Soil pH explained

Soil pH is a measure of the acidity or basicity (alkalinity) of a soil. Soil pH is a key characteristic that can be used to make informative analysis both qualitative and quantitatively regarding soil characteristics.[1] pH is defined as the negative logarithm (base 10) of the activity of hydronium ions (or, more precisely,) in a solution. In soils, it is measured in a slurry of soil mixed with water (or a salt solution, such as  ), and normally falls between 3 and 10, with 7 being neutral. Acid soils have a pH below 7 and alkaline soils have a pH above 7. Ultra-acidic soils (pH < 3.5) and very strongly alkaline soils (pH > 9) are rare.[2] [3]

Soil pH is considered a master variable in soils as it affects many chemical processes. It specifically affects plant nutrient availability by controlling the chemical forms of the different nutrients and influencing the chemical reactions they undergo. The optimum pH range for most plants is between 5.5 and 7.5;[3] however, many plants have adapted to thrive at pH values outside this range.

Classification of soil pH ranges

The United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service classifies soil pH ranges as follows:[4]

DenominationpH range
Ultra acidic< 3.5
Extremely acidic3.5–4.4
Very strongly acidic4.5–5.0
Strongly acidic5.1–5.5
Moderately acidic5.6–6.0
Slightly acidic6.1–6.5
Neutral6.6–7.3
Slightly alkaline7.4–7.8
Moderately alkaline7.9–8.4
Strongly alkaline8.5–9.0
Very strongly alkaline> 9.0
0 to 6=acidic,7=neutral and 8 and above alkalinity

Determining pH

Methods of determining pH include:

Precise, repeatable measures of soil pH are required for scientific research and monitoring. This generally entails laboratory analysis using a standard protocol; an example of such a protocol is that in the USDA Soil Survey Field and Laboratory Methods Manual.[8] In this document the three-page protocol for soil pH measurement includes the following sections: Application; Summary of Method; Interferences; Safety; Equipment; Reagents; and Procedure.

Factors affecting soil pH

The pH of a natural soil depends on the mineral composition of the parent material of the soil, and the weathering reactions undergone by that parent material. In warm, humid environments, soil acidification occurs over time as the products of weathering are leached by water moving laterally or downwards through the soil. In dry climates, however, soil weathering and leaching are less intense and soil pH is often neutral or alkaline.[9] [10]

Sources of acidity

Many processes contribute to soil acidification. These include:[11]

Sources of alkalinity

Total soil alkalinity increases with:[13] [14]

The accumulation of alkalinity in a soil (as carbonates and bicarbonates of Na, K, Ca and Mg) occurs when there is insufficient water flowing through the soils to leach soluble salts. This may be due to arid conditions, or poor internal soil drainage; in these situations most of the water that enters the soil is transpired (taken up by plants) or evaporates, rather than flowing through the soil.[13]

The soil pH usually increases when the total alkalinity increases, but the balance of the added cations also has a marked effect on the soil pH. For example, increasing the amount of sodium in an alkaline soil tends to induce dissolution of calcium carbonate, which increases the pH. Calcareous soils may vary in pH from 7.0 to 9.5, depending on the degree to which or dominate the soluble cations.[13]

Effect of soil pH on plant growth

Acid soils

High levels of aluminium occur near mining sites; small amounts of aluminium are released to the environment at the coal-fired power plants or incinerators.[15] Aluminium in the air is washed out by the rain or normally settles down but small particles of aluminium remain in the air for a long time.

Acidic precipitation is the main natural factor to mobilize aluminium from natural sources[16] and the main reason for the environmental effects of aluminium;[17] however, the main factor of presence of aluminium in salt and freshwater are the industrial processes that also release aluminium into air. Plants grown in acid soils can experience a variety of stresses including aluminium (Al), hydrogen (H), and/or manganese (Mn) toxicity, as well as nutrient deficiencies of calcium (Ca) and magnesium (Mg).[18]

Aluminium toxicity is the most widespread problem in acid soils. Aluminium is present in all soils to varying degrees, but dissolved Al3+ is toxic to plants; Al3+ is most soluble at low pH; above pH 5.0, there is little Al in soluble form in most soils.[19] [20] Aluminium is not a plant nutrient, and as such, is not actively taken up by the plants, but enters plant roots passively through osmosis. Aluminium can exist in many different forms and is a responsible agent for limiting growth in various parts of the world. Aluminium tolerance studies have been conducted in different plant species to see viable thresholds and concentrations exposed along with function upon exposure.[21] Aluminium inhibits root growth; lateral roots and root tips become thickened and roots lack fine branching; root tips may turn brown. In the root, the initial effect of Al3+ is the inhibition of the expansion of the cells of the rhizodermis, leading to their rupture; thereafter it is known to interfere with many physiological processes including the uptake and transport of calcium and other essential nutrients, cell division, cell wall formation, and enzyme activity.[19] [22]

Proton (H+ ion) stress can also limit plant growth. The proton pump, H+-ATPase, of the plasmalemma of root cells works to maintain the near-neutral pH of their cytoplasm. A high proton activity (pH within the range 3.0–4.0 for most plant species) in the external growth medium overcomes the capacity of the cell to maintain the cytoplasmic pH and growth shuts down.[23]

In soils with a high content of manganese-containing minerals, Mn toxicity can become a problem at pH 5.6 and lower. Manganese, like aluminium, becomes increasingly soluble as pH drops, and Mn toxicity symptoms can be seen at pH levels below 5.6. Manganese is an essential plant nutrient, so plants transport Mn into leaves. Classic symptoms of Mn toxicity are crinkling or cupping of leaves.[24]

Nutrient availability in relation to soil pH

Soil pH affects the availability of some plant nutrients:

As discussed above, aluminium toxicity has direct effects on plant growth; however, by limiting root growth, it also reduces the availability of plant nutrients. Because roots are damaged, nutrient uptake is reduced, and deficiencies of the macronutrients (nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, calcium and magnesium) are frequently encountered in very strongly acidic to ultra-acidic soils (pH<5.0).[25] When aluminum levels increase in the soil, it decreases the pH levels. This does not allow for trees to take up water, meaning they cannot photosynthesize, leading them to die. The trees can also develop yellowish colour on their leaves and veins.[26]

Molybdenum availability is increased at higher pH; this is because the molybdate ion is more strongly sorbed by clay particles at lower pH.[27]

Zinc, iron, copper and manganese show decreased availability at higher pH (increased sorption at higher pH).[27]

The effect of pH on phosphorus availability varies considerably, depending on soil conditions and the crop in question. The prevailing view in the 1940s and 1950s was that P availability was maximized near neutrality (soil pH 6.5–7.5), and decreased at higher and lower pH.[28] [29] Interactions of phosphorus with pH in the moderately to slightly acidic range (pH 5.5–6.5) are, however, far more complex than is suggested by this view. Laboratory tests, glasshouse trials and field trials have indicated that increases in pH within this range may increase, decrease, or have no effect on P availability to plants.[29] [30]

Water availability in relation to soil pH

Strongly alkaline soils are sodic and dispersive, with slow infiltration, low hydraulic conductivity and poor available water capacity.[31] Plant growth is severely restricted because aeration is poor when the soil is wet; while in dry conditions, plant-available water is rapidly depleted and the soils become hard and cloddy (high soil strength).[32] The higher the pH in the soil, the less water available to be distributed to the plants and organisms that depend on it. With a decreased pH, this does not allow for plants to uptake water like they normally would. This causes them to not be able to photosynthesize.[33]

Many strongly acidic soils, on the other hand, have strong aggregation, good internal drainage, and good water-holding characteristics. However, for many plant species, aluminium toxicity severely limits root growth, and moisture stress can occur even when the soil is relatively moist.[19]

Plant pH preferences

In general terms, different plant species are adapted to soils of different pH ranges. For many species, the suitable soil pH range is fairly well known. Online databases of plant characteristics, such as USDA PLANTS[34] and Plants for a Future[35] can be used to look up the suitable soil pH range of a wide range of plants. Documents like Ellenberg's indicator values for British plants[36] can also be consulted.

However, a plant may be intolerant of a particular pH in some soils as a result of a particular mechanism, and that mechanism may not apply in other soils. For example, a soil low in molybdenum may not be suitable for soybean plants at pH 5.5, but soils with sufficient molybdenum allow optimal growth at that pH.[25] Similarly, some calcifuges (plants intolerant of high-pH soils) can tolerate calcareous soils if sufficient phosphorus is supplied.[37] Another confounding factor is that different varieties of the same species often have different suitable soil pH ranges. Plant breeders can use this to breed varieties that can tolerate conditions that are otherwise considered unsuitable for that species – examples are projects to breed aluminium-tolerant and manganese-tolerant varieties of cereal crops for food production in strongly acidic soils.[38]

The table below gives suitable soil pH ranges for some widely cultivated plants as found in the USDA PLANTS Database.[34] Some species (like Pinus radiata and Opuntia ficus-indica) tolerate only a narrow range in soil pH, whereas others (such as Vetiveria zizanioides) tolerate a very wide pH range.

Scientific name Common name pH (minimum) pH (maximum)
Chrysopogon zizanioides vetiver grass 3.0 8.0
Pinus rigidapitch pine 3.5 5.1
Rubus chamaemoruscloudberry 4.0 5.2
Ananas comosuspineapple4.06.0
Coffea arabicaArabian coffee 4.07.5
Rhododendron arborescenssmooth azalea4.2 5.7
Pinus radiataMonterey pine4.55.2
Carya illinoinensispecan4.57.5
Tamarindus indicatamarind4.58.0
Vaccinium corymbosumhighbush blueberry4.77.5
Manihot esculentacassava5.05.5
Morus albawhite mulberry5.07.0
Malusapple5.07.5
Pinus sylvestrisScots pine5.07.5
Carica papayapapaya5.08.0
Cajanus cajanpigeonpea5.08.3
Pyrus communiscommon pear5.26.7
Solanum lycopersicumgarden tomato5.57.0
Psidium guajavaguava5.57.0
Nerium oleanderoleander5.57.8
Punica granatumpomegranate6.06.9
Viola sororiacommon blue violet6.07.8
Caragana arborescensSiberian peashrub6.09.0
Cotoneaster integerrimuscotoneaster6.88.7
Opuntia ficus-indicaBarbary fig (pricklypear)7.08.5

In natural or near-natural plant communities, the various pH preferences of plant species (or ecotypes) at least partly determine the composition and biodiversity of vegetation. While both very low and very high pH values are detrimental to plant growth, there is an increasing trend of plant biodiversity along the range from extremely acidic (pH 3.5) to strongly alkaline (pH 9) soils, i.e. there are more calcicole than calcifuge species, at least in terrestrial environments.[39] [40] Although widely reported and supported by experimental results,[41] [42] the observed increase of plant species richness with pH is still in need of a clearcut explanation. Competitive exclusion between plant species with overlapping pH ranges most probably contributes to the observed shifts of vegetation composition along pH gradients.[43]

pH effects on soil biota

Soil biota (soil microflora, soil animals) are sensitive to soil pH, either directly upon contact or after soil ingestion or indirectly through the various soil properties to which pH contributes (e.g. nutrient status, metal toxicity, humus form). According to the various physiological and behavioural adaptations of soil biota, the species composition of soil microbial and animal communities varies with soil pH.[44] [45] Along altitudinal gradients, changes in the species distribution of soil animal and microbial communities can be at least partly ascribed to variation in soil pH.[45] [46] The shift from toxic to non-toxic forms of aluminium around pH5 marks the passage from acid-tolerance to acid-intolerance, with few changes in the species composition of soil communities above this threshold, even in calcareous soils.[47] [48] Soil animals exhibit distinct pH preferences when allowed to exert a choice along a range of pH values,[49] explaining that various field distributions of soil organisms, motile microbes included, could at least partly result from active movement along pH gradients.[50] [51] Like for plants, competition between acido-tolerant and acido-intolerant soil-dwelling organisms was suspected to play a role in the shifts in species composition observed along pH ranges.[52]

The opposition between acido-tolerance and acido-intolerance is commonly observed at species level within a genus or at genus level within a family, but it also occurs at much higher taxonomic rank, like between soil fungi and bacteria, here too with a strong involvement of competition.[53] It has been suggested that soil organisms more tolerant of soil acidity, and thus living mainly in soils at pH less than 5, were more primitive than those intolerant of soil acidity.[54] A cladistic analysis on the collembolan genus Willemia showed that tolerance to soil acidity was correlated with tolerance of other stress factors and that stress tolerance was an ancestral character in this genus.[55] However the generality of these findings remains to be established.

At low pH, the oxidative stress induced by aluminium (Al3+) affects soil animals the body of which is not protected by a thick chitinous exoskeleton like in arthropods, and thus are in more direct contact with the soil solution, e.g. protists, nematodes, rotifers (microfauna), enchytraeids (mesofauna) and earthworms (macrofauna).[56]

Effects of pH on soil biota can be mediated by the various functional interactions of soil foodwebs. It has been shown experimentally that the collembolan Heteromurus nitidus, commonly living in soils at pH higher than 5, could be cultured in more acid soils provided that predators were absent.[57] Its attraction to earthworm excreta (mucus, urine, faeces), mediated by ammonia emission,[58] provides food and shelter within earthworm burrows in mull humus forms associated with less acid soils.[59]

Effects of soil biota on soil pH

Soil biota affect soil pH directly through excretion, and indirectly by acting on the physical environment. Many soil fungi, although not all of them, acidify the soil by excreting oxalic acid, a product of their respiratory metabolism. Oxalic acid precipitates calcium, forming insoluble crystals of calcium oxalate and thus depriving the soil solution from this necessary element.[60] On the opposite side, earthworms exert a buffering effect on soil pH through their excretion of mucus, endowed with amphoteric properties.[61]

By mixing organic matter with mineral matter, in particular clay particles, and by adding mucus as a glue for some of them, burrowing soil animals, e.g. fossorial rodents, moles, earthworms, termites, some millipedes and fly larvae, contribute to decrease the natural acidity of raw organic matter, as observed in mull humus forms.[62] [63]

Changing soil pH

Increasing pH of acidic soil

Finely ground agricultural lime is often applied to acid soils to increase soil pH (liming). The amount of limestone or chalk needed to change pH is determined by the mesh size of the lime (how finely it is ground) and the buffering capacity of the soil. A high mesh size (60 mesh = 0.25 mm; 100 mesh = 0.149 mm) indicates a finely ground lime that will react quickly with soil acidity. The buffering capacity of a soil depends on the clay content of the soil, the type of clay, and the amount of organic matter present, and may be related to the soil cation exchange capacity. Soils with high clay content will have a higher buffering capacity than soils with little clay, and soils with high organic matter will have a higher buffering capacity than those with low organic matter.[64] Soils with higher buffering capacity require a greater amount of lime to achieve an equivalent change in pH.[65] The buffering of soil pH is often directly related to the quantity of aluminium in soil solution and taking up exchange sites as part of the cation exchange capacity. This aluminium can be measured in a soil test in which it is extracted from the soil with a salt solution, and then is quantified with a laboratory analysis. Then, using the initial soil pH and the aluminium content, the amount of lime needed to raise the pH to a desired level can be calculated.[66]

Amendments other than agricultural lime that can be used to increase the pH of soil include wood ash, industrial calcium oxide (burnt lime), magnesium oxide, basic slag (calcium silicate), and oyster shells. These products increase the pH of soils through various acid–base reactions. Calcium silicate neutralizes active acidity in the soil by reacting with H+ ions to form monosilicic acid (H4SiO4), a neutral solute.[67]

Decreasing the pH of alkaline soil

The pH of an alkaline soil can be reduced by adding acidifying agents or acidic organic materials. Elemental sulfur (90–99% S) has been used at application rates of 300kg/ha500kg/ha – it slowly oxidizes in soil to form sulfuric acid. Acidifying fertilizers, such as ammonium sulfate, ammonium nitrate and urea, can help to reduce the pH of a soil because ammonium oxidises to form nitric acid. Acidifying organic materials include peat or sphagnum peat moss.[68]

However, in high-pH soils with a high calcium carbonate content (more than 2%), it can be very costly and/or ineffective to attempt to reduce the pH with acids. In such cases, it is often more efficient to add phosphorus, iron, manganese, copper and/or zinc instead, because deficiencies of these nutrients are the most common reasons for poor plant growth in calcareous soils.[69] [68]

See also

External links

Notes and References

  1. Book: 10.2136/sssabookser5.3.c16 . Soil pH and soil acidity . Methods of soil analysis . SSSA Book Series . 1996 . Thomas . G. W. . 475–90 . 978-0-89118-866-7 . 93493509 . https://booksc.me/book/63966872/3a9fd8 . 29 January 2023 . Sparks . D. L. . Page . A. L. . Helmke . P. A. . Loeppert . R. H. . Soltanpour . P. N. . Tabatabai . M. A. . Johnston . C. T. . Sumner . M. E. . . Madison, Wisconsin .
  2. Slessarev . Eric W. . Lin . Yuan . Bingham . Nina L. . Johnson . Jennifer E. . Dai . Yongjiu . Schimel . Joshua P. . Chadwick . Oliver A. . Water balance creates a threshold in soil pH at the global scale . . 21 November 2016 . 540 . 7634 . 567–69 . 10.1038/nature20139 . 27871089 . 2016Natur.540..567S . 4466063 . 5 February 2023 .
  3. Web site: Queensland Government . Soil pH . . 5 February 2023 . en-AU.
  4. Web site: Soil Science Division Staff . Soil Survey Manual 2017, Chapter 3, Examination and description of soil profiles . Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Handbook 18 . 12 February 2023.
  5. Book: 978-0813828732 . Soil genesis and classification . Fifth . 2003 . 12 February 2023 . Buol . Stanley W. . Southard . Randal J. . Graham . Robert C. . McDaniel . Paul A. . . Hoboken, New Jersey .
  6. Web site: Evolution of the pH Meter . 2023-09-22 . Lab Manager . en.
  7. Bargrizan . Sima . Smernik . Ronald J. . Mosley . Luke M. . Development of a spectrophotometric method for determining pH of soil extracts and comparison with glass electrode measurements . . November 2017 . 81 . 6 . 1350–58 . 10.2136/sssaj2017.04.0119 . 2017SSASJ..81.1350B . 12 February 2023.
  8. Book: Soil Survey Staff . Rebecca Burt and Soil Survey Staff . Kellogg Soil Survey Laboratory Methods Manual. Soil Survey Investigations Report No. 42, Version 5.0 . 2014 . United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service . 276–279 . 19 February 2023.
  9. Web site: USDA-NRCS . Soil pH . Soil Health - Guides for Educators . 19 February 2023.
  10. Van Breemen . Nico . Nico van Breemen . Mulder . Jan . Driscoll . Charles T.. Acidification and alkalinization of soils . . October 1983 . 75 . 3 . 283–308 . 10.1007/BF02369968 . 1983PlSoi..75..283V . 39568100 . 19 February 2023.
  11. Van Breemen . Nico . Driscoll . Charles T. . Mulder . Jan . Acidic deposition and internal proton sources in acidification of soils and waters . . 16 February 1984 . 307 . 5952 . 599–604 . 10.1038/307599a0 . 1984Natur.307..599B . 4342985 . 19 February 2023.
  12. Web site: US EPA . OAR . 2016-02-09 . What is acid rain?. 26 February 2023 . . en.
  13. Book: Bloom . Paul R. . Skyllberg . Ulf . Huang . Pan Ming . Li . Yuncong . Sumner . Malcolm E. . Handbook of soil sciences: properties and processes . 2012 . . Boca Raton, Florida . 9780429095986 . 10.1201/b11267 . 19–1 to 19–14 . 2nd . Soil pH and pH buffering . 12 March 2023.
  14. Web site: Oosterbaan . Roland J.. Soil alkalinity (alkaline-sodic soils) . www.waterlog.info . 12 March 2023.
  15. Web site: Public health statement for aluminum . www.atsdr.cdc.gov . en . September 2008 . 12 March 2023 . 12 December 2016 . https://web.archive.org/web/20161212212014/https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/phs/phs.asp?id=1076&tid=34 . live.
  16. Dolara . Piero . 21 July 2014 . Occurrence, exposure, effects, recommended intake and possible dietary use of selected trace compounds (aluminium, bismuth, cobalt, gold, lithium, nickel, silver) . . 65 . 8 . 911–24 . 10.3109/09637486.2014.937801 . 1465-3478 . 25045935 . 43779869 . 12 March 2023.
  17. Rosseland . Bjorn Olav . Eldhuset . Toril Drabløs . Staurnes . Magne . 1990 . Environmental effects of aluminium . Environmental Geochemistry and Health . 12 . 1–2 . 17–27 . 10.1007/BF01734045 . 24202562 . 1990EnvGH..12...17R . 23714684 . 0269-4042 . 12 March 2023.
  18. Book: The nature and properties of soils, global edition . 15th . 2016 . Weil . Raymond R. . Brady . Nyle C. . 9781292162232 . 19 March 2023 . . London, United Kingdom.
  19. Kopittke . Peter M. . Menzies . Neal W. . Wang . Peng . Blamey . F. Pax C. . Kinetics and nature of aluminium rhizotoxic effects: a review . . August 2016 . 67 . 15 . 4451–67 . 10.1093/jxb/erw233 . 27302129 . 19 March 2023.
  20. Hansson . Karna . Olsson . Bengt A. . Olsson . Mats . Johansson . Ulf . Kleja . Dan Berggren . Differences in soil properties in adjacent stands of Scots pine, Norway spruce and silver birch in SW Sweden . . August 2011 . 262 . 3 . 522–30 . 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.04.021 . 19 March 2023.
  21. Wright . Robert J. . Soil aluminum toxicity and plant growth . Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis . September 1989 . 20 . 15–16 . 1479–97 . 10.1080/00103628909368163 . 1989CSSPA..20.1479W . 19 March 2023.
  22. Rout . Gyana Ranjan . Samantaray . Sanghamitra . Das . Premananda . Aluminium toxicity in plants: a review . Agronomie . January 2001 . 21 . 1 . 3–21 . 10.1051/agro:2001105 . 2001AgSD...21....3R . 19 March 2023.
  23. Shavrukov . Yuri . Hirai . Yoshihiko . Good and bad protons: genetic aspects of acidity stress responses in plants . . January 2016 . 67 . 1 . 15–30 . 10.1093/jxb/erv437 . 26417020 . free.
  24. Ramakrishnan . Palayanoor Sivaswamy . Nutritional requirements of the edaphic ecotypes in Melilotus alba Medic. II. Aluminium and manganese . . April 1968 . 67 . 2 . 301–08 . 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1968.tb06385.x . free.
  25. Sumner . Malcolm E. . Yamada . Tsuioshi . Farming with acidity . Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis . November 2002 . 33 . 15–18 . 2467–96 . 10.1081/CSS-120014461 . 2002CSSPA..33.2467S . 93165895.
  26. Cape . J. N. . Direct damage to vegetation caused by acid rain and polluted cloud: definition of critical levels for forest trees . . 1 January 1993 . 82 . 2 . 167–180 . 10.1016/0269-7491(93)90114-4 . 15091786 . 2 April 2023.
  27. Book: Bolan . Nanthi . Brennan . Ross . Budianta . Dedik . Camberato . James J. . Naidu . Ravi . Pan . William L. . Sharpley . Andrew . Sparks . Donald L. . Sumner . Malcolm E. . Huang . Pan Ming . Li . Yuncong . Sumner . Malcolm E. . Handbook of soil sciences: resource management and environmental impacts . 2012 . . Boca Raton, Florida . 978-1-4398-0308-0 . 11–1 to 11–80 . 2nd . Bioavailability of N, P, K, Ca, Mg, S, Si, and micronutrients . 2 April 2023.
  28. Book: Truog . Emil . Science in farming, USDA Yearbook, 1941–1947 . 1946 . 566–76 . The liming of soils . https://naldc.nal.usda.gov/download/IND43893966/PDF . 9 April 2023.
  29. Book: Sumner . Malcolm E. . Farina . Mart P.W. . Stewart . Bob A. . Advances in soil science . 1986 . . New York, New York . 978-1-4613-8660-5 . 201–36 . Phosphorus interactions with other nutrients and lime in field cropping systems . 10.1007/978-1-4613-8660-5_5 . https://www.researchgate.net/publication/286120267 . 9 April 2023.
  30. Haynes . R. J. . Effects of liming on phosphate availability in acid soils: a critical review . . October 1982 . 68 . 3 . 289–308 . 10.1007/BF02197935 . 22695096 . 9 April 2023.
  31. Book: Ellis . Boyd . Foth . Henry . Soil fertility . 2nd . 73–74 . 1997 . 10 April 2023 . 9781566702430 . . Boca Raton, Florida .
  32. Web site: Sodic soils and plant growth . fao.org . 10 April 2023 . en.
  33. 10.1155/2019/5794869 . free . The role of soil pH in plant nutrition and soil remediation . 2019 . Neina . Dora . . 2019 . 1–9.
  34. Web site: USDA NRCS . Plants Database Characteristics Search . plants.usda.gov . . 16 April 2023 . 2023.
  35. Web site: Plants for a future . Plant Database Search Page . www.pfaf.org . 16 April 2023.
  36. Book: Hill . Mark Oliver . Mountford . J. Owen . Roy . David B. . Bunce . Robert G.H. . Ellenberg's indicator values for British plants. ECOFACT Volume 2. Technical Annex . 1999 . . Huntingdon, United Kingdom . 978-1870393485 . 16 April 2023.
  37. Lee . John A. . The calcicole-calcifuge problem revisited . Advances in Botanical Research . 1998 . 29 . 13 . 23 April 2023 . 9780080561837.
  38. Book: Scott . Brendan J. . Fisher . J.A. . Robson . Alan D.. Soil acidity and plant growth . 1989 . . Sydney, Australia . 978-0125906555 . 167–203 . 23 April 2023 . Selection of genotypes tolerant of aluminium and manganese . 10.1016/B978-0-12-590655-5.50010-4.
  39. Chytrý . Milan . Tichý . Lubomír . Rolček . Jan . Local and regional patterns of species richness in Central European vegetation types along the pH/calcium gradient . Folia Geobotanica . December 2003 . 38 . 4 . 429–42 . 10.1007/BF02803250 . 2003FolGe..38..429C . 13016841 . 7 May 2023.
  40. Pärtel . Meelis . Helm . Aveliina . Ingerpuu . Nele . Reier . Ülle . Tuvi . Eva-Liis . Conservation of Northern European plant diversity: the correspondence with soil pH . . December 2004 . 120 . 4 . 525–31 . 10.1016/j.biocon.2004.03.025 . 2004BCons.120..525P . 7 May 2023.
  41. Crawley . Michael J. . Johnston . A. Edward . Silvertown . Jonathan . Dodd . Mike . de Mazancourt . Claire . Heard . Matthew S. . Henman . D. F. . Edwards . Grant R. . Determinants of species richness in the Park Grass Experiment . . February 2005 . 165 . 2 . 179–92 . 10.1086/427270 . 15729649 . 7389457 . 14 May 2023.
  42. Poozesh . Vahid . Castillon . Pierre . Cruz . Pablo . Bertoni . Georges . Re-evaluation of the liming-fertilization interaction in grasslands on poor and acid soils . Grass and Forage Science . June 2010 . 65 . 2 . 260–72 . 10.1111/j.1365-2494.2010.00744.x . 14 May 2023.
  43. Prince . Candice M. . MacDonald . Gregory E. . Ferrell . Jason A. . Sellers . Brent A. . Wang . Jingjing . Impact of soil pH on cogongrass (Imperata cylindrica) and bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum) competition . . 2018 . 32 . 3 . 336–41 . 10.1017/wet.2018.3 . 91112353 .
  44. Lauber . Christian L. . Hamady . Micah . Knight . Rob . Fierer . Noah . Pyrosequencing-based assessment of soil pH as a predictor of soil bacterial community structure at the continental scale . . August 2009 . 75 . 15 . 5111–20 . 10.1128/AEM.00335-09 . 19502440 . 2725504 . 2009ApEnM..75.5111L .
  45. Loranger . Gladys . Bandyopadhyaya . Ipsa . Razaka . Barbara . Ponge . Jean-François . Does soil acidity explain altitudinal sequences in collembolan communities? . . March 2001 . 33 . 3 . 381–93 . 10.1016/S0038-0717(00)00153-X . 84523833 . 4 June 2023.
  46. Tian . Qiuxiang . Jiang . Ying . Tang . Yanan . Wu . Yu . Tang . Zhiyao . Liu . Feng . Soil pH and organic carbon properties drive soil bacterial communities in surface and deep layers along an elevational gradient . . 30 July 2021 . 12 . 646124 . 646124 . 10.3389/fmicb.2021.646124 . 34394018 . 8363232 . free.
  47. Ponge . Jean-François . Biocenoses of Collembola in atlantic temperate grass-woodland ecosystems . Pedobiologia . July 1993 . 37 . 4 . 223–44 . 10.1016/S0031-4056(24)00100-8 . 11 June 2023.
  48. Desie . Ellen . Van Meerbeek . Koenraad . De Wandeler . Hans . Bruelheide . Helge . Domisch . Timo . Jaroszewicz . Bogdan . Joly . François-Xavier . Vancampenhout . Karen . Vesterdal . Lars . Muys . Bart . Positive feedback loop between earthworms, humus form and soil pH reinforces earthworm abundance in European forests . . August 2020 . 34 . 12 . 2598–2610 . 10.1111/1365-2435.13668 . 2020FuEco..34.2598D . 225182565 . 11 June 2023. 1893/31777 . free .
  49. Van Straalen . Nico M. . Verhoef . Herman A. . The development of a bioindicator system for soil acidity based on arthropod pH preferences . . February 1997 . 34 . 1 . 217–32 . 10.2307/2404860 . 2404860 . 1997JApEc..34..217V . 18 June 2023.
  50. He . Bin . Wang . Zhipeng . Xu . Changhui . Shen . Runjie . Hu . Sanqing . The study on pH gradient control in solution for driving bacteria . Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering . 2013 . 33 . 2 . 88–95 . 10.1016/j.bbe.2013.03.003 . 18 June 2023.
  51. Wang . Congli . Bruening . George . Williamson . Valerie M. . Determination of preferred pH for root-knot nematode aggregation using pluronic F-127 gel . . 20 October 2009 . 35 . 10 . 1242–51 . 10.1007/s10886-009-9703-8 . 19838866 . 2780626 . 2009JCEco..35.1242W . 8403899 . 18 June 2023.
  52. Hågvar . Sigmund . Reactions to soil acidification in microarthropods: is competition a key factor? . Biology and Fertility of Soils . April 1990 . 9 . 2 . 178–81 . 10.1007/BF00335804 . 1990BioFS...9..178H . 5099516 . 25 June 2023.
  53. Rousk . Johannes . Brookes . Philip C. . Bååth . Erland . Investigating the mechanisms for the opposing pH relationships of fungal and bacterial growth in soil . . June 2010 . 42 . 6 . 926–34 . 10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.02.009 . 25 June 2023.
  54. Ponge . Jean-François . Acidophilic Collembola: living fossils? . Contributions from the Biological Laboratory, Kyoto University . March 2000 . 29 . 65–74 . 2 July 2023.
  55. Prinzing . Andreas . D'Haese . Cyrille A. . Pavoine . Sandrine . Ponge . Jean-François . Species living in harsh environments have low clade rank and are localized on former Laurasian continents: a case study of Willemia (Collembola) . . February 2014 . 41 . 2 . 353–65 . 10.1111/jbi.12188 . 2014JBiog..41..353P . 86619537 . 2 July 2023.
  56. Li . Yin-Sheng . Sun . Jing . Robin . Paul . Cluzeau . Daniel . Qiu . Jiangping . Responses of the earthworm Eisenia andrei exposed to sublethal aluminium levels in an artificial soil substrate . Chemistry and Ecology . April 2014 . 30 . 7 . 611–21 . 10.1080/02757540.2014.881804 . 2014ChEco..30..611L . 97315212 . 2 July 2023.
  57. Salmon . Sandrine . Ponge . Jean-François . Distribution of Heteromurus nitidus (Hexapoda, Collembola) according to soil acidity: interactions with earthworms and predator pressure . . July 1999 . 31 . 8 . 1161–70 . 10.1016/S0038-0717(99)00034-6 . 16 July 2023.
  58. Salmon . Sandrine . Earthworm excreta (mucus and urine) affect the distribution of springtails in forest soils . Biology and Fertility of Soils . November 2001 . 34 . 5 . 304–10 . 10.1007/s003740100407 . 2001BioFS..34..304S . 33455553 . 23 July 2023.
  59. Salmon . Sandrine . The impact of earthworms on the abundance of Collembola: improvement of food resources or of habitat? . Biology and Fertility of Soils . 17 September 2004 . 40 . 5 . 523–33 . 10.1007/s00374-004-0782-y . 2004BioFS..40..323S . 9671870 . 23 July 2023.
  60. Casarin . Valter . Plassard . Claude . Souche . Gérard . Arvieu . Jean-Claude . Quantification of oxalate ions and protons released by ectomycorrhizal fungi in rhizosphere soil . Agronomie . July 2003 . 23 . 5–6 . 461–69 . 10.1051/agro:2003020 . 2003AgSD...23..461C . 84663116 . 20 August 2023.
  61. Schrader . Stefan . Influence of earthworms on the pH conditions of their environment by cutaneous mucus secretion . . 1994 . 233 . 5–6 . 211–19.
  62. Guhra . Tom . Stolze . Katharina . Schweizer . Steffen . Totsche . Kai Uwe . Earthworm mucus contributes to the formation of organo-mineral associations in soil . . June 2020 . 145 . 107785 . 1–10 . 10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.107785 . 27 August 2023. free . 21.11116/0000-0006-600A-3 . free .
  63. Zanella . Augusto . Ponge . Jean-François . Briones . Maria J. I. . Humusica 1, article 8: Terrestrial humus systems and forms – Biologicalactivity and soil aggregates, space-time dynamics . Applied Soil Ecology . January 2018 . 122 . 1 . 103–37 . 10.1016/j.apsoil.2017.07.020 . 2018AppSE.122..103Z . 27 August 2023.
  64. Minhal . Fibrianty . Ma'as . Aswar . Hanudin . Eko . Sudira . Putu . Improvement of the chemical properties and buffering capacity of coastal sandy soil as affected by clay and organic by-product application . Soil and Water Research . June 2020 . 15 . 2 . 93–100 . 10.17221/55/2019-SWR . 3 September 2023.
  65. Aitken . R.L. . Moody . Philip W. . McKinley . P.G. . Lime requirement of acidic Queensland soils. I. Relationships between soil properties and pH buffer capacity . . 1990 . 28 . 5 . 695–701 . 10.1071/SR9900695 .
  66. Bartlett . Richmond . 1982 . Reactive aluminum in the Vermont Soil Test . Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis . 13 . 7. 497–506 . 10.1080/00103628209367289 . 1982CSSPA..13..497B .
  67. Book: von Uexkull . H.R. . Rome, Italy . Efficient fertilizer use in acid upland soils of the humid tropics . 1986 . . 9789251023877 . 16–22 . 10 September 2023 . en . Lime and liming.
  68. Web site: Solutions to soil problems. II. High pH (alkaline soil) . Cox . Loralie . Koenig . Rich . 2010 . . Logan, Utah . 10 September 2023.
  69. Web site: Soil quality indicators: pH . 1998 . . 10 September 2023.

This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Soil pH".

Except where otherwise indicated, Everything.Explained.Today is © Copyright 2009-2024, A B Cryer, All Rights Reserved. Cookie policy.