Tontine Explained

A tontine is an investment linked to a living person which provides an income for as long as that person is alive. Such schemes originated as plans for governments to raise capital in the 17th century and became relatively widespread in the 18th and 19th centuries.

Tontines enable subscribers to share the risk of living a long life by combining features of a group annuity with a kind of mortality lottery. Each subscriber pays a sum into a trust and thereafter receives a periodical payout. As members die, their payout entitlements devolve to the other participants, and so the value of each continuing payout increases. On the death of the final member, the trust scheme is usually wound up.[1]

Tontines are still common in France.[2] They can be issued by European insurers under the Directive 2002/83/EC of the European Parliament.[3] The Pan-European Pension Regulation passed by the European Commission in 2019 also contains provisions that specifically permit next-generation pension products that abide by the "tontine principle" to be offered in the 27 EU member states.[4]

Questionable practices by U.S. life insurers in 1906 led to the Armstrong Investigation in the United States restricting some forms of tontines. Nevertheless, in March 2017, The New York Times reported that tontines were getting fresh consideration as a way for people to get steady retirement income.[5]

History

The investment plan is named after Neapolitan banker Lorenzo de Tonti, who is popularly credited with inventing it in France in 1653. He more probably merely modified existing Italian investment schemes;[6] while another precursor was a proposal put to the Senate of Lisbon by Nicolas Bourey in 1641.[7] Tonti put his proposal to the French royal government, but after consideration it was rejected by the Parlement de Paris.[8]

The first true tontine was therefore organised in the city of Kampen in the Netherlands in October 1670, and was soon followed by three other cities.[9] The French finally established a state tontine in 1689 (though it was not described by that name because Tonti had died in disgrace, about five years earlier). The English government organised a tontine in 1693.[10] Nine further government tontines were organised in France down to 1759; four more in Britain down to 1789; and others in the Netherlands and some of the German states. Those in Britain were not fully subscribed, and in general the British schemes tended to be less popular and successful than their continental counterparts.[11]

By the end of the 18th century, the tontine had fallen out of favour as a revenue-raising instrument with governments, but smaller-scale and less formal tontines continued to be arranged between individuals or to raise funds for specific projects throughout the 19th century, and, in modified form, to the present day.[5]

Concept

Each investor pays a sum into the tontine. Each investor then receives annual interest on the capital invested. As each investor dies, their share is reallocated among the surviving investors. This process continues until the death of the final investor, when the trust scheme is wound up. Each subscriber receives only interest; the capital is never paid back.[12]

Strictly speaking, the transaction involves four different roles:[12]

  1. the government or corporate body that organizes the scheme, receives the contributions and manages the capital
  2. the subscribers who provide the capital
  3. the shareholders who receive the annual interest
  4. the nominees on whose lives the contracts are contingent

In most 18th- and 19th-century schemes, parties 2 to 4 were the same individuals; but in a significant minority of schemes each initial subscriber–shareholder was permitted to invest in the name of another party (generally one of his or her own children), who would inherit that share on the subscriber's death.[12]

Because younger nominees clearly had a longer life expectancy, the 17th- and 18th-century tontines were normally divided into several "classes" by age (typically in bands of 5, 7 or 10 years): each class effectively formed a separate tontine, with the shares of deceased members devolving to fellow-nominees within the same class.[12]

Works of fiction (see In popular culture below) often feature a variant model of the tontine in which the capital devolves upon the last surviving nominee, thereby dissolving the trust and potentially making the survivor very wealthy. It is unclear whether this model ever existed in the real world.

Patent

Financial inventions were patentable under French law from January 1791 until September 1792. In June 1792 a patent was issued to inventor F. P. Dousset for a new type of tontine in combination with a lottery.[13]

Uses and abuses

Louis XIV first made use of tontines in 1689 to fund military operations when he could not otherwise raise the money. The initial subscribers each put in 300 livres and, unlike many later schemes, this one was run honestly; the last survivor, a widow named Charlotte Barbier, who died in 1726 at the age of 96, received 73,000 livres in her last payment.[14] [15] [16] The English government first issued tontines in 1693 to fund a war against France, part of the Nine Years' War.[10] [16]

Tontines soon caused financial problems for their issuing governments, as the organisers tended to underestimate the longevity of the population. At first, tontine holders included men and women of all ages. However, by the mid-18th century, investors were beginning to understand how to game the system, and it became increasingly common to buy tontine shares for young children, especially for girls around the age of 5 (since girls lived longer than boys, and by which age they were less at risk of infant mortality). This created the possibility of significant returns for the shareholders, but significant losses for the organizers.[17] As a result, tontine schemes were eventually abandoned, and by the mid-1850s tontines had been replaced by other investment vehicles, such as "penny policies", a predecessor of the 20th-century pension scheme.

A property development tontine, The Victoria Park Company, was at the heart of the notable case of Foss v Harbottle in mid-19th-century England.

Projects funded by tontines

Tontines were often used to raise funds for private or public works projects.[18] These sometimes contained the word "tontine" in their name.

Some notable tontine-funded projects included:

Tontine pensions in the US: 1868–1906

Tontines became associated with life insurance in the United States in 1868 when Henry Baldwin Hyde of the Equitable Life Assurance Society introduced them as a means of selling more life insurance and meeting the demands of competition. Over the next four decades, the Equitable and its imitators sold approximately 9 million policies – two-thirds of the nation's outstanding insurance contracts. During the Panic of 1873 many life insurance companies went out of business as deteriorating financial conditions created solvency problems: those that survived had all offered tontines.[24] However, the contracts included an obligation to maintain monthly payments, and as a result spawned large numbers of policy owners whose life savings were wiped out by a single missed payment. The profits produced by the tontines' deferred payout structures proved tempting for the issuers – especially the profligate James Hyde. As the funds in the investment account accumulated, they found their way into directors' and agents' pockets, and also into the hands of judges and legislators, who reciprocated with prejudicial judgments and laws.[25]

Finally, in 1905, the Armstrong Investigation was set up to enquire into the selling of tontines. It resulted in the banning of the continued sale of any tontines which contained toxic clauses for consumers.[26] In essence, these toxic versions of tontine pensions were effectively (though not literally) outlawed in response to corrupt insurance company management.[27]

When Equitable Life Assurance was establishing its business in Australia in the 1880s, an actuary of the Australian Mutual Provident Society criticised tontine insurance, calling it "an immoral contract" which "put a premium on murder".[28] In New Zealand at the time, another of the chief critics of tontines had been the government, which also issued its own insurance.[29]

Modern regulation

In France and Belgium, tontines clauses are inserted into contracts such as ownership deeds for property as a means to potentially reduce inheritance tax.[30]

The First Life Directive of the European Union includes tontines as a permitted class of business for insurers. However, this does not mean that tontines should be considered insurance contracts. According to the Supreme Court of the United States the nature of "insurance" involves some investment risk-taking on the part of the company. Tontines replace idiosyncratic longevity risk with systemic longevity risk and therefore have aspects of insurance however unless the issuer of a tontine provides a fixed return, the issuer assumes no true risk in the insurance sense.[31]

The new Pan-European Pension legislation which came into effect in March 2022 specifically paves the way for other types of financial service providers to create new pension products that abide by the "tontine principle" which tontine PEPP (pan-European Personal Pension Product)[32] products can be offered throughout Europe once approved in a single member state.[4]

In most places in the United States using tontines to raise capital or obtain lifetime income is consistently upheld as being legal; however, legislation in two states has fostered the false perception that selling tontines in the broader U.S. is not legal.[33]

Several new pension architectures have been designed or deployed which partially or fully utilise the tontine risk-sharing structure including:

Variant uses of the term

In French-speaking cultures, particularly in developing countries, the meaning of the term "tontine" has broadened to encompass a wider range of semi-formal group savings and microcredit schemes. The crucial difference between these and tontines in the traditional sense is that benefits do not depend on the deaths of other members.

As a type of rotating savings and credit association (ROSCA), tontines are well established as a savings instrument in central Africa, and in this case function as savings clubs in which each member makes regular payments and is lent the kitty in turn. They are wound up after each cycle of loans.[35] In West Africa, "tontines" – often consisting of mainly women – are an example of economic, social and cultural solidarity.[36]

Informal group savings and loan associations are also traditional in many east Asian societies, and under the name of tontines are found in Cambodia, and among emigrant Cambodian communities.[37]

In Singapore, the Chit Funds Act of 1971[38] defines the application of legislation to the operation of chit funds, which were also known colloquially as tontines (although more properly a variant type of ROSCA).

In Malaysia, chit funds are primarily known as "kootu funds", which again are ROSCAs and which are defined under the Kootu Funds (Prohibition) Act 1971 as"...a scheme or arrangement variously known as a kootu, cheetu, chit fund, hwei, tontine or otherwise whereby the participants subscribe periodically or otherwise to a common fund and such common fund is put up for sale or payment to the participants by auction, tender, bid, ballot or otherwise...".[39]

In the UK during the mid-20th century, the term "tontine" was applied to communal Christmas saving schemes, with participants making regular payments of an agreed sum through the year, which would be withdrawn shortly before Christmas to fund gifts and festivities.[40]

In popular culture

Tontines (or schemes described as tontines) have been featured as plot devices in many stories, movies and television programs, including:

See also

Sources

External links

Notes and References

  1. Weir 1989, pp. 96, 102–03, 105.
  2. News: Property in France: Keep it in la famille now and for ever. Ingram. Miranda. Daily Telegraph. 2008-08-29. 2017-10-16. en-GB. 0307-1235.
  3. Web site: EUR-Lex – 32002L0083 – EN . eur-lex.europa.eu. 5 November 2002 . en. 2017-10-17.
  4. Meerten . Hans van . Hooghiemstra . Sebastiaan Niels . PEPP – Towards a Harmonized European Legislative Framework for Personal Pensions . SSRN . July 2017 .
  5. Web site: When Others Die, Tontine Investors Win . . 2017-03-24 . 2017-03-27.
  6. Jennings; Swanson; Trout (1988), p. 107
  7. McKeever. Kent. 10 February 2017 . A Tontine before Lorenzo de Tonti's! The Lisbon Tontine Proposal of 1641 . Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law Blog.
  8. Tontine. 27.
  9. Milevsky 2015, pp. 58–59.
  10. Milevsky 2015.
  11. Weir 1989, pp. 95–124
  12. Weir 1989, pp. 103–04
  13. Web site: Description des machines et procédés spécifiés dans les brevets d'invention, publ. par C.P. Molard. [With] Table générale des vingt premiers volumes. [Continued as] Description des machines ... pour lesquels des brevets d'invention ont été pris sous le régime de la loi du 5 juillet 1844]. France min du. commerce. 30 April 2018. Google Books.
  14. Coudy 1957
  15. Jennings and Trout 1982.
  16. Weir 1989.
  17. https://www.finance-watch.org/blog/lessons-from-history-ii-the-thirty-maidens-of-geneva-and-the-french-revolution/ Lessons from history II: The «Thirty Maidens of Geneva» and the French Revolution
  18. Green 2019.
  19. Book: Davenport, Neil . Thames Bridges from Dartford to the source. 2006. Kettering. Silver Link Publishing. 978-1-85794-229-3.
  20. Web site: MQ Magazine . 19 . United Grand Lodge of England.
  21. Web site: Tontine Hotel, 5 Ardgowan Square: Listed Building Report . Historic Scotland.
  22. Web site: About The Tontine: History of The Tontine . The Cleveland Tontine . 28 February 2019 .
  23. Book: Lowndes. William. The Theatre Royal at Bath. registration . 1982 . Bristol . Redcliffe . 978-0-905459-49-3 . 35.
  24. Book: Yang . Tony . 2009 . 5 . The Performance of Life Insurance Companies: 1860–1905 .
  25. William J. . Bernstein . King William's Tontine: Why the Retirement Annuity of the Future Should Resemble Its Past (a review) . Financial Analysts Journal . CFA Institute . 10 . 1 . 2015 . 11 May 2018 . 10.2469/br.v10.n1.17 . 31 January 2024 .
  26. Moss . David . Eugene . Kintgen . The Armstrong Investigation . Harvard Business School Case Collection . 708-034 . January 2008 . January 2009 . 11 May 2018 .
  27. Web site: J. Mark . Iwry . Claire . Haldeman . William G. . Gale . David C. . John . 15 October 2020 . Retirement tontines: Using a classical finance mechanism as an alternative source of retirement income . Brookings Institution . 5 December 2020 .
  28. Buley 1967, p. 291.
  29. Buley 1967, p. 472.
  30. Web site: French Wills and forced heirship . Buckles Solicitors.
  31. Web site: S. E. C. v. VARIABLE ANNUITY CO.. FindLaw.
  32. https://www.eiopa.europa.eu/browse/regulation-and-policy/pan-european-personal-pension-product-pepp/consumer-oriented-faqs-pan-european-personal-pension-product_en Consumer-oriented FAQs on the pan-European Personal Pension Product.
  33. Web site: Tardi . Carla . Tontine . Investopedia.
  34. The Simple Analytics of a Pooled Annuity Fund . 10.1111/j.1539-6975.2005.00134.x. 2005 . Piggott . John . Valdez . Emiliano A. . Detzel . Bettina . Journal of Risk & Insurance . 72 . 3 . 497–520 . 154359987 .
  35. Web site: Using tontines to run the economy . Alain . Henry . l'École de Paris du management . June 19, 2003.
  36. Web site: Flexible and disciplined . Eva-Maria . Bruchhaus . D+C, Development and Cooperation . November 3, 2016.
  37. Web site: Tontine: an alternative financial instrument in Cambodian communities . Man Hau . Liev . 12th NZASIA Conference . November 26–29, 1997.
  38. Web site: Chit Funds Act . Singapore Statutes Online . 1971 . 2013 . 11 May 2018 .
  39. Web site: Kootu Funds (Prohibition) Act 1971 . Commonwealth Legal Information Institute . 1971 . 27 May 2019 .
  40. For a description and images of a contribution card, see Web site: Rhostyllen: a history through pictures . 11 May 2018 .
  41. Kerry Tombs (2019). The Malvern Murders. London: Joffe Books, revised edition ("It's a financial agreement drawn up by a number of parties, the chief clause of which is that all the investment or funds, will all eventually go to the surviving member", p. 191)