Style of life explained

Style of life should not be confused with Lifestyle (sociology).

The term style of life (German: Lebensstil) was used by psychiatrist Alfred Adler as one of several constructs describing the dynamics of the personality.

Origins

Adler was influenced by the writings of Hans Vaihinger, and his concept of fictionalism, mental constructs, or working models of how to interpret the world.[1] From them he evolved his notion of the teleological goal of an individual's personality, a fictive ideal, which he later elaborated with the means for attaining it into the whole style of life.[2]

The Life Style

The Style of Life reflects the individual's unique, unconscious, and repetitive way of responding to (or avoiding) the main tasks of living: friendship, love, and work. This style, rooted in a childhood prototype, remains consistent throughout life, unless it is changed through depth psychotherapy.[3]

The style of life is reflected in the unity of an individual's way of thinking, feeling, and acting. The life style was increasingly seen by Adler as a product of the individual's own creative power, as well as being rooted in early childhood situations.[4] Clues to the nature of the life style are provided by dreams, memories (real or constructed), and childhood/adolescent activities.[5]

Often bending an individual away from the needs of others or of common sense, in favor of a private logic,[6] movements are made to relieve inferiority feelings or to compensate for those feelings with an unconscious fictional final goal.[7]

At its broadest, the life style includes self-concept, the self-ideal (or ego ideal), an ethical stance and a view of the wider world.[8]

Classical Adlerian psychotherapy attempts to dissolve the archaic style of life and stimulate a more creative approach to living, using the standpoint of social usefulness as a benchmark for change.[9]

Types of style

Adler felt he could distinguish four primary types of style. Three of them he said to be "mistaken styles".

These include:

  1. the ruling type: aggressive, dominating people who don't have much social interest or cultural perception;
  2. the getting type: dependent people who take rather than give;
  3. the avoiding type: people who try to escape life's problems and take little part in socially constructive activity.
  4. the socially useful type: people with a great deal of social interest and activity.[10]

Adler warns that the heuristic nature of types should not be taken seriously, for they should only be used "as a conceptual device to make more understandable the similarities of individuals". Furthermore, he claims that each individual cannot be typified or classified because each individual has a different/unique meaning and attitude toward what constitutes success.[11]

Religious interpretation

Adler used life style as a way of psychologising religion, seeing evil as a distortion in the style of life, driven by egocentrism, and grace as first the recognition of the faulty life style, and then its rectification by human help to rejoin the human community.[12]

Wider influence

See also

Further reading

External links

Notes and References

  1. R Gregory ed., The Oxford Companion to the Mind (1987) p. 6
  2. R Gregory ed., The Oxford Companion to the Mind (1987) p. 6
  3. Alfred Adler, Understanding Human Nature (1992 [1927]) p. 18
  4. Henri Ellenberger, The Discovery of the Unconscious (1970) p. 623-7
  5. Ellenberger, p. 615
  6. H. H. Mosak/M. Maniacci, A Primer of Adlerian Psychology (1999) p. 48
  7. Adler, p. 69-70
  8. Mosak/Maniacci, p. 49
  9. Adler, p. 140-1
  10. Engler, Barbara. Personality Theories. 2006
  11. Adler, Alfred. The Individual Psychology of Alfred Adler.
  12. Ellenberger, p. 625
  13. Ellenberger, p. 598
  14. Thomas A. Harris, I'm OK - You're OK (1969) p. 68
  15. Eric Berne, What Do You Say After You Say Hello? (1974) p. 32 and p. 58