Genetically modified mouse explained

A genetically modified mouse or genetically engineered mouse model (GEMM)[1] is a mouse (Mus musculus) that has had its genome altered through the use of genetic engineering techniques. Genetically modified mice are commonly used for research or as animal models of human diseases and are also used for research on genes. Together with patient-derived xenografts (PDXs), GEMMs are the most common in vivo models in cancer research. Both approaches are considered complementary and may be used to recapitulate different aspects of disease.[2] GEMMs are also of great interest for drug development, as they facilitate target validation and the study of response, resistance, toxicity and pharmacodynamics.[3]

History

In 1974 Beatrice Mintz and Rudolf Jaenisch created the first genetically modified animal by inserting a DNA virus into an early-stage mouse embryo and showing that the inserted genes were present in every cell.[4] However, the mice did not pass the transgene to their offspring, and the impact and applicability of this experiment were, therefore, limited. In 1981 the laboratories of Frank Ruddle[5] from Yale University, Frank Costantini and Elizabeth Lacy from Oxford, and Ralph L. Brinster and Richard Palmiter in collaboration from the University of Pennsylvania and the University of Washington injected purified DNA into a single-cell mouse embryo utilizing techniques developed by Brinster in the 1960s and 1970s, showing transmission of the genetic material to subsequent generations for the first time.[6] [7] [8] During the 1980s, Palmiter and Brinster developed and led the field of transgenesis, refining methods of germline modification and using these techniques to elucidate the activity and function of genes in a way not possible before their unique approach.[9]

Methods

There are two basic technical approaches to produce genetically modified mice. The first involves pronuclear injection, a technique developed and refined by Ralph L. Brinster in the 1960s and 1970s, into a single cell of the mouse embryo, where it will randomly integrate into the mouse genome.[10] This method creates a transgenic mouse and is used to insert new genetic information into the mouse genome or to over-express endogenous genes. The second approach, pioneered by Oliver Smithies and Mario Capecchi, involves modifying embryonic stem cells with a DNA construct containing DNA sequences homologous to the target gene. Embryonic stem cells that recombine with the genomic DNA are selected for and they are then injected into the mice blastocysts.[11] This method is used to manipulate a single gene, in most cases "knocking out" the target gene, although increasingly more subtle and complex genetic manipulation can occur (e.g. humanisation of a specific protein, or only changing single nucleotides). A humanised mouse can also be created by direct addition of human genes, thereby creating a murine form of human-animal hybrid. For example, genetically modified mice may be born with human leukocyte antigen genes in order to provide a more realistic environment when introducing human white blood cells into them in order to study immune system responses.[12] One such application is the identification of hepatitis C virus (HCV) peptides that bind to HLA, and that can be recognized by the human immune system, thereby potentially being targets for future vaccines against HCV.[13]

Uses

Genetically modified mice are used extensively in research as models of human disease.[14] Mice are a useful model for genetic manipulation and research, as their tissues and organs are similar to that of a human and they carry virtually all the same genes that operate in humans.[15] They also have advantages over other mammals, in regards to research, in that they are available in hundreds of genetically homogeneous strains.[15] Also, due to their size, they can be kept and housed in large numbers, reducing the cost of research and experiments.[15] The most common type is the knockout mouse, where the activity of a single (or in some cases multiple) genes are removed. They have been used to study and model obesity, heart disease, diabetes, arthritis, substance abuse, anxiety, aging, temperature and pain reception, and Parkinson disease.[16] [17] Transgenic mice generated to carry cloned oncogenes and knockout mice lacking tumor suppressing genes have provided good models for human cancer. Hundreds of these oncomice have been developed covering a wide range of cancers affecting most organs of the body and they are being refined to become more representative of human cancer.[9] The disease symptoms and potential drugs or treatments can be tested against these mouse models.

A mouse has been genetically engineered to have increased muscle growth and strength by overexpressing the insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) in differentiated muscle fibers.[18] [19] Another mouse has had a gene altered that is involved in glucose metabolism and runs faster, lives longer, is more sexually active and eats more without getting fatter than the average mouse (see Metabolic supermice).[20] [21] Another mouse had the TRPM8 receptor blocked or removed in a study involving capsaicin and menthol. With the TRPM8 receptor removed, the mouse was unable to detect small changes in temperature and the pain associated with it.

Great care should be taken when deciding how to use genetically modified mice in research.[22] Even basic issues like choosing the correct "wild-type" control mouse to use for comparison are sometimes overlooked.[23]

See also

External links

Notes and References

  1. Singh . M. . Murriel . C. L. . Johnson . L. . Genetically Engineered Mouse Models: Closing the Gap between Preclinical Data and Trial Outcomes . Cancer Research . 16 May 2012 . 72 . 11 . 2695–2700 . 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-2786. 22593194 . free .
  2. Abate-Shen . C. . Pandolfi . P. P. . Effective Utilization and Appropriate Selection of Genetically Engineered Mouse Models for Translational Integration of Mouse and Human Trials . Cold Spring Harbor Protocols . 30 September 2013 . 2013 . 11 . 1006–1011 . 10.1101/pdb.top078774. 24173311 . 4382078 . free .
  3. Sharpless . Norman E. . DePinho . Ronald A. . The mighty mouse: genetically engineered mouse models in cancer drug development . Nature Reviews Drug Discovery . September 2006 . 5 . 9 . 741–754 . 10.1038/nrd2110 . 16915232 . 7254415 . en . 1474-1784.
  4. 10.1073/pnas.71.4.1250. Jaenisch, R.. Mintz, B.. 1974. Simian virus 40 DNA sequences in DNA of healthy adult mice derived from preimplantation blastocysts injected with viral DNA.. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.. 71. 4. 1250–1254. 4364530. 388203. 1974PNAS...71.1250J. free.
  5. Kucherlapati, Raju. Leinwand, Leslie A.. 2013. Frank Ruddle (1929–2013. American Journal of Human Genetics. 92. 6. 839–840. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2013.05.012. 24242788. 3675234.
  6. 1244–6. 4526. 1981. 6272397. 10.1126/science.6272397. 214. Science. Ruddle, F.. Integration and stable germ line transmission of genes injected into mouse pronuclei. Gordon, J.. 1981Sci...214.1244G.
  7. 92–4. 5836. 1981. 6945481. 10.1038/294092a0. 294. Nature. Lacy, E.. Introduction of a rabbit β-globin gene into the mouse germ line. Costantini, F.. 1981Natur.294...92C. 4371351.
  8. Brinster R, Chen HY, Trumbauer M, Senear AW, Warren R, Palmiter RD. Somatic expression of herpes thymidine kinase in mice following injection of a fusion gene into eggs. 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90376-7. Cell. 27. 1 Pt 2. 223–231. 1981. 6276022. 4883678.
  9. 10.1101/gad.1583307. The origins of oncomice: a history of the first transgenic mice genetically engineered to develop cancer. Genes Dev.. 2007. 21. 18. 2258–2270. Douglas Hanahan. Erwin F. Wagner. Richard D. Palmiter. 17875663. free.
  10. 10.1073/pnas.77.12.7380. Gordon, J.W., Scangos, G.A, Plotkin, D.J., Barbosa, J.A. and Ruddle F.H.. 1980. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. Genetic transformation of mouse embryos by microinjection of purified DNA. 77. 12. 7380–7384. 6261253. 350507. 1980PNAS...77.7380G. free.
  11. Thomas KR, Capecchi MR . 1987. Site-directed mutagenesis by gene targeting in mouse embryo-derived stem cells. Cell. 2822260. 51. 3. 503–12. 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90646-5. 31961262.
  12. Yong KS, Her Z, Chen Q . Humanized Mice as Unique Tools for Human-Specific Studies . Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis . 66 . 4 . 245–266 . August 2018 . 29411049 . 6061174 . 10.1007/s00005-018-0506-x .
  13. Web site: Mouse strain C57BL/6-Mcph1Tg(HLA-A2.1)1Enge. The Jackson Laboratory. 2023-01-06.
  14. Web site: Background: Cloned and Genetically Modified Animals. April 14, 2005. Center for Genetics and Society. July 11, 2010. https://web.archive.org/web/20161123110939/http://geneticsandsociety.org/article.php?id=386. November 23, 2016. dead.
  15. Book: Hofker, Marten H.. Transgenic Mouse. Humana Press. 2002. 0-89603-915-3. Totowa, New Jersey. 1. Deursen, Jan van. registration.
  16. Web site: Knockout Mice. Nation Human Genome Research Institute. 2009.
  17. Web site: How peppers and peppermint identified sensory receptors for temperature and pain. Julius. David. iBiology. en-US. 2020-05-14.
  18. 6628. 387. 83–90. 1997. 10.1038/387083a0. 9139826. Nature. Regulation of skeletal muscle mass in mice by a new TGF-beta superfamily member. McPherron, A.. Lawler, A.. Lee, S.. 1997Natur.387...83M. 4271945.
  19. 10.1073/pnas.95.26.15603. Viral mediated expression of insulin-like growth factor I blocks the aging-related loss of skeletal muscle function. Elisabeth R. Barton-Davis. Daria I. Shoturma. Antonio Musaro. Nadia Rosenthal. H. Lee Sweeney. PNAS. 1998. 95. 26. 15603–15607. 9861016. 28090. 1998PNAS...9515603B. free.
  20. News: Genetically engineered super mouse stuns scientists. AAP. November 3, 2007.
  21. Hakimi P, Yang J, Casadesus G, Massillon D, Tolentino-Silva F, Nye C, Cabrera M, Hagen D, Utter C, Baghdy Y, Johnson DH, Wilson DL, Kirwan JP, Kalhan SC, Hanson RW. Overexpression of the cytosolic form of phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (GTP) in skeletal muscle repatterns energy metabolism in the mouse. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 282. 17716967. 10.1074/jbc.M706127200. 2007. 32844–32855. 45. 4484620. free.
  22. 10.1111/j.1601-183X.2008.00438.x. Standards for the publication of mouse mutant studies. 2009. Crusio, W.E.. Wim Crusio. Goldowitz, D.. Holmes, A.. Wolfer, D.. Genes, Brain and Behavior. 8. 1–4. 18778401. 1. 205853147. free.
  23. 10.1021/tx200143x . Mispairing C57BL/6 Substrains of Genetically Engineered Mice and Wild-Type Controls Can Lead to Confounding Results as It Did in Studies of JNK2 in Acetaminophen and Concanavalin A Liver Injury. Mohammed Bourdi. John S. Davies. Lance R. Pohl. Chemical Research in Toxicology. 2011. 24. 6. 794–796. 21557537. 3157912.