Cosmic microwave background explained

The cosmic microwave background (CMB or CMBR) is microwave radiation that fills all space in the observable universe. It is sometimes called relic radiation. With a standard optical telescope, the background space between stars and galaxies is almost completely dark. However, a sufficiently sensitive radio telescope detects a faint background glow that is almost uniform and is not associated with any star, galaxy, or other object. This glow is strongest in the microwave region of the radio spectrum. The accidental discovery of the CMB in 1965 by American radio astronomers Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson was the culmination of work initiated in the 1940s.

The CMB is landmark evidence of the Big Bang theory for the origin of the universe. In the Big Bang cosmological models, during the earliest periods, the universe was filled with an opaque fog of dense, hot plasma of sub-atomic particles. As the universe expanded, this plasma cooled to the point where protons and electrons combined to form neutral atoms of mostly hydrogen. Unlike the plasma, these atoms could not scatter thermal radiation by Thomson scattering, and so the universe became transparent. Known as the recombination epoch, this decoupling event released photons to travel freely through space. However, the photons have grown less energetic due to the cosmological redshift associated with the expansion of the universe. The surface of last scattering refers to a shell at the right distance in space so photons are now received that were originally emitted at the time of decoupling.

The CMB is not completely smooth and uniform, showing a faint anisotropy that can be mapped by sensitive detectors. Ground and space-based experiments such as COBE, WMAP and Planck have been used to measure these temperature inhomogeneities. The anisotropy structure is determined by various interactions of matter and photons up to the point of decoupling, which results in a characteristic lumpy pattern that varies with angular scale. The distribution of the anisotropy across the sky has frequency components that can be represented by a power spectrum displaying a sequence of peaks and valleys. The peak values of this spectrum hold important information about the physical properties of the early universe: the first peak determines the overall curvature of the universe, while the second and third peak detail the density of normal matter and so-called dark matter, respectively. Extracting fine details from the CMB data can be challenging, since the emission has undergone modification by foreground features such as galaxy clusters.

Features

The cosmic microwave background radiation is an emission of uniform black body thermal energy coming from all directions. Intensity of the CMB is expressed in kelvin (K), the SI unit of temperature. The CMB has a thermal black body spectrum at a temperature of .[1] Variations in intensity are expressed as variations in temperature. The blackbody temperature uniquely characterizes the intensity of the radiation at all wavelengths; a measured brightness temperature at any wavelength can be converted to a blackbody temperature.

The radiation is remarkably uniform across the sky, very unlike the almost point-like structure of stars or clumps of stars in galaxies.[2] The radiation is isotropic to roughly one part in 25,000: the root mean square variations are just over 100 μK, after subtracting out a dipole anisotropy from the Doppler shift of the background radiation. The latter is caused by the peculiar velocity of the Sun relative to the comoving cosmic rest frame as it moves at 369.82 ± 0.11 km/s towards the constellation Crater near its boundary with the constellation Leo The CMB dipole and aberration at higher multipoles have been measured, consistent with galactic motion.Despite the very small degree of anisotropy in the CMB, many aspects can be measured with high precision and such measurements are critical for cosmological theories.[2]

In addition to temperature anisotropy, the CMB should have an angular variation in polarization. The polarization at each direction in the sky has an orientation described in terms of E-mode and B-mode polarization. The E-mode signal is a factor of 10 less strong than the temperature anisotropy; it supplements the temperature data as they are correlated. The B-mode signal is even weaker but may contain additional cosmological data.[2]

The anisotropy is related to physical origin of the polarization. Excitation of an electron by linear polarized light generates polarized light at 90 degrees to the incident direction. If the incoming radiation is isotropic, different incoming directions create polarizations that cancel out. If the incoming radiation has quadrupole anisotropy, residual polarization will be seen.[3]

Other than the temperature and polarization anisotropy, the CMB frequency spectrum is expected to feature tiny departures from the black-body law known as spectral distortions. These are also at the focus of an active research effort with the hope of a first measurement within the forthcoming decades, as they contain a wealth of information about the primordial universe and the formation of structures at late time.[4]

The CMB contains the vast majority of photons in the universe by a factor of 400 to 1;[5] the number density of photons in the CMB is one billion times (109) the number density of matter in the universe. Without the expansion of the universe to cause the cooling of the CMB, the night sky would shine as brightly as the Sun.[6] The energy density of the CMB is 0.26eV/cm3, about 411 photons/cm3.[7]

History

Early speculations

In 1931, Georges Lemaître speculated that remnants of the early universe may be observable as radiation, but his candidate was cosmic rays. Richard C. Tolman showed in 1934 that expansion of the universe would cool blackbody radiation while maintaining a thermal spectrum.The cosmic microwave background was first predicted in 1948 by Ralph Alpher and Robert Herman, in a correction[8] they prepared for a paper by Alpher's PhD advisor George Gamow.[9] Alpher and Herman were able to estimate the temperature of the cosmic microwave background to be 5 K.[10]

Discovery

See also: Discovery of cosmic microwave background radiation.

The first published recognition of the CMB radiation as a detectable phenomenon appeared in a brief paper by Soviet astrophysicists A. G. Doroshkevich and Igor Novikov, in the spring of 1964.[11] In 1964, David Todd Wilkinson and Peter Roll, Dicke's colleagues at Princeton University, began constructing a Dicke radiometer to measure the cosmic microwave background.[12] In 1964, Arno Penzias and Robert Woodrow Wilson at the Crawford Hill location of Bell Telephone Laboratories in nearby Holmdel Township, New Jersey had built a Dicke radiometer that they intended to use for radio astronomy and satellite communication experiments. The antenna was constructed in 1959 to support Project Echo—the National Aeronautics and Space Administration's passive communications satellites, which used large earth orbiting aluminized plastic balloons as reflectors to bounce radio signals from one point on the Earth to another.[13] On 20 May 1964 they made their first measurement clearly showing the presence of the microwave background,[14] with their instrument having an excess 4.2K antenna temperature which they could not account for. After receiving a telephone call from Crawford Hill, Dicke said "Boys, we've been scooped."[15] [16] A meeting between the Princeton and Crawford Hill groups determined that the antenna temperature was indeed due to the microwave background. Penzias and Wilson received the 1978 Nobel Prize in Physics for their discovery.[17]

Cosmic origin

The interpretation of the cosmic microwave background was a controversial issue in the late 1960s. Alternative explanations included energy from within the solar system, from galaxies, from intergalactic plasma, from multiple extragalactic radio sources. Two requirements would show that the microwave radiation was truly "cosmic". First the intensity vs frequency or spectrum needed to be shown to match a thermal or blackbody source. This was accomplished by 1968 in a series of measurements of the radiation temperature at higher and lower wavelengths. Second the radiation needed be shown to be isotropic, the same from all directions. This was also accomplished by 1970, demonstrating that this radiation was truly cosmic in origin.[18]

Progress on theory

In the 1970s numerous studies showed that tiny deviations from isotropy in the CMB could result from events in the early universe.[18] Harrison,[19] Peebles and Yu,[20] and Zel'dovich[21] realized that the early universe would require quantum inhomogeneities that would result in temperature anisotropy at the level of 10−4 or 10−5.[18] Rashid Sunyaev, using the alternative name relic radiation, calculated the observable imprint that these inhomogeneities would have on the cosmic microwave background.[22]

COBE

After a lull in the 1970s caused in part by the many experimental difficulties in measuring CMB at high precision,[18] increasingly stringent limits on the anisotropy of the cosmic microwave background were set by ground-based experiments during the 1980s. RELIKT-1, a Soviet cosmic microwave background anisotropy experiment on board the Prognoz 9 satellite (launched 1 July 1983), gave the first upper limits on the large-scale anisotropy.[18]

The other key event in the 1980s was the proposal by Alan Guth for cosmic inflation. This theory of rapid spatial expansion gave an explanation for large-scale isotropy by allowing causal connection just before the epoch of last scattering.[18] With this and similar theories, detailed prediction encouraged larger and more ambitious experiments.

The NASA Cosmic Background Explorer (COBE) satellite orbited Earth in 1989–1996 detected and quantified the large scale anisotropies at the limit of its detection capabilities.The NASA COBE mission clearly confirmed the primary anisotropy with the Differential Microwave Radiometer instrument, publishing their findings in 1992.[23] [24] The team received the Nobel Prize in physics for 2006 for this discovery.

Precision cosmology

Inspired by the COBE results, a series of ground and balloon-based experiments measured cosmic microwave background anisotropies on smaller angular scales over the two decades. The sensitivity of the new experiments improved dramatically, with a reduction in internal noise by three orders of magnitude.[25] The primary goal of these experiments was to measure the scale of the first acoustic peak, which COBE did not have sufficient resolution to resolve. This peak corresponds to large scale density variations in the early universe that are created by gravitational instabilities, resulting in acoustical oscillations in the plasma.[26] The first peak in the anisotropy was tentatively detected by the MAT/TOCO experiment[27] and the result was confirmed by the BOOMERanG[28] and MAXIMA experiments.[29] These measurements demonstrated that the geometry of the universe is approximately flat, rather than curved.[30] They ruled out cosmic strings as a major component of cosmic structure formation and suggested cosmic inflation was the right theory of structure formation.[31]

Observations after COBE

See main article: List of cosmic microwave background experiments. Inspired by the initial COBE results of an extremely isotropic and homogeneous background, a series of ground- and balloon-based experiments quantified CMB anisotropies on smaller angular scales over the next decade. The primary goal of these experiments was to measure the angular scale of the first acoustic peak, for which COBE did not have sufficient resolution. These measurements were able to rule out cosmic strings as the leading theory of cosmic structure formation, and suggested cosmic inflation was the right theory.

During the 1990s, the first peak was measured with increasing sensitivity and by 2000 the BOOMERanG experiment reported that the highest power fluctuations occur at scales of approximately one degree. Together with other cosmological data, these results implied that the geometry of the universe is flat. A number of ground-based interferometers provided measurements of the fluctuations with higher accuracy over the next three years, including the Very Small Array, Degree Angular Scale Interferometer (DASI), and the Cosmic Background Imager (CBI). DASI made the first detection of the polarization of the CMB and the CBI provided the first E-mode polarization spectrum with compelling evidence that it is out of phase with the T-mode spectrum.

Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe

See main article: Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe. In June 2001, NASA launched a second CMB space mission, WMAP, to make much more precise measurements of the large scale anisotropies over the full sky. WMAP used symmetric, rapid-multi-modulated scanning, rapid switching radiometers at five frequencies to minimize non-sky signal noise. The data from the mission was released in five installments, the last being the nine year summary.The results are broadly consistent Lambda CDM models based on 6 free parameters and fitting in to Big Bang cosmology with cosmic inflation.[32]

Planck Surveyor

See main article: Planck Surveyor. A third space mission, the ESA (European Space Agency) Planck Surveyor, was launched in May 2009 and performed an even more detailed investigation until it was shut down in October 2013. Planck employed both HEMT radiometers and bolometer technology and measured the CMB at a smaller scale than WMAP. Its detectors were trialled in the Antarctic Viper telescope as ACBAR (Arcminute Cosmology Bolometer Array Receiver) experiment—which has produced the most precise measurements at small angular scales to date—and in the Archeops balloon telescope.

On 21 March 2013, the European-led research team behind the Planck cosmology probe released the mission's all-sky map (565x318 jpeg, 3600x1800 jpeg) of the cosmic microwave background.[33] [34] The map suggests the universe is slightly older than researchers expected. According to the map, subtle fluctuations in temperature were imprinted on the deep sky when the cosmos was about years old. The imprint reflects ripples that arose as early, in the existence of the universe, as the first nonillionth (10-30) of a second. Apparently, these ripples gave rise to the present vast cosmic web of galaxy clusters and dark matter. Based on the 2013 data, the universe contains 4.9% ordinary matter, 26.8% dark matter and 68.3% dark energy. On 5 February 2015, new data was released by the Planck mission, according to which the age of the universe is billion years old and the Hubble constant was measured to be .[35]

South Pole Telescope

Theoretical models

The cosmic microwave background radiation and the cosmological redshift-distance relation are together regarded as the best available evidence for the Big Bang event. Measurements of the CMB have made the inflationary Big Bang model the Standard Cosmological Model.[36] The discovery of the CMB in the mid-1960s curtailed interest in alternatives such as the steady state theory.[37]

In the Big Bang model for the formation of the universe, inflationary cosmology predicts that after about 10−37 seconds[38] the nascent universe underwent exponential growth that smoothed out nearly all irregularities. The remaining irregularities were caused by quantum fluctuations in the inflaton field that caused the inflation event.[39] Long before the formation of stars and planets, the early universe was more compact, much hotter and, starting 10−6 seconds after the Big Bang, filled with a uniform glow from its white-hot fog of interacting plasma of photons, electrons, and baryons.

As the universe expanded, adiabatic cooling caused the energy density of the plasma to decrease until it became favorable for electrons to combine with protons, forming hydrogen atoms. This recombination event happened when the temperature was around 3000 K or when the universe was approximately 379,000 years old.[40] As photons did not interact with these electrically neutral atoms, the former began to travel freely through space, resulting in the decoupling of matter and radiation.[41]

The color temperature of the ensemble of decoupled photons has continued to diminish ever since; now down to,[1] it will continue to drop as the universe expands. The intensity of the radiation corresponds to black-body radiation at 2.726 K because red-shifted black-body radiation is just like black-body radiation at a lower temperature. According to the Big Bang model, the radiation from the sky we measure today comes from a spherical surface called the surface of last scattering. This represents the set of locations in space at which the decoupling event is estimated to have occurred[42] [43] and at a point in time such that the photons from that distance have just reached observers. Most of the radiation energy in the universe is in the cosmic microwave background,[44] making up a fraction of roughly of the total density of the universe.[45]

Two of the greatest successes of the Big Bang theory are its prediction of the almost perfect black body spectrum and its detailed prediction of the anisotropies in the cosmic microwave background. The CMB spectrum has become the most precisely measured black body spectrum in nature.[46]

Predictions based on the Big Bang model

In the late 1940s Alpher and Herman reasoned that if there was a Big Bang, the expansion of the universe would have stretched the high-energy radiation of the very early universe into the microwave region of the electromagnetic spectrum, and down to a temperature of about 5 K. They were slightly off with their estimate, but they had the right idea. They predicted the CMB. It took another 15 years for Penzias and Wilson to discover that the microwave background was actually there.

According to standard cosmology, the CMB gives a snapshot of the hot early universe at the point in time when the temperature dropped enough to allow electrons and protons to form hydrogen atoms. This event made the universe nearly transparent to radiation because light was no longer being scattered off free electrons.[47] When this occurred some 380,000 years after the Big Bang, the temperature of the universe was about 3,000 K. This corresponds to an ambient energy of about, which is much less than the ionization energy of hydrogen.[48] This epoch is generally known as the "time of last scattering" or the period of recombination or decoupling.[49]

Since decoupling, the color temperature of the background radiation has dropped by an average factor of 1,089 due to the expansion of the universe. As the universe expands, the CMB photons are redshifted, causing them to decrease in energy. The color temperature of this radiation stays inversely proportional to a parameter that describes the relative expansion of the universe over time, known as the scale length. The color temperature Tr of the CMB as a function of redshift, z, can be shown to be proportional to the color temperature of the CMB as observed in the present day (2.725 K or 0.2348 meV):[50]

Tr = 2.725 K × (1 + z)

The high degree of uniformity throughout the observable universe and its faint but measured anisotropy lend strong support for the Big Bang model in general and the ΛCDM ("Lambda Cold Dark Matter") model in particular. Moreover, the fluctuations are coherent on angular scales that are larger than the apparent cosmological horizon at recombination. Either such coherence is acausally fine-tuned, or cosmic inflation occurred.[51] [52]

Primary anisotropy

The anisotropy, or directional dependency, of the cosmic microwave background is divided into two types: primary anisotropy, due to effects that occur at the surface of last scattering and before; and secondary anisotropy, due to effects such as interactions of the background radiation with intervening hot gas or gravitational potentials, which occur between the last scattering surface and the observer.

The structure of the cosmic microwave background anisotropies is principally determined by two effects: acoustic oscillations and diffusion damping (also called collisionless damping or Silk damping). The acoustic oscillations arise because of a conflict in the photon–baryon plasma in the early universe. The pressure of the photons tends to erase anisotropies, whereas the gravitational attraction of the baryons, moving at speeds much slower than light, makes them tend to collapse to form overdensities. These two effects compete to create acoustic oscillations, which give the microwave background its characteristic peak structure. The peaks correspond, roughly, to resonances in which the photons decouple when a particular mode is at its peak amplitude.

The peaks contain interesting physical signatures. The angular scale of the first peak determines the curvature of the universe (but not the topology of the universe). The next peak—ratio of the odd peaks to the even peaks—determines the reduced baryon density.[53] The third peak can be used to get information about the dark-matter density.[54]

The locations of the peaks give important information about the nature of the primordial density perturbations. There are two fundamental types of density perturbations called adiabatic and isocurvature. A general density perturbation is a mixture of both, and different theories that purport to explain the primordial density perturbation spectrum predict different mixtures.

Adiabatic density perturbations:In an adiabatic density perturbation, the fractional additional number density of each type of particle (baryons, photons, etc.) is the same. That is, if at one place there is a 1% higher number density of baryons than average, then at that place there is a 1% higher number density of photons (and a 1% higher number density in neutrinos) than average. Cosmic inflation predicts that the primordial perturbations are adiabatic.
  • Isocurvature density perturbations:In an isocurvature density perturbation, the sum (over different types of particle) of the fractional additional densities is zero. That is, a perturbation where at some spot there is 1% more energy in baryons than average, 1% more energy in photons than average, and 2% energy in neutrinos than average, would be a pure isocurvature perturbation. Hypothetical cosmic strings would produce mostly isocurvature primordial perturbations.

    • The CMB spectrum can distinguish between these two because these two types of perturbations produce different peak locations. Isocurvature density perturbations produce a series of peaks whose angular scales (ℓ values of the peaks) are roughly in the ratio 1 : 3 : 5 : ..., while adiabatic density perturbations produce peaks whose locations are in the ratio 1 : 2 : 3 : ...[55] Observations are consistent with the primordial density perturbations being entirely adiabatic, providing key support for inflation, and ruling out many models of structure formation involving, for example, cosmic strings.

    Collisionless damping is caused by two effects, when the treatment of the primordial plasma as fluid begins to break down:

    These effects contribute about equally to the suppression of anisotropies at small scales and give rise to the characteristic exponential damping tail seen in the very small angular scale anisotropies.

    The depth of the LSS refers to the fact that the decoupling of the photons and baryons does not happen instantaneously, but instead requires an appreciable fraction of the age of the universe up to that era. One method of quantifying how long this process took uses the photon visibility function (PVF). This function is defined so that, denoting the PVF by P(t), the probability that a CMB photon last scattered between time t and is given by P(t)dt.

    The maximum of the PVF (the time when it is most likely that a given CMB photon last scattered) is known quite precisely. The first-year WMAP results put the time at which P(t) has a maximum as 372,000 years.[56] This is often taken as the "time" at which the CMB formed. However, to figure out how it took the photons and baryons to decouple, we need a measure of the width of the PVF. The WMAP team finds that the PVF is greater than half of its maximal value (the "full width at half maximum", or FWHM) over an interval of 115,000 years.[56] By this measure, decoupling took place over roughly 115,000 years, and thus when it was complete, the universe was roughly 487,000 years old.

    Late time anisotropy

    Since the CMB came into existence, it has apparently been modified by several subsequent physical processes, which are collectively referred to as late-time anisotropy, or secondary anisotropy. When the CMB photons became free to travel unimpeded, ordinary matter in the universe was mostly in the form of neutral hydrogen and helium atoms. However, observations of galaxies today seem to indicate that most of the volume of the intergalactic medium (IGM) consists of ionized material (since there are few absorption lines due to hydrogen atoms). This implies a period of reionization during which some of the material of the universe was broken into hydrogen ions.

    The CMB photons are scattered by free charges such as electrons that are not bound in atoms. In an ionized universe, such charged particles have been liberated from neutral atoms by ionizing (ultraviolet) radiation. Today these free charges are at sufficiently low density in most of the volume of the universe that they do not measurably affect the CMB. However, if the IGM was ionized at very early times when the universe was still denser, then there are two main effects on the CMB:

    1. Small scale anisotropies are erased. (Just as when looking at an object through fog, details of the object appear fuzzy.)
    2. The physics of how photons are scattered by free electrons (Thomson scattering) induces polarization anisotropies on large angular scales. This broad angle polarization is correlated with the broad angle temperature perturbation.

    Both of these effects have been observed by the WMAP spacecraft, providing evidence that the universe was ionized at very early times, at a redshift around 10. The detailed provenance of this early ionizing radiation is still a matter of scientific debate. It may have included starlight from the very first population of stars (population III stars), supernovae when these first stars reached the end of their lives, or the ionizing radiation produced by the accretion disks of massive black holes.

    The time following the emission of the cosmic microwave background—and before the observation of the first stars—is semi-humorously referred to by cosmologists as the Dark Age, and is a period which is under intense study by astronomers (see 21 centimeter radiation).

    Two other effects which occurred between reionization and our observations of the cosmic microwave background, and which appear to cause anisotropies, are the Sunyaev–Zeldovich effect, where a cloud of high-energy electrons scatters the radiation, transferring some of its energy to the CMB photons, and the Sachs–Wolfe effect, which causes photons from the Cosmic Microwave Background to be gravitationally redshifted or blueshifted due to changing gravitational fields.

    Alternative theories

    See main article: Non-standard cosmology. The standard cosmology that includes the Big Bang "enjoys considerable popularity among the practicing cosmologists"[57] However there are challenges to the standard big bang framework for explaining CMB data. In particular standard cosmology requires fine-tuning of some free parameters, with different values supported by different experimental data.[57] As an example of the fine-tuning issue, standard cosmology cannot predict the present temperature of the relic radiation,

    T0

    .[57] This value of

    T0

    is one of the best results of experimental cosmology and the steady state model can predict it.However, alternative models have their own set of problems and they have only made post-facto explanations of existing observations.[57] Nevertheless these alternatives have played an important historic role in providing ideas for and challenges to the standard explanation.[5]

    Polarization

    The cosmic microwave background is polarized at the level of a few microkelvin. There are two types of polarization, called E-mode (or gradient-mode) and B-mode (or curl mode). This is in analogy to electrostatics, in which the electric field (E-field) has a vanishing curl and the magnetic field (B-field) has a vanishing divergence.

    E-modes

    The E-modes arise from Thomson scattering in a heterogeneous plasma.[58] E-modes were first seen in 2002 by the Degree Angular Scale Interferometer (DASI).[59] [60]

    B-modes

    B-modes are expected to be an order of magnitude weaker than the E-modes. The former are not produced by standard scalar type perturbations, but are generated by gravitational waves during cosmic inflation shortly after the big bang.[61] [62] [63] However, gravitational lensing of the stronger E-modes can also produce B-mode polarization.[64] [65] Detecting the original B-modes signal requires analysis of the contamination caused by lensing of the relatively strong E-mode signal.[66]

    Primordial gravitational waves

    Models of "slow-roll" cosmic inflation in the early universe predicts primordial gravitational waves that would impact the polarisation of the cosmic microwave background, creating a specific pattern of B-mode polarization. Detection of this pattern would support the theory of inflation and their strength can confirm and exclude different models of inflation.[62] [67] Claims that this characteristic pattern of B-mode polarization had been measured by BICEP2 instrument were later attributed to cosmic dust due to new results of the Planck experiment.[68] [67]

    Gravitational lensing

    The second type of B-modes was discovered in 2013 using the South Pole Telescope with help from the Herschel Space Observatory.[69] In October 2014, a measurement of the B-mode polarization at 150 GHz was published by the POLARBEAR experiment. Compared to BICEP2, POLARBEAR focuses on a smaller patch of the sky and is less susceptible to dust effects. The team reported that POLARBEAR's measured B-mode polarization was of cosmological origin (and not just due to dust) at a 97.2% confidence level.

    Multipole analysis

    The CMB angular anisotropies are usually presented in terms of power per multipole.[70] The angular the map of temperature across the sky,

    T(\theta,\varphi),

    is written as coefficients of spherical harmonics,T(\theta,\varphi) = \sum_ a_ Y_(\theta,\varphi)where the

    a\ell

    term measures the strength of the angular oscillation in

    Y\ell(\theta,\varphi)

    , and ℓ is the multipole number while m is the azimuthal number.The azimuthal variation is not significant and is removed by applying the angular correlation function, giving power spectrum term 

    C\ell\equiv\langle|a\ell|2\rangle.

    Increasing values of ℓ correspond to higher multipole moments of CMB, meaning more rapid variation with angle.

    CMBR monopole term (ℓ = 0)

    The monopole term,, is the constant isotropic mean temperature of the CMB, [70] with one standard deviation confidence. This term must be measured with absolute temperature devices, such as the FIRAS instrument on the COBE satellite.[70]

    CMBR dipole anisotropy (ℓ = 1)

    CMB dipole represents the largest anisotropy, which is in the first spherical harmonic, a cosine function. The amplitude of CMB dipole is around .[70] The CMB dipole moment is interpreted as the peculiar motion of the Earth relative to the CMB. Its amplitude depends on the time due to the Earth's orbit about the barycenter of the solar system. This enables us to add a time-dependent term to the dipole expression. The modulation of this term is 1 year,[70] [71] which fits the observation done by COBE FIRAS.[71] [72] The dipole moment does not encode any primordial information.

    From the CMB data, it is seen that the Sun appears to be moving at relative to the reference frame of the CMB (also called the CMB rest frame, or the frame of reference in which there is no motion through the CMB). The Local Group — the galaxy group that includes our own Milky Way galaxy — appears to be moving at in the direction of galactic longitude, .[70] The dipole is now used to calibrate mapping studies.

    Multipole (ℓ ≥ 2)

    The temperature variation in the CMB temperature maps at higher multipoles, or, is considered to be the result of perturbations of the density in the early Universe, before the recombination epoch at a redshift of around . Before recombination, the Universe consisted of a hot, dense plasma of electrons and baryons. In such a hot dense environment, electrons and protons could not form any neutral atoms. The baryons in such early Universe remained highly ionized and so were tightly coupled with photons through the effect of Thompson scattering. These phenomena caused the pressure and gravitational effects to act against each other, and triggered fluctuations in the photon-baryon plasma. Quickly after the recombination epoch, the rapid expansion of the universe caused the plasma to cool down and these fluctuations are "frozen into" the CMB maps we observe today.[70]

    Data analysis challenges

    Raw CMBR data, even from space vehicles such as WMAP or Planck, contain foreground effects that completely obscure the fine-scale structure of the cosmic microwave background. The fine-scale structure is superimposed on the raw CMBR data but is too small to be seen at the scale of the raw data. The most prominent of the foreground effects is the dipole anisotropy caused by the Sun's motion relative to the CMBR background. The dipole anisotropy and others due to Earth's annual motion relative to the Sun and numerous microwave sources in the galactic plane and elsewhere must be subtracted out to reveal the extremely tiny variations characterizing the fine-scale structure of the CMBR background.The detailed analysis of CMBR data to produce maps, an angular power spectrum, and ultimately cosmological parameters is a complicated, computationally difficult problem.

    In practice it is hard to take the effects of noise and foreground sources into account. In particular, these foregrounds are dominated by galactic emissions such as Bremsstrahlung, synchrotron, and dust that emit in the microwave band; in practice, the galaxy has to be removed, resulting in a CMB map that is not a full-sky map. In addition, point sources like galaxies and clusters represent another source of foreground which must be removed so as not to distort the short scale structure of the CMB power spectrum.

    Constraints on many cosmological parameters can be obtained from their effects on the power spectrum, and results are often calculated using Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling techniques.

    Anomalies

    See also: Cosmological principle, Axis of evil (cosmology) and CMB cold spot.

    With the increasingly precise data provided by WMAP, there have been a number of claims that the CMB exhibits anomalies, such as very large scale anisotropies, anomalous alignments, and non-Gaussian distributions.[73] [74] [75] The most longstanding of these is the low-ℓ multipole controversy. Even in the COBE map, it was observed that the quadrupole (spherical harmonic) has a low amplitude compared to the predictions of the Big Bang. In particular, the quadrupole and octupole modes appear to have an unexplained alignment with each other and with both the ecliptic plane and equinoxes.[76] [77] [78] A number of groups have suggested that this could be the signature of new physics at the greatest observable scales; other groups suspect systematic errors in the data.[79] [80] [81]

    Ultimately, due to the foregrounds and the cosmic variance problem, the greatest modes will never be as well measured as the small angular scale modes. The analyses were performed on two maps that have had the foregrounds removed as far as possible: the "internal linear combination" map of the WMAP collaboration and a similar map prepared by Max Tegmark and others.[82] [83] [84] Later analyses have pointed out that these are the modes most susceptible to foreground contamination from synchrotron, dust, and Bremsstrahlung emission, and from experimental uncertainty in the monopole and dipole.

    A full Bayesian analysis of the WMAP power spectrum demonstrates that the quadrupole prediction of Lambda-CDM cosmology is consistent with the data at the 10% level and that the observed octupole is not remarkable.[85] Carefully accounting for the procedure used to remove the foregrounds from the full sky map further reduces the significance of the alignment by ~5%.[86] [87] [88] [89] Recent observations with the Planck telescope, which is very much more sensitive than WMAP and has a larger angular resolution, record the same anomaly, and so instrumental error (but not foreground contamination) appears to be ruled out.[90] Coincidence is a possible explanation, chief scientist from WMAP, Charles L. Bennett suggested coincidence and human psychology were involved, "I do think there is a bit of a psychological effect; people want to find unusual things."[91]

    Measurements of the density of quasars based on Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer data finds a dipole significantly different from the one extracted from the CMB anisotropy.[92] This difference is conflict with the cosmological principle.[93]

    Future evolution

    Assuming the universe keeps expanding and it does not suffer a Big Crunch, a Big Rip, or another similar fate, the cosmic microwave background will continue redshifting until it will no longer be detectable,[94] and will be superseded first by the one produced by starlight, and perhaps, later by the background radiation fields of processes that may take place in the far future of the universe such as proton decay, evaporation of black holes, and positronium decay.[95]

    Timeline of prediction, discovery and interpretation

    See also: Timeline of cosmological theories.

    Thermal (non-microwave background) temperature predictions

    Microwave background radiation predictions and measurements

    In popular culture

    Further reading

    External links

    Notes and References

    1. Fixsen . D. J. . 2009 . The Temperature of the Cosmic Microwave Background . . 707 . 2 . 916–920 . 0911.1955 . 2009ApJ...707..916F . 10.1088/0004-637X/707/2/916 . 119217397.
    2. Hu . Wayne . Dodelson . Scott . September 2002 . Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropies . Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics . en . 40 . 1 . 171–216 . 10.1146/annurev.astro.40.060401.093926 . 0066-4146. astro-ph/0110414 . 2002ARA&A..40..171H .
    3. Hu, Wayne, and Martin White. "A CMB polarization primer." arXiv preprint astro-ph/9706147 (1997).
    4. Chluba. J.. etal. New Horizons in Cosmology with Spectral Distortions of the Cosmic Microwave Background. Voyage 2050 Proposals. 2021. 51. 3. 1515–1554. 10.1007/s10686-021-09729-5. 1909.01593. 2021ExA....51.1515C. 202539910.
    5. Ćirković . Milan M. . Perović . Slobodan . 2018-05-01 . Alternative explanations of the cosmic microwave background: A historical and an epistemological perspective . Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics . 62 . 1–18 . 10.1016/j.shpsb.2017.04.005 . 1705.07721 . 2018SHPMP..62....1C . 1355-2198.
    6. K.A. Olive and J.A. Peacock(September 2017) "21. Big-Bang Cosmology"in .S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), to be published in Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024)
    7. Web site: 29. Cosmic Microwave Background: Particle Data Group P.A. Zyla (LBL, Berkeley) et al..
    8. Alpher. R. A.. Herman. R. C.. 4113488. 1948. Evolution of the Universe. Nature. 162. 4124. 774–775. 10.1038/162774b0. 1948Natur.162..774A.
    9. Gamow. G.. 4793163. 1948. The evolution of the universe. Nature. 162. 680–682. 10.1038/162680a0. 18893719. 1948Natur.162..680G. 4122.
    10. Assis. A. K. T.. Neves. M. C. D.. 1995. History of the 2.7 K Temperature Prior to Penzias and Wilson. 3. 79–87 . Apeiron .
    11. Penzias. A. A.. 2006. The origin of elements. https://web.archive.org/web/20060925205437/http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1978/penzias-lecture.pdf . 2006-09-25 . live. Science. 205. 4406. 549–54. Nobel Foundation. 10.1126/science.205.4406.549. 17729659. 2006-10-04.
    12. Dicke. R. H.. 1946. The Measurement of Thermal Radiation at Microwave Frequencies. Review of Scientific Instruments. 17. 268–275. 10.1063/1.1770483. 20991753. 1946RScI...17..268D. 7 . 26658623 . free. This basic design for a radiometer has been used in most subsequent cosmic microwave background experiments.
    13. News: Overbye . Dennis . Dennis Overbye . Back to New Jersey, Where the Universe Began - A half-century ago, a radio telescope in Holmdel, N.J., sent two astronomers 13.8 billion years back in time — and opened a cosmic window that scientists have been peering through ever since.. 5 September 2023 . . live . https://archive.today/20230905113310/https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/04/science/astronomy-holmdel-antenna-microwaves.html . 5 September 2023 . 5 September 2023 .
    14. Web site: The Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (Nobel Lecture) by Robert Wilson 8 Dec 1978, p. 474.
    15. Dicke. R. H.. 1965. Cosmic Black-Body Radiation. Astrophysical Journal. 142. 414–419. 10.1086/148306. 1965ApJ...142..414D. etal.
    16. Book: Peebles, P. J. E. 1993. Principles of Physical Cosmology. 139–148. Princeton University Press. 978-0-691-01933-8.
    17. Web site: 1978. The Nobel Prize in Physics 1978. Nobel Foundation. 2009-01-08.
    18. Book: Partridge, R. Bruce . The Oxford Handbook of the History of Modern Cosmology . 2019-04-04 . Oxford University Press . 978-0-19-881766-6 . Kragh . Helge . 1 . 292–345 . en . The cosmic microwave background: from discovery to precision cosmology . 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198817666.013.8 . Longair . Malcolm S..
    19. Harrison. E. R.. 1970. Fluctuations at the threshold of classical cosmology. Physical Review D. 1. 2726–2730. 10.1103/PhysRevD.1.2726. 1970PhRvD...1.2726H. 10 .
    20. Peebles. P. J. E.. Yu. J. T.. 1970. Primeval Adiabatic Perturbation in an Expanding Universe. Astrophysical Journal. 162. 815–836. 10.1086/150713. 1970ApJ...162..815P.
    21. Zeldovich. Y. B.. 1972. A hypothesis, unifying the structure and the entropy of the Universe. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 160. 1P–4P. 10.1093/mnras/160.1.1P . free . 1972MNRAS.160P...1Z.
    22. Sunyaev RA. Zel'dovich YB. Small-scale fluctuations of relic radiation. Astrophys. Space Sci.. 7. 1. 3–19. 1970. 1970Ap&SS...7....3S. 10.1007/BF00653471. 117050217.
    23. Smoot. G. F.. 1992. Structure in the COBE differential microwave radiometer first-year maps. Astrophysical Journal Letters. 396. 1. L1–L5. 10.1086/186504. 1992ApJ...396L...1S. 120701913 . etal. free.
    24. Bennett. C.L.. 1996. Four-Year COBE DMR Cosmic Microwave Background Observations: Maps and Basic Results. Astrophysical Journal Letters. 464. L1–L4. 10.1086/310075. 1996ApJ...464L...1B. astro-ph/9601067 . 18144842. etal.
    25. Komatsu . Eiichiro . 2022-05-18 . New physics from the polarized light of the cosmic microwave background . Nature Reviews Physics . en . 4 . 7 . 452–469 . 10.1038/s42254-022-00452-4 . 2522-5820. 2202.13919 . 2022NatRP...4..452K .
    26. Book: Grupen, C. . 2005. Astroparticle Physics. 240–241. Springer. 978-3-540-25312-9. etal.
    27. Miller. A. D.. 1999. A Measurement of the Angular Power Spectrum of the Microwave Background Made from the High Chilean Andes. Astrophysical Journal. 521. 2. L79–L82. 10.1086/312197. 1999ApJ...521L..79T. astro-ph/9905100 . 16534514. etal.
    28. Melchiorri. A.. 2000. A Measurement of Ω from the North American Test Flight of Boomerang. The Astrophysical Journal Letters. 536. 2. L63–L66. 10.1086/312744. 10859119. 2000ApJ...536L..63M. astro-ph/9911445 . 27518923. etal.
    29. Hanany. S.. 2000. MAXIMA-1: A Measurement of the Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropy on Angular Scales of 10'–5°. Astrophysical Journal. 545. 1. L5–L9. 10.1086/317322. 2000ApJ...545L...5H. astro-ph/0005123 . 119495132. etal.
    30. de Bernardis. P.. 2000. A flat Universe from high-resolution maps of the cosmic microwave background radiation. Nature. 404. 10801117. 6781. 955–959. 2000Natur.404..955D. 10.1038/35010035. astro-ph/0004404 . etal. 10044/1/60851. 4412370.
    31. Pogosian. L.. Levon Pogosian. 2003. Observational constraints on cosmic string production during brane inflation. Physical Review D. 68. 2. 023506. 10.1103/PhysRevD.68.023506. hep-th/0304188 . 2003PhRvD..68b3506P . etal.
    32. Bennett . C. L. . Larson . D. . Weiland . J. L. . Jarosik . N. . Hinshaw . G. . Odegard . N. . Smith . K. M. . Hill . R. S. . Gold . B. . Halpern . M. . Komatsu . E. . Nolta . M. R. . Page . L. . Spergel . D. N. . Wollack . E. . 2013-09-20 . NINE-YEAR WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PROBE (WMAP) OBSERVATIONS: FINAL MAPS AND RESULTS . The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series . 208 . 2 . 20 . 10.1088/0067-0049/208/2/20 . 0067-0049. 1212.5225 . 2013ApJS..208...20B .
    33. Web site: Clavin . Whitney . Harrington . J.D. . Planck Mission Brings Universe Into Sharp Focus . 21 March 2013. . 21 March 2013 .
    34. Web site: Staff . Mapping the Early Universe . 21 March 2013 . . 23 March 2013 .
    35. Planck Collaboration . 2016 . Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters (See Table 4 on page 31 of pfd) . 1502.01589. 2016A&A...594A..13P . 10.1051/0004-6361/201525830 . 594 . 13 . Astronomy & Astrophysics . A13. 119262962 .
    36. Scott. D.. 2005. The Standard Cosmological Model. astro-ph/0510731. 10.1139/P06-066. 84. 6–7. Canadian Journal of Physics. 419–435. 2006CaJPh..84..419S . 10.1.1.317.2954. 15606491.
    37. Book: Durham, Frank. Purrington, Robert D.. Frame of the universe: a history of physical cosmology. registration. Columbia University Press. 1983. 978-0-231-05393-8. 193–209.
    38. Book: Guth, A. H.. 1998. The Inflationary Universe: The Quest for a New Theory of Cosmic Origins. 186. Basic Books. 978-0201328400. 35701222.
    39. Cirigliano . D. . de Vega . H.J. . Sanchez . N. G. . Norma Sanchez . 2005 . Clarifying inflation models: The precise inflationary potential from effective field theory and the WMAP data . . Submitted manuscript . 71 . 10 . 77–115 . astro-ph/0412634 . 2005PhRvD..71j3518C . 10.1103/PhysRevD.71.103518 . 36572996.
    40. Web site: Abbott . B. . 2007 . Microwave (WMAP) All-Sky Survey . . 2008-01-13 . dead . https://web.archive.org/web/20130213023246/http://www.haydenplanetarium.org/universe/duguide/exgg_wmap.php . 2013-02-13 .
    41. Gawiser. E.. Silk. J.. 2000. The cosmic microwave background radiation. Physics Reports. 333–334. 2000. 245–267. 10.1016/S0370-1573(00)00025-9. astro-ph/0002044. 2000PhR...333..245G . 10.1.1.588.3349. 15398837.
    42. Web site: Smoot. G. F.. 2006. Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation Anisotropies: Their Discovery and Utilization. Nobel Lecture. Nobel Foundation. 2008-12-22.
    43. Web site: NASA's "CMB Surface of Last Scatter". 2023-07-05.
    44. Book: Hobson. M.P.. Efstathiou. G.. Lasenby. A.N.. 2006. General Relativity: An Introduction for Physicists. limited. 388. Cambridge University Press. 978-0-521-82951-9.
    45. Book: Unsöld. A.. Bodo. B.. 2002. The New Cosmos, An Introduction to Astronomy and Astrophysics. 5th. 485. Springer-Verlag. 978-3-540-67877-9. 2001ncia.book.....U.
    46. White. M.. 1999. Anisotropies in the CMB. Proceedings of the Los Angeles Meeting, DPF 99. UCLA. astro-ph/9903232 . 1999dpf..conf.....W .
    47. Kaku . M. . Michio Kaku . 2014 . First Second of the Big Bang . . 3 . 4 . Discovery Science.
    48. astro-ph/9508159. Fixsen. D. J.. Formation of Structure in the Universe. 1995.
    49. Web site: Converted number: Conversion from K to eV.
    50. Noterdaeme, P. . Petitjean, P. . Srianand, R. . Ledoux, C. . López, S. . The evolution of the cosmic microwave background temperature. Measurements of TCMB at high redshift from carbon monoxide excitation . Astronomy and Astrophysics . 526 . February 2011 . 10.1051/0004-6361/201016140 . 2011A&A...526L...7N . 1012.3164 . L7 . 118485014 .
    51. Dodelson . S. . 2003 . Coherent Phase Argument for Inflation . . 689 . 184–196 . hep-ph/0309057 . 2003AIPC..689..184D . 10.1063/1.1627736. 10.1.1.344.3524 . 18570203 .
    52. Web site: Baumann . D. . 2011 . The Physics of Inflation . . 2015-05-09 . https://web.archive.org/web/20180921195002/http://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/db275/TEACHING/INFLATION/Lectures.pdf . 2018-09-21 . dead .
    53. Web site: Baryons and Inertia . Wayne Hu.
    54. Web site: Radiation Driving Force . Wayne Hu.
    55. Hu . W.. White. M.. 1996. Acoustic Signatures in the Cosmic Microwave Background. Astrophysical Journal. 471. 30–51. 10.1086/177951. 1996ApJ...471...30H. astro-ph/9602019 . 8791666.
    56. WMAP Collaboration. 2003. First-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Determination of Cosmological Parameters. Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. 148. Verde. 1. 175–194. L.. 10.1086/377226. Peiris. H. V.. Komatsu. E.. Nolta. M. R.. Bennett. C. L.. Halpern. M.. Hinshaw. G.. Jarosik. N.. astro-ph/0302209. 2003ApJS..148..175S. 10794058. 8.
    57. Narlikar . Jayant V. . Padmanabhan . T. . September 2001 . Standard Cosmology and Alternatives: A Critical Appraisal . Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics . en . 39 . 1 . 211–248 . 10.1146/annurev.astro.39.1.211 . 2001ARA&A..39..211N . 0066-4146.
    58. Trippe . Sascha . 2014 . Polarization and Polarimetry: A Review . Journal of the Korean Astronomical Society . 47 . 1 . 15–39 . 10.5303/JKAS.2014.47.1.15 . 1225-4614. 1401.1911 . 2014JKAS...47...15T .
    59. Kovac . J. M. . Leitch . E. M. . Pryke . C. . Carlstrom . J. E. . Halverson . N. W. . Holzapfel . W. L. . December 2002 . Detection of polarization in the cosmic microwave background using DASI . Nature . en . 420 . 6917 . 772–787 . 10.1038/nature01269 . 12490941 . 0028-0836. astro-ph/0209478 . 2002Natur.420..772K .
    60. Ade . P. A. R. . Aikin . R. W. . Barkats . D. . Benton . S. J. . Bischoff . C. A. . Bock . J. J. . Brevik . J. A. . Buder . I. . Bullock . E. . Dowell . C. D. . Duband . L. . Filippini . J. P. . Fliescher . S. . Golwala . S. R. . Halpern . M. . 2014-06-19 . Detection of B -Mode Polarization at Degree Angular Scales by BICEP2 . Physical Review Letters . en . 112 . 24 . 241101 . 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.241101 . 24996078 . 0031-9007. 1403.3985 . 2014PhRvL.112x1101B .
    61. U.. Seljak. Measuring Polarization in the Cosmic Microwave Background. Astrophysical Journal. June 1997. 482. 1. 6–16. 10.1086/304123. astro-ph/9608131 . 1997ApJ...482....6S . 16825580.
    62. U.. Seljak. Zaldarriaga M.. Signature of Gravity Waves in the Polarization of the Microwave Background. Phys. Rev. Lett.. March 17, 1997. 78. 11. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.2054. astro-ph/9609169 . 1997PhRvL..78.2054S. 2054–2057. 30795875.
    63. M.. Kamionkowski. Kosowsky A.. Stebbins A.. amp. A Probe of Primordial Gravity Waves and Vorticity. Phys. Rev. Lett.. 1997. 78. 11. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.2058. astro-ph/9609132 . 1997PhRvL..78.2058K. 2058–2061. 17330375.
    64. M.. Zaldarriaga. Seljak U.. Gravitational lensing effect on cosmic microwave background polarization. Physical Review D. July 15, 1998. 58. 2. 023003. 2. 10.1103/PhysRevD.58.023003. astro-ph/9803150 . 1998PhRvD..58b3003Z . 119512504.
    65. Lewis. A.. Challinor. A.. 2006. Weak gravitational lensing of the CMB. Physics Reports. 429. 1. 1–65. 10.1016/j.physrep.2006.03.002. astro-ph/0601594. 2006PhR...429....1L . 1731891.
    66. Hanson. D.. 2013. Detection of B-mode polarization in the Cosmic Microwave Background with data from the South Pole Telescope. Physical Review Letters. 111. 14. 141301. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.141301. 24138230. 1307.5830. 2013PhRvL.111n1301H . 9437637. etal.
    67. Kamionkowski . Marc . Kovetz . Ely D. . 2016-09-19 . The Quest for B Modes from Inflationary Gravitational Waves . Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics . en . 54 . 1 . 227–269 . 10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023433 . 0066-4146. 1510.06042 . 2016ARA&A..54..227K .
    68. Planck Collaboration Team . Planck intermediate results. XXX. The angular power spectrum of polarized dust emission at intermediate and high Galactic latitudes . 9 February 2016 . 1409.5738 . Astronomy & Astrophysics . 586 . 133 . 10.1051/0004-6361/201425034 . A133 . 2016A&A...586A.133P. 9857299 .
    69. Polarization detected in Big Bang's echo. Nature. 10.1038/nature.2013.13441. 2013. Samuel Reich. Eugenie. 211730550.
    70. P.A. Zyla et al. (Particle Data Group) . Review of Particle Physics . Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics . 2020 . 2020 . 8 . 083C01 . 10.1093/ptep/ptaa104 . free . Cosmic Microwave Background review by Scott and Smoot.
    71. Web site: COBE Differential Microwave Radiometers: Calibration Techniques.. Bennett. C..
    72. Dipole Modulation of Cosmic Microwave Background Temperature and Polarization.. Shosh. S.. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics. 2016. 2016 . 1. 046. 10.1088/1475-7516/2016/01/046 . 1507.04078 . 2016JCAP...01..046G . 118553819.
    73. Rossmanith . G. . 2009 . Non-Gaussian Signatures in the five-year WMAP data as identified with isotropic scaling indices . 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15421.x. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 399. 4. 1921–1933. 0905.2854. 2009MNRAS.399.1921R . Räth . C. . Banday. A. J.. Morfill. G. . free . 11586058 .
    74. Bernui. A. . 2007 . Mapping the large-scale anisotropy in the WMAP data. 10.1051/0004-6361:20065585 . Astronomy and Astrophysics. 464 . 2 . 479–485 . astro-ph/0511666 . 2007A&A...464..479B . Mota . B. . Rebouças. M. J.. Tavakol. R.. 16138962 .
    75. Jaffe. T.R.. 2005. Evidence of vorticity and shear at large angular scales in the WMAP data: a violation of cosmological isotropy?. 10.1086/444454. The Astrophysical Journal. 629 . 1. L1–L4. astro-ph/0503213. 2005ApJ...629L...1J . Banday . A. J. . Eriksen. H. K. . Górski. K. M.. Hansen. F. K.. 15521559.
    76. de Oliveira-Costa . A. . 2004 . The significance of the largest scale CMB fluctuations in WMAP. Physical Review D. 69 . 063516 . 10.1103/PhysRevD.69.063516 . astro-ph/0307282 . 2004PhRvD..69f3516D . 6 . Tegmark . Max . Zaldarriaga . Matias . Hamilton . Andrew. 119463060 . Submitted manuscript .
    77. Schwarz. D. J.. 2004. Is the low-ℓ microwave background cosmic?. Physical Review Letters. 93. 221301. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.221301. 15601079. astro-ph/0403353. 2004PhRvL..93v1301S . 22 . Starkman . Glenn D. . Huterer. Dragan. Copi. Craig. 12554281. 2. Submitted manuscript.
    78. Bielewicz. P.. Gorski. K. M.. Banday. A. J.. 2004 . Low-order multipole maps of CMB anisotropy derived from WMAP. . 355. 1283–1302 . 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08405.x . astro-ph/0405007 . 2004MNRAS.355.1283B . 4 . free. 5564564.
    79. Liu. Hao. Li. Ti-Pei. 2009. Improved CMB Map from WMAP Data. astro-ph . 0907.2731v3.
    80. Sawangwit. Utane. Shanks. Tom. 2010. Lambda-CDM and the WMAP Power Spectrum Beam Profile Sensitivity. astro-ph . 1006.1270v1.
    81. Liu. Hao. 2010. Diagnosing Timing Error in WMAP Data . Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters . 413 . 1. L96–L100. 1009.2701v1 . etal . 2011MNRAS.413L..96L. 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2011.01041.x . free . 118739762.
    82. Hinshaw. G.. (WMAP collaboration). 2007. Three-year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) observations: temperature analysis. Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. 170. 2. 288–334. 10.1086/513698. astro-ph/0603451. 2007ApJS..170..288H. Bennett. C. L.. Bean. R.. Rachel Bean. Doré. O.. Greason. M. R.. Halpern. M.. Hill. R. S.. Jarosik. N.. Kogut. A.. Komatsu. E.. Limon. M.. Odegard. N.. Meyer. S. S.. Page . L. . Peiris . H. V.. Spergel. D. N.. Tucker. G. S.. Verde. L.. Weiland. J. L.. Wollack. E.. Wright. E. L.. etal. 10.1.1.471.7186. 15554608.
    83. Bennett. C. L.. (WMAP collaboration). 2003. First-year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) observations: preliminary maps and basic results. Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. 148. 1. 1–27. 10.1086/377253. astro-ph/0302207. 2003ApJS..148....1B. Hinshaw. G.. Jarosik. N.. Kogut. A.. Limon. M.. Meyer. S. S.. Page. L.. Spergel. D. N.. Tucker. G. S.. Wollack . E.. Wright. E. L.. Barnes. C.. Greason. M. R.. Hill. R. S.. Komatsu . E.. Nolta. M. R.. Odegard. N.. Peiris. H. V.. Verde. L.. Weiland. J. L.. 115601. etal. This paper warns that "the statistics of this internal linear combination map are complex and inappropriate for most CMB analyses."
    84. Tegmark. M.. de Oliveira-Costa. A.. Hamilton. A.. 2003. A high resolution foreground cleaned CMB map from WMAP. Physical Review D. 68. 123523. 10.1103/PhysRevD.68.123523. astro-ph/0302496. 2003PhRvD..68l3523T. 12 . 17981329. This paper states, "Not surprisingly, the two most contaminated multipoles are [the quadrupole and octupole], which most closely trace the galactic plane morphology."
    85. O'Dwyer. I.. 2004. Bayesian Power Spectrum Analysis of the First-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe Data. Astrophysical Journal Letters. 617. L99–L102. 10.1086/427386. astro-ph/0407027. 2004ApJ...617L..99O. 2. Eriksen . H. K. . Wandelt. B. D.. Jewell. J. B.. Larson. D. L.. Górski. K. M.. Banday. A. J.. Levin. S.. Lilje. P. B. . 118150531 .
    86. Slosar. A.. Seljak. U.. 2004. Assessing the effects of foregrounds and sky removal in WMAP. Physical Review D. 70. 083002. 10.1103/PhysRevD.70.083002. astro-ph/0404567. 2004PhRvD..70h3002S. 8. 119443655. Submitted manuscript.
    87. Bielewicz. P.. 2005. Multipole vector anomalies in the first-year WMAP data: a cut-sky analysis. Astrophysical Journal. 635. 750–60. 10.1086/497263. astro-ph/0507186. 2005ApJ...635..750B. 2. Eriksen . H. K. . Banday. A. J.. Górski. K. M.. Lilje. P. B. . 1103733.
    88. Copi . C.J. . 2006. On the large-angle anomalies of the microwave sky. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 367. 1 . 79–102. 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09980.x. astro-ph/0508047 . 2006MNRAS.367...79C. Huterer . Dragan . Schwarz . D. J. . Starkman . G. D. . free . 10.1.1.490.6391 . 6184966 .
    89. de Oliveira-Costa. A.. Tegmark. M.. 2006. CMB multipole measurements in the presence of foregrounds. Physical Review D. 74. 023005. 10.1103/PhysRevD.74.023005. astro-ph/0603369. 2006PhRvD..74b3005D. 2. 5238226. Submitted manuscript.
    90. Web site: Planck shows almost perfect cosmos – plus axis of evil.
    91. Web site: Found: Hawking's initials written into the universe.
    92. A Test of the Cosmological Principle with Quasars. The Astrophysical Journal Letters. 2021. 10.3847/2041-8213/abdd40. Secrest. Nathan J.. Hausegger. Sebastian von. Rameez. Mohamed. Mohayaee. Roya. Sarkar. Subir. Colin. Jacques. 908. 2. L51. 2009.14826. 2021ApJ...908L..51S. 222066749 . free .
    93. Perivolaropoulos . L. . Skara . F. . 2022-12-01 . Challenges for ΛCDM: An update . New Astronomy Reviews . 95 . 101659 . 10.1016/j.newar.2022.101659 . 1387-6473. 2105.05208 . 2022NewAR..9501659P .
    94. 2007GReGr..39.1545K . 10.1007/s10714-007-0472-9 . The return of a static universe and the end of cosmology . 2007 . Krauss . Lawrence M. . Scherrer . Robert J. . General Relativity and Gravitation . 39 . 10 . 1545–1550. 0704.0221 . 123442313 .
    95. 1997RvMP...69..337A . astro-ph/9701131 . 10.1103/RevModPhys.69.337 . A dying universe: The long-term fate and evolution of astrophysical objects . 1997 . Adams . Fred C. . Laughlin . Gregory . . 69 . 2 . 337–372. 12173790 .
    96. Guillaume, C.-É., 1896, La Nature 24, series 2, p. 234
    97. Book: 1979-12-31 . Lang . Kenneth R. . Gingerich . Owen . 45. The Internal Constitution of the Stars . https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.4159/harvard.9780674366688.c50/html . Harvard University Press . 281–290 . 10.4159/harvard.9780674366688.c50 . 978-0-674-36668-8 . A Source Book in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 1900–1975 .
    98. Book: Kragh, H.. 1999. Cosmology and Controversy: The Historical Development of Two Theories of the Universe. Princeton University Press. registration. 135. 978-0-691-00546-1. "In 1946, Robert Dicke and coworkers at MIT tested equipment that could test a cosmic microwave background of intensity corresponding to about 20K in the microwave region. However, they did not refer to such a background, but only to 'radiation from cosmic matter'. Also, this work was unrelated to cosmology and is only mentioned because it suggests that by 1950, detection of the background radiation might have been technically possible, and also because of Dicke's later role in the discovery". See also Dicke. R. H.. 1946. Atmospheric Absorption Measurements with a Microwave Radiometer. Physical Review. 70. 5–6. 340–348. 10.1103/PhysRev.70.340. 1946PhRv...70..340D . etal.
    99. George Gamow, The Creation Of The Universe p.50 (Dover reprint of revised 1961 edition)
    100. Book: Gamow, G.. George Gamow. 2004. 1961. Cosmology and Controversy: The Historical Development of Two Theories of the Universe. 40. Courier Dover Publications. 978-0-486-43868-9.
    101. Erwin Finlay-Freundlich, "Ueber die Rotverschiebung der Spektrallinien" (1953) Contributions from the Observatory, University of St. Andrews; no. 4, p. 96–102. Finlay-Freundlich gave two extreme values of 1.9K and 6.0K in Finlay-Freundlich, E.: 1954, "Red shifts in the spectra of celestial bodies", Phil. Mag., Vol. 45, pp. 303–319.
    102. McKellar. A.. Molecular Lines from the Lowest States of Diatomic Molecules Composed of Atoms Probably Present in Interstellar Space. Publications of the Dominion Astrophysical Observatory. Vancouver, B.C., Canada. 1941. 7. 251–272. 6. 1941PDAO....7..251M .
    103. Book: Weinberg, Steven . Steven Weinberg . Gravitation and cosmology: principles and applications of the general theory of relativity . 1972 . Wiley . 978-0-471-92567-5 . New York . 514.
    104. [Helge Kragh]
    105. Alpher . Ralph A. . Gamow . George . Herman . Robert . December 1967 . Thermal Cosmic Radiation and the Formation of Protogalaxies . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences . en . 58 . 6 . 2179–2186 . 10.1073/pnas.58.6.2179 . free . 0027-8424 . 223817 . 16591578. 1967PNAS...58.2179A .
    106. Delannoy, J., Denisse, J. F., Le Roux, E., & Morlet, B. (1957). Mesures absolues de faibles densités de flux de rayonnement à 900 MHz. Annales d'Astrophysique, Vol. 20, p. 222, 20, 222.
    107. Web site: Wright . Edward . Cosmic Microwave Background . 2024-05-28 . astro.ucla.edu.
    108. Shmaonov. T. A.. 1957. Commentary. ru. Pribory I Tekhnika Experimenta. 1. 83. 10.1016/S0890-5096(06)60772-3.
    109. Book: Naselsky. P. D.. Novikov. D.I.. Novikov. I. D.. 2006. The Physics of the Cosmic Microwave Background. Cambridge University Press . 978-0-521-85550-1.
    110. Doroshkevich. A. G.. Novikov. I.D.. 96773397. 1964. Mean Density of Radiation in the Metagalaxy and Certain Problems in Relativistic Cosmology. Soviet Physics Doklady. 9. 4292–4298. 10.1021/es990537g. 23. 1999EnST...33.4292W .
    111. Nobel Prize In Physics: Russia's Missed Opportunities, RIA Novosti, Nov 21, 2006
    112. News: Sanders. R.. Kahn, J.. 13 October 2006. UC Berkeley, LBNL cosmologist George F. Smoot awarded 2006 Nobel Prize in Physics. UC Berkeley News. 2008-12-11.
    113. Kovac. J.M.. 2002. Detection of polarization in the cosmic microwave background using DASI. Nature. 12490941. 420. 6917. 772–787. 10.1038/nature01269. astro-ph/0209478 . 2002Natur.420..772K . 4359884. etal. Submitted manuscript.
    114. Readhead. A. C. S.. 2004. Polarization Observations with the Cosmic Background Imager. Science. 15472038. 306. 5697. 836–844. 10.1126/science.1105598. 2004Sci...306..836R. astro-ph/0409569 . 9234000. etal.
    115. A. Readhead et al., "Polarization observations with the Cosmic Background Imager", Science 306, 836–844 (2004).
    116. Web site: Clavin . Whitney . NASA Technology Views Birth of the Universe . March 17, 2014 . . March 17, 2014 .
    117. News: Overbye . Dennis . Dennis Overbye . March 17, 2014 . Space Ripples Reveal Big Bang's Smoking Gun . . registration . March 17, 2014.
    118. News: Overbye . Dennis . Dennis Overbye . Ripples From the Big Bang . https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220101/https://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/25/science/space/ripples-from-the-big-bang.html . 2022-01-01 . limited . March 24, 2014 . . March 24, 2014 .
    119. Ade, P.A.R. (BICEP2 Collaboration) . Detection of B-Mode Polarization at Degree Angular Scales by BICEP2 . 2014 . . 112 . 24 . 241101 . 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.241101 . 24996078. 1403.3985 . 2014PhRvL.112x1101B . 22780831 .
    120. Web site: BICEP2 News Not Even Wrong.
    121. News: Overbye . Dennis . Dennis Overbye . Astronomers Hedge on Big Bang Detection Claim . https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220101/https://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/20/science/space/scientists-debate-gravity-wave-detection-claim.html . 2022-01-01 . limited . June 19, 2014 . . June 20, 2014 .
    122. News: Amos . Jonathan . Cosmic inflation: Confidence lowered for Big Bang signal . June 19, 2014 . . June 20, 2014 .
    123. Gravitational waves discovery now officially dead. Cowen. Ron. 2015-01-30. Nature. 10.1038/nature.2015.16830. 124938210.
    124. Planck Collaboration . etal . Planck 2018 results. I. Overview and the cosmological legacy of Planck . Astronomy and Astrophysics . 2020 . 641 . A1 . 10.1051/0004-6361/201833880 . 1807.06205 . 2020A&A...641A...1P. 119185252 .
    125. Planck Collaboration . etal . Planck 2018 results. V. CMB power spectra and likelihoods . Astronomy and Astrophysics . 2020 . 641 . A5 . 10.1051/0004-6361/201936386 . 1907.12875 . 2020A&A...641A...5P . 198985935 .
    126. November 10, 2010 . Stargate Universe - Robert Carlyle talks about background radiation and Destiny's mission . Video . 2023-02-28 . YouTube .
    127. Web site: Liu . Cixin . 2014-09-23 . The Three-Body Problem: "The Universe Flickers" . 2023-01-23 . Tor.com . en-US.
    128. Web site: Astronomy in your wallet - NCCR PlanetS . 2023-01-23 . nccr-planets.ch . en-US.
    129. Web site: 2021-02-03 . WandaVision's 'cosmic microwave background radiation' is real, actually . 2023-01-23 . SYFY Official Site . en-US.

    This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Cosmic microwave background".

    Except where otherwise indicated, Everything.Explained.Today is © Copyright 2009-2024, A B Cryer, All Rights Reserved. Cookie policy.