Subsonic and transonic wind tunnel explained

Subsonic wind tunnels are used for operations at low Mach numbers, with speeds in the test section up to 480 km/h (~ 134 m/s, M = 0.4). They may be of open-return type (also known as the Eiffel type) or closed-return flow (also known as the Prandtl type). These tunnels use large axial fans to move air and increase dynamic pressure, overcoming viscous losses. The design principles of subsonic wind tunnels are based on the continuity equation and Bernoulli's principle, which allow for the calculation of important parameters such as the tunnel's contraction ratio.

Transonic wind tunnels (0.75 < M < 1.2) are designed on similar principles as subsonic tunnels but present additional challenges, primarily due to the reflection of shock waves from the walls of the test section. To mitigate this, perforated or slotted walls are used to reduce shock reflection. In transonic testing, both Mach number and Reynolds number are critical and must be properly simulated. This often necessitates the use of large-scale facilities and/or pressurized or cryogenic wind tunnels. These tunnels are crucial for studying aerodynamic properties of objects at speeds approaching and surpassing the speed of sound, such as high-speed aircraft and spacecraft during critical phases of flight.

Low subsonic tunnel

Low-speed wind tunnels are used for operations at very low Mach number, with speeds in the test section up to 480 km/h (~ 134 m/s, M = 0.4).[1] [2] They may be of open-return type (also known as the Eiffel type, see figure), or closed-return flow (also known as the Prandtl type, see figure) with air moved by a propulsion system usually consisting of large axial fans that increase the dynamic pressure to overcome the viscous losses.

Open wind tunnel

The working principle is based on the continuity and Bernoulli's equation:

The continuity equation is given by:

AV=constant

dA=-
A
dV
V

The Bernoulli equation states:-

Ptotal=Pstatic+Pdynamic=Ps+

1
2

\rhoV2

Putting Bernoulli into the continuity equation gives:

2=2
V
m
C2
C2-1
Psettl-pm
\rho

2

\Deltap
\rho

The contraction ratio of a windtunnel can now be calculated by:

C=

Asettl
Am

Closed wind tunnel

In a return-flow wind tunnel the return duct must be properly designed to reduce the pressure losses and to ensure smooth flow in the test section.The compressible flow regime:Again with the continuity law, but now for isentropic flow gives:

-

d\rho
\rho

=-

1
a2
dp
\rho

=-

1
a2
-\rhoVdV
\rho

=

V
a2

dV

The 1-D area-velocity is known as:

dA
A

=(M2-1)

dV
V

The minimal area A where M=1, also known as the sonic throat area is than given for a perfect gas:

\left(

A
Athroat

\right)2=

1
M2

\left(

2
\gamma+1

\left(1+

\gamma-1
2

M2\right)

\gamma+1
\gamma-1
\right)

Transonic tunnel

High subsonic wind tunnels (0.4 < M < 0.75) and transonic wind tunnels (0.75 < M < 1.2) are designed on the same principles as the subsonic wind tunnels. The highest speed is reached in the test section. The Mach number is approximately 1 with combined subsonic and supersonic flow regions. Testing at transonic speeds presents additional problems, mainly due to the reflection of the shock waves from the walls of the test section (see figure below or enlarge the thumb picture at the right). Therefore, perforated or slotted walls are required to reduce shock reflection from the walls. Since important viscous or inviscid interactions occur (such as shock waves or boundary layer interaction) both Mach and Reynolds number are important and must be properly simulated.Large-scale facilities and/or pressurized or cryogenic wind tunnels are used.

de Laval nozzle

See main article: article and de Laval nozzle.

With a sonic throat, the flow can be accelerated or slowed down. This follows from the 1D area–velocity equation. If an acceleration to supersonic flow is required, a convergent-divergent nozzle is required.Otherwise:

dA
dx

<0 ⇒

converging
dA
dx

=0

dA
dx

>0

diverging

Conclusion: The Mach number is controlled by the expansion ratio

A
Athroat

See also

Notes and References

  1. Aeronautical Research Council Reports & Memoranda. Rossiter . J. E. . 1964 . Wind-Tunnel Experiments on the Flow over Rectangular Cavities at Subsonic and Transonic Speeds . en.
  2. Mouton . Sylvain . October 2007 . Numerical Investigations of Model Support Interference in Subsonic and Transonic Wind Tunnels . ODAS 2007 - 8th ONERA-DLR Aerospace Symposium . Göttingen, France.