Transboundary protected area explained

A transboundary protected area (TBPA) is an ecological protected area that spans boundaries of more than one country or sub-national entity. Such areas are also known as transfrontier conservation areas (TFCAs) or peace parks.[1] [2]

TBPAs exist in many forms around the world,[3] and are established for various reasons. The preservation of traditional animal migration patterns, ensuring sufficient food and water sources for population growth, is a critical reason for the creation of TBPAs. However, TBPAs also encourage tourism, economic development and goodwill between neighbouring countries, as well as making it easier for indigenous inhabitants of the area to travel.[4]

Types of transboundary protected areas

TBPAs exist in various types of geographic configuration, with various levels of ecological protection, and with various levels of international cooperation. Additionally, different organizations employ different definitions for TBPAs. Julia Marton-Lefevre broadly defines TBPAs as "areas that involve a degree of cooperation across one or more boundaries between (or within) countries." The Southern Africa Development Community's Protocol on Wildlife Conservation and Law Enforcement defines Transfrontier Conservation Area as "the area or the component of a large ecological region that straddles the boundaries of two or more countries, encompassing one or more protected areas, as well as multiple resources use areas."[5] The Global Transboundary Protected Areas Network (GTPAN) lists four types of "transboundary conservation areas:"

GTPAN defines a transboundary protected area as "a clearly defined geographical space that includes protected areas that are ecologically connected across one or more international boundaries and involves some form of cooperation." GTPAN defines a transboundary conservation landscape and/or seascape as "an ecologically connected area that includes both protected areas and multiple resource use areas across one or more international boundaries and involves some form of cooperation."

GTPAN defines a transboundary conservation migration area as "wildlife habitats in two or more countries that are necessary to sustain populations of migratory species and involve some form of cooperation."

GTPAN defines a "park for peace" as "any of the three types of transboundary conservation areas [that is] dedicated to the promotion, celebration and/or commemoration of peace and cooperation."

In many instances, individual TBPAs are part of broader international environmental or cultural programs. TBPAs can be World Heritage Sites, Ramsar Wetlands, and/or UNESCO Biosphere Reserves.

History of transboundary protected areas

In 1932, the governments of Canada and the United States passed legislation creating the first international peace park: Waterton-Glacier International Peace Park. This action followed from a joint resolution of the Rotary Clubs of Montana and Alberta calling for the creation of the peace park.[7]

On 1 February 1997, Anton Rupert, together with Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands and Nelson Mandela, founded the Peace Parks Foundation as a nonprofit organisation to facilitate the establishment of transfrontier conservation areas (TFCAs).[8]

A 2001 study by the World Conservation Union found "there were 166 existing transboundary protected area complexes worldwide comprising 666 individual conservation zones."[9]

In 2007, the Global Transboundary Conservation Network published a global inventory of transboundary protected areas identifying 227 transboundary protected areas.[10]

Established transboundary protected areas

Africa

Transboundary World Heritage Sites

Transboundary Ramsar Wetlands

Transboundary Biosphere Reserves

Transboundary Conservation Complexes

Asia

Europe

Transboundary World Heritage Sites

Transboundary Ramsar Wetlands

Transboundary Biosphere Reserves

Of the world's twenty transboundary UNESCO biosphere reserves, twelve are in Europe. Spain, Portugal, Poland, and Ukraine each contribute to three reserves.

Transboundary Conservation Complexes

North America

Canada and the United States

Canadian interprovincial Parks
United States interstate parks

Mexico and the United States

Latin America

Intercontinental TBPAs

Areas in the conceptual phase

TBPA advocates by 2006 had identified additional sites for protection. Professor Saleem Ali of the University of Vermont noted that "numerous ecologically sensitive areas remain unprotected" and cites a 2006 "geographic information systems (GIS) study" that "found 104 transboundary wild areas involving 61 countries that are not formally part of any conservation park." Specific sites for proposed TBPAs include:

As awareness of the importance of conserving the pristinity and ecology of Arctic region has increased, there has been a global call to declare the Arctic region as a global sanctuary/international peace park. The Save the Arctic[91] campaign by Greenpeace, an environmental nonprofit organisation, has received online support from more than 5 million citizens from around the world.

Areas with treaty signed

Memorandums of agreement signed

Impacts on peace and conflict

Transboundary protected areas are also termed peace parks. They are supposed to facilitate cooperation and exchange between (adversary) countries, to improve livelihoods of local populations, to demonstrate the possibility of positive-sum interactions, and hence to support more peaceful international relations.[93] There are several cases documented in which trans-boundary conservation contributed to conflict resolution (although it was not the main driver), such as in the Virunga region between the DR Congo, Rwanda and Uganda,[94] around the Trifinio region between El Salvador and Honduras,[95] and in the Cordillera del Cóndor region between Ecuador and Peru.[96] According to a statistical analysis published in 2014, states that share a trans-boundary protected area are slightly less likely to engage with militarized disputes with each other. But the question remains whether the TBPA is a driver or consequence on better interstate relations in these cases.[97] A more recent analysis triangulates data from various sources to show that international environmental cooperation (in the form of TBPAs and water treaties) increases the likelihood for reconciliation between states in conflict. The effect is, however, modest and contingent on a number of context factors such as high levels of environmental attention, internal political stability, a tradition of environmental cooperation and already ongoing processes of reconciliation.

However, a number of authors criticize that peace parks have a very limited impact on formal relations between states, but can accelerate conflicts on the local level, for instance by extending (authoritarian) state control, by prioritizing business and tourism over the interests of local populations, and by excluding local people from the protected areas.[98] [99] TBPAs can also stimulate (low-level) international conflicts, for instance about the sharing of revenues or the presence of human populations in the parks.[100]

Massive Online Open Course on Peace Park Development and Management

A Massive Online Open Course on Peace Park Development and Management was developed by the Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (SCBD), its Peace and Biodiversity Dialogue Initiative in partnership with UNDP and the NBSAP Forum. This free three-week course offered in five languages: English, French, Spanish, Russian and Arabic. Financial support is provided by the Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity's Peace and Biodiversity Dialogue Initiative funded by the Ministry of Environment of the Republic of Korea.

This course will:

The course is designed for Peace Park development practitioners and environmental peacebuilding enthusiasts but is open to everyone.[101] Participants must create an account on Learning for Nature before registering for the course.

See also

External links

Notes and References

  1. Web site: Global Transboundary Protected Areas Network. Tbpa.net. 2018-08-15.
  2. Book: Peace parks : conservation and conflict resolution. 2007. MIT Press. Ali, Saleem H. (Saleem Hassan), 1973-. 9780262266970. Cambridge, Mass.. 173511323.
  3. Web site: 2007 UNEP-WCMC Global List of Transboundary Protected Areas . Lysenko . Daniel . 2007 . Southern African Development Community . 19 February 2019.
  4. Web site: Transboundary Parks Award 2018 - Pasvik-Inari Trilateral Park. 28 September 2018. EUROPARC Federation. 14 March 2019.
  5. Web site: Protocol on Wildlife Conservation and Law Enforcement. Sadc.int.
  6. http://www.tbpa.net/page.php?ndx=83 Typology of Transboundary Conservation Areas
  7. Web site: Designation information. Canada. Parks Canada Agency, Government of. Pc.gc.ca. 2018-11-13.
  8. Web site: Origins of Peace Parks Foundation. Thiel. Erhardt. 2009. Peaceparks.org. Peace Parks Foundation. 31 December 2016.
  9. Book: Ali, Saleem. Peace Parks: Conservation and Conflict Resolution. The MIT Press. 2007. 978-0-262-51198-8. i.; 2; 7; 14.
  10. Web site: UNEP-WCMC Transboundary Protected Areas Inventory-2007 . Global Transboundary Protected Areas Network . Global Transboundary Protected Areas Network . 2018-01-31.
  11. Web site: Maloti-Drakensberg Park. UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Whc.unesco.org. 2018-01-26.
  12. Web site: Mosi-oa-Tunya / Victoria Falls. UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Whc.unesco.org. 2018-01-26.
  13. Web site: Mount Nimba Strict Nature Reserve. UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Whc.unesco.org. 2018-01-27.
  14. Web site: Sangha Trinational. UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Whc.unesco.org. 2018-01-26.
  15. Web site: Virunga National Park. UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Whc.unesco.org. 2018-02-16.
  16. Web site: Rwenzori Mountains National Park. UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Whc.unesco.org. 2018-02-16.
  17. Web site: W-Arly-Pendjari Complex. UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Whc.unesco.org. 2018-01-26.
  18. Web site: Parc national du W Ramsar Sites Information Service. Rsis.ramsar.org. 2018-02-09.
  19. Web site: Transboundary Biosphere Reserves United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. Unesco.org. 2018-02-10.
  20. Griffin. Pamela. January 2012. The Ramsar Convention: A new window for environmental diplomacy?. Institute for Environmental Diplomacy & Security @ the University of Vermont. A1-2012-1. 6–12.
  21. Web site: List of Transboundary Ramsar Sites. Ramsar.org.
  22. Web site: Lac Tchad Ramsar Sites Information Service. Rsis.ramsar.org. 2018-02-09.
  23. Web site: Partie tchadienne du lac Tchad Ramsar Sites Information Service. Rsis.ramsar.org. 2018-02-09.
  24. Web site: Lake Chad Wetlands in Nigeria Ramsar Sites Information Service. Rsis.ramsar.org. 2018-02-09.
  25. Web site: Partie Camerounaise du Lac Tchad Ramsar Sites Information Service. Rsis.ramsar.org. 2018-02-09.
  26. News: /Ai /Ais-Richtersveld Transfrontier Park. Peace Parks Foundation. 2018-02-22.
  27. News: Great Limpopo Transfrontier Conservation Area. Peace Parks Foundation. 2018-02-22.
  28. News: Greater Mapungubwe. Peace Parks Foundation. 2018-02-22.
  29. News: Kavango Zambezi. Peace Parks Foundation. 2018-02-22.
  30. Web site: Kilimanjaro National Park. UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Whc.unesco.org. 2018-02-21.
  31. News: Lower Zambezi - Mana Pools TFCA. Peace Parks Foundation. 2018-02-22.
  32. News: Lubombo Transfrontier Conservation and Resource Area. Peace Parks Foundation. 2018-02-22.
  33. News: Malawi-Zambia TFCA. Peace Parks Foundation. 2018-02-22.
  34. Web site: La Forêt Classée et Réserve Partielle de Faune Comoé-Léraba Ramsar Sites Information Service. Rsis.ramsar.org. 2018-02-09.
  35. Web site: Jiwani Coastal Wetland Ramsar Sites Information Service. Rsis.ramsar.org. 2018-02-26.
  36. Web site: Govater Bay and Hur-e-Bahu Ramsar Sites Information Service. Rsis.ramsar.org. 2018-02-26.
  37. Web site: Hamun-e-Puzak, south end Ramsar Sites Information Service. Rsis.ramsar.org. 2018-02-26.
  38. Web site: Hamun-e-Saberi & Hamun-e-Helmand Ramsar Sites Information Service. Rsis.ramsar.org. 2018-02-26.
  39. Web site: Landscapes of Dauria. UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Whc.unesco.org. 2018-01-26.
  40. News: The dream of a rainforest transfrontier reserve in the Heart of Borneo: cross-border expedition. 2018-02-05.
  41. News: Opinion Saving More Than Just Snow Leopards. Zahler. Peter. 2014-02-01. The New York Times. 2018-01-31. Schaller. George. 0362-4331.
  42. Web site: Turtle Islands Wildlife Sanctuary - UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Centre. UNESCO World Heritage. Whc.unesco.org. 2018-02-24.
  43. Web site: Uvs Nuur Basin. UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Whc.unesco.org. 2018-01-26.
  44. Brosius . J. Peter . Campbell . Lisa M. . Collaborative Event Ethnography: Conservation and Development Trade-offs at the World Conservation Congress . Conservation and Society . 2010 . 8 . 4 . 253 . 10.4103/0972-4923.78141. free .
  45. Web site: Bialowieza Forest. UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Whc.unesco.org. 2018-01-26.
  46. Web site: Caves of Aggtelek Karst and Slovak Karst. UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Whc.unesco.org. 2018-01-26.
  47. Web site: Curonian Spit. UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Whc.unesco.org. 2018-01-27.
  48. Web site: Monte San Giorgio. UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Whc.unesco.org. 2018-01-26.
  49. Web site: Muskauer Park / Park Muzakowski. UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Whc.unesco.org. 2018-01-27.
  50. Web site: Pyrénées - Mont Perdu. UNESCO World Heritage Centre. whc.unesco.org. 2018-01-26.
  51. Web site: Rhaetian Railway in the Albula / Bernina Landscapes. UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Whc.unesco.org. 2018-01-27.
  52. Web site: Wadden Sea. UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Whc.unesco.org. 2018-01-26.
  53. Web site: New Transboundary Ramsar Site Ramsar. Ramsar.org. 2018-02-09.
  54. Web site: Gornje Podunavlje Ramsar Sites Information Service. Rsis.ramsar.org. 2018-02-25.
  55. Web site: Srebarna Nature Reserve. Centre. UNESCO World Heritage. Whc.unesco.org. 2018-11-08.
  56. Web site: Mannavuoma Ramsar Sites Information Service. Rsis.ramsar.org. 2018-02-25.
  57. Web site: Storkölen Ramsar Sites Information Service. Rsis.ramsar.org. 2018-02-25.
  58. Web site: Kluane / Wrangell-St. Elias / Glacier Bay / Tatshenshini-Alsek. UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Whc.unesco.org. 2018-01-26.
  59. Web site: Hiking the Chilkoot Trail. Pc.gc.ca. 2018-01-29.
  60. Web site: Waterton Glacier International Peace Park. UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Whc.unesco.org. 2018-01-29.
  61. News: New Brunswick Vacation Maine Vacation Roosevelt Campobello Island International Park. Campobello. 2018-01-29.
  62. Web site: Global Transboundary Protected Areas Network. Global Transboundary Protected Areas Network. Global Transboundary Protected Areas Network. 2018-02-01.
  63. Web site: Cypress Hills Destination Area. Tourism Saskatchewan. 2018-01-30.
  64. Web site: Alberta Parks Kakwa WPP Kakwa-Willmore Interprovincial Park. Albertaparks.ca. 2018-01-30.
  65. http://www.parkreports.com/parksblog/?p=121/ Ontario Parks Web Log, A New Manitoba–Ontario Interprovincial Wilderness Area
  66. http://www.bonjourquebec.com/qc-en/attractions-directory/trail/parc-lineaire-interprovincial-petit-temis_8502936.html/ Quebec Official Tourism Site, Parc linéaire interprovincial Petit Témis
  67. Web site: Park Info: Interstate State Park: Minnesota DNR. Dnr.state.mn.us. 2018-01-29. https://web.archive.org/web/20180129141627/http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/state_parks/interstate/narrative.html. 2018-01-29. dead.
  68. Web site: Palisades Interstate Park Commission Palisades Interstate Park in New Jersey. Njpalisades.org. 2018-01-29.
  69. Web site: Park Maps and Trail Info Breaks Park. Breakspark.com. 2018-01-29.
  70. Web site: Opinion - Forget Trump's Border Wall. Let's Build F.D.R.'s International Park.. Dan W.. Reicher. 14 March 2019. 14 March 2019. The New York Times.
  71. Web site: Plan Trifinio - El Salvador - Guatemala - Honduras. Oas.org.
  72. Web site: Talamanca Range-La Amistad Reserves / La Amistad National Park. UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Whc.unesco.org. 2018-02-01.
  73. Web site: Volcán Tacaná United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. Unesco.org. 2018-02-03.
  74. Web site: Gandoca-Manzanillo Ramsar Sites Information Service. Rsis.ramsar.org. 2018-02-06.
  75. Web site: San San - Pond Sak Ramsar Sites Information Service. Rsis.ramsar.org. 2018-02-06.
  76. Web site: Reserva de Usos Múltiples Río Sarstún Ramsar Sites Information Service. Rsis.ramsar.org. 2018-02-06.
  77. Web site: Sarstoon Temash National Park Ramsar Sites Information Service. Rsis.ramsar.org. 2018-02-06.
  78. Web site: Global Transboundary Protected Areas Network. Global Transboundary Protected Areas Network. Global Transboundary Protected Areas Network. 2018-01-31.
  79. Web site: Cordillera del Condor - Negotiating a Peace Park Institute For Environmental Diplomacy And Security (IEDS). Uvm.edu. 2018-01-31.
  80. Web site: Torres del Paine and Bernardo O'Higgins National Parks, Region of Magallanes - UNESCO World Heritage Centre. UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Whc.unesco.org. 2018-01-31.
  81. Web site: Los Glaciares National Park. UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Whc.unesco.org. 2018-01-31.
  82. Web site: Iguaçu National Park. UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Whc.unesco.org. 2018-02-21.
  83. Web site: Iguazu National Park. UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Whc.unesco.org. 2018-02-21.
  84. Web site: Lago Titicaca Ramsar Sites Information Service. Rsis.ramsar.org. 2018-02-09.
  85. Web site: Lago Titicaca Ramsar Sites Information Service. Rsis.ramsar.org. 2018-02-09.
  86. Web site: Intercontinental BR of the Mediterranean United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. Unesco.org. 2018-02-12.
  87. Web site: Los Katíos National Park. UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Whc.unesco.org. 2018-02-15.
  88. Web site: Darien National Park. UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Whc.unesco.org. 2018-02-15.
  89. Book: Buscher, Bram. Transforming the Frontier: Peace Parks and the Politics of Neoliberal Conservation in Southern Africa. Duke University Press. 2013. 978-0-8223-5404-8. 1, 53.
  90. Pool. Catherine. 2006. Transboundary Protected Areas as a Solution to Border Issues. Nebraska Anthropologist. 23. 41–57.
  91. Web site: Save the Arctic - YOUR actions make a difference. Peoplevsoil.org. 14 March 2019.
  92. Web site: Angola and Namibia sign MoA for Iona-Skeleton Transfrontier Park . Transfrontier Conservation Areas . 16 June 2024 . 4 May 2018.
  93. Book: Ali, Saleem H.. Peace Parks: Conservation and Conflict Resolution. MIT Press. 2007. 9780262012355. Cambridge, MA.
  94. Martin. Adrian. Rutagarama. Eugene. Cascão. Ana. Gray. Maryke. Chhotray. Vasudha. September 2011. Understanding the co-existence of conflict and cooperation: Transboundary ecosystem management in the Virunga Massif. Journal of Peace Research. 48. 5. 621–635. 10.1177/0022343311412410. 53334931 . 0022-3433.
  95. Ide. Tobias. May 2018. Does environmental peacemaking between states work? Insights on cooperative environmental agreements and reconciliation in international rivalries. Journal of Peace Research. 55. 3. 351–365. 10.1177/0022343317750216. 117600202 . 0022-3433.
  96. Book: Carius, Alexander. Environmental Peacebuilding: Environmental Cooperation as an Instrument of Crisis Prevention and Peacebuilding: Conditions for Success and Constraints. adelphi. 2006. Berlin.
  97. Barquet. Karina. Lujala. Päivi. Rød. Jan Ketil. September 2014. Transboundary conservation and militarized interstate disputes. Political Geography. 42. 1–11. 10.1016/j.polgeo.2014.05.003.
  98. Duffy. Rosaleen. September 2001. Peace parks: The paradox of globalisation1. Geopolitics. 6. 2. 1–26. 10.1080/14650040108407715. 144665048 . 1465-0045.
  99. Büscher. Bram. Ramutsindela. Maano. 2015-12-24. African Affairs. adv058. 10.1093/afraf/adv058. 0001-9909. Green Violence: Rhino Poaching and the War to Save Southern Africa's Peace Parks.
  100. van Amerom. Marloes. Büscher. Bram. 2005-06-16. Peace parks in Southern Africa: bringers of an African Renaissance?. The Journal of Modern African Studies. 43. 2. 159–182. 10.1017/S0022278X05000790. 0022-278X. 1871/21865. free.
  101. Web site: Peace Park Development and Management – Learning for Nature. en-US. 2019-03-25.