In algebraic geometry, a morphism
f:X\toS
\overline{s}\toS
X\overline{s
If S is the spectrum of an algebraically closed field and f is of finite type, then one recovers the definition of a nonsingular variety.
A singular variety is called smoothable if it can be put in a flat family so that the nearby fibers are all smooth. Such a family is called a smoothning of the variety.
There are many equivalent definitions of a smooth morphism. Let
f:X\toS
\OmegaX/S
X/S
x\inX
\operatorname{Spec}B
\operatorname{Spec}A
f(x)
B=A[t1,...,tn]/(P1,...,Pm)
(\partialPi/\partialtj)
X\overset{g}\to
n | |
A | |
S |
\toS
A morphism of finite type is étale if and only if it is smooth and quasi-finite.
A smooth morphism is stable under base change and composition.
A smooth morphism is universally locally acyclic.
Smooth morphisms are supposed to geometrically correspond to smooth submersions in differential geometry; that is, they are smooth locally trivial fibrations over some base space (by Ehresmann's theorem).
Let
f
SpecC\left(
C[x,y] | |
(f=y2-x3-x-1) |
\right)\toSpec(C)
[3x2-1,y]
(1/\sqrt{3},0),(-1/\sqrt{3},0)
\begin{align} f(1/\sqrt{3},0)&=1-
1 | |
\sqrt{3 |
Given a smooth scheme
Y
Y x X\toX
Every vector bundle
E\toX
l{O}(k)
Pn
O(k)=P(1,\ldots,1,k)-\{[0: … :0:1]\}\toPn
[x0: … :xn:xn+1]\to[x0: … :xn]
O(k) ⊕ O(l)
O(k) ⊕ O(l)=O(k) x XO(l)
Recall that a field extension
K\toL
L=
K[x] | |
(f(x)) |
gcd(f(x),f'(x))=1
\OmegaL/K=0
If we consider
Spec
R
X
X
3
5 | |
x | |
0 |
+
5 | |
x | |
1 |
+
5 | |
x | |
2 |
+
5 | |
x | |
3 |
+
5 | |
x | |
4 |
4 | |
\begin{bmatrix} 5x | |
0 |
&
4 | |
5x | |
1 |
&
4 | |
5x | |
2 |
&
4 | |
5x | |
3 |
&
4 | |
5x | |
4 |
\end{bmatrix}
Another example of a singular variety is the projective cone of a smooth variety: given a smooth projective variety
X\subsetPn
Pn+1
X
Proj\left(
C[x,y] | |
(x4+y4) |
\right)
Proj\left(
C[x,y,z] | |
(x4+y4) |
\right)
z ≠ 0
Spec\left(
C[X,Y] | |
(X4+Y4) |
\right)
1 | |
A | |
Y |
Consider the flat family
Spec\left(
C[t,x,y] | |
(xy-t) |
\right)\to
1 | |
A | |
t |
For example, the field
p) | |
F | |
p(t |
\toFp(t)
f(x)=xp-tp
df=0
See also: Formally smooth map and Geometrically regular ring. One can define smoothness without reference to geometry. We say that an S-scheme X is formally smooth if for any affine S-scheme T and a subscheme
T0
X(T)\toX(T0)
X(T)=\operatorname{Hom}S(T,X)
In the definition of "formally smooth", if we replace surjective by "bijective" (resp. "injective"), then we get the definition of formally étale (resp. formally unramified).
Let S be a scheme and
\operatorname{char}(S)
S\to\operatorname{Spec}Z
f:X\toS
g:S'\toS
l{F}
Xet
0\nep
\operatorname{char}(S)
p:l{F}\tol{F}
g*(R
if | |
*l{F})\to |
*l{F}) | |
R | |
*(g' |