Tunneling nanotube explained

A tunneling nanotube (TNT) or membrane nanotube is a term that has been applied to cytoskeletal protrusions that extend from the plasma membrane which enable different animal cells to connect over long distances, sometimes over 100 μm between certain types of cells.[1] [2] [3] Tunneling nanotubes that are less than 0.7 micrometers in diameter, have an actin structure and carry portions of plasma membrane between cells in both directions. Larger TNTs (>0.7 μm) contain an actin structure with microtubules and/or intermediate filaments, and can carry components such as vesicles and organelles between cells, including whole mitochondria.[4] [5] The diameter of TNTs ranges from 0.05 μm to 1.5 μm and they can reach lengths of several cell diameters.[6] [7] There have been two types of observed TNTs: open ended and closed ended. Open ended TNTs connect the cytoplasm of two cells. Closed ended TNTs do not have continuous cytoplasm as there is a gap junction cap that only allows small molecules and ions to flow between cells.[8] These structures have shown involvement in cell-to-cell communication, transfer of nucleic acids such as mRNA and miRNA between cells in culture or in a tissue, and the spread of pathogens or toxins such as HIV and prions.[9] [10] [11] [12] [13] TNTs have observed lifetimes ranging from a few minutes up to several hours, and several proteins have been implicated in their formation and inhibition, including many that interact with Arp2/3.[14] [15]

History

Membrane nanotubes were first described in a 1999 Cell article examining the development of Drosophila melanogaster wing imaginal discs.[16] More recently, a Science article published in 2004 described structures that connected PC12 cells together, as well as other types of cell cultures.[17] This study coined the term "tunneling nanotubes" and also showed that nanotube formation between cells is correlated with both membrane and organelle transfer. Since these publications, more TNT-like structures have been recorded, containing varying levels of F-actin, microtubules and other components, but remaining relatively homogenous in terms of composition.

Formation

Several mechanisms may be involved in nanotube formation. These include molecular controls as well as cell-to-cell interactions.

Two primary mechanisms for TNT formation have been proposed. The first involves cytoplasmic protrusions extending from one cell to another, where they fuse with the membrane of the target cell. The other mechanism occurs when two previously connected cells move away from one another, and TNTs remain as bridges between the two cells.[18]

Induction

Some dendritic cells and THP-1 monocytes have been shown to connect via tunneling nanotubes and display evidence of calcium flux when exposed to bacterial or mechanical stimuli. TNT-mediated signaling has shown to produce spreading in target cells, similar to the lamellipodia produced when dendritic cells are exposed to bacterial products. The TNTs demonstrated in this study propagated at initial speed of 35 micrometers/second and have shown to connect THP-1 monocytes with nanotubes up to 100 micrometers long.[19]

Phosphatidylserine exposure has demonstrated the ability to guide TNT formation from mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) to a population of injured cells.[20] The protein S100A4 and its receptor have been shown to guide the direction of TNT growth, as p53 activates caspase 3 to cleave S100A4 in the initiating cell, thereby generating a gradient in which the target cell has higher amounts of the protein.[21] These findings suggests that chemotactic gradients may be involved in TNT induction.

One study found that cell-to-cell contact was necessary for the formation of nanotube bridges between T cells. p53 activation has also been implicated as a necessary mechanism for the development of TNTs, as the downstream genes up-regulated by p53 (namely EGFR, Akt, PI3K, and mTOR) were found to be involved in nanotube formation following hydrogen peroxide treatment and serum starvation.[22] Connexin-43 has shown to promote connection between bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) and alveolar epithelial cells, leading to the formation of nanotubes.[23]

Cellular stress by rotenone or TNF-α was also shown to induce TNT formation between epithelial cells.[24] Inflammation by lipopolysaccharides or interferon-γ has shown to increase the expression of proteins related to TNT formation.[25]

Inhibition

While TNTs have many components, their main inhibitors work by blocking or limiting actin formation. TNT-like structures called streamers, which are extremely thin protrusions, did not form when cultured with cytochalasin D, an F-actin depolymerizing compound.[26] A separate study using cytochalasin B found that it impacted TNT formation without the destruction of existing TNTs.[27] Latrunculin-B, another F-actin depolymerizing compound, was found to completely block TNT formation. Blocking CD38, which had been implicated in the release of mitochondria by astrocytes, also significantly decreased TNT formation.[28] [29]

TNFAIP2, also called M-Sec, is known to mediate TNT formation, and knockdown of this protein by shRNA reduced TNT development in epithelial cells by about two-thirds.

Inhibiting Arp2/3 directly resulted in different effects depending on cell type. In human eye cells and macrophages, blocking Arp2/3 led to a decrease in TNT formation. However, such inhibition in neuronal cells resulted in an increase in the amount of cells connected via TNTs, while lowering the total amount of TNTs connecting cells.[30]

Role in intercellular transfer

Mitochondria

Tunneling nanotubes have been implicated as one mechanism by which whole mitochondria can be transferred from cell to cell. A recent study in Nature Nanotechnology has reported that cancer cells can hijack the mitochondria from immune cells via physical tunneling nanotubes.[31] Mitochondrial DNA damage appears to be the main trigger for the formation of TNTs in order to traffic entire mitochondria, though the exact threshold of damage necessary to induce TNT formation is yet unknown.[32] The maximum speed of mitochondria traveling over TNTs was found to be about 80 nm/s, lower than the measured speed of 100-1400 nm/s of axonal transport of mitochondria; this could be due to the smaller diameter of TNTs inhibiting mitochondrial migration.[33]

In one study, Ahmad et al. used four lines of mesenchymal stem cells, each expressing either a differing phenotype of the Rho-GTPase Miro1; a higher level of Miro1 was associated with more efficient mitochondrial transfer via TNTs. Several studies have shown, through the selective blockage of TNT formation, that TNTs are a primary mechanism for the trafficking of whole mitochondria between heterogeneous cells.[34] [35] [36]

Action Potential

Tunneling nanotubes have been shown to propagate action potentials via their extensions of endoplasmic reticulum that propagate Ca2+ influx through active diffusion.[37]

Virus

Many viruses can transfer their proteins to TNT-connected cells. Certain types, such as influenza, have even been found to transfer their genome via TNTs.[38] Over two dozen types of viruses have been found to transfer through and/or modulate TNT.[39] A 2022 study suggests that SARS-CoV-2 builds tunneling nanotubes from nose cells to gain access to the brain.[40] [41]

Nanomedicine

Tunneling nanotubes have the potential to be involved in applications of nanomedicine, as they have shown the ability to transfer such treatments between cells. Future applications look to either inhibit TNTs to prevent nanomedicine toxicity from reaching neighboring cells, or to promote TNT formation to increase positive effects of the medicine.[42]

TNT-like structures

While TNT-like structures are all made of cytoskeletal cellular protrusions, their fundamental difference with TNTs is in the connection between two cells. TNT-like structures do not share intracellular contents such as ions or small molecules between connected cells–a feature that is present in both open ended and closed ended TNTs.

A TNT-like structure called a cytoneme enables exchanges between signaling centers. The formation of cytonemes towards a FGF homolog gradient has been observed, suggesting that chemotactic controls may also induce the formation of TNT-like structures. Cytonemes, however, do not always connect the membrane two cells and can act solely as environmental sensors.[43]

Plasmodesmata have been identified as functional channels interconnecting plant cells, and stromules interconnect plastids.[44] [45]

Myopodia are actin-rich cytoplasmic extensions which have been observed in embryonic Drosophila. Similar structures have been observed in Xenopus and mouse models. Actin-containing cellular protrusions dubbed "streamers" have been observed in cultured B cells.

Vesicular transport in membrane nanotubes has been modeled utilizing a continuum approach.[46] A variety of synthetic nanotubes, based on stacking of cyclic peptides and other cyclic molecules, have been investigated.[47]

See also

Further reading

External links

Notes and References

  1. Abounit S, Zurzolo C . Wiring through tunneling nanotubes--from electrical signals to organelle transfer . Journal of Cell Science . 125 . Pt 5 . 1089–1098 . March 2012 . 22399801 . 10.1242/jcs.083279 . 8433589 . free .
  2. Sowinski S, Jolly C, Berninghausen O, Purbhoo MA, Chauveau A, Köhler K, Oddos S, Eissmann P, Brodsky FM, Hopkins C, Onfelt B, Sattentau Q, Davis DM . 6 . Membrane nanotubes physically connect T cells over long distances presenting a novel route for HIV-1 transmission . Nature Cell Biology . 10 . 2 . 211–219 . February 2008 . 18193035 . 10.1038/ncb1682 . 25410308 .
  3. Davis DM, Sowinski S . Membrane nanotubes: dynamic long-distance connections between animal cells . Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology . 9 . 6 . 431–436 . June 2008 . 18431401 . 10.1038/nrm2399 . 8136865 .
  4. Resnik N, Erman A, Veranič P, Kreft ME . Triple labelling of actin filaments, intermediate filaments and microtubules for broad application in cell biology: uncovering the cytoskeletal composition in tunneling nanotubes . Histochemistry and Cell Biology . 152 . 4 . 311–317 . October 2019 . 31392410 . 10.1007/s00418-019-01806-3 . 199491883 .
  5. Onfelt B, Nedvetzki S, Benninger RK, Purbhoo MA, Sowinski S, Hume AN, Seabra MC, Neil MA, French PM, Davis DM . 6 . Structurally distinct membrane nanotubes between human macrophages support long-distance vesicular traffic or surfing of bacteria . Journal of Immunology . 177 . 12 . 8476–8483 . December 2006 . 17142745 . 10.4049/jimmunol.177.12.8476 . free .
  6. Rustom A, Saffrich R, Markovic I, Walther P, Gerdes HH . Nanotubular highways for intercellular organelle transport . Science . 303 . 5660 . 1007–1010 . February 2004 . 14963329 . 10.1126/science.1093133 . 37863055 . 2004Sci...303.1007R .
  7. Wang ZG, Liu SL, Tian ZQ, Zhang ZL, Tang HW, Pang DW . Myosin-driven intercellular transportation of wheat germ agglutinin mediated by membrane nanotubes between human lung cancer cells . ACS Nano . 6 . 11 . 10033–10041 . November 2012 . 23102457 . 10.1021/nn303729r .
  8. Zurzolo C . Tunneling nanotubes: Reshaping connectivity . Current Opinion in Cell Biology . 71 . 139–147 . August 2021 . 33866130 . 10.1016/j.ceb.2021.03.003 . Membrane Trafficking . 233298036 . free .
  9. Onfelt B, Davis DM . Can membrane nanotubes facilitate communication between immune cells? . Biochemical Society Transactions . 32 . Pt 5 . 676–678 . November 2004 . 15493985 . 10.1042/BST0320676 . 32181738 .
  10. Haimovich G, Dasgupta S, Gerst JE . RNA transfer through tunneling nanotubes . Biochemical Society Transactions . 49 . 1 . 145–160 . February 2021 . 33367488 . 10.1042/BST20200113 . 229689880 .
  11. Haimovich G, Ecker CM, Dunagin MC, Eggan E, Raj A, Gerst JE, Singer RH . Intercellular mRNA trafficking via membrane nanotube-like extensions in mammalian cells . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America . 114 . 46 . E9873–E9882 . November 2017 . 29078295 . 5699038 . 10.1073/pnas.1706365114 . 2017PNAS..114E9873H . free .
  12. Belting M, Wittrup A . Nanotubes, exosomes, and nucleic acid-binding peptides provide novel mechanisms of intercellular communication in eukaryotic cells: implications in health and disease . The Journal of Cell Biology . 183 . 7 . 1187–1191 . December 2008 . 19103810 . 2606965 . 10.1083/jcb.200810038 .
  13. Gousset K, Schiff E, Langevin C, Marijanovic Z, Caputo A, Browman DT, Chenouard N, de Chaumont F, Martino A, Enninga J, Olivo-Marin JC, Männel D, Zurzolo C . 6 . Prions hijack tunnelling nanotubes for intercellular spread . Nature Cell Biology . 11 . 3 . 328–336 . March 2009 . 19198598 . 10.1038/ncb1841 . 30793469 .
  14. Gurke S, Barroso JF, Gerdes HH . The art of cellular communication: tunneling nanotubes bridge the divide . Histochemistry and Cell Biology . 129 . 5 . 539–550 . May 2008 . 18386044 . 2323029 . 10.1007/s00418-008-0412-0 .
  15. Hanna SJ, McCoy-Simandle K, Miskolci V, Guo P, Cammer M, Hodgson L, Cox D . The Role of Rho-GTPases and actin polymerization during Macrophage Tunneling Nanotube Biogenesis . Scientific Reports . 7 . 1 . 8547 . August 2017 . 28819224 . 5561213 . 10.1038/s41598-017-08950-7 . 2017NatSR...7.8547H .
  16. Ramírez-Weber FA, Kornberg TB . Cytonemes: cellular processes that project to the principal signaling center in Drosophila imaginal discs . Cell . 97 . 5 . 599–607 . May 1999 . 10367889 . 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80771-0 . 15789546 . free .
  17. Onfelt B, Nedvetzki S, Yanagi K, Davis DM . Cutting edge: Membrane nanotubes connect immune cells . Journal of Immunology . 173 . 3 . 1511–1513 . August 2004 . 15265877 . 10.4049/jimmunol.173.3.1511 . free .
  18. Sherer NM, Lehmann MJ, Jimenez-Soto LF, Horensavitz C, Pypaert M, Mothes W . Retroviruses can establish filopodial bridges for efficient cell-to-cell transmission . Nature Cell Biology . 9 . 3 . 310–315 . March 2007 . 17293854 . 2628976 . 10.1038/ncb1544 .
  19. Watkins SC, Salter RD . Functional connectivity between immune cells mediated by tunneling nanotubules . Immunity . 23 . 3 . 309–318 . September 2005 . 16169503 . 10.1016/j.immuni.2005.08.009 . free .
  20. Liu K, Ji K, Guo L, Wu W, Lu H, Shan P, Yan C . Mesenchymal stem cells rescue injured endothelial cells in an in vitro ischemia-reperfusion model via tunneling nanotube like structure-mediated mitochondrial transfer . Microvascular Research . 92 . 10–18 . March 2014 . 24486322 . 10.1016/j.mvr.2014.01.008 .
  21. Sun X, Wang Y, Zhang J, Tu J, Wang XJ, Su XD, Wang L, Zhang Y . 6 . Tunneling-nanotube direction determination in neurons and astrocytes . Cell Death & Disease . 3 . 12 . e438 . December 2012 . 23222508 . 3542613 . 10.1038/cddis.2012.177 .
  22. Wang Y, Cui J, Sun X, Zhang Y . Tunneling-nanotube development in astrocytes depends on p53 activation . Cell Death and Differentiation . 18 . 4 . 732–742 . April 2011 . 21113142 . 3131904 . 10.1038/cdd.2010.147 .
  23. Islam MN, Das SR, Emin MT, Wei M, Sun L, Westphalen K, Rowlands DJ, Quadri SK, Bhattacharya S, Bhattacharya J . 6 . Mitochondrial transfer from bone-marrow-derived stromal cells to pulmonary alveoli protects against acute lung injury . Nature Medicine . 18 . 5 . 759–765 . April 2012 . 22504485 . 3727429 . 10.1038/nm.2736 .
  24. Ahmad T, Mukherjee S, Pattnaik B, Kumar M, Singh S, Kumar M, Rehman R, Tiwari BK, Jha KA, Barhanpurkar AP, Wani MR, Roy SS, Mabalirajan U, Ghosh B, Agrawal A . 6 . Miro1 regulates intercellular mitochondrial transport & enhances mesenchymal stem cell rescue efficacy . The EMBO Journal . 33 . 9 . 994–1010 . May 2014 . 24431222 . 4193933 . 10.1002/embj.201386030 .
  25. Hase K, Kimura S, Takatsu H, Ohmae M, Kawano S, Kitamura H, Ito M, Watarai H, Hazelett CC, Yeaman C, Ohno H . 6 . M-Sec promotes membrane nanotube formation by interacting with Ral and the exocyst complex . Nature Cell Biology . 11 . 12 . 1427–1432 . December 2009 . 19935652 . 10.1038/ncb1990 . 1388030 .
  26. Austefjord MW, Gerdes HH, Wang X . Tunneling nanotubes: Diversity in morphology and structure . Communicative & Integrative Biology . 7 . 1 . e27934 . January 2014 . 24778759 . 10.4161/cib.27934 . 3995728 .
  27. Bukoreshtliev NV, Wang X, Hodneland E, Gurke S, Barroso JF, Gerdes HH . Selective block of tunneling nanotube (TNT) formation inhibits intercellular organelle transfer between PC12 cells . FEBS Letters . 583 . 9 . 1481–1488 . May 2009 . 19345217 . 10.1016/j.febslet.2009.03.065 . 13528434 .
  28. 6 . Hayakawa K, Esposito E, Wang X, Terasaki Y, Liu Y, Xing C, Ji X, Lo EH . July 2016 . Transfer of mitochondria from astrocytes to neurons after stroke . Nature . 535 . 7613 . 551–555 . 2016Natur.535..551H . 10.1038/nature18928 . 4968589 . 27466127.
  29. Marlein CR, Piddock RE, Mistry JJ, Zaitseva L, Hellmich C, Horton RH, Zhou Z, Auger MJ, Bowles KM, Rushworth SA . 6 . CD38-Driven Mitochondrial Trafficking Promotes Bioenergetic Plasticity in Multiple Myeloma . Cancer Research . 79 . 9 . 2285–2297 . May 2019 . 30622116 . 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-18-0773 . free .
  30. Dagar S, Pathak D, Oza HV, Mylavarapu SV . Tunneling nanotubes and related structures: molecular mechanisms of formation and function . The Biochemical Journal . 478 . 22 . 3977–3998 . November 2021 . 34813650 . 10.1042/bcj20210077 . 244529025 .
  31. Saha T, Dash C, Jayabalan R, Khiste S, Kulkarni A, Kurmi K, Mondal J, Majumder PK, Bardia A, Jang HL, Sengupta S . 6 . Intercellular nanotubes mediate mitochondrial trafficking between cancer and immune cells . Nature Nanotechnology . 17 . 1 . 98–106 . January 2022 . 34795441 . 10.1038/s41565-021-01000-4 . 2022NatNa..17...98S . 244349825 . 10071558 .
  32. Torralba D, Baixauli F, Sánchez-Madrid F . 2016 . Mitochondria Know No Boundaries: Mechanisms and Functions of Intercellular Mitochondrial Transfer . Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology . 4 . 107 . 10.3389/fcell.2016.00107 . 5039171 . 27734015 . free.
  33. Wang X, Gerdes HH . Transfer of mitochondria via tunneling nanotubes rescues apoptotic PC12 cells . Cell Death and Differentiation . 22 . 7 . 1181–1191 . July 2015 . 25571977 . 4572865 . 10.1038/cdd.2014.211 .
  34. Pasquier J, Guerrouahen BS, Al Thawadi H, Ghiabi P, Maleki M, Abu-Kaoud N, Jacob A, Mirshahi M, Galas L, Rafii S, Le Foll F, Rafii A . 6 . Preferential transfer of mitochondria from endothelial to cancer cells through tunneling nanotubes modulates chemoresistance . Journal of Translational Medicine . 11 . 1 . 94 . April 2013 . 23574623 . 3668949 . 10.1186/1479-5876-11-94 . free .
  35. Lu J, Zheng X, Li F, Yu Y, Chen Z, Liu Z, Wang Z, Xu H, Yang W . 6 . Tunneling nanotubes promote intercellular mitochondria transfer followed by increased invasiveness in bladder cancer cells . Oncotarget . 8 . 9 . 15539–15552 . February 2017 . 28107184 . 5362504 . 10.18632/oncotarget.14695 .
  36. Li X, Zhang Y, Yeung SC, Liang Y, Liang X, Ding Y, Ip MS, Tse HF, Mak JC, Lian Q . 6 . Mitochondrial transfer of induced pluripotent stem cell-derived mesenchymal stem cells to airway epithelial cells attenuates cigarette smoke-induced damage . American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology . 51 . 3 . 455–465 . September 2014 . 24738760 . 10.1165/rcmb.2013-0529OC .
  37. Smith IF, Shuai J, Parker I . Active generation and propagation of Ca2+ signals within tunneling membrane nanotubes . Biophysical Journal . 100 . 8 . L37–L39 . April 2011 . 21504718 . 3077701 . 10.1016/j.bpj.2011.03.007 . 2011BpJ...100L..37S .
  38. Kumar A, Kim JH, Ranjan P, Metcalfe MG, Cao W, Mishina M, Gangappa S, Guo Z, Boyden ES, Zaki S, York I, García-Sastre A, Shaw M, Sambhara S . 6 . Influenza virus exploits tunneling nanotubes for cell-to-cell spread . Scientific Reports . 7 . 1 . 40360 . January 2017 . 28059146 . 5216422 . 10.1038/srep40360 . 2017NatSR...740360K .
  39. Jansens RJ, Tishchenko A, Favoreel HW . Bridging the Gap: Virus Long-Distance Spread via Tunneling Nanotubes . Journal of Virology . 94 . 8 . e02120–19 . March 2020 . 32024778 . 7108841 . 10.1128/JVI.02120-19 . Glaunsinger BA .
  40. News: Coronavirus may enter the brain by building tiny tunnels from the nose . New Scientist . 23 August 2022.
  41. Pepe A, Pietropaoli S, Vos M, Barba-Spaeth G, Zurzolo C . Tunneling nanotubes provide a route for SARS-CoV-2 spreading . Science Advances . 8 . 29 . eabo0171 . July 2022 . 35857849 . 9299553 . 10.1126/sciadv.abo0171 . 2022SciA....8O.171P . free .
  42. Ottonelli I, Caraffi R, Tosi G, Vandelli MA, Duskey JT, Ruozi B . Tunneling Nanotubes: A New Target for Nanomedicine? . International Journal of Molecular Sciences . 23 . 4 . 2237 . February 2022 . 35216348 . 8878036 . 10.3390/ijms23042237 . free .
  43. Austefjord MW, Gerdes HH, Wang X . Tunneling nanotubes: Diversity in morphology and structure . Communicative & Integrative Biology . 7 . 1 . e27934 . January 2014 . 24778759 . 3995728 . 10.4161/cib.27934 .
  44. Gallagher KL, Benfey PN . January 2005 . Not just another hole in the wall: understanding intercellular protein trafficking . Genes & Development . 19 . 2 . 189–195 . 10.1101/gad.1271005 . 15655108 . free.
  45. Köhler RH, Cao J, Zipfel WR, Webb WW, Hanson MR . Exchange of protein molecules through connections between higher plant plastids . Science . 276 . 5321 . 2039–2042 . June 1997 . 9197266 . 10.1126/science.276.5321.2039 .
  46. Kuznetsov AV . Modeling bidirectional transport of quantum dot nanoparticles in membrane nanotubes . Mathematical Biosciences . 232 . 2 . 101–109 . August 2011 . 21609723 . 10.1016/j.mbs.2011.04.008 .
  47. Book: Rodríguez-Vázquez N, Fuertes A, Amorín M, Granja JR . The Alkali Metal Ions: Their Role for Life . Bioinspired Artificial Sodium and Potassium Ion Channels . Metal Ions in Life Sciences . 16 . 485–556 . 2016 . 26860310 . 10.1007/978-3-319-21756-7_14 . 978-3-319-21755-0 . Sigel A, Sigel H, Sigel RK .

This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Tunneling nanotube".

Except where otherwise indicated, Everything.Explained.Today is © Copyright 2009-2024, A B Cryer, All Rights Reserved. Cookie policy.