Transdifferentiation Explained

Transdifferentiation, also known as lineage reprogramming,[1] is the process in which one mature somatic cell is transformed into another mature somatic cell without undergoing an intermediate pluripotent state or progenitor cell type.[2] It is a type of metaplasia, which includes all cell fate switches, including the interconversion of stem cells. Current uses of transdifferentiation include disease modeling and drug discovery and in the future may include gene therapy and regenerative medicine.[3] The term 'transdifferentiation' was originally coined by Selman and Kafatos[4] in 1974 to describe a change in cell properties as cuticle producing cells became salt-secreting cells in silk moths undergoing metamorphosis.[5]

Discovery

Davis et al. 1987 reported the first instance (sight) of transdifferentiation where a cell changed from one adult cell type to another. Forcing mouse embryonic fibroblasts to express MyoD was found to be sufficient to turn those cells into myoblasts.[6]

Natural examples

The only known instances where adult cells change directly from one lineage to another occurs in the species Turritopsis dohrnii (also known as the immortal jellyfish) and Turritopsis nutricula.

In newts, when the eye lens is removed, pigmented epithelial cells de-differentiate and then redifferentiate into the lens cells.[7] Vincenzo Colucci described this phenomenon in 1891 and Gustav Wolff described the same thing in 1894; the priority issue is examined in Holland (2021).

In humans and mice, it has been demonstrated that alpha cells in the pancreas can spontaneously switch fate and transdifferentiate into beta cells. This has been demonstrated for both healthy and diabetic human and mouse pancreatic islets.[8] While it was previously believed that oesophageal cells were developed from the transdifferentiation of smooth muscle cells, that has been shown to be false.[9]

Induced and therapeutic examples

The first example of functional transdifferentiation has been provided by Ferber et al.[10] by inducing a shift in the developmental fate of cells in the liver and converting them into 'pancreatic beta-cell-like' cells. The cells induced a wide, functional and long-lasting transdifferentiation process that reduced the effects of hyperglycemia in diabetic mice.[11] Moreover, the trans-differentiated beta-like cells were found to be resistant to the autoimmune attack that characterizes type 1 diabetes.[12]

The second step was to undergo transdifferentiation in human specimens. By transducing liver cells with a single gene, Sapir et al. were able to induce human liver cells to transdifferentiate into human beta cells.[13]

This approach has been demonstrated in mice, rat, xenopus and human tissues.[14]

Schematic model of the hepatocyte-to-beta cell transdifferentiation process. Hepatocytes are obtained by liver biopsy from diabetic patient, cultured and expanded ex vivo, transduced with a PDX1 virus, transdifferentiated into functional insulin-producing beta cells, and transplanted back into the patient.[13]

Granulosa and theca cells in the ovaries of adult female mice can transdifferentiate to Sertoli and Leydig cells via induced knockout of the FOXL2 gene.[15] Similarly, Sertoli cells in the testes of adult male mice can transdifferentiate to granulosa cells via induced knockout of the DMRT1 gene.[16]

Methods

Lineage-instructive approach

In this approach, transcription factors from progenitor cells of the target cell type are transfected into a somatic cell to induce transdifferentiation.[2] There exists two different means of determining which transcription factors to use: by starting with a large pool and narrowing down factors one by one[17] or by starting with one or two and adding more.[18] One theory to explain the exact specifics is that ectopic Transcriptional factors direct the cell to an earlier progenitor state and then redirects it towards a new cell type. Rearrangement of the chromatin structure via DNA methylation or histone modification may play a role as well.[19] Here is a list of in vitro examples and in vivo examples. In vivo methods of transfecting specific mouse cells utilize the same kinds of vectors as in vitro experiments, except that the vector is injected into a specific organ. Zhou et al. (2008) injected Ngn3, Pdx1 and Mafa into the dorsal splenic lobe (pancreas) of mice to reprogram pancreatic exocrine cells into β-cells in order to ameliorate hyperglycaemia.[20]

Initial epigenetic activation phase approach

Somatic cells are first transfected with pluripotent reprogramming factors temporarily (Oct4, Sox2, Nanog, etc.) before being transfected with the desired inhibitory or activating factors.[21] Here is a list of examples in vitro.

Pharmacological agents

The DNA methylation inhibitor, 5-azacytidine is also known to promote phenotypic transdifferentiation of cardiac cells to skeletal myoblasts.[22]

In prostate cancer, treatment with androgen receptor targeted therapies induces neuroendocrine transdifferentiation in a subset of patients.[23] [24] No standard of care exists for these patients, and those diagnosed with treatment induced neuroendocrine carcinoma are typically treated palliatively.[25]

Mechanism of action

The transcription factors serve as a short term trigger to an irreversible process. The transdifferentiation liver cells observed 8 months after one single injection of pdx1.[11]

The ectopic transcription factors turn off the host repertoire of gene expression in each of the cells. However, the alternate desired repertoire is being turned on only in a subpopulation of predisposed cells.[26] Despite the massive dedifferentiation – lineage tracing approach indeed demonstrates that transdifferentiation originates in adult cells.[27]

Mogrify algorithm

Determining the unique set of cellular factors that is needed to be manipulated for each cell conversion is a long and costly process that involved much trial and error. As a result, this first step of identifying the key set of cellular factors for cell conversion is the major obstacle researchers face in the field of cell reprogramming. An international team of researchers have developed an algorithm, called Mogrify(1), that can predict the optimal set of cellular factors required to convert one human cell type to another. When tested, Mogrify was able to accurately predict the set of cellular factors required for previously published cell conversions correctly. To further validate Mogrify's predictive ability, the team conducted two novel cell conversions in the laboratory using human cells, and these were successful in both attempts solely using the predictions of Mogrify.[28] [29] [30] Mogrify has been made available online for other researchers and scientists.

Issues

Evaluation

When examining transdifferentiated cells, it is important to look for markers of the target cell type and the absence of donor cell markers which can be accomplished using green fluorescent protein or immunodetection. It is also important to examine the cell function, epigenome, transcriptome, and proteome profiles. Cells can also be evaluated based upon their ability to integrate into the corresponding tissue in vivo[17] and functionally replace its natural counterpart. In one study, transdifferentiating tail-tip fibroblasts into hepatocyte-like cells using transcription factors Gata4, Hnf1α and Foxa3, and inactivation of p19(Arf) restored hepatocyte-like liver functions in only half of the mice using survival as a means of evaluation.[31]

Transition from mouse to human cells

Generally transdifferentiation that occurs in mouse cells does not translate in effectiveness or speediness in human cells. Pang et al. found that while transcription factors Ascl1, Brn2 and Myt1l turned mouse cells into mature neurons, the same set of factors only turned human cells into immature neurons. However, the addition of NeuroD1 was able to increase efficiency and help cells reach maturity.[32]

Order of transcription factor expression

The order of expression of transcription factors can direct the fate of the cell. Iwasaki et al. (2006) showed that in hematopoietic lineages, the expression timing of Gata-2 and (C/EBPalpha) can change whether or not a lymphoid-committed progenitors can differentiate into granulocyte/monocyte progenitor, eosinophil, basophil or bipotent basophil/mast cell progenitor lineages.[33]

Immunogenicity

It has been found for induced pluripotent stem cells that when injected into mice, the immune system of the synergeic mouse rejected the teratomas forming. Part of this may be because the immune system recognized epigenetic markers of specific sequences of the injected cells. However, when embryonic stem cells were injected, the immune response was much lower. Whether or not this will occur within transdifferentiated cells remains to be researched.[3]

Method of transfection

In order to accomplish transfection, one may use integrating viral vectors such as lentiviruses or retroviruses, non-integrating vectors such as Sendai viruses or adenoviruses, microRNAs and a variety of other methods including using proteins and plasmids;[34] one example is the non-viral delivery of transcription factor-encoding plasmids with a polymeric carrier to elicit neuronal transdifferentiation of fibroblasts.[35] When foreign molecules enter cells, one must take into account the possible drawbacks and potential to cause tumorous growth. Integrating viral vectors have the chance to cause mutations when inserted into the genome. One method of going around this is to excise the viral vector once reprogramming has occurred, an example being Cre-Lox recombination[36] Non-integrating vectors have other issues concerning efficiency of reprogramming and also the removal of the vector.[37] Other methods are relatively new fields and much remains to be discovered.

Pluripotent reprogramming

See also

Notes and References

  1. Orkin . S. H. . Zon . L. I. . 10.1016/j.cell.2008.01.025 . Hematopoiesis: An Evolving Paradigm for Stem Cell Biology . Cell . 132 . 4 . 631–644 . 2008 . 18295580 . 2628169 .
  2. Graf . T. . Enver . T. . 10.1038/nature08533 . Forcing cells to change lineages . Nature . 462 . 7273 . 587–594 . 2009 . 19956253 . 2009Natur.462..587G . 4417323 .
  3. Pournasr . B. . Khaloughi . K. . Salekdeh . G. H. . Totonchi . M. . Shahbazi . E. . Baharvand . H. . 10.1002/stem.760 . Concise Review: Alchemy of Biology: Generating Desired Cell Types from Abundant and Accessible Cells . Stem Cells . 29 . 12 . 1933–1941 . 2011 . 21997905 . free .
  4. Selman. Kelly. Kafatos. Fotis C.. 1974-07-01. Transdifferentiation in the labial gland of silk moths: is DNA required for cellular metamorphosis?. Cell Differentiation. 3. 2. 81–94. 10.1016/0045-6039(74)90030-X. 4277742.
  5. Selman . K. . Kafatos . F. C. . Transdifferentiation in the labial gland of silk moths: Is DNA required for cellular metamorphosis? . Cell Differentiation . 3 . 2 . 81–94 . 2013. 4277742 . 10.1016/0045-6039(74)90030-x.
  6. Davis . R. L. . Weintraub . H. . Lassar . A. B. . Expression of a single transfected cDNA converts fibroblasts to myoblasts . Cell . 51 . 6 . 987–1000 . 1987 . 3690668 . 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90585-x. 37741454 .
  7. Jopling . C. . Boue . S. . Belmonte . J. C. I. . 10.1038/nrm3043 . Dedifferentiation, transdifferentiation and reprogramming: Three routes to regeneration . Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology . 12 . 2 . 79–89 . 2011 . 21252997 . 205494805 .
  8. van der Meulen . T. . Mawla . A.M. . DiGruccio . M.R. . Adams . M.W.. Nies . V.. Dolleman . S. . Liu . S. . Ackermann . A.M. . Caceres . E.. Hunter . A.E. . Kaestner . K.H. . Donaldson . C.J. . Huising . M.O. . 10.1016/j.cmet.2017.03.017. Virgin Beta Cells Persist throughout Life at a Neogenic Niche within Pancreatic Islets. Cell Metabolism. 25. 4 . 911–926 . 2017 . 28380380 . 8586897 . free.
  9. Rishniw . M. . Xin . H. B. . Deng . K. Y. . Kotlikoff . M. I. . Skeletal myogenesis in the mouse esophagus does not occur through transdifferentiation . 10.1002/gene.10198 . Genesis . 36 . 2 . 81–82 . 2003 . 12820168 . 20010447 .
  10. Ferber S, Halkin A, Cohen H, Ber I, Einav Y, Goldberg I, Barshack I, Seijffers R, Kopolovic J, Kaiser N, Karasik A (2000) Pancreatic and duodenal homeobox gene 1 induces expression of insulin genes in liver and ameliorates streptozotocin-induced hyperglycemia. http://www.nature.com/nm/journal/v6/n5/full/nm0500_568.html
  11. Sarah Ferber, Amir Halkin, Hofit Cohen, Idit Ber, Yulia Einav, Iris Goldberg, Iris Barshack, Rhona Seijffers, Juri Kopolovic, Nurit Kaiser & Avraham Karasik (2000) - "Pancreatic and duodenal homeobox gene 1 induces expression of insulin genes in liver and ameliorates streptozotocin-induced hyperglycemia"
  12. Shternhall-Ron K et al., Ectopic PDX-1 expression in liver ameliorates type 1 diabetes, Journal of Autoimmunity (2007),doi:10.1016/j.jaut.2007.02.010. http://www.orgenesis.com/uploads/default/files/shternhall-jai-2007.pdf
  13. Tamar Sapir, Keren Shternhall, Irit Meivar-Levy, Tamar Blumenfeld, Hamutal Cohen, Ehud Skutelsky, Smadar Eventov-Friedman, Iris Barshack, Iris Goldberg, Sarah Pri-Chen, Lya Ben-Dor, Sylvie Polak-Charcon, Avraham Karasik, Ilan Shimon, Eytan Mor, and Sarah Ferber (2005) Cell-replacement therapy for diabetes: Generating functional insulin-producing tissue from adult human liver cells
  14. Al-Hasani . K . Pfeifer . A . Courtney . M . Ben-Othman . N . Gjernes . E . Vieira . A . Druelle . N . Avolio . F . Ravassard . P . Leuckx . G . Lacas-Gervais . S . Ambrosetti . D . Benizri . E . Hecksher-Sorensen . J . Gounon . P . Ferrer . J . Gradwohl . G . Heimberg . H . Mansouri . A . Collombat . P . 2013 . Adult Duct-Lining Cells Can Reprogram into β-like Cells Able to Counter Repeated Cycles of Toxin-Induced Diabetes . Dev. Cell . 26 . 1. 86–100 . 10.1016/j.devcel.2013.05.018 . 23810513 . free . 11858/00-001M-0000-0014-3C2F-6 . free .
  15. Uhlenhaut NH, Jakob S, Anlag K, Eisenberger T, Sekido R, Kress J, Treier AC, Klugmann C, Klasen C, Holter NI, Riethmacher D, Schütz G, Cooney AJ, Lovell-Badge R, Treier M . 6 . Somatic sex reprogramming of adult ovaries to testes by FOXL2 ablation . Cell . 139 . 6 . 1130–42 . December 2009 . 20005806 . 10.1016/j.cell.2009.11.021 . free .
  16. Matson CK, Murphy MW, Sarver AL, Griswold MD, Bardwell VJ, Zarkower D . DMRT1 prevents female reprogramming in the postnatal mammalian testis. . Nature. 476. 7358. 101–4. July 2011 . 21775990. 10.1038/nature10239 . 3150961 .
  17. Ieda . M. . Fu . J. D. . Delgado-Olguin . P. . Vedantham . V. . Hayashi . Y. . Bruneau . B. G. . Srivastava . D. . 10.1016/j.cell.2010.07.002 . Direct Reprogramming of Fibroblasts into Functional Cardiomyocytes by Defined Factors . Cell . 142 . 3 . 375–386 . 2010 . 20691899 . 2919844 .
  18. Vierbuchen . T. . Ostermeier . A. . Pang . Z. P. . Kokubu . Y. . Südhof . T. C. . Wernig . M. . 10.1038/nature08797 . Direct conversion of fibroblasts to functional neurons by defined factors . Nature . 463 . 7284 . 1035–1041 . 2010 . 20107439 . 2829121 . 2010Natur.463.1035V .
  19. Ang . Y. S. . Gaspar-Maia . A. . Lemischka . I. R. . Bernstein . E. . Stem cells and reprogramming: Breaking the epigenetic barrier? . 10.1016/j.tips.2011.03.002 . Trends in Pharmacological Sciences . 32 . 7 . 394–401 . 2011 . 21621281 . 3128683 .
  20. Zhou . Q. . Brown . J. . Kanarek . A. . Rajagopal . J. . Melton . D. A. . In vivo reprogramming of adult pancreatic exocrine cells to β-cells . 10.1038/nature07314 . Nature . 455 . 7213 . 627–632 . 2008 . 18754011 . 9011918 . 2008Natur.455..627Z . 205214877 .
  21. Efe . J. A. . Hilcove . S. . Kim . J. . Zhou . H. . Ouyang . K. . Wang . G. . Chen . J. . Ding . S. . 10.1038/ncb2164 . Conversion of mouse fibroblasts into cardiomyocytes using a direct reprogramming strategy . Nature Cell Biology . 13 . 3 . 215–222 . 2011 . 21278734 . 5310172 .
  22. kaur. keerat. yang. jinpu. eisenberg. carol. eisenberg. leonard. 5-azacytidine promotes the transdifferentiation of cardiac cells to skeletal myocytes.. Cellular Reprogramming. 2014. 16. 5. 25090621. 10.1089/cell.2014.0021. 324–330.
  23. Usmani . S . Orevi . M . Stefanelli . A . Zaniboni . A . Gofrit . ON . Bnà . C . Illuminati . S . Lojacono . G . Noventa . S . Savelli . G . Neuroendocrine differentiation in castration resistant prostate cancer. Nuclear medicine radiopharmaceuticals and imaging techniques: A narrative review. . Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology . June 2019 . 138 . 29–37 . 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2019.03.005 . 31092382. 131934021 .
  24. Davies . AH . Beltran . H . Amina Zoubeidi. Cellular plasticity and the neuroendocrine phenotype in prostate cancer. . Nature Reviews. Urology . May 2018 . 15 . 5 . 271–286 . 10.1038/nrurol.2018.22 . 29460922. 4732323 .
  25. Aggarwal . R . Zhang . T . Small . EJ . Armstrong . AJ . Neuroendocrine prostate cancer: subtypes, biology, and clinical outcomes. . Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network . May 2014 . 12 . 5 . 719–26 . 10.6004/jnccn.2014.0073 . 24812138.
  26. Meivar-Levy . I. . Sapir . T. . Gefen-Halevi . S. . Aviv . V. . Barshack . I. . Onaca . N. . Mor . E. . Ferber . S. . 10.1002/hep.21766 . Pancreatic and duodenal homeobox gene 1 induces hepatic dedifferentiation by suppressing the expression of CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein β . Hepatology . 46 . 3 . 898–905 . 2007 . 17705277 . free .
  27. Mauda-Havakuk . M. . Litichever . N. . Chernichovski . E. . Nakar . O. . Winkler . E. . Mazkereth . R. . Orenstein . A. . Bar-Meir . E. . Ravassard . P. . Meivar-Levy . I. . Ferber . S. . Linden . Rafael . Ectopic PDX-1 Expression Directly Reprograms Human Keratinocytes along Pancreatic Insulin-Producing Cells Fate . 10.1371/journal.pone.0026298 . PLOS ONE . 6 . 10 . e26298 . 2011 . 22028850 . 3196540 . 2011PLoSO...626298M . free .
  28. http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2016-01/dms-moc011516.php Mapping out cell conversion
  29. Owen . Rackham . Gough . Julian . 2016 . A predictive computational framework for direct reprogramming between human cell types . Nature Genetics. 48. 3. 331–335. 10.1038/ng.3487 . 26780608. 1983/e6490a78-f3e8-4253-acc4-7ee181c79168 . 217524918 . free .
  30. Jane Byrne (Jul 2021). Mogrify looks to transform cell therapy development. BIOPHARMA-REPORTER.COM
  31. Huang . P. . He . Z. . Ji . S. . Sun . H. . Xiang . D. . Liu . C. . Hu . Y. . Wang . X. . Hui . L. . 10.1038/nature10116 . Induction of functional hepatocyte-like cells from mouse fibroblasts by defined factors . Nature . 475 . 7356 . 386–389 . 2011 . 21562492 . 1115749 .
  32. Pang . Z. P. . Yang . N. . Vierbuchen . T. . Ostermeier . A. . Fuentes . D. R. . Yang . T. Q. . Citri . A. . Sebastiano . V. . Marro . S. . Südhof . 10.1038/nature10202 . T. C. . Wernig . M. . Induction of human neuronal cells by defined transcription factors . Nature . 476 . 7359 . 220–223 . 2011 . 21617644 . 3159048 . 2011Natur.476..220P .
  33. Iwasaki . H. . Mizuno . S. -I. . Arinobu . Y. . Ozawa . H. . Mori . Y. . Shigematsu . H. . Takatsu . K. . Tenen . D. G. . Akashi . K. . 10.1101/gad.1493506 . The order of expression of transcription factors directs hierarchical specification of hematopoietic lineages . Genes & Development . 20 . 21 . 3010–3021 . 2006 . 17079688 . 1620021 .
  34. Patel . M. . Yang . S. . 10.1007/s12015-010-9123-8 . Advances in Reprogramming Somatic Cells to Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells . Stem Cell Reviews and Reports . 6 . 3 . 367–380 . 2010 . 20336395 . 2924949 .
  35. Adler . A. F. . Grigsby . C. L. . Kulangara . K. . Wang . H. . Yasuda . R. . Leong . K. W. . 10.1038/mtna.2012.25 . Nonviral Direct Conversion of Primary Mouse Embryonic Fibroblasts to Neuronal Cells . Molecular Therapy: Nucleic Acids . 1 . 7 . e32– . 2012 . 23344148 . 3411320 .
  36. Sommer . C. A. . Sommer . A. . Longmire . T. A. . Christodoulou . C. . Thomas . D. D. . Gostissa . M. . Alt . F. W. . Murphy . G. J. . Kotton . D. N. . 10.1002/stem.255 . Mostoslavsky . G. . Excision of Reprogramming Transgenes Improves the Differentiation Potential of iPS Cells Generated with a Single Excisable Vector . Stem Cells . 28 . 1 . 64–74 . 2009 . 19904830 . 4848036.
  37. Zhou . W. . Freed . C. R. . 10.1002/stem.201 . Adenoviral Gene Delivery Can Reprogram Human Fibroblasts to Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells . Stem Cells . 27 . 11 . 2667–2674 . 2009 . 19697349 . free .
  38. Zhou . Q. . Melton . D. A. . 10.1016/j.stem.2008.09.015 . Extreme Makeover: Converting One Cell into Another . Cell Stem Cell . 3 . 4 . 382–388 . 2008 . 18940730 . free .
  39. Passier . R. . Mummery . C. . 10.1016/j.stem.2010.07.004 . Getting to the Heart of the Matter: Direct Reprogramming to Cardiomyocytes . Cell Stem Cell . 7 . 2 . 139–141 . 2010 . 20682439 . free .

This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Transdifferentiation".

Except where otherwise indicated, Everything.Explained.Today is © Copyright 2009-2024, A B Cryer, All Rights Reserved. Cookie policy.