Thin-film equation explained

In fluid mechanics, the thin-film equation is a partial differential equation that approximately predicts the time evolution of the thickness of a liquid film that lies on a surface. The equation is derived via lubrication theory which is based on the assumption that the length-scales in the surface directions are significantly larger than in the direction normal to the surface. In the non-dimensional form of the Navier-Stokes equation the requirement is that terms of order and are negligible, where is the aspect ratio and is the Reynolds number. This significantly simplifies the governing equations. However, lubrication theory, as the name suggests, is typically derived for flow between two solid surfaces, hence the liquid forms a lubricating layer. The thin-film equation holds when there is a single free surface. With two free surfaces, the flow must be treated as a viscous sheet.[1] [2]

Definition

The basic form of a 2-dimensional thin film equation is[3] [4] [5]

\partialh
\partialt

=-\nablaQ

where the fluid flux

Q

is

Q=

h3
3\mu

\left[\nabla\right(\gamma\nabla2h+\rhog\hat{en})+\rhog\hat{ei}]+

h2
2\mu

A

,

and μ is the viscosity (or dynamic viscosity) of the liquid, h(x,y,t) is film thickness, γ is the interfacial tension between the liquid and the gas phase above it,

\rho

is the liquid density and

A

the surface shear. The surface shear could be caused by flow of the overlying gas or surface tension gradients.[6] [7] The vectors

\hat{ei}

represent the unit vector in the surface co-ordinate directions, the dot product serving to identify the gravity component in each direction. The vector

\hat{en}

is the unit vector perpendicular to the surface.

A generalised thin film equation is discussed in

\partialh
\partialt

=-

1
3\mu

\nabla\left(hn\nabla\left(\gamma\nabla2h\right)\right)

.

When

n<3

this may represent flow with slip at the solid surface whole

n=1

describes the thickness of a thin bridge between two masses of fluid in a Hele-Shaw cell.[8] The value

n=3

represents surface tension driven flow.

A form frequently investigated with regard to the rupture of thin liquid films involves the addition of a disjoining pressure Π(h) in the equation,[9] as in

\partialh
\partialt

=-

1
3\mu

\nabla\left(h3\nabla\left(\gamma\nabla2h-\Pi(h)\right)\right)

where the function Π(h) is usually very small in value for moderate-large film thicknesses h and grows very rapidly when h goes very close to zero.

Properties

Physical applications, properties and solution behaviour of the thin-film equation are reviewed in. With the inclusion of phase change at the substrate a form of thin film equation for an arbitrary surface is derived in.[10] A detailed study of the steady-flow of a thin film near a moving contact line is given in.[11] For a yield-stress fluid flow driven by gravity and surface tension is investigated in.[12]

For purely surface tension driven flow it is easy to see that one static (time-independent) solution is a paraboloid of revolution

h(x,y)=A-B(x2+y2)

and this is consistent with the experimentally observed spherical cap shape of a static sessile drop, as a "flat" spherical cap that has small height can be accurately approximated in second order with a paraboloid. This, however, does not handle correctly the circumference of the droplet where the value of the function h(x,y) drops to zero and below, as a real physical liquid film can't have a negative thickness. This is one reason why the disjoining pressure term Π(h) is important in the theory.

One possible realistic form of the disjoining pressure term is[9]

\Pi(h)=B\left[\left(

h*
h

\right)n-\left(

h*
h

\right)m\right]

where B, h*, m and n are some parameters. These constants and the surface tension

\gamma

can be approximately related to the equilibrium liquid-solid contact angle

\thetae

through the equation[9] [13]

B

(m-1)(n-1)
h*(n-m)

\gamma(1-\cos\thetae)

.

The thin film equation can be used to simulate several behaviors of liquids, such as the fingering instability in gravity driven flow.[14]

The lack of a second-order time derivative in the thin-film equation is a result of the assumption of small Reynold's number in its derivation, which allows the ignoring of inertial terms dependent on fluid density

\rho

. This is somewhat similar to the situation with Washburn's equation, which describes the capillarity-driven flow of a liquid in a thin tube.

See also

External links

Notes and References

  1. Fliert. B. W. Van De. Howell. P. D.. Ockenden. J. R.. June 1995. Pressure-driven flow of a thin viscous sheet. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. en. 292. 359–376. 10.1017/S002211209500156X. 1995JFM...292..359V . 120047555 . 1469-7645.
  2. Buckmaster. J. D.. Nachman. A.. Ting. L.. May 1975. The buckling and stretching of a viscida. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. en. 69. 1. 1–20. 10.1017/S0022112075001279. 1975JFM....69....1B . 120390660 . 1469-7645.
  3. A. Oron, S. H. Davis, S. G. Bankoff, "Long-scale evolution of thin liquid films", Rev. Mod. Phys., 69, 931–980 (1997)
  4. H. Knüpfer, "Classical solutions for a thin-film equation", PhD thesis, University of Bonn.
  5. Myers. T. G.. January 1998. Thin Films with High Surface Tension. SIAM Review. en. 40. 3. 441–462. 10.1137/S003614459529284X. 1998SIAMR..40..441M . 0036-1445.
  6. O'Brien. S. B. G. M.. September 1993. On Marangoni drying: nonlinear kinematic waves in a thin film. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. en. 254. 649–670. 10.1017/S0022112093002290. 1993JFM...254..649O . 122742594 . 0022-1120.
  7. Myers. T. G.. Charpin. J. P. F.. Thompson. C. P.. January 2002. Slowly accreting ice due to supercooled water impacting on a cold surface. Physics of Fluids. en. 14. 1. 240–256. 10.1063/1.1416186. 2002PhFl...14..240M . 1070-6631.
  8. Constantin. Peter. Dupont. Todd F.. Goldstein. Raymond E.. Kadanoff. Leo P.. Shelley. Michael J.. Zhou. Su-Min. 1993-06-01. Droplet breakup in a model of the Hele-Shaw cell. Physical Review E. en. 47. 6. 4169–4181. 10.1103/PhysRevE.47.4169. 9960494 . 1993PhRvE..47.4169C . 1063-651X.
  9. L. W. Schwartz, R. V. Roy, R. R. Eley, S. Petrash, "Dewetting patterns in a drying liquid film ", Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 243, 363374 (2001).
  10. Myers. T. G.. Charpin. J. P. F.. Chapman. S. J.. August 2002. The flow and solidification of a thin fluid film on an arbitrary three-dimensional surface. Physics of Fluids. en. 14. 8. 2788–2803. 10.1063/1.1488599. 2002PhFl...14.2788M . 1070-6631. 2117/102903. free.
  11. Tuck. E. O.. Schwartz. L. W.. September 1990. A Numerical and Asymptotic Study of Some Third-Order Ordinary Differential Equations Relevant to Draining and Coating Flows. SIAM Review. en. 32. 3. 453–469. 10.1137/1032079. 0036-1445.
  12. Balmforth. Neil. Ghadge. Shilpa. Myers. Tim. March 2007. Surface tension driven fingering of a viscoplastic film. Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics. en. 142. 1–3. 143–149. 10.1016/j.jnnfm.2006.07.011.
  13. N.V. Churaev, V.D. Sobolev, Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 61 (1995) 1-16
  14. L. Kondic, "Instabilities in gravity driven flow of thin liquid films", SIAM Review, 45, 95–115 (2003)