Spectral radius explained

In mathematics, the spectral radius of a square matrix is the maximum of the absolute values of its eigenvalues.[1] More generally, the spectral radius of a bounded linear operator is the supremum of the absolute values of the elements of its spectrum. The spectral radius is often denoted by .

Definition

Matrices

Let be the eigenvalues of a matrix . The spectral radius of is defined as

\rho(A)=max\left\{|λ1|,...c,|λn|\right\}.

The spectral radius can be thought of as an infimum of all norms of a matrix. Indeed, on the one hand,

\rho(A)\leqslant\|A\|

for every natural matrix norm

\|\|

; and on the other hand, Gelfand's formula states that

\rho(A)=\limk\toinfty\|Ak\|1/k

. Both of these results are shown below.

However, the spectral radius does not necessarily satisfy

\|Av\|\leqslant\rho(A)\|v\|

for arbitrary vectors

v\inCn

. To see why, let

r>1

be arbitrary and consider the matrix

Cr=\begin{pmatrix}0&r-1\r&0\end{pmatrix}

. The characteristic polynomial of

Cr

is

λ2-1

, so its eigenvalues are

\{-1,1\}

and thus

\rho(Cr)=1

. However,

Cre1=re2

. As a result,

\|Cre1\|=r>1=\rho(Cr)\|e1\|.

As an illustration of Gelfand's formula, note that
k\|
\|C
r

1/k\to1

as

k\toinfty

, since
k
C
r

=I

if

k

is even and
k
C
r

=Cr

if

k

is odd.

A special case in which

\|Av\|\leqslant\rho(A)\|v\|

for all

v\inCn

is when

A

is a Hermitian matrix and

\|\|

is the Euclidean norm. This is because any Hermitian Matrix is diagonalizable by a unitary matrix, and unitary matrices preserve vector length. As a result,

\|Av\|=\|U*DUv\|=\|DUv\|\leqslant\rho(A)\|Uv\|=\rho(A)\|v\|.

Bounded linear operators

In the context of a bounded linear operator on a Banach space, the eigenvalues need to be replaced with the elements of the spectrum of the operator, i.e. the values

λ

for which

A-λI

is not bijective. We denote the spectrum by

\sigma(A)=\left\{λ\in\Complex:A-λIisnotbijective\right\}

The spectral radius is then defined as the supremum of the magnitudes of the elements of the spectrum:

\rho(A)=\supλ|λ|

Gelfand's formula, also known as the spectral radius formula, also holds for bounded linear operators: letting

\|\|

denote the operator norm, we have

\rho(A)=\limk\|Ak\|

1
k
=inf
k\inN*

\|Ak\|

1
k

.

A bounded operator (on a complex Hilbert space) is called a spectraloid operator if its spectral radius coincides with its numerical radius. An example of such an operator is a normal operator.

Graphs

The spectral radius of a finite graph is defined to be the spectral radius of its adjacency matrix.

This definition extends to the case of infinite graphs with bounded degrees of vertices (i.e. there exists some real number such that the degree of every vertex of the graph is smaller than). In this case, for the graph define:

\ell2(G)=\left\{f:V(G)\toR:\sum\nolimitsv\left\|f(v)2\right\|<infty\right\}.

Let be the adjacency operator of :

\begin{cases}\gamma:\ell2(G)\to\ell2(G)\(\gammaf)(v)=\sum(u,v)f(u)\end{cases}

The spectral radius of is defined to be the spectral radius of the bounded linear operator .

Upper bounds

Upper bounds on the spectral radius of a matrix

The following proposition gives simple yet useful upper bounds on the spectral radius of a matrix.

Proposition. Let with spectral radius and a consistent matrix norm . Then for each integer

k\geqslant1

:

\rho(A)\leq\|Ak\|

1
k

.

Proof

Let be an eigenvector-eigenvalue pair for a matrix A. By the sub-multiplicativity of the matrix norm, we get:

|λ|k\|v\|=\|λkv\|=\|Akv\|\leq\|Ak\|\|v\|.

Since, we have

|λ|k\leq\|Ak\|

and therefore

\rho(A)\leq\|Ak\|

1
k

.

concluding the proof.

Upper bounds for spectral radius of a graph

There are many upper bounds for the spectral radius of a graph in terms of its number n of vertices and its number m of edges. For instance, if

(k-2)(k-3)
2

\leqm-n\leq

k(k-3)
2

where

3\lek\len

is an integer, then[2]

\rho(G)\leq\sqrt{2m-n-k+

5
2

+\sqrt{2m-2n+

9
4
}}

Power sequence

The spectral radius is closely related to the behavior of the convergence of the power sequence of a matrix; namely as shown by the following theorem.

Theorem. Let with spectral radius . Then if and only if

\limkAk=0.

On the other hand, if,

\limk\|Ak\|=infty

. The statement holds for any choice of matrix norm on .

Proof

Assume that

Ak

goes to zero as

k

goes to infinity. We will show that . Let be an eigenvector-eigenvalue pair for A. Since, we have

\begin{align} 0&=\left(\limkAk\right)v\\ &=\limk\left(Akv\right)\\ &=\limkλkv\\ &=v\limkλk \end{align}

Since by hypothesis, we must have

\limkλk=0,

which implies

|λ|<1

. Since this must be true for any eigenvalue

λ

, we can conclude that .

Now, assume the radius of is less than . From the Jordan normal form theorem, we know that for all, there exist with non-singular and block diagonal such that:

A=VJV-1

with

J=\begin{bmatrix} J
m1

(λ1)&0&0&&0\\ 0&

J
m2

(λ2)&0&&0\\ \vdots&&\ddots&&\vdots\\ 0&&0&

J
ms-1

(λs-1)&0\\ 0&&&0&

J
ms

(λs) \end{bmatrix}

where

J
mi

(λi)=\begin{bmatrix} λi&1&0&&0\\ 0&λi&1&&0\\ \vdots&\vdots&\ddots&\ddots&\vdots\\ 0&0&&λi&1\\ 0&0&&0&λi \end{bmatrix}\in

mi x mi
C

,1\leqi\leqs.

It is easy to see that

Ak=VJkV-1

and, since is block-diagonal,

k(λ
J
1)

&0&0&&0\\ 0&

k(λ
J
2)

&0&&0\\ \vdots&&\ddots&&\vdots\\ 0&&0&

k(λ
J
s-1

)&0\\ 0&&&0&

k(λ
J
s) \end{bmatrix}

Now, a standard result on the -power of an

mi x mi

Jordan block states that, for

k\geqmi-1

:
k(λ
J
i)=\begin{bmatrix} λ
k
i

&{k\choose

k-1
1}λ
i

&{k\choose

k-2
2}λ
i

&&{k\choosemi-1}λ

k-mi+1
i

\\ 0&

k
λ
i

&{k\choose

k-1
1}λ
i

&&{k\choosemi-2}λ

k-mi+2
i

\\ \vdots&\vdots&\ddots&\ddots&\vdots\\ 0&0&&

k
λ
i

&{k\choose

k-1
1}λ
i

\\ 0&0&&0&

k \end{bmatrix}
λ
i

Thus, if

\rho(A)<1

then for all

|λi|<1

. Hence for all we have:

\limk

k=0
J
mi

which implies

\limkJk=0.

Therefore,

\limk

k=\lim
A
k\toinfty

VJkV-1=V\left(\limkJk\right)V-1=0

On the other side, if

\rho(A)>1

, there is at least one element in that does not remain bounded as increases, thereby proving the second part of the statement.

Gelfand's formula

Gelfand's formula, named after Israel Gelfand, gives the spectral radius as a limit of matrix norms.

Theorem

For any matrix norm we have[3]

\rho(A)=\limk\left\|Ak\right

1
k
\|
.

Moreover, in the case of a consistent matrix norm

\limk\left\|Ak\right

1
k
\|
approaches

\rho(A)

from above (indeed, in that case

\rho(A)\leq\left\|Ak\right

1
k
\|
for all

k

).

Proof

For any, let us define the two following matrices:

A\pm=

1
\rho(A)\pm\varepsilon

A.

Thus,

\rho\left(A\pm\right)=

\rho(A)
\rho(A)\pm\varepsilon

,    \rho(A+)<1<\rho(A-).

We start by applying the previous theorem on limits of power sequences to :

\limk

k=0.
A
+

This shows the existence of such that, for all,

k
\left\|A
+

\right\|<1.

Therefore,

\left\|Ak\right

1
k
\|

<\rho(A)+\varepsilon.

Similarly, the theorem on power sequences implies that

k\|
\|A
-
is not bounded and that there exists such that, for all k ≥ N,
k
\left\|A
-

\right\|>1.

Therefore,

\left\|Ak

1
k
\right\|

>\rho(A)-\varepsilon.

Let . Then,

\forall\varepsilon>0   \existsN\inN\forallk\geqN\rho(A)-\varepsilon<\left\|Ak\right

1
k
\|

<\rho(A)+\varepsilon,

that is,

\limk\left\|Ak\right

1
k
\|

=\rho(A).

This concludes the proof.

Corollary

Gelfand's formula yields a bound on the spectral radius of a product of commuting matrices: if

A1,\ldots,An

are matrices that all commute, then

\rho(A1An)\leq\rho(A1)\rho(An).

Numerical example

Consider the matrix

A=\begin{bmatrix} 9&-1&2\\ -2&8&4\\ 1&1&8 \end{bmatrix}

whose eigenvalues are ; by definition, . In the following table, the values of

\|Ak\|

1
k
for the four most used norms are listed versus several increasing values of k (note that, due to the particular form of this matrix,

\|.\|1=\|.\|infty

):
k

\

\cdot\_1=\\cdot\_\infty

\

\cdot\_F

\

\cdot\_2
11415.36229149610.681145748
212.64911064112.32829434810.595665162
311.93483191911.53245066410.500980846
411.50163316911.15100298610.418165779
511.21604315110.92124223510.351918183

\vdots

\vdots

\vdots

\vdots

1010.60494442210.45591043010.183690042
1110.54867768010.41370221310.166990229
1210.50192183510.37862093010.153031596

\vdots

\vdots

\vdots

\vdots

2010.29825439910.22550444710.091577411
3010.19786089210.14977692110.060958900
4010.14803164010.11212368110.045684426
5010.11825103510.08959882010.036530875

\vdots

\vdots

\vdots

\vdots

10010.05895175210.04469950810.018248786
20010.02943256210.02232483410.009120234
30010.01961209510.01487769010.006079232
40010.01470546910.01115619410.004559078

\vdots

\vdots

\vdots

\vdots

100010.00587959410.00446098510.001823382
200010.00293936510.00223024410.000911649
300010.00195948110.00148677410.000607757

\vdots

\vdots

\vdots

\vdots

1000010.00058780410.00044600910.000182323
2000010.00029389810.00022300210.000091161
3000010.00019593110.00014866710.000060774

\vdots

\vdots

\vdots

\vdots

10000010.00005877910.00004460010.000018232

See also

Notes and References

  1. Book: Gradshteĭn, I. S. . Table of integrals, series, and products . 1980 . Academic Press . I. M. Ryzhik, Alan Jeffrey . 0-12-294760-6 . Corr. and enl. . New York . 5892996.
  2. Guo. Ji-Ming. Wang. Zhi-Wen. Li. Xin. 2019. Sharp upper bounds of the spectral radius of a graph. Discrete Mathematics. en. 342. 9. 2559–2563. 10.1016/j.disc.2019.05.017. 198169497. free.
  3. The formula holds for any Banach algebra; see Lemma IX.1.8 in and