Surmic languages explained

Surmic
Region:southwestern Ethiopia and southeastern South Sudan
Familycolor:Nilo-Saharan
Fam2:Eastern Sudanic?
Fam3:Southern Eastern?
Protoname:Proto-Surmic
Glotto:surm1244
Glottorefname:Surmic

The Surmic languages are a branch of the Eastern Sudanic language family.

Today, the various peoples who speak Surmic languages make their living in a variety of ways, including nomadic herders, settled farmers, and slash and burn farmers. They live in a variety of terrain, from the lowlands of South Sudan and the banks of the Omo River to mountains over 2,300 meters.

Languages

According to the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, the Surmic languages are classified as follows:[1]

The Surmic languages are found in southwest Ethiopia and adjoining parts of southeast South Sudan. In the past, Surmic had been known as “Didinga-Murle” and “Surma”. The former name was too narrow by referring only to two closely related languages and the latter was a label also used to refer to a specific language (Unseth 1997b), so the label “Surmic” is now used. The relationships in the chart above are based on Fleming's work (1983).

Previous studies

Much foundational fieldwork and analysis of Surmic languages was done by Harold C. Fleming and M. L. Bender. The most complete descriptions of Ethiopian Surmic languages are of Murle (Arensen 1982) and Tirma (Bryant 1999). All Surmic languages are presumed to be tonal, have implosive consonants, and have distinctive vowel length. Some have as many as nine vowel qualities, and more detailed study may confirm this in other Surmic languages, also. Me'en and Kwegu (also spelled Koegu) have sets of ejective consonants.

The languages share a system of marking the number of both the possessed and the possessor in possessive pronouns (Unseth 1991). Number of nominals is typically marked on a number of morphemes, with t/k marking singular and plural (Bryan 1959). Adjectives are formed by stative relative clauses.

Majangir (also called Majang) and Southwest Surmic languages (Fleming 1983) share a number of traits, so they are therefore presumably reconstructable in Proto-Surmic: relative clauses (which include adjectives), demonstratives, adverbs, numerals, genitives, and possessive pronouns follow their heads, noun derivations and subject marking on verbs are marked by suffixes, VSO (verb–subject–object) order predominates in indicative main clauses. Some typologically exceptional points are discussed by Arensen, et al. (1997). However, Dimmendaal’s introduction proposes a different analysis (1998).

All Surmic languages have been documented as having case suffixes (Unseth 1989). None of them have a marked accusative, but at least Majang and Murle sometimes mark nominatives, part of a broader areal pattern (König 2006).

The original geographic home of the Surmic peoples is thought to be in Southwestern Ethiopia, somewhere near Maji, with the various groups dispersing from there: for example, the Majangir having moved north, the Murle having migrated clockwise around Lake Turkana (Arensen 1983:56-61, Tornay 1981), and the Mursi having moved into and out of the Omo River valley. Ethnolinguistic identities within the Surmic group have not been rigid, with ample evidence of people’s identities shifting from one ethnolinguistic group to another (Tornay 1981, Turton 1979, Unseth and Abbink 1998).

Abbink has published a pioneering work comparing the vocabulary and systems of kinship among Surmic languages, particularly from the South West node of Surmic (Abbink 2006).

The starting point for linguistic and anthropological research into Surmic studies is the book edited by Dimmendaal (1998), especially the bibliography article (Abbink and Unseth 1998).

Reconstruction

The sound systems of Proto-Southwest Surmic and Proto-Southeast Surmic have been reconstructed by Yigezu (2001).[2] Unseth has proposed a reconstruction of the case suffixes for Proto-Surmic.[3] Unseth has reconstructed the system of marking possession for Proto-Surmic.[4] Unseth has also reconstructed a causative prefix for Proto-Surmic.[5] [6]

Numerals

Comparison of numerals in individual languages:[7] One of the shared innovations that separates Southeast Surmic languages from the rest of Surmic is that they have a base 10 system, rather than building to 10 from 5, such as five-plus-one, etc.[8]

Classification Language 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
North, Majang Majang (1) òmóŋ, òm pɛ́ɛ́jǃ * ɟíítǃ àŋàn tùùl tùùl à òm (5 + 1) tùùl à pɛ́ɛ́jǃ (5 +2) tùùl à ɟíítǃ (5 + 3) tùùl à àŋàn (5 + 4) áárŋǃ
North, Majang Majang (2) oˈmʊŋ pʰɛɛj d͡ʒiitʰ ˈaŋan tʰuul tʰuula ʔom (5 + 1) tʰuula pʰɛɛj (5 +2) tʰuula d͡ʒiitʰ (5 + 3) tʰuula aŋan (5 + 4) ˈaarin
South, Southeast, Kwegu Kwegu (Koegu) (1) kíum ɗáa jien áhur cuu la (borrowed from Kara) tsʼoba (borrowed from Kara) lunkáí (borrowed from Kara) sal (borrowed from Kara) tómon
South, Southeast, Kwegu Kwegu (2) kium ɗaa jien ahur cuu la tsʼoba lunkai sal tomon
South, Southeast, Pastoral, Me’en kɔ̂náŋ ramáŋ sizzí wut͡ʃ hat͡ʃʼánáŋ illè issabò isset sáal tɔ̂mmɔn
South, Southeast, Pastoral, Suri Mursi (1) ɗɔ́nɛ́j ràmàn sízzí wùʃ háánán íllɛ́ íssábài / also ~issábaj íssé / also ~ísséj sákkàl tɔ́mmɔ́n (maybe borrowed)
South, Southeast, Pastoral, Suri Mursi (2) ɗɔ́nɛ́j raman sízzi wuʃ háánán illɛ isaabaj isse sakal tɔmɔn
South, Southeast, Pastoral, Suri ɗɔ́nɛ ràmmán sízzì wùʃ / wùy háyɛ́ná ìllɛ̀y ìsàbbày ìssèy sàkkàl tɔ̀mɔ̀n
South, Southwest, Didinga-Murle, Didinga-Longarim xɔ̀ɗɛ́ɪ ràmːá ìyyó ʊ̀wwétʃ t̺úɾ t̪ɔ̀ɾkɔ̀nɔ́n (5+ 1) t̪ʊ́ɾkɪ́ɾámːá (5+ 2) t̪úɾkɪ́yyó (5+ 3) t̪ʊ́ɾkʊ́wwétʃ (5+ 4) ɔmɔt̪ɔ
South, Southwest, Didinga-Murle, Didinga-Longarim odoi, codoi ramma iyyio wẽẽc tur torkonom (5+ 1) turɡerem (5+ 2) turɡi (5+ 3) torkõwõc (5+ 4) õmmõtõ
South, Southwest, Didinga-Murle, Murle codoi / aˈdoi rǎm iːˈyǔ oic /wec tǔːɾ tɔrkɔnǒm (5+ 1) turɡɛrɛ́m (5+ 2) turɡɛ (5+ 3) torkɔc (5+ 4) amɔ̌tɔ
South, Southwest, Didinga-Murle, Tennet tʃɔ́ɗɛ̂ rámːá íjó wétʃ túɾ̥ tɔ̀ɾ̥kónóm (5+ 1) tóɾ̥ɡéɾém (5+ 2) túɾɡè (5+ 3) tóɾ̥kôtʃ (5+ 4) òmòtò
South, Southwest, Kacipo-Balesi Kacipo-Balesi (1) óɗè rámmá íyó wèhé tűr tɔ̀rkɔ̀nɔ́ tʉ̀rɡɛ̀rɛ́ tùrɡè tɔ́rɡɔ̀ɡɔ̀ ɔ̀mɔ̀ðɔ̀
South, Southwest, Kacipo-Balesi Kacipo-Balesi (2) óóɗē rámmá íyyó wé ̀ túr tɔ̄rkɔ́hɔ̄ (5+ 1) tʊ̄rɡɛ́rɛ̄ (5+ 2) tūrɡē (5+ 3) tɔ̀rɡɔ́ɡɔ̄ (5+ 4) ɔ̄mɔ̄ðɔ́

See also

Relevant literature

Notes and References

  1. Web site: Glottolog 4.8 - Surmic . 2023-07-10 . 2023-11-07 . . Hammarström . Harald . https://web.archive.org/web/20231108012740/https://glottolog.org/resource/languoid/id/surm1244 . 2023-11-08 . live . . Harald Hammarström . Forkel . Robert . . 10.5281/zenodo.7398962 . Haspelmath . Martin . Martin Haspelmath . Bank . Sebastian . free.
  2. Yigezu, Moges. 2001. A comparative study of the phonetics and phonology of Surmic languages. Bruxelles: Univ. libre de Bruxelles. Doctoral dissertation, University of Bruxelles.
  3. Unseth, Peter. 1989. "An Initial Comparison and Reconstruction of Case Suffixes in Surmic Languages," Journal of Ethiopian Studies 22:97–104.
  4. Unseth, Peter. 1991. "Possessive Markers in Surmic Languages," Proceedings of the 4th Nilo-Saharan Linguistics Colloquium, ed. by M. L. Bender, pp. 91–104. (Nilo-Saharan: Linguistic Analyses and Documentation, vol. 7.) Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag.
  5. Unseth, Peter. 1997a. "An Archaic Surmic Causative Prefix," Occasional Papers in the Study of Sudanese Languages 7:41–48
  6. Unseth, Peter. 1998. "Two Old Causative Affixes in Surmic," Surmic Languages and Cultures, ed. by Gerrit Dimmendaal, pp. 113–126. Cologne: Köppe.
  7. Web site: The Nilo-Saharan Language Phylum. Chan. Eugene. Numeral Systems of the World's Languages. 2019.
  8. p. 54. Unseth, Peter. 1988. "The Validity and Unity of the Southeast Surma Language Grouping," Northeast African Studies 10.2/3:151–163.