Upper Midwest forest–savanna transition explained

Upper Midwest forest–savanna transition
Country:United States
Country1:Canada
State:Minnesota
State1:Wisconsin
State2:Michigan
State3:Iowa
State4:Ontario
State5:Manitoba
Region Type:States/Provinces
Border:Western Great Lakes forests
Border1:Southern Great Lakes forests
Border2:Central forest-grasslands transition
Border3:Central tall grasslands
Border4:Northern tall grasslands
Border5:Midwestern Canadian Shield forests
Bird Species:215[1]
Mammal Species:62
Habitat Loss:62.5
Protected:4.7
Area:166100
Biogeographic Realm:Nearctic
Biome:Temperate broadleaf and mixed forest
Climate:Humid continental (Dfa and Dfb)
Map:Upper Midwest Forest-Savanna Transition Zone map.svg

The Upper Midwest forest–savanna transition is a terrestrial ecoregion that is defined by the World Wildlife Fund. An oak savanna plant community located in the Upper Midwest region of the United States, it is an ecotone (a transitional area) between the tallgrass prairies to the west and the temperate deciduous forests to the east. A part of the Upper Mississippi River basin, it is considered endangered with less than 5% of the original ecosystem remaining intact, due mostly to overgrazing and conversion to agriculture.[2]

Fire and disturbance

Historically, wildfire has been the primary driver and determinant of the forest dynamics in the plant community. Due to this the resulting canopy structure has been relatively sparse (the basal area ranges approximately from 4 to 29 meters hectare−1). Presence and biodiversity of plant species is largely controlled by the frequency of fire. Typical tallgrass prairie vegetation such as grasses, forbs, shrubs, and sedges, increase with an increase in the amount of fire, whereas tree density and basal area decrease.[3]

After European American settlement and the abandonment of fire as a land management regime, most savannas have been converted into closed canopy woodlands, with shade tolerant and fire-intolerant species dominating rather than the historic primary and secondary succession species dependent on fire.[4]

Species distribution

Trees:

Intact habitat

A survey in 1985 concluded that only 26km2 of oak savanna remain, roughly 0.02% of what is estimated to have existed at the time of European settlement. Highly dispersed and fragmented, none of the present habitat falls under the designation of National Forests but comes under the administration of the states' Department of Natural Resources organizations or federal entities such as the Fish and Wildlife Service. Remaining intact habitat areas include:

See also

Notes and References

  1. Book: Hoekstra . J. M. . Molnar . J. L. . Jennings . M. . Revenga . C. . Spalding . M. D. . Boucher . T. M. . Robertson . J. C. . Heibel . T. J. . Ellison . K. . The Atlas of Global Conservation: Changes, Challenges, and Opportunities to Make a Difference . . Molnar . J. L. . 2010 . 978-0-520-26256-0 . registration .
  2. Book: Benke, Arthur C. . Colbert E. Cushing . Rivers of North America . Academic Press . 26 May 2005 . 978-0-12-088253-3 . registration .
  3. Tester . John R. . Effects of fire frequency on oak savanna in east-central Minnesota . Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club . 116 . 2 . 134–144 . 1989 . 10.2307/2997196. 2010-06-04. 2997196 .
  4. Mabry . Catherine M. . L.A. Brudvig . R.C. Atwell . The confluence of landscape context and site-level management in determining Midwestern savanna and woodland breeding bird communities . . 260 . 1 . 42–51 . Elsevier B.V. . 2010-06-15 . 10.1016/j.foreco.2010.03.028 .