Sampler (needlework) explained

A needlework sampler is a piece of embroidery or cross-stitching produced as a 'specimen of achievement',[1] demonstration or a test of skill in needlework.[2] [3] It often includes the alphabet, figures, motifs, decorative borders and sometimes the name of the person who embroidered it and the date. The word sampler is derived from the Latin Latin: exemplum, which means 'example'.[4]

History

The earliest sampler extant is a spot sampler, i.e. one having randomly scattered motifs, of the Nazca culture in Peru[5] formerly in the Museum of Primitive Art, New York City. It is estimated to date from ca. 200 BCE –300 CE and is worked in cotton and wool pattern darning on a woven cotton ground. It has seventy-four figures of birds, plants and mythological beings.[6]

Coptic sampler fragments[7] of silk on linen in double running stitch and pattern darning have been found in Egyptian burial grounds of 400–500 CE. These are pattern samplers having designs based on early Christian symbols.[8]

Samplers were known to be used by stitchers in Europe as early as the beginning of the 16th century, although none that early have been found. A collection of fifty Spanish; Castilian: dechados (samplers) was listed in the 1509 inventory of the possessions of Queen Joanna (Juana I, 1479–1555) of Castile (Spain). They were described as stitchery and Spanish; Castilian: deshilado (drawn thread work), some in silk and others in gold thread. At the time of the inventory they were in the care of her chamberlain Diego de Rivera and his son Alonso, but they have all disappeared.[9]

Early mentions of samplers in text include Skelton (1469-1529),[10] and Shakespeare (1564-1616).[11]

The oldest surviving European samplers were made in the 16th and 17th centuries. As there were few pre-printed patterns available for needleworkers, a stitched model was needed. Whenever a needleworker saw a new and interesting example of a stitching pattern, they would quickly sew a small sample of it onto a piece of cloth – their 'sampler'.[12] The patterns were sewn randomly onto the fabric as a reference for future use, and the needleworker would collect extra stitches and patterns throughout their lifetime.

The first printed pattern book German: Furm oder Modelbüchlein was published by Johann Schönsperger the Younger of Augsburg in 1523, but it was not easily obtainable and a sampler was the most common form of reference available to many women. Pattern books[13] were widely copied and issued by other publishers. Some are still available in reprint today.[14]

The earliest English dated surviving sampler, housed in the Victoria and Albert Museum in London, was made by Jane Bostocke who included her name and the date 1598 in the inscription. Stitched with silk and metal thread on linen it has pictorial figures above with border and all-over patterns below. The inscription reads:

The museum has two other samplers believed to date from the 16th century, one from Germany with religious motifs and one from Italy with floral patterns and grotesques. Both are worked in silk and linen.A Dutch sampler dated 1585 survives in the Nederlands Openluchtmuseum in Arnhem.

A sampler in the Museum of London has two cutwork bands stitched in silk, gold, and silver threads and thirteen bands of reticella whitework in white linen thread. The fourth band from the top has the initials E R, the royal arms of Queen Elizabeth I, and the maker's name SUSAN NEGABRI in bold letters. It is believed to date before the queen's death in 1603.[15]

Because very few samplers from the 16th century have been found it is not possible to generalize about their style and appearance. By the middle of the 17th century English, Dutch, and German samplers were being stitched on a narrow band of fabric 6– wide. Hand-woven linen, bleached or unbleached, is the foundation material of early samplers.[16] As fabric was very expensive, these samplers were totally covered with neat rows of stitches. They were known as band samplers and valued highly, often being mentioned in wills and passed down through the generations. These samplers were stitched using a variety of needlework styles, threads, and ornament. Many of them were exceedingly elaborate, incorporating subtly shaded colours, silk and metallic embroidery threads, and using stitches such as Hungarian, Florentine, tent, cross, long-armed cross, two-sided Italian cross, rice, running, Holbein, Algerian eye and buttonhole stitches. The samplers also incorporated small designs of flowers and animals, and geometric designs stitched using as many as 20 different colors of thread.[17] Some were stitched partially or entirely in whitework.

Band samplers were more decorative than the utilitarian random motif spot samplers, and stitchers finished them by adding their names, dates of completion, and sometimes teacher or school names. As the work of sampler making moved into schools in the late 17th and early 18th centuries design styles changed. Alphabets and verses were added along with pictorial elements such as architectural motifs, landscapes, and large potted plants. Educational themes included maps, multiplication tables, perpetual calendars, and acrostic puzzles.[18]

By the 18th century, samplers were a complete contrast to the scattered samples sewn earlier on. They became wider and more square, eventually with borders on all four sides. Samplers were mainly school exercises during the 18th and 19th centuries, and were almost entirely worked in cross stitch. Design styles were increasingly influenced by Berlin woolwork which became popular worldwide, due to the availability of patterns, initially emanating from Berlin, Germany. This style of needlework reached its height of popularity between the 1830s and 1870s.[19] These samplers were stitched more to demonstrate knowledge than to preserve skill. The stitching of samplers was believed to be a sign of virtue, achievement and industry, and girls were taught the art from a young age.[20]

Berlin woolwork designs had naturalistic shading and more depth of perspective than the flat two-dimensional objects on traditional needlework. By mid-19th century adult needleworkers were devising long and narrow stitch samplers having geometric patterns done in woolwork. The Art Needlework movement and elimination of samplers from female education brought about the decline in traditional sampler making that continued into the 20th century.

Modern samplers

Samplers are widely stitched today, some using kits purchased from needlework shops, some from chart-packs, and many from patterns available on the Internet or through e-mail from designers. Patterns range from simple using only one stitch, to complex, using 15 to 20 and more stitches. Designs range widely in style, from accurate reproductions of historic pieces to much more contemporary and modern styles including subversive stitching. Popular topics include designs commemorating births and marriages, family trees, and mottoes of all kinds. Map charts are widely available in English-speaking countries and Denmark. These are often pictorial maps of local areas, whole countries, or even the imaginary realms of Tolkien's Middle-earth. Many sampler reproductions are also available, copying colors and imperfect stitches from the originals.

The word "sampler" is sometimes inaccurately applied to any piece of needlework meant for display. However, the genre may broadly be said to include any needlework in sampler style with or without lettering.

Materials used include aida cloth, evenweave, and linen fabrics, in cotton, linen, and man-made materials combined in more and more ways; and fibers from cotton floss to silk, rayon, viscose, and metallic.

See also

References

External links

Notes and References

  1. Samplers and Tapestry Embroideries, Marcus Huish, Longmans, 1913 "First of all consisting of decorative patterns thrown here and there without care upon the surface of a piece of canvas (see Plate II.); then of designs placed in more orderly rows, and making in themselves a harmonious whole; then added thereto alphabet and figures for the use of those who marked the linen, and as an off-shoot imitation of tapestry pictures by the additions of figures, houses, etc. Finally it was adopted as an educational task in the schools, as a specimen of phenomenal achievement at an early age…"https://archive.org/details/samplerstapestry00huisrich/page/12
  2. Book: Lambert, Miss. My Croquet Sample. 1. 1847. D.M. Peyser .
  3. Book: Lambert, Miss. My Croquet Sample. 2. 1848. J. Murray .
  4. Sampler.
  5. Web site: Textile Research Centre.
  6. Sebba, Anne, Samplers, Five Centuries of a Gentle Craft, New York: Thames and Hudson, 1979. p. 6. .
  7. Web site: Google images of Coptic sampler fragments.
  8. Sebba 1979, pp. 6–7.
  9. Segura Lacomba, Maravillas, Bordados Populaires Españoles, Madrid: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas, Instituto ″San Jose de Calasanz″ de Pedagogia, 1949. p.72.
  10. Huish, Samplers and Tapestry Embroideries "the sampler to sowe on, the laces to embroide"
  11. Midsummer Nights Dream Helena to Hermia "...We, Hermia... Have with our needles created both one flower, Both on one sampler etc,."
  12. Web site: A History of Samplers. www.vam.ac.uk. Victoria and Albert Museum. en-GB. 2017-11-20.
  13. Huish cites The Needles Excellency... "wherein are divers admirable works wrought with the needle", printed for James Boler, and are to be sold at the Syne of the Marigold in Paules Churchyard"
  14. Banham, Joanna, ed. Encyclopedia of Interior Design, London and Chicago: Fitzroy Dearborn, 1997. vol. 2 p. 858 ″Needlework″
  15. Hughes, Therle, English Domestic Needlework 1660–1860, London: Abbey Fine Arts, 1961. p. 76, fig. 30.
  16. Huish, Samplers and Tapestry Embroideries, 1913, p.171.
  17. Don, Sarah, Traditional Samplers, Newton Abbot and London: David and Charles, 1986. pp. 11–14.
  18. Mayor, Susan and Diana Fowle, Samplers, Wakefield RI and London: Moyer Bell, 1996. pp. 7–11.
  19. Book: The Needle arts : a social history of American needlework.. Time-Life Books. Time-Life Books.. 1990. 0-8094-6841-7. Alexandria, Va.. 21482166.
  20. Sebba 1979, pp.113–121