Tehuelche people explained

Group:Tehuelche
Population:Total: 40,836
Araucanized: 23,416
• Not araucanized: 17,420
Region1: Argentina
Pop1:40,836 (2022)
Ref1:[1]
Religions:AnimismCatholicism

The Tehuelche people, also called the Aónikenk, are an Indigenous people from eastern Patagonia in South America. In the 18th and 19th centuries the Tehuelche were influenced by Mapuche people, and many adopted a horseriding lifestyle. Once a nomadic people, the lands of the Tehuelche were colonized in the 19th century by Argentina and Chile, gradually disrupting their traditional economies. The establishment of large sheep farming estates in Patagonia was particularly detrimental to the Tehuelche.[2] Contact with outsiders also brought in infectious diseases ushering deadly epidemics among Tehuelche tribes. Most existing members of the group currently reside in cities and towns of Argentine Patagonia.

The name "Tehuelche complex" has been used by researchers in a broad sense to group together indigenous peoples from Patagonia and the Pampas. Several specialists, missionaries and travelers have proposed grouping them together on account of the similarities in their cultural traits, geographic vicinity and languages, even though the languages they spoke amongst themselves were not related to each other and their geographic distributions were extensive.[3]

Name

According to the historian Antonio Pigafetta from Ferdinand Magellan's expedition in 1520, he referred to the indigenous people he came across in the San Julian Bay as the "Patagoni". In 1535 the historian Gonzalo Fernández de Oviedo y Valdés explained in his Spanish; Castilian: Historia general y natural de las Indias (General and Natural History of the Indies), that "We Spaniards call them the Patagones for their big feet", which the historian Francisco López de Gómara agreed with in 1552. Based on these accounts, the first name the Spanish used to refer to the Tehuelche people was the Patagones. However, some researchers speculate, without verifiable bases, that Magellan could have been inspired by the dog-headed monster from the 1512 novel Primaleón known as "Pathogan".[4] [5]

According to the most widespread view, the word Tehuelche comes from the Mapuche term chewel che, which would mean "brave people", "rugged people", or "barren land people".[6] Another version suggests that it could be derived from one of their factions, the Tueshens, plus the Mapuche word "che" meaning 'people' or 'peoples'.

Classifications

The classification of indigenous groups that lived in the Pampas and Patagonia is confusing due to the different terms that were used to refer to the native population groups from these regions. There are various causes that have prevented the establishment of one unique and complete classification. Among these circumstances, the extinction of some of these groups, coupled with the vast amount of land on which these groups were distributed, which inhibited Spanish explorers who first identified certain Tehuelche peoples from making contact with all the groups. In other cases, the seasonal migrations that they practiced which involved traveling long distances made Europeans that observed them overestimate the number of people from a group or the distribution range of a language. In conjunction with all of these factors, the intrusion of the Mapuches, or Araucans, from the west deeply transformed their cultural reality, intermixing and absorbing ethnic groups from the Pampas and central and North of Patagonia, producing the Araucanization of a large part of the ancient inhabitants. Finally, the subsequent Conquest of the Desert carried out by the Argentine Army led to the near extinction of these indigenous communities. This historic overview has led to the disagreement among researchers.

In the 19th century, explorers such as Ramón Lista and George Chaworth Musters named them "tsóneka", "tsónik" or "chonik". The majority of experts agree that the Chubut river separated the two largest subdivisions: the "Southern Tehuelche" and "Northern Tehuelche". The first subdivision stretched towards the south to the Strait of Magellan, whereas the second group extended towards the north to the Colorado River (Argentina) and Rio Negro (Argentina). The presence, or lack thereof, Tehuelche people in the Pampas has led to disagreements among researchers, who have not agreed on the existence of a separate subdivision called the "Pampas", nor what their relationship and borders were with the Mapuches.

According to Thomas Falkner

One of the primary classifications was from English Jesuit Thomas Falkner in his 1774 work A description of Patagonia and the adjoining parts of South America, which introduced the ethnic name 'Het peoples' for the Puelche people, which included the Tehuelche:[7]

or Falkner the "Tehuelhets" or "Patagones" were the Tehuelche people who lived from the banks of the Rio Negro to the Strait of Magellan:

According to Milcíades Vignati

In 1936 Milcíades Vignati published Spanish; Castilian: Las culturas indígenas de la Pampa y Las culturas indígenas de la Patagonia (The Indigenous Cultures of the Pampas and the Indigenous Cultures of Patagonia) in which he proposed that between the 16th and 19th centuries the "Gününa-küne" or "Tuelches" lived from the southern half of the province of Rio Negro to the boundary between the present Chubut and Santa Cruz provinces. The "Serranos" were to the North of them and the "Aônükün'k" or "Patagones" were located to the South. These peoples were divided between three groups: the "Peénken" (people of the North), the "Háunikenk" (people of the South), and the "Aónikenk" (the people of the West).

According to Federico Escalada

In his 1949 piece Spanish; Castilian: El complejo tehuelche. Estudio de etnografía patagónica (The Tehuelche Complex. An Ethnographic study of Patagonians), the military doctor Federico A. Escalada classified the Tehuelche people from historic periods, on the basis of the Spanish; Castilian: Estudio de la realidad humana y de la bibliografía (Study of Human Reality and Bibliography), into five simple categories, each with their own language derived from a mother language called "Ken". He grouped them together geographically into "dry land" and "islanders", denying the existence of a separate "Pampa" group.[8]

The names used by Escalada, which he obtained from Mapuche-speaking informants, were:

According to Rodolfo Casamiquela

Argentine historian and paleontologist Rodolfo Casamiquela reviewed Escalada's classifications in his books Spanish; Castilian: Rectificaciones y ratificaciones hacia una interpretación definitiva del panorama etnológico de la Patagonia y área septentrional adyacente (Rectifications and ratifications towards a definitive interpretation of the ethnological panorama of Patagonia and the adjacent Northern area) (1965); Spanish; Castilian: Un nuevo panorama etnológico del area pan-pampeana y patagónica adyacente (A new ethnological panorama of the Pan-Pampas and adjacent Patagonian area) (1969); and Spanish; Castilian: Bosquejo de una etnología de la provincia de Río Negro (Outline of an ethnology of the Río Negro province) (1985), reaffirming the existence of a Tehuelche complex.[15]

Casamiquela proposed the following classification for the continental area circa 1700:

Languages

The different ethnic groups that are recognized under the broad term "Tehuelche" spoke languages whose exact quantity and relationships have been subject to different opinions. For Roberto Lehmann Nitsche, the languages stemming from the Pampas and Patagonia divided in to two groups, the Chonan languages and the Het languages.[17] [18] The available evidence distinguishes between six languages in the Tehuelche complex: the Chon group (Teushen, Aoenek'enk, Selk'nam and Haush), the language of the Gününa küne indigenous group and the language of the Querandí people.[19]

The language of the Aonekkenk people appears more closely related to the language of the Teushen people (central eastern Chonan). These languages in turn maintain a closer relationship with the languages from Isla Grande de Tierra del Fuego (southern Chonan) and a more distant relationship with the language of the Gününa küne indigenous group (northern Chonan). Escalada considered the idea that the entire Tehuelche complex had a common linguistic core, called Ken ('people').

Until the 19th century the following languages were recognized:

In central Patagonia there was also an ancient transition language between the Penkkenk and the Aonekkenk languages, called Tehuesh (Tewsün, Téushenkenk or Teushen), which was gradually replaced by the Aonekkenk language. However, a large portion of the current names of places in the central plateau retain their Tewsün roots today; for example, the name of the Chubut Province is derived from the term "chupat".

Finally, the Aonekken ("people of the South") people speak the language commonly known as the Tehuelche language or Tshoneka or Aonekkenk, which constitutes the language currently most studied from the group and the only language that continues to be used. There is a group of people who try to recover the language through a program called "Kkomshkn e wine awkkoi 'a'ien" ("I am not ashamed of speaking Tehuelche"). The organization focuses on spreading the language and culture.[20]

Studies of Gününa yajüch

In 1864, Hunziker recorded a vocabulary and a collection of phrases from a language called Genakenn in the Viedma region. In 1865, the explorer Jorge Claraz traveled from south of Buenos Aires to Chubut being guided by individuals who spoke Gününa iajëch, collecting the names of places, words and sentences in his Spanish; Castilian: Diario de viaje de exploración al Chubut (Chubut exploration travel diary) (1865–1866).

In 1913, Lehmann Nitsche used the data collected by Hunziker and Claraz to create a comparative vocabulary of Tehuelche languages: Latin: El grupo lingüístico tschon de los territorios magallánicos (The Chonan Linguistic Groups of the Magellanic Territories).

In 1925, Harrington gathered words from bilingual Tehuelche speakers which he published in 1946 in Spanish; Castilian: Contribución al estudio del indio gününa küne (A Contribution to the Study of the Gününa küne Indian), claiming that they called their language Gününa yájitch or Pampa. During the 1950s, Casamiquela collected vocabulary, songs and prayers from various elders, outlining a morphosyntactic analysis.

In 1960, Ana Gerzenstein made a phonetic and phonological classification in her Spanish; Castilian: Fonología de la lengua gününa-këna (Phonology of the Gününa-këna Language).

In 1991, José Pedro Viegas Barros outlined a morphosyntactic projection in Spanish; Castilian: Clarificación lingüística de las relaciones interculturales e interétnicas en la región pampeano-patagónica (Linguistic Clarification of Intercultural and Inter-ethnic Relations in the Pampas-Patagonian Region), and in 2005 he developed a phonological description in Spanish; Castilian: Voces en el viento[21] (Voices in the Wind).

Puelche is a dead language. Casamiquela released the first and last name of the last Puelche speaker: José María Cual, who died in 1960 at the age of 90.[22]

Social organization

Although mobile, Tehuelche groups tended to move in specific circuits, predominantly from west to east and vice versa. During each season, the groups had places where they would set up camps, known as aik or aiken among themselves, and referred to as tolderías by the Spanish and Creoles.

Each Tehuelche group was composed of various kinship and they had specific territories for hunting and gathering. The boundaries of these territories were defined through ancestry by markers with unknown significance: a hill, a trough, a hollow, or important tree. In cases where a group could not satisfy their needs in their own territory, they had to ask for the permission of neighboring people from the same ethnic group to use the resources from their territories; a violation of this rule led to war.

The Tehuelche had a very organized family unit, in which men were the authoritative figures and women were subordinate.[23] In most family contexts, the father would offer his daughter for marriage in exchange for various goods. Each man could have two or three wives, depending on his status.

Religion

As in the case of other ethnic groups that did not develop a state structure, the Tehuelche did not possess an organized religious system (liturgy and vertical structure). However, like all the Pampas and Patagonian peoples, they had a corpus of beliefs based on their own myths and rituals, which were narrated and updated by the shamans who also practiced medicine with the help of the spirits invoked in themselves.

The Tehuelche people believed in diverse Earth spirits, along with a supreme deity who created the world but does not intervene in it. One of the cosmological versions of the creation myth is one in which the deity, known as Kóoch, brought order to the world's chaos, creating distinct elements. Similarly, the Selk'nam people from Tierra del Fuego in Argentina, narrated a similar myth where the world creator, a deity known as Kénos' (a variant of Kóoch through a common root). According to this, a certain El Lal was sent. Also, within Tehuelche myth, through the god Temauckel, Erral created humans and taught them how to use bows and arrows. The Tehuelche culture embraced the presence of evil spirits called guarichos. Gualicho.

History

Pre-Columbian period

The ancestors of the Tehuelche are probably responsible for the creation of the rock art of Cueva de las Manos, created from about 13,000 to 9,000 years ago up until around 700 A.D.[24] [25] Six thousand years ago the Toldense industry emerged, consisting primarily of goods such as two-sided sub-triangular projectile points, lateral and terminal scrapers, bifacial knives and tools made from bone. Later, between 7000 and 4000 B.C., the Casapedrense industry appeared, characterized by a greater proportion of stone tools made in sheets, which was most likely a demonstration of a specialization in guanaco hunting,[26] which is also present in the subsequent cultural developments of the Tehuelche people.

From this time and until the European arrival (early 16th century) the Tehuelche people were hunter-gatherers who utilized seasonal mobility, moving towards guanaco herds. During the winter they were in the low areas (meadows, wetlands, shores, lake shores, etc.), and during the summer they moved up to the central plateaus of Patagonia or to the Andes mountains where they had, among other sacred sites, Mount Fitz Roy.

Spanish arrival

On 31 March 1520 the Spanish expedition, under the command of Fernando de Magallanes, landed in San Julián Bay to spend the winter there. Here, they made contact with Tehuelche indigenous groups, who they referred to as "Patagones", as told by the scribe, Antonio Pigafetta. Pigaffetta described these people as a mythical tribe of Patagonian giants.[27]

Prior to meeting the Tehuelche groups in person, the explorers had been amazed by the size of their footprints. Enlarged by the animal furs they used as footwear, their feet appeared much larger than those of the Europeans at the time. During the 16th century, the average male height of Europeans at around [28] would have been shorter than the Patagonian men whose height reportedly averaged above 2m (07feet) by some accounts and around 183cm (72inches) by other accounts.[29] Thus the Europeans may have considered them to be "Patones" ('large footed') or the Patagonians may have reminded the explorers of the giant Pathoagón from the knighthood novel Primaleón. The Patagonians' large craniometry made them famous in European literature from the 16th to the 19th centuries due to their large stature and physical strength.

Influence from the Mapuches

Since the 18th century, there was important commercial activity and product exchanges among the native inhabitants of the Pampas plains and the Sierras of the current Buenos Aires Province, the inhabitants of Northern Patagonia, and those of both edges of the Andes. There were two very important trade fairs in Cayrú and Chapaleofú. These trade fairs, called "Poncho fairs" by the Jesuits at the time who recorded their existence (such as Thomas Falkner), were places for the exchange of various types of products: from livestock and agricultural products to garments, such as ponchos. Cayrú was located in the most western part of the Tandilia system (in the current territory of the Olavarría Partido). Chapaleofú refers to the homonymic water stream vicinity, situated in the current Tandil Partido.[30] Both municipalities, or partidos, are located in the interior of the current Buenos Aires Province. The movements of people to participate in the exchanging of products generated certain cultural exchanges between different groups living anywhere from the humid Pampas, the northern Patagonia, the immediate area near the Andes (both on its western and eastern edges), to the coast of the Pacific Ocean. This was the start of cultural exchanges and migratory movements, between distinct groups such as the Tehuelche, Ranquel and Mapuche people.[31]

Although Mapuche trade started as a means of fostering commerce and alliances, it was completed by generating a large cultural influence on the Tehuelche and other groups, to the point that it is referred to as the "Mapuchization" or "Araucanization of Patagonia". A large portion of the Tehuelche and Ranquel peoples adopted many of the Mapuche customs and their language, while the Mapuches adopted parts of the Tehuelche way of life (such as living in tolderías) and thereby, the differences between the two groups were blurred to the point that their descendants refer to themselves as Mapuche-Tehuelche people.[32]

During the first half of the 18th century, Chief Cacapol and his son, Chief Cangapol, were the most important chiefs in the regions extending from the Andes Mountains to the Atlantic Oceans, and from the Río Negro to the Salado River. Cangapol had a seat in the government in the Sierra de la Ventana region, and their people were known as the "Mountain Pampas". The Pampas knew how to align themselves with the Mapuches from the west, to attack the Buenos Aires Campaign in 1740.

In this process there were also inter-ethnic struggles and by 1820 heavy combat erupted between the Patagones and Pehuenches on the banks of the Senguerr River; other combat occurred at Barrancas Blancas and Shótel Káike. By 1828, the Pincheira Royalist army attacked the Tehuelche group in the Bahía Blanca and Carmen de Patagones area.

The Tehuelche people south of the Río Negro had a female chief: María la Grande. Her successor, Casimiro Biguá, was the first Tehuelche chief to make treaties with the Argentine government. His sons, Chiefs Papón and Mulato, ended up on a reserve in southern Chile.

The Tehuelche people had to live with Welsh immigrants who, since the second half of the 19th century, began to settle in Chubut: the relations were generally harmonious between the two groups. In 1869, Chief Biguá recognized the need to defend the Welsh against a potential attack from Chief Calfucurá.

Little information is known about Tehuelche culture before the use of the horse, although their socioeconomic organization resembled that of the Ona people from Tierra del Fuego. The introduction of the horse by the Spaniards, which they became acquainted with as of 1570, transformed the social organization of Tehuelche people: the introduction caused groups to develop dependencies on horses in their daily lives. Like the indigenous groups in the North American Great Plains, the Tehuelche also worked the thicket steppes of Patagonia, living mainly off of guanaco and rhea meat (ñandú or choique), followed by South Andean deer, deer, Patagonian mara and even puma and jaguar meat, in addition to certain plants (although late, they learned how to cultivate the land). As for fish and shellfish, there were certain cases where their consumption was banned: for example, some groups had prohibited the consumption of fish. Their groups used to consist of between 50 and 100 members.The adoption of the horse meant an extensive social change in Tehuelche culture: the new mobility altered their ancestral territories and greatly affected their movement patterns. Before the 17th century east–west movements prevailed in pursuit of guanacos; however, as of the dawn of the equestrian complex, longitudinal movements (from south to north and vice versa) were very important in establishing extensive exchange networks. In the mid-19th century the Aonikenk exchanged their skins and mollusks for cholilas (strawberries, blackberries, raspberries, Magellan barberry, Chilean pine tree seeds, Cyttaria, buds and Chilean bamboo buds, etc.) and apples with the Gennakenk people of Neuquén, the upper valley of Río Negro and the so-called 'country of Strawberries', or Chulilaw (the region approximately bounded to the north by Lake Nahuel Huapi, to the east by the low mountains and morraines called Patagónides, to the west by the high summits of the Andes and to the south by Lake Buenos Aires/General Carrera).The horse, or more precisely, the mare, became a principle part of the Tehuelche diet, leaving guanacos in second place. The Selk'nam from Tierra del Fuego did not develop a comparable dependency on horses.

Relations with Welsh settlers

Welsh settlers arrived in the Tehuelche lands of the lower Chubut Valley in 1865. Relations were mostly amicable and have been described as mutual feelings of "trust and admiration". Paternalistic attitudes toward the Tehuelche were common among the Welsh. There was a widespread critical view of the Argentine militaries' treatment of the Tehuelche and of traders who provided Tehuelches with alcohol and weaponry. Tehuelches were reportedly seen as uncivilized, savage and childlike by the Welsh.

Abduction and forced exhibition

As early as the second half of the 19th century, Tehuelche groups were abducted and displayed against their will in countries such as Belgium, Switzerland, (Germany), France and England. More specific data shows that a chief known as Pitioche and his wife and child were captured. Reports of these shocking facts form part of Christian Báez and Peter Mason's book Spanish; Castilian: Zoológicos humanos[33] (Human Zoos).

Anthropologist Robert Lehmann-Nitsche was also criticized for having studied members of the Tehuelche people who had been abducted and were exhibited in circuses.[34]

Reservations in Santa Cruz

By decree of President José Evaristo Uriburu on 11 January 1898, the Camusu Aike reservation was created for the "gathering of Tehuelche tribes". The reservation is located in the Santa Cruz Province of Argentina.[35]

In 1922, President Hipólito Yrigoyen created the following reserves by decree: Lago Viedma (Lots 119–117) between 20000ha25000ha, Lago Cardiel (Lot 6) and Lago Cardiel (Lot 28 bis). The first two were stripped of their status in 1966 and the third in 1990.[36]

Notable Tehuelche people

Present-day status of the Tehuelche

According to the unfinished "National Indigenous Census" (1966–1968), there were only a few Tehuelche descendants that spoke the Tehuelche language. The population of Tehuelche descent that has remained the most attached to their culture is located in the central plateau of the Santa Cruz Province, although the population is intermixed with those of other descents. The census recorded that in Santa Cruz Province:[37]

There were also inter-mixed marriages in Tres Lagos, Puerto San Julián, Gobernador Gregores and Río Gallegos.

The "Complementary Survey of Indigenous peoples" (ECPI) 2004–2005, supplementary to the "2001 National Census of Population, Household and Housing," resulted in the recognition of 4351 people descended from the first generation of Tehuelche people in the Chubut and Santa Cruz Provinces. Another 1664 considered themselves Tehuelche within the city of Buenos Aires and the 24 partidos of Greater Buenos Aires; with 4575 in the rest of the country. In all of Argentina 10,590 people considered themselves Tehuelche.[38]

The 2010 National Population Census in Argentina revealed the existence of 27,813 people who considered themselves Tehuelche throughout the country, 7924 in the Chubut Province, 4570 in the interior of the Buenos Aires Province, 2615 in the Santa Cruz Province, 2269 in the Río Negro Province, 1702 in the city of Buenos Aires, 844 in the Mendoza Province, 738 in the Neuquén Province and 625 in the La Pampa Province.[39] [40] [41] [42] [43]

There are currently Tehuelche settlements in the Santa Cruz Province including:

There are some bilingual Aonekko 'a'ien speakers in these settlements; the rest speak Spanish.

There are two reservations located in the Chubut Province. El Chalía, the Manuel Quilchamal community, in the Río Senguer Department, located 60 km from the Doctor Ricardo Rojas village. El Chalía was created in 1916 with 60,000 ha, but today its area has been reduced to 32,000, with 80 residents.[44] Loma Redonda is a reservation located between Río Mayo and Alto Río Senguer, with 30 residents.[45] 17.65% of the people inhabiting these reservations are bilingual in Spanish and Mapudungun and the rest speak Spanish. The 1991 census only reported two elderly women with memory of the Aonek'o 'a'ien language.

Since 1995, the Instituto Nacional de Asuntos Indígenas (INAI), or National Institute for Indigenous Affairs, began recognizing the legal status of indigenous communities in Argentina through registration in the National Registry of Indigenous Communities (Renaci). Among these were 2 Tehuelche communities in the Santa Cruz Province and 4 Mapuche-Tehuelche communities in the Chubut, Río Negro, Buenos Aires and Santa Cruz Provinces:[46]

Santa Cruz Province (Tehuelche People)

Santa Cruz Province (Mapuche-Tehuelche People)

Chubut Province (Mapuche-Tehuelche People)

Río Negro Province (Tehuelche People)

Buenos Aires Province (Mapuche-Tehuelche People)

Mapuche-Tehuelche communities

In the Chubut Province, there are mixed communities of Mapuche and Tehuelche people, and they call themselves Mapuche-Tehuelche:

Four urban Mapuche-Tehuelche communities also exist in Santa Cruz: in Caleta Olivia (Fem Mapu), Gallegos River (Aitué), in Río Turbio (Willimapu) and in Puerto Santa Cruz (Millanahuel).[48]

The Cushamen indigenous reserve in the Cushamen Department in Chubut was created in 1889 to accommodate Chief Miguel Ñancuche Nahuelquir's tribe, who was removed from the Neuquén mountain area by the Conquest of the Desert. It comprises 1250 km2 and 400 Mapuches-Tehuelche families.[49]

In Chile

The Tehuelche group is nearly extinct in Chile. In 1905 they suffered a smallpox epidemic that killed Chief Mulato and other members of his settled tribe in the río Zurdo valley, near Punta Arenas. The survivors took refuge in Argentinian territory, possibly on the Cumusu Aike reserve.[50] Their memory is present in the name Villa Tehuelches, a Chilean town in the Laguna Blanca commune.

Notes

Bibliography

Further reading

Notes and References

  1. News: 8 March 2024 . INDEC . Censo 2022 . Census 2022 . Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos, República Argentina.
  2. Book: Informe de la comisión verdad histórica y nuevo trato 2003 . 2003 . Spanish . Los pueblos indígenas del extremo sur.
  3. Book: Boccara . Guillaume . Colonización, resistencia y mestizaje en las Américas (siglos XVI-XX) . 2002 . Abya-Yala . 277 . Quito . 9978222065 . es.
  4. Book: Álvarez . Antonio . Crónica de la Patagonia y tierras australes. Desde el descubrimiento hasta la colonización . 2000 . Zagier & Urruty Publications . Ushuaia . 9781879568747 . 1st . 7 June 2019 . es.
  5. Book: Casamiquela . Rodolfo . Mondelo . Osvaldo . Enrique . Perea . Martinic . Mateo . Del mito a la realidad. Evolución iconográfica del pueblo tehuelche meridional . 1991 . Fundación Ameghino . Buenos Aires . 9509986402 . 1 . es.
  6. Book: Fernández Garay . Ana . El Tehuelche. Una lengua en vías de extinción . 1990 . Universidad Austral de Chile . Valdivia . 9567105138 . es.
  7. Book: Falkner . Thomas . Pugh . C . A description of Patagonia, and the adjoining parts of South America . 1774 . 99 . https://archive.org/details/descriptionofpat01falk . 4.
  8. Book: Escalada . Federico A . El complejo "tehuelche": estudios de etnografía patagónica . 1949 . Instituto Superior de Estudios Patagónicos . Buenos Aires . 25 . es.
  9. Book: Cox . Guillermo Eloi . Viaje en las rejiones septentrionales de la Patagonia, 1862–1863 . 1863 . Santiago de Chile . Imprenta nacional . es.
  10. Book: Hunziker . Johann Friedrich . Outes . Felix F. . Vocabulario y fraseario genakenn (puelche) . 1928 . Coni . Buenos Aires . es.
  11. Book: Harrington . Tomas . Nombres indios y galeses de la toponimia patagónica . 1941 . Consejo Nacional de Educación . Buenos Aires . 24–29 . es.
  12. Book: Boccara . Guillaume . Colonización, resistencia y mestizaje en las Américas, siglos XVI–XX . 2002 . Abya-Yala . Quito . 9978222065 . 235–265 . es.
  13. Book: Milanesio . Doménico . Etimología araucana, idiomas comparados de la Patagonia; lecturas y frasario araucano . 1915 . Talleres Gráficos del Estado Mayor del Ejército . Buenos Aires . es.
  14. Lehmann-Nitsche . Roberto . El grupo lingüístico Het de la pampa argentina . Revista del Museo de La Plata . 1922 . 27 . 10–84 . Coni . Buenos Aires . es.
  15. Book: Fernandez Garay . Ana . Hernandez . Graciela . Origen y uso del fuego mito recogido entre los tehuelches araucanizados de la patagonia argentina . 1999 . Amerindia 24 . 73–85 . https://web.archive.org/web/20130603134652/http://celia.cnrs.fr/FichExt/Am/A_24_05.htm . 3 June 2013 . es.
  16. Book: Casamiquela . Rodolfo M. . Rectificaciones y ratificaciones hacia una interpretación definitiva del panorama etnológico de la Patagonia y área septentrional adyacente . 1965 . Universidad Nacional del Sur . Bahía Blanca . 1 . es.
  17. Lehmann-Nitsche . Robert . El grupo lingüístico Tshon de los territorios magallánicos . Revista del Museo de La Plata . 22 . 1913 . es.
  18. Lehmann-Nitsche . Robert . El grupo lingüístico 'Het' de la pampa Argentina . Revista del Museo de La Plata . 27 . 1922 . es.
  19. Book: Viegas Barros . Pedro J. . Voces en el viento: Raíces lingüísticas de la Patagonia . Colección El Suri . 2005 . Ediciones Mondragon . Buenos Aires . 9871163045.
  20. Web site: Wenai sh e pekk groupe. kketo sh m 'ekot – lengua tehuelche. kketoshmekot.org. 7 June 2019.
  21. La frase nominal en gününa iajëch . Orden . María Emilia . 2008 . CONICET . XI Congreso de la Sociedad Argentina de Lingüística en la Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Universidad Nacional del Litoral: Coloquio Lenguas Indígenas sudamericanas: aspectos morfosintácticos y léxicos . 1–12 . Santa Fe . https://web.archive.org/web/20120121170855/http://www.lenguas.unc.edu.ar/aledar/hosted/xicongreso/simposio_y_coloquio/lenguas_indigenas/orden.pdf . 21 January 2012 . XI Congreso de la Sociedad Argentina de Lingüística.
  22. Web site: Argentina: Historiador Rodolfo Casamiquela : 'Los mapuches son chilenos... no tienen derecho sobre la tierra'. Argentina: Historian Rodolfo Casamiquela : "The Mapuches are Chilean... they have no right to the land". 2007. BWN Patagonia. es. https://web.archive.org/web/20101215134657/http://www.bolsonweb.com.ar/diariobolson/detalle.php?id_noticia=5535. 15 December 2010. 7 June 2019.
  23. Book: Martinic . Mateo . Los Aonikenk, Historia y Cultura . 1995 . Impresos VANIC Ltda . Punto Arenas . 9567189056 . 1st . 7 June 2019.
  24. https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/936 "Cueva de las Manos, Río Pinturas"
  25. Book: Art & Place: Site-Specific Art of the Americas.. 2013. Phaidon Press. Editorial Director: Amanda Renshaw; text and expertise provided by Daniel Arsenault et al.. 978-0-7148-6551-5. London. 354–355. 865298990.
  26. Book: Sondereguer . Cesar . Amerindia. Introducción a la etnohistoria y las artes visuales precolombinas . 1999 . Editorial Corregidor . 9500511797 . es.
  27. Book: Pigafetta . Antonio . Skelton . R. A. . Magellan's Voyage: A Narrative Account of the First Circumnavigation . registration . 1969 . . New Haven & London . 0486280993.
  28. Web site: Men From Early Middle Ages Were Nearly As Tall As Modern People . . 2 September 2004 . Science Daily . Ohio State University . 25 May 2020 .
  29. Fantastically Wrong: Magellan's Strange Encounter With the 10-Foot Giants of Patagonia . Wired. 2020-12-03. 1059-1028.
  30. Book: Pedrotta . Victoria . Lanteri . Sol . La frontera sur de Buenos Aires en la larga duración, Una Perspectiva Multidisciplinar . 2015 . Archivo Histórico de la Provincia de Buenos Aires . La Plata . 1 . 7 June 2019.
  31. Pedrotta . Victoria . Reandando los caminos al Chapaleofu: viejas y nuevas hipótesis sobre las construcciones de piedra del sistema de Tandilia . Memoria Americana. Cuadernos de Etnohistoria . 2013 . 21 . 2 . 7 June 2019 . Buenos Aires . es.
  32. Web site: Reunión con las Comunidades Mapuche-Tehuelche de Chubut . Museo de la Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo . Museo de la Plata . 7 June 2019 . es.
  33. Book: Báez . Christian . Mason . Peter . Zoológicos humanos . 2000 . Pehuen . Santiago . 9561604124.
  34. Ballestero. Diego. 2013. Los espacios de la antropología en la obra de Robert Lehmann-Nitsche, 1894–1938. PhD. Universidad Nacional de La Plata.
  35. Web site: Comunidad Camusu Aike . Santa Cruz Gobierno de la Provincia . la Dirección General de Informática del Consejo Provincial de Educación . 7 June 2019.
  36. Rodríguez . Mariela Eva . Trayectorias de una recuperación en suspenso (ex Reserva Lago Viedma) . Avá. Revista de Antropologia . July 2009 . 14 . 7 June 2019 . es.
  37. Book: Fabre . Alain . Diccionario etnolingüístico y guía bibliográfica de los pueblos indígenas sudamericanos. CHON . 2005 . 7 June 2019.
  38. Web site: Instituto Nacional de Asuntos Indígenas (INAI) Información estadística . Ministerio de Desarrollo Social . 5 . es . National Institute for Indigenous Affairs (INAI) Statistical Information.
  39. Web site: Censo Nacional de Población, Hogares y Viviendas 2010, Capítulo 10 . Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos . 6 June 2019 . 281 . es . 2010 National Census of Population, Household and Housing, Chapter 10.
  40. Web site: Censo Nacional de Población, Hogares y Viviendas 2010: Censo del Bicentenario. Pueblos Originarios. Región Patagonia – 1a ed. . Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos (INDEC) . 7 June 2019 . es . 2010 National Census of Population, Household and Housing: Bicentennial Census. Native Peoples: Patagonia region-1a ed..
  41. Web site: Censo Nacional de Población, Hogares y Viviendas 2010: Censo del Bicentenario. Pueblos Originarios. Región Metropolitana – 1a ed. . Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos (INDEC) . 7 June 2019 . es . 2010 National Census of Population, Household and Housing: Bicentennial Census. Native Peoples: Metropolitan region-1a ed..
  42. Web site: Censo Nacional de Población, Hogares y Viviendas 2010: Censo del Bicentenario. Pueblos Originarios. Región Cuyo – 1a ed. . Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos (INDEC) . 7 June 2019 . es . 2010 National Census of Population, Household and Housing: Bicentennial Census. Native Peoples: Cuyo region-1a ed..
  43. Web site: Censo Nacional de Población, Hogares y Viviendas 2010: Censo del Bicentenario. Pueblos Originarios. Región Pampeana – 1a ed. . Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos (INDEC) . 7 June 2019 . es . 2010 National Census of Population, Household and Housing: Bicentennial Census. Native Peoples: Pampas region-1a ed..
  44. Web site: El Sindicato de Camioneros asistió a la comunidad tehuelche de El Chalía . Diario Jornada . 7 June 2019 . es . 24 March 2014.
  45. Web site: Aborígenes en la Patagonia Argentina . Patagonia Express . PatagoniaExpress . 7 June 2019 . es . 2019.
  46. Web site: Instituto Nacional de Asuntos Indigenas. Resolución Nº 115/2012 . InfoLEG . Ministerio de Justicia y Derechos Humanos Presidencia de la Nación . 7 June 2019 . es . 2012.
  47. Web site: Instituto Nacional de Asuntos Indigenas. Resolución Nº 116/2014 . InfoLEG . Ministerio de Justicia y Derechos Humanos Presidencia de la Nación . 7 June 2019 . es . 25 March 2014.
  48. De 'reservas' a comunidades: Procesos de visibilización de los pueblos originarios en la provincia de Santa Cruz (Argentina) . es . Rodríguez . Mariela Eva . 2009 . Universidad Nacional San Martín . Indigenismos y Políticas indigenistas en las Américas para un análisis comparativo de las relaciones entre Pueblos Indígenas y Estados en los siglos XX y XXI . Buenos Aires . https://web.archive.org/web/20111230032124/http://www.ram2009.unsam.edu.ar/GT/GT%2012%20%E2%80%93%20Indigenismos%20e%20Pol%C3%ADticas%20Indigenistas%20nas%20Am%C3%A9ricas/GT12%20-%20Ponencia%20%5BRodriguez%5D.pdf . 30 December 2011 . VIII Reunión de Antropología del MERCOSUR (RAM).
  49. Web site: Los Pueblos de Chubut . Honorable Legislatura Provincia del Chubut . Honorable Legislatura del Chubut.
  50. Web site: Pueblos Originarios. Tehuelche . Chile precolombino . Museo Chileno de Arte Precolombino . 7 June 2019 . es.