Retaliatory arrest and prosecution explained

A retaliatory arrest or retaliatory prosecution is an arrest or prosecution undertaken in retaliation for a person's exercise of their civil rights. It is a form of prosecutorial misconduct.

United States

In Hartman v. Moore in 2006, the United States Supreme Court ruled that for a prosecution to be found retaliatory, it must have been brought without probable cause.[1] [2]

In the 2018 case of Lozman v. City of Riviera Beach, Riviera Beach, Florida argued that the logic of Hartman extended to retaliatory arrest. The Supreme Court issued a narrow ruling that plaintiff Fane Lozman was able to bring the claim despite there having been probable cause for his arrest.[3] A year later, they answered the broader question, holding in Nieves v. Bartlett that probable cause defeats a claim of retaliatory arrest unless the plaintiff can show that others have typically not been arrested for similar conduct.[4] [5]

See also

Notes and References

  1. News: Wasserman . Howard M. . 2018-11-19 . Argument preview: Probable cause, retaliatory arrests, and the First Amendment . en-US . 2022-02-02.
  2. Hartman v. Moore . 547 . U.S. . 250 . 2006 . https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/547/250/.
  3. . 585 . U.S. . ___ . 2018 . https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/585/17-21/.
  4. Nieves v. Bartlett . 587 . U.S. . ___ . 2019 . https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/587/17-1174/.
  5. Web site: The Supreme Court Just Made It Easier for Police to Arrest You for Filming Them . Brian . Frazelle . May 31, 2019 . May 31, 2019 . .