involves sex-dependent markings on their plumage that are visible only in the ultraviolet range.[33] [34]

Fish

Teleosts (bony fish) are generally tetrachromatic. The sensitivity of fish UVS opsins vary from 347-383 nm, and LWS opsins from 500-570 nm.[35] However, some fish that use alternative chromophores can extend their LWS opsin sensitivity to 625 nm.[35] The popular belief that the common goldfish is the only animal that can see both infrared and ultraviolet light[36] is incorrect, because goldfish cannot see infrared light.[37]

Invertebrates

The visual systems of invertebrates deviate greatly from vertebrates, so direct comparisons are difficult. However, UV sensitivity has been reported in most insect species.[38] Bees and many other insects can detect ultraviolet light, which helps them find nectar in flowers. Plant species that depend on insect pollination may owe reproductive success to their appearance in ultraviolet light rather than how colorful they appear to humans. Bees' long-wave limit is at about 590 nm.[39] Mantis shrimp exhibit up to 14 opsins, enabling a visible range of less than 300 nm to above 700 nm.[17]

Thermal vision

See main article: Infrared sensing in snakes. Some snakes can "see"[40] radiant heat at wavelengths between 5 and 30 μm to a degree of accuracy such that a blind rattlesnake can target vulnerable body parts of the prey at which it strikes,[41] and other snakes with the organ may detect warm bodies from a meter away.[42] It may also be used in thermoregulation and predator detection.[43] [44]

Spectroscopy

See main article: Spectroscopy.

Spectroscopy is the study of objects based on the spectrum of color they emit, absorb or reflect. Visible-light spectroscopy is an important tool in astronomy (as is spectroscopy at other wavelengths), where scientists use it to analyze the properties of distant objects. Chemical elements and small molecules can be detected in astronomical objects by observing emission lines and absorption lines. For example, helium was first detected by analysis of the spectrum of the Sun. The shift in frequency of spectral lines is used to measure the Doppler shift (redshift or blueshift) of distant objects to determine their velocities towards or away from the observer. Astronomical spectroscopy uses high-dispersion diffraction gratings to observe spectra at very high spectral resolutions.

See also

Notes and References

  1. Book: Introduction to Optics . 9781108428262 . 7–8 . December 21, 2017 . Cambridge University Press . Frank L. . Pedrotti . Leno M. . Pedrotti . Leno S. . Pedrotti.
  2. Book: Biology: Concepts and Applications . Starr, Cecie . Thomson Brooks/Cole . 2005 . 978-0-534-46226-0 . registration . 94 .
  3. Web site: The visible spectrum. 27 May 2024. Britannica.
  4. February 2016 . D. H. Sliney . 26768917 . 4763133 . 1476-5454 . 222–229 . Eye . 10.1038/eye.2015.252 . 2 . What is light? The visible spectrum and beyond. 30 .
  5. Book: 2001 . W. C. Livingston . Color and light in nature. Cambridge University Press . 0-521-77284-2 . Cambridge, UK . 2nd .
  6. December 2014 . Grazyna Palczewska . etal . E5445–E5454 . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences . 10.1073/pnas.1410162111 . 50 . Human infrared vision is triggered by two-photon chromophore isomerization. 111 . 25453064 . 4273384 . 2014PNAS..111E5445P . free .
  7. Web site: Spectral Colors . Hyperphysics . R . Nave . 2022-05-11.
  8. Bruno, Thomas J. and Svoronos, Paris D. N. (2005). CRC Handbook of Fundamental Spectroscopic Correlation Charts. CRC Press.
  9. Book: Coffey, Peter. The Science of Logic: An Inquiry Into the Principles of Accurate Thought . 185. roger bacon prism.. 1912. Longmans.
  10. Book: Isacoff, Stuart. Temperament: How Music Became a Battleground for the Great Minds of Western Civilization. 18 March 2014. 16 January 2009. Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group. 978-0-307-56051-3. 12–13.
  11. Book: Asimov, Isaac. Eyes on the universe : a history of the telescope. 1975. Houghton Mifflin. Boston. 978-0-395-20716-1. 59. registration.
  12. Book: Evans, Ralph M.. The perception of color. 1974. Wiley-Interscience. New York. 978-0-471-24785-2. null.
  13. McLaren. K.. Newton's indigo. Color Research & Application. March 2007. 10. 4. 225–229. 10.1002/col.5080100411.
  14. Book: Waldman, Gary. Introduction to light : the physics of light, vision, and color. 2002. Dover Publications. Mineola. 978-0-486-42118-6. 193. Dover.
  15. Book: The Cambridge History of Science: The Modern Physical and Mathematical Sciences . 5 . Mary Jo Nye . Cambridge University Press . 2003 . 978-0-521-57199-9 . 278 .
  16. Book: Lines of light: the sources of dispersive spectroscopy, 1800–1930 . John C. D. Brand . CRC Press . 1995 . 978-2-88449-163-1 . 30–32 .
  17. Hunt . D.M. . Wilkie . S.E. . Bowmaker . J.K. . Poopalasundaram . S. . Vision in the ultraviolet . Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences . October 2001 . 58 . 11 . 1583–1598 . 10.1007/PL00000798 . 11706986 . 22938704 . Radiation below 320 nm [ultraviolet (UV)A] is largely screened out by the ozone layer in the Earth’s upper atmosphere and is therefore unavailable to the visual system,.
  18. Boettner . Edward A. . Wolter . J. Reimer . Transmission of Ocular Media . Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science . December 1962 . 1 . 776-783.
  19. Book: Laufer, Gabriel . Geometrical Optics . Introduction to Optics and Lasers in Engineering . https://books.google.com/books?id=4MxLPYMS5TUC&pg=PA11 . 20 October 2013 . 1996 . 978-0-521-45233-5 . 11. 10.1017/CBO9781139174190.004 . 1996iole.book.....L .
  20. Book: Bradt, Hale . Astronomy Methods: A Physical Approach to Astronomical Observations . 20 October 2013 . 2004 . Cambridge University Press . 978-0-521-53551-9 . 26.
  21. Book: Ohannesian . Lena . Streeter . Anthony . Handbook of Pharmaceutical Analysis . 20 October 2013 . 2001 . CRC Press . 978-0-8247-4194-5 . 187.
  22. Book: Ahluwalia . V.K. . Goyal . Madhuri . A Textbook of Organic Chemistry . 20 October 2013 . 2000 . Narosa . 978-81-7319-159-6 . 110.
  23. Sliney . David H. . Wangemann . Robert T. . Franks . James K. . Wolbarsht . Myron L. . 1976 . Visual sensitivity of the eye to infrared laser radiation . . 66 . 4 . 339–341 . 1976JOSA...66..339S . 10.1364/JOSA.66.000339 . 1262982 . The foveal sensitivity to several near-infrared laser wavelengths was measured. It was found that the eye could respond to radiation at wavelengths at least as far as 1,064 nm. A continuous 1,064 nm laser source appeared red, but a 1,060 nm pulsed laser source appeared green, which suggests the presence of second harmonic generation in the retina..
  24. Book: Lynch . David K. . Color and Light in Nature . Livingston . William Charles . Cambridge University Press . 2001 . 978-0-521-77504-5 . 2nd . Cambridge . 231 . Limits of the eye's overall range of sensitivity extends from about 310 to 1,050 nanometers . 12 October 2013 . https://web.archive.org/web/20221008031821/https://books.google.com/books?id=4Abp5FdhskAC&pg=PA231 . 8 October 2022 . live.
  25. Book: Dash . Madhab Chandra . Fundamentals of Ecology 3E . Dash . Satya Prakash . Tata McGraw-Hill Education . 2009 . 978-1-259-08109-5 . 213 . Normally the human eye responds to light rays from 390 to 760 nm. This can be extended to a range of 310 to 1,050 nm under artificial conditions. . 18 October 2013 . https://web.archive.org/web/20221008031820/https://books.google.com/books?id=7mW4-us4Yg8C&pg=PA213 . 8 October 2022 . live.
  26. Saidman . Jean . 15 May 1933 . Sur la visibilité de l'ultraviolet jusqu'à la longueur d'onde 3130 . The visibility of the ultraviolet to the wave length of 3130 . live . . fr . 196 . 1537–9 . https://web.archive.org/web/20131024092515/http://visualiseur.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k3148d . 24 October 2013 . 21 October 2013.
  27. Book: Kurzel . Richard B. . Wolbarsht . Myron L. . Yamanashi . Bill S. . Ultraviolet Radiation Effects on the Human Eye . 1977 . Photochemical and Photobiological Reviews . 133–167 . 10.1007/978-1-4684-2577-2_3. 978-1-4684-2579-6 .
  28. Enezi J, Revell V, Brown T, Wynne J, Schlangen L, Lucas R . A "melanopic" spectral efficiency function predicts the sensitivity of melanopsin photoreceptors to polychromatic lights . Journal of Biological Rhythms . 26 . 4 . 314–323 . August 2011 . 21775290 . 10.1177/0748730411409719 . 22369861 . free .
  29. Gouras . Peter . Ekesten . Bjorn . Why do mice have ultra-violet vision? . Experimental Eye Research . December 2004 . 79 . 6 . 887–892 . 10.1016/j.exer.2004.06.031. 15642326 .
  30. Neitz . Jay . Geist . Timothy . Jacobs . Gerald H. . Color vision in the dog . Visual Neuroscience . August 1989 . 3 . 2 . 119–125 . 10.1017/S0952523800004430. 2487095 . 23509491 .
  31. Carroll . Joseph . Murphy . Christopher J. . Neitz . Maureen . Ver Hoeve . James N. . Neitz . Jay . Photopigment basis for dichromatic color vision in the horse . Journal of Vision . 3 October 2001 . 1 . 2 . 80–87 . 10.1167/1.2.2. 12678603 . free .
  32. Hart . Nathan S. . Hunt . David M. . Avian Visual Pigments: Characteristics, Spectral Tuning, and Evolution . The American Naturalist . January 2007 . 169 . S1 . S7–S26 . 10.1086/510141. 19426092 . 25779190 .
  33. Book: Cuthill, Innes C . Innes Cuthill . Peter J.B. Slater. Advances in the Study of Behavior. Academic Press. Oxford, England. 1997. 29. Ultraviolet vision in birds. 161. 978-0-12-004529-7.
  34. Book: Jamieson, Barrie G. M. . Reproductive Biology and Phylogeny of Birds. University of Virginia. Charlottesville VA. 2007. 128. 978-1-57808-386-2.
  35. Carleton . Karen L. . Escobar-Camacho . Daniel . Stieb . Sara M. . Cortesi . Fabio . Marshall . N. Justin . Seeing the rainbow: mechanisms underlying spectral sensitivity in teleost fishes . Journal of Experimental Biology . 15 April 2020 . 223 . 8 . 10.1242/jeb.193334. 32327561 . 7188444 .
  36. Web site: True or False? "The common goldfish is the only animal that can see both infra-red and ultra-violet light." . Skeptive . 2013. September 28, 2013 . https://web.archive.org/web/20131224110616/http://www.skeptive.com/disputes/4484 . December 24, 2013 . dead . mdy-all .
  37. Book: Neumeyer, Christa . Olga . Lazareva . Toru . Shimizu . Edward . Wasserman . How Animals See the World: Comparative Behavior, Biology, and Evolution of Vision . Oxford Scholarship Online . 2012 . Chapter 2: Color Vision in Goldfish and Other Vertebrates . 978-0-19-533465-4.
  38. Briscoe . Adriana D. . Chittka . Lars . THEEVOLUTION OFCOLORVISION ININSECTS . Annual Review of Entomology . January 2001 . 46 . 1 . 471–510 . 10.1146/annurev.ento.46.1.471. 11112177 .
  39. Skorupski. Peter. Chittka. Lars. 10 August 2010 . Photoreceptor Spectral Sensitivity in the Bumblebee, Bombus impatiens (Hymenoptera: Apidae) . PLOS ONE . 5 . 8 . e12049 . 10.1371/journal.pone.0012049 . 20711523. 2919406. 2010PLoSO...512049S . free.
  40. 2693128 . 7256281 . 213 . 4509 . Integration of visual and infrared information in bimodal neurons in the rattlesnake optic tectum . 1981 . Science . 789–91 . Newman . EA . Hartline . PH . 10.1126/science.7256281. 1981Sci...213..789N .
  41. Kardong . KV . Mackessy . SP . 1991 . The strike behavior of a congenitally blind rattlesnake . Journal of Herpetology . 25 . 2. 208–211 . 10.2307/1564650. 1564650 .
  42. 10.1038/news.2010.122 . Snake infrared detection unravelled . Fang, Janet . Nature News. 14 March 2010 .
  43. Krochmal. Aaron R.. George S. Bakken . Travis J. LaDuc . Heat in evolution's kitchen: evolutionary perspectives on the functions and origin of the facial pit of pitvipers (Viperidae: Crotalinae). Journal of Experimental Biology . 15 November 2004. 207. 4231–4238. 10.1242/jeb.01278. 15531644. Pt 24. free.
  44. Greene HW. (1992). "The ecological and behavioral context for pitviper evolution", in Campbell JA, Brodie ED Jr. Biology of the Pitvipers. Texas: Selva. .