Upper set explained

(X,\leq)

is a subset

S\subseteqX

with the following property: if s is in S and if x in X is larger than s (that is, if

s<x

), then x is in S. In other words, this means that any x element of X that is

\geq

to some element of S is necessarily also an element of S. The term lower set (also called a downward closed set, down set, decreasing set, initial segment, or semi-ideal) is defined similarly as being a subset S of X with the property that any element x of X that is

\leq

to some element of S is necessarily also an element of S.

Definition

Let

(X,\leq)

be a preordered set. An in

X

(also called an , an , or an set) is a subset

U\subseteqX

that is "closed under going up", in the sense that

for all

u\inU

and all

x\inX,

if

u\leqx

then

x\inU.

The dual notion is a (also called a , , , , or ), which is a subset

L\subseteqX

that is "closed under going down", in the sense that

for all

l\inL

and all

x\inX,

if

x\leql

then

x\inL.

The terms or are sometimes used as synonyms for lower set.[1] [2] This choice of terminology fails to reflect the notion of an ideal of a lattice because a lower set of a lattice is not necessarily a sublattice.[3]

Properties

(X,\leq),

the family of upper sets of

X

ordered with the inclusion relation is a complete lattice, the upper set lattice.

Y

of a partially ordered set

X,

the smallest upper set containing

Y

is denoted using an up arrow as

\uparrowY

(see upper closure and lower closure).

Y

is denoted using a down arrow as

\downarrowY.

\downarrow\{x\}

where

x

is an element of

X.

Y

of a finite partially ordered set

X

is equal to the smallest lower set containing all maximal elements of

Y

\downarrowY=\downarrow\operatorname{Max}(Y)

where

\operatorname{Max}(Y)

denotes the set containing the maximal elements of

Y.

\{x\in\R:x>0\}

and

\{x\in\R:x>1\}

are both mapped to the empty antichain.

Upper closure and lower closure

Given an element

x

of a partially ordered set

(X,\leq),

the upper closure or upward closure of

x,

denoted by

x\uparrow,

x\uparrow,

or

\uparrowx,

is defined byx^ =\; \uparrow\! x = \while the lower closure or downward closure of

x

, denoted by

x\downarrow,

x\downarrow,

or

\downarrowx,

is defined byx^ =\; \downarrow\! x = \.

The sets

\uparrowx

and

\downarrowx

are, respectively, the smallest upper and lower sets containing

x

as an element. More generally, given a subset

A\subseteqX,

define the upper/upward closure and the lower/downward closure of

A,

denoted by

A\uparrow

and

A\downarrow

respectively, as A^ = A^ = \bigcup_ \uparrow\!aand A^ = A^ = \bigcup_ \downarrow\!a.

In this way,

\uparrowx=\uparrow\{x\}

and

\downarrowx=\downarrow\{x\},

where upper sets and lower sets of this form are called principal. The upper closure and lower closure of a set are, respectively, the smallest upper set and lower set containing it.

The upper and lower closures, when viewed as functions from the power set of

X

to itself, are examples of closure operators since they satisfy all of the Kuratowski closure axioms. As a result, the upper closure of a set is equal to the intersection of all upper sets containing it, and similarly for lower sets. (Indeed, this is a general phenomenon of closure operators. For example, the topological closure of a set is the intersection of all closed sets containing it; the span of a set of vectors is the intersection of all subspaces containing it; the subgroup generated by a subset of a group is the intersection of all subgroups containing it; the ideal generated by a subset of a ring is the intersection of all ideals containing it; and so on.)

Ordinal numbers

An ordinal number is usually identified with the set of all smaller ordinal numbers. Thus each ordinal number forms a lower set in the class of all ordinal numbers, which are totally ordered by set inclusion.

See also

U

of a partially ordered set

(X,\leq)

that contains for every element

x\inX,

some element

y

such that

x\leqy.

References

Notes and References

  1. Book: Stanley . R.P. . Enumerative combinatorics . Cambridge studies in advanced mathematics . 1 . 2002 . Cambridge University Press . 978-0-521-66351-9 . 100.
  2. Book: Lawson . M.V. . Inverse semigroups: the theory of partial symmetries . limited . 1998 . World Scientific . 978-981-02-3316-7 . 22.
  3. Book: Brian A. Davey . Hilary Ann Priestley . Hilary Priestley . Introduction to Lattices and Order. Introduction to Lattices and Order . 2nd . 2002 . . 0-521-78451-4 . 2001043910 . 20, 44.