Route of administration explained

In pharmacology and toxicology, a route of administration is the way by which a drug, fluid, poison, or other substance is taken into the body.[1]

Routes of administration are generally classified by the location at which the substance is applied. Common examples include oral and intravenous administration. Routes can also be classified based on where the target of action is. Action may be topical (local), enteral (system-wide effect, but delivered through the gastrointestinal tract), or parenteral (systemic action, but is delivered by routes other than the GI tract). Route of administration and dosage form are aspects of drug delivery.

Classification

Routes of administration are usually classified by application location (or exposition).

The route or course the active substance takes from application location to the location where it has its target effect is usually rather a matter of pharmacokinetics (concerning the processes of uptake, distribution, and elimination of drugs). Exceptions include the transdermal or transmucosal routes, which are still commonly referred to as routes of administration.

The location of the target effect of active substances are usually rather a matter of pharmacodynamics (concerning e.g. the physiological effects of drugs[2]). An exception is topical administration, which generally means that both the application location and the effect thereof is local.[3]

Topical administration is sometimes defined as both a local application location and local pharmacodynamic effect,[3] and sometimes merely as a local application location regardless of location of the effects.[4] [5]

By application location

Enteral/gastrointestinal route

Through the gastrointestinal tract is sometimes termed enteral or enteric administration (literally meaning 'through the intestines'). Enteral/enteric administration usually includes oral (through the mouth) and rectal (into the rectum)[6] administration, in the sense that these are taken up by the intestines. However, uptake of drugs administered orally may also occur already in the stomach, and as such gastrointestinal (along the gastrointestinal tract) may be a more fitting term for this route of administration. Furthermore, some application locations often classified as enteral, such as sublingual[6] (under the tongue) and sublabial or buccal (between the cheek and gums/gingiva), are taken up in the proximal part of the gastrointestinal tract without reaching the intestines. Strictly enteral administration (directly into the intestines) can be used for systemic administration, as well as local (sometimes termed topical), such as in a contrast enema, whereby contrast media are infused into the intestines for imaging. However, for the purposes of classification based on location of effects, the term enteral is reserved for substances with systemic effects.

Many drugs as tablets, capsules, or drops are taken orally. Administration methods directly into the stomach include those by gastric feeding tube or gastrostomy. Substances may also be placed into the small intestines, as with a duodenal feeding tube and enteral nutrition. Enteric coated tablets are designed to dissolve in the intestine, not the stomach, because the drug present in the tablet causes irritation in the stomach.The rectal route is an effective route of administration for many medications, especially those used at the end of life.[7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] The walls of the rectum absorb many medications quickly and effectively.[14] Medications delivered to the distal one-third of the rectum at least partially avoid the "first pass effect" through the liver, which allows for greater bio-availability of many medications than that of the oral route. Rectal mucosa is highly vascularized tissue that allows for rapid and effective absorption of medications.[15] A suppository is a solid dosage form that fits for rectal administration. In hospice care, a specialized rectal catheter, designed to provide comfortable and discreet administration of ongoing medications provides a practical way to deliver and retain liquid formulations in the distal rectum, giving health practitioners a way to leverage the established benefits of rectal administration. The Murphy drip is an example of rectal infusion.

Parenteral route

The parenteral route is any route that is not enteral (par- + enteral).

Parenteral administration can be performed by injection, that is, using a needle (usually a hypodermic needle) and a syringe,[16] or by the insertion of an indwelling catheter.

Locations of application of parenteral administration include:

Topical route

See main article: Topical drug delivery. The definition of the topical route of administration sometimes states that both the application location and the pharmacodynamic effect thereof is local.[3]

In other cases, topical is defined as applied to a localized area of the body or to the surface of a body part regardless of the location of the effect.[4] [5] By this definition, topical administration also includes transdermal application, where the substance is administered onto the skin but is absorbed into the body to attain systemic distribution.

If defined strictly as having local effect, the topical route of administration can also include enteral administration of medications that are poorly absorbable by the gastrointestinal tract. One such medication is the antibiotic vancomycin, which cannot be absorbed in the gastrointestinal tract and is used orally only as a treatment for Clostridium difficile colitis.[24]

Choice of routes

The reason for choice of routes of drug administration are governing by various factors:

In acute situations, in emergency medicine and intensive care medicine, drugs are most often given intravenously. This is the most reliable route, as in acutely ill patients the absorption of substances from the tissues and from the digestive tract can often be unpredictable due to altered blood flow or bowel motility.

Convenience

Enteral routes are generally the most convenient for the patient, as no punctures or sterile procedures are necessary. Enteral medications are therefore often preferred in the treatment of chronic disease. However, some drugs can not be used enterally because their absorption in the digestive tract is low or unpredictable. Transdermal administration is a comfortable alternative; there are, however, only a few drug preparations that are suitable for transdermal administration.

Desired target effect

Identical drugs can produce different results depending on the route of administration. For example, some drugs are not significantly absorbed into the bloodstream from the gastrointestinal tract and their action after enteral administration is therefore different from that after parenteral administration. This can be illustrated by the action of naloxone (Narcan), an antagonist of opiates such as morphine. Naloxone counteracts opiate action in the central nervous system when given intravenously and is therefore used in the treatment of opiate overdose. The same drug, when swallowed, acts exclusively on the bowels; it is here used to treat constipation under opiate pain therapy and does not affect the pain-reducing effect of the opiate.

Oral

The oral route is generally the most convenient and costs the least. However, some drugs can cause gastrointestinal tract irritation.[25] For drugs that come in delayed release or time-release formulations, breaking the tablets or capsules can lead to more rapid delivery of the drug than intended. The oral route is limited to formulations containing small molecules only while biopharmaceuticals (usually proteins) would be digested in the stomach and thereby become ineffective. Biopharmaceuticals have to be given by injection or infusion. However, recent research found various ways to improve oral bioavailability of these drugs. In particular permeation enhancers,[26] ionic liquids,[27] lipid-based nanocarriers,[28] enzyme inhibitors and microneedles[29] have shown potential.

Oral administration is often denoted "PO" from "per os", the Latin for "by mouth".

The bioavailability of oral administration is affected by the amount of drug that is absorbed across the intestinal epithelium and first-pass metabolism.[30]

Oral mucosal

The oral mucosa is the mucous membrane lining the inside of the mouth.

Buccal

Buccally administered medication is achieved by placing the drug between gums and the inner lining of the cheek.[31] In comparison with sublingual tissue, buccal tissue is less permeable resulting in slower absorption.

Sublabial

See main article: Sublabial administration.

Sublingual

Sublingual administration is fulfilled by placing the drug between the tongue and the lower surface of the mouth. The sublingual mucosa is highly permeable and thereby provides access to the underlying expansive network composed of capillaries, leading to rapid drug absorption.

Intranasal

Drug administration via the nasal cavity yields rapid drug absorption and therapeutic effects.[32] This is because drug absorption through the nasal passages does not go through the gut before entering capillaries situated at tissue cells and then systemic circulation and such absorption route allows transport of drugs into the central nervous system via the pathways of olfactory and trigeminal nerve.[32]

Intranasal absorption features low lipophilicity, enzymatic degradation within the nasal cavity, large molecular size, and rapid mucociliary clearance from the nasal passages, which explains the low risk of systemic exposure of the administered drug absorbed via intranasal.[32]

Local

By delivering drugs almost directly to the site of action, the risk of systemic side effects is reduced.

Skin absorption (dermal absorption), for example, is to directly deliver drug to the skin and, hopefully, to the systemic circulation.[33] However, skin irritation may result, and for some forms such as creams or lotions, the dosage is difficult to control.[25] Upon contact with the skin, the drug penetrates into the dead stratum corneum and can afterwards reach the viable epidermis, the dermis, and the blood vessels.[33]

Parenteral

The term parenteral is from para-1 'beside' + Greek enteron 'intestine' + -al. This name is due to the fact that it encompasses a route of administration that is not intestinal. However, in common English the term has mostly been used to describe the four most well-known routes of injection.

The term injection encompasses intravenous (IV), intramuscular (IM), subcutaneous (SC) and intradermal (ID) administration.[34]

Parenteral administration generally acts more rapidly than topical or enteral administration, with onset of action often occurring in 15–30 seconds for IV, 10–20 minutes for IM and 15–30 minutes for SC.[35] They also have essentially 100% bioavailability and can be used for drugs that are poorly absorbed or ineffective when they are given orally.[36] Some medications, such as certain antipsychotics, can be administered as long-acting intramuscular injections.[37] Ongoing IV infusions can be used to deliver continuous medication or fluids.[38]

Disadvantages of injections include potential pain or discomfort for the patient and the requirement of trained staff using aseptic techniques for administration.[36] However, in some cases, patients are taught to self-inject, such as SC injection of insulin in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. As the drug is delivered to the site of action extremely rapidly with IV injection, there is a risk of overdose if the dose has been calculated incorrectly, and there is an increased risk of side effects if the drug is administered too rapidly.[36]

Respiratory tract

Mouth inhalation

Inhaled medications can be absorbed quickly and act both locally and systemically.[25] Proper technique with inhaler devices is necessary to achieve the correct dose. Some medications can have an unpleasant taste or irritate the mouth.[25]

In general, only 20–50% of the pulmonary-delivered dose rendered in powdery particles will be deposited in the lung upon mouth inhalation.[39] The remainder of 50-70% undeposited aerosolized particles are cleared out of lung as soon as exhalation.[39]

An inhaled powdery particle that is >8 μm is structurally predisposed to depositing in the central and conducting airways (conducting zone) by inertial impaction.[39]

An inhaled powdery particle that is between 3 and 8 μm in diameter tend to largely deposit in the transitional zones of the lung by sedimentation.[39]

An inhaled powdery particle that is <3 μm in diameter is structurally predisposed to depositing primarily in the respiratory regions of the peripheral lung via diffusion.[39]

Particles that deposit in the upper and central airways are generally absorbed systemically to great extent because they are only partially removed by mucociliary clearance, which results in orally mediated absorption when the transported mucous is swallowed, and first pass metabolism or incomplete absorption through loss at the fecal route can sometimes reduce the bioavailability.[40] This should in no way suggest to clinicians or researchers that inhaled particles are not a greater threat than swallowed particles, it merely signifies that a combination of both methods may occur with some particles, no matter the size of or lipo/hydrophilicity of the different particle surfaces.[39]

Nasal inhalation

Inhalation by nose of a substance is almost identical to oral inhalation, except that some of the drug is absorbed intranasally instead of in the oral cavity before entering the airways. Both methods can result in varying levels of the substance to be deposited in their respective initial cavities, and the level of mucous in either of these cavities will reflect the amount of substance swallowed. The rate of inhalation will usually determine the amount of the substance which enters the lungs. Faster inhalation results in more rapid absorption because more substance finds the lungs. Substances in a form that resists absorption in the lung will likely resist absorption in the nasal passage, and the oral cavity, and are often even more resistant to absorption after they fail absorption in the former cavities and are swallowed.

Research

Neural drug delivery is the next step beyond the basic addition of growth factors to nerve guidance conduits. Drug delivery systems allow the rate of growth factor release to be regulated over time, which is critical for creating an environment more closely representative of in vivo development environments.[41]

See also

External links

Notes and References

  1. http://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/route+of+administration TheFreeDictionary.com > route of administration
  2. Lees P, Cunningham FM, Elliott J . Principles of pharmacodynamics and their applications in veterinary pharmacology . J. Vet. Pharmacol. Ther. . 27 . 6 . 397–414 . 2004 . 15601436 . 10.1111/j.1365-2885.2004.00620.x . 2023-12-09 . 2022-08-18 . https://web.archive.org/web/20220818044753/https://researchonline.rvc.ac.uk/id/eprint/912/ . live .
  3. Web site: topical. Merriam-Webster dictionary. 2017-07-30. https://web.archive.org/web/20170730223343/https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/topical. 2017-07-30. live.
  4. http://www.thefreedictionary.com/topical thefreedictionary.com > topical
  5. Web site: topical. dictionary.com. 2017-07-30. https://web.archive.org/web/20170730214617/http://www.dictionary.com/browse/topical. 2017-07-30. live.
  6. Web site: Oklahoma Administrative Code and Register > 195:20-1-3.1. Pediatric conscious sedation utilizing enteral methods (oral, rectal, sublingual) . 2009-01-18 . https://web.archive.org/web/20110722120920/http://www.oar.state.ok.us/viewhtml/195_20-1-3.1.htm . 2011-07-22 . live .
  7. Davis MP, Walsh D, LeGrand SB, Naughton M . 2002 . Symptom control in cancer patients: the clinical pharmacology and therapeutic role of suppositories and rectal suspensions . Support Care Cancer . 10 . 2. 117–38 . 10.1007/s00520-001-0311-6. 11862502 . 30569818 .
  8. De Boer AG, Moolenaar F, de Leede LG, Breimer DD . 1982 . Rectal drug administration: clinical pharmacokinetic considerations . Clin Pharmacokinetics . 7 . 4. 285–311 . 10.2165/00003088-198207040-00002 . 6126289. 41562861 .
  9. Van Hoogdalem EJ, de Boer AG, Breimer DD . 1991 . Pharmacokinetics of rectal drug administration, Part 1 . Clin Pharmacokinet . 21 . 1. 11–26 . 10.2165/00003088-199121010-00002. 1717195 . 35104089 .
  10. Van Hoogdalem EJ, de Boer AG, Breimer DD . 1991 . Pharmacokinetics of rectal drug administration, Part 2 . Clin Pharmacokinet . 21 . 2. 110–128 . 10.2165/00003088-199121020-00003 . 1884566. 11720029 .
  11. Moolenaar F, Koning B, Huizinga T . 1979 . Biopharmaceutics of rectal administration of drugs in man. Absorption rate and bioavailability of phenobarbital and its sodium salt from rectal dosage forms . . 4 . 2. 99–109 . 10.1016/0378-5173(79)90057-7.
  12. Graves NM, Holmes GB, Kriel RL, Jones-Saete C, Ong B, Ehresman DJ . 1989 . Relative bioavailability of rectally administered phenobarbital sodium parenteral solution . DICP: The Annals of Pharmacotherapy . 23 . 7–8. 565–568 . 10.1177/1060028089023007-806. 2763578 . 27397387 .
  13. Moolenaar S, Bakker S, Visser J, Huizinga T . 1980 . Biopharmaceutics of rectal administration of drugs in man IX. Comparative biopharmaceutics of diazepam after single rectal, oral, intramuscular and intravenous administration in man . International Journal of Pharmaceutics . 5 . 2. 127–137 . 10.1016/0378-5173(80)90017-4.
  14. http://www.hpna.org.
  15. Web site: Use of Rectal Meds for Palliative Care Patients. End of Life / Palliative Education Resource Center, Medical College of Wisconsin. mcw.edu. 14 April 2018. dead. https://web.archive.org/web/20140602060038/http://www.eperc.mcw.edu/EPERC/FastFactsIndex/ff_257.htm. 2 June 2014.
  16. Web site: injection. Cambridge dictionary. 2017-07-30. https://web.archive.org/web/20170730202011/http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/injection. 2017-07-30. live.
  17. Web site: MDMA (ecstasy) metabolites and neurotoxicity: No occurrence of MDMA neurotoxicity from metabolites when injected directly into brain, study shows . Neurotransmitter.net . 2010-08-19 . https://web.archive.org/web/20100807215102/http://www.neurotransmitter.net/mdmametabolites.html . 2010-08-07 . live .
  18. A potential application for the intracerebral injection of drugs entrapped within liposomes in the treatment of human cerebral gliomas . 2010-07-06 . 1028604. Firth. G. Oliver. S. Uttley. D. O'Laoire. S. 48. 12. 1213–1219. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry. 10.1136/jnnp.48.12.1213. 2418156. McKeran RO, Firth G, Oliver S, Uttley D, O'Laoire S.
  19. Blood–brain barrier changes following intracerebral injection of human recombinant tumor necrosis factor-α in the rat . 10.1007/BF01057957 . 20 . Journal of Neuro-Oncology . 17–25 . 1994 . Wright JL, Merchant RE. 1 . 7807180 . 12445653 .
  20. Web site: Acute Decreases in Cerebrospinal Fluid Glutathione Levels after Intracerebroventricular Morphine for Cancer Pain . Anesthesia-analgesia.org . 1999-06-22 . 2010-08-19 . https://web.archive.org/web/20060106043224/http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/full/89/5/1209 . 2006-01-06 . live .
  21. Web site: Crystal Meth: The Effects . Fenway Community Health. . dead. https://web.archive.org/web/20101210183228/http://www.fenwayhealth.org/site/PageServer?pagename=CM_efc_effects. 10 December 2010.
  22. Book: Malenka, Eric J. Nestler, Steven E. Hyman, Robert C.. Molecular Neuropharmacology: A Foundation for Clinical Neuroscience. 2009. McGraw-Hill Medical. New York. 978-0-07-148127-4. 2nd.
  23. Mylonaki I, Allémann É, Saucy F, Haefliger J-A, Delie F, Jordan O . 2017 . Perivascular medical devices and drug delivery systems: Making the right choices . Biomaterials . 128 . 56–68 . 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.02.028 . 28288349 . 2020-03-23 . 2020-04-23 . https://web.archive.org/web/20200423234047/https://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:92897 . live .
  24. Web site: Vancocin. The American Society of Health-System Pharmacists. Sep 4, 2015. https://web.archive.org/web/20150906002445/http://www.drugs.com/monograph/vancocin.html. September 6, 2015. live.
  25. Web site: DDS Medication Administration Recertification Manual . 2006 . DDS Recertification Review Manual . . April 2, 2013 . https://web.archive.org/web/20130514074151/http://www.ct.gov/dds/lib/dds/edsupp/medadmin_recert_part_ii.pdf . May 14, 2013 . live .
  26. Yamamoto . A. Ukai . H . Morishita . M. Katsumi . H . Approaches to improve intestinal and transmucosal absorption of peptide and protein drugs . Adv Drug Deliv Rev . 2020. 211. 107537 . 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2020.107537. 32201316. 214618193.
  27. Banerjee. Amrita. Ibsen. Kelly. Brown. Tyler. Chen. Renwei . Agatemor. Christian. Mitragotri. Samir. 2018-06-20. Ionic liquids for oral insulin delivery. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. en. 7296–7301. 10.1073/pnas.1722338115. 0027-8424. 29941553. 6048483. 115. 28. 2018PNAS..115.7296B. free.
  28. Haddadzadegan . S. Dorkoosh . F . Bernkop-Schnürch. A. Oral delivery of therapeutic peptides and proteins: Technology landscape of lipid-based nanocarriers . Adv Drug Deliv Rev . 2022. 182. 114097 . 10.1016/j.addr.2021.114097. 34999121. free.
  29. Maher . S. Brayden. DJ . Approaches to improve intestinal and transmucosal absorption of peptide and protein drugs . Pharmacol Ther . 2021. 177. 113925. 10.1016/j.addr.2021.113925. 34418495. free.
  30. Book: Hebert, Mary F. . Clinical Pharmacology During Pregnancy . Impact of Pregnancy on Maternal Pharmacokinetics of Medications . Elsevier . 2013 . 978-0-12-386007-1 . 10.1016/b978-0-12-386007-1.00003-9 . 17–39.
  31. Web site: LE.JENNIFER . Drug Absorption - Clinical Pharmacology . MSD Manual Professional Edition . 2020-03-27 . 2020-03-28 . https://web.archive.org/web/20191031171922/https://www.msdmanuals.com/professional/clinical-pharmacology/pharmacokinetics/drug-absorption . 2019-10-31 . live .
  32. Kaminsky . Bonnie M. . Bostwick . Jolene R. . Guthrie . Sally K. . Alternate Routes of Administration of Antidepressant and Antipsychotic Medications . The Annals of Pharmacotherapy . SAGE Publications . 49 . 7 . 2015-04-23 . 1060-0280 . 25907529 . 10.1177/1060028015583893 . 808–817. 39802797 .
  33. Book: Rodrigues . Francisca . Oliveira . Maria Beatriz P.P. . Concepts and Models for Drug Permeability Studies . Cell-based in vitro models for dermal permeability studies . Elsevier . 2016 . 978-0-08-100094-6 . 10.1016/b978-0-08-100094-6.00010-9 . 155–167.
  34. Web site: List of Error-Prone Abbreviations. Institute For Safe Medication Practices. 14 April 2018. https://web.archive.org/web/20160222201424/https://www.ismp.org/tools/errorproneabbreviations.pdf. 22 February 2016. live.
  35. Web site: Routes for Drug Administration . 2003 . Emergency Treatment Guidelines Appendix . Manitoba Health . April 2, 2013 . https://web.archive.org/web/20131001174406/http://www.gov.mb.ca/health/ems/guidelines/docs/A2.08.03.pdf . October 1, 2013 . dead .
  36. Web site: The Administration of Medicines . 2007 . Nursing Practice Clinical Zones: Prescribing . NursingTimes.net . April 2, 2013 . https://web.archive.org/web/20200102152352/https://www.nursingtimes.net/clinical-archive/medicine-management/the-administration-of-medicines-19-11-2007/ . January 2, 2020 . live .
  37. Stahl SM, Stahl's Essential Psychopharmacology: Neuroscientific basis and practical applications, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008
  38. Smeltzer SC Bare BG, Textbook of Medical-Surgical Nursing, 9th ed, Philadelphia: Lippincott, 2000.
  39. Book: Tandel . Hemal . Florence . Kiruba . Misra . Ambikanandan . Challenges in Delivery of Therapeutic Genomics and Proteomics . Protein and Peptide Delivery through Respiratory Pathway . Elsevier . 2011 . 978-0-12-384964-9 . 10.1016/b978-0-12-384964-9.00009-8 . 429–479.
  40. Cilia and Mucociliary Clearance. Ximena M.. Bustamante-Marin. Lawrence E.. Ostrowski. April 18, 2017. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology. 9. 4. a028241. 10.1101/cshperspect.a028241. 27864314. 5378048.
  41. Lavik, E. and R. Langer, Tissue engineering; current state and perspectives. Applied Microbiology Biotechnology, 2004. 65: p. 1–8