Resm-i bennâk explained

The resm-i bennâk was a tax on peasants who had little or no land - those who did not pay the resm-i çift - in the Ottoman Empire.[1]

The name is probably a loanword of Armenian origin;[2] in the Ottoman Empire, "bennâk" came to mean a landless peasant, or a man who had married but not yet established his own household. "Bennâk" was also a term for a small area of farmland, less than half a çift.[3]

The resm-i bennâk was usually paid annually, on 1 March, by the head of a family who is either landless or has very little land - not enough to be assessed for resm-i çift. The tax was payable to the timar-holder[4] or to a tax-farmer in their stead.

The rate of resm-i bennâk was generally lower than the resm-i çift. For instance, in the provincial tax code of Hüdavendigar in 1487, a married man with his own farm might pay the full resm-i çift rate of 40 akçes; a bennâk would pay 12 akçes, and a mücerred (bachelor) would pay 6 akçes (see also resm-i mücerred).[5]

In some cases, bennâk was only paid by peasants in the Ottoman Empire who had a small but nonzero area of land to farm; the truly landless peasants would pay a caba tax[6] in which case the remaining bennak might be called "ekinlü-bennâk".

Academics might be exempted. Miners were also exempted from many taxes, and the resm-i bennâk was no exemption - for example, sipahis who worked in saltpetre mines would be exempt from resm-i bennâk, resm-i çift, and caba; they would also be exempted from avariz and other taxes.[7] Some of the sadat - those claiming descent from Muhammed - were initially exempted from paying resm-i bennâk, but this exemption was eroded over time.[8] There were even cases of people forging certificates of ancestry in order to claim tax exemptions.[9]

Notes and References

  1. Demirci. Suleyman. Avariz and nüzul levies in the Ottoman Empire: An assessment of tax burden on the tax-paying subjects. A case study of the Province of Karaman, 1628-1700. 2003.
  2. Book: Dankoff, Robert. Robert Dankoff. Armenian loanwords in Turkish. 1995. Otto Harrassowitz Verlag. 978-3-447-03640-5.
  3. Vryonis. Speros. The Byzantine Legacy and Ottoman Forms. Dumbarton Oaks Papers. 1969. 23/24. 251–308. 10.2307/1291294. 1291294.
  4. Book: ACCOUNTING METHOD USED BY OTTOMANS FOR 500 YEARS: STAIRS (MERDIBAN) METHOD. Turkish Republic Ministry of Finance Strategy Development Unit. dead. https://web.archive.org/web/20140201203209/http://www.sgb.gov.tr/Publications/Accounting%20Method%20Used%20By%20Ottomans%20For%20500%20Years%20-%20Stairs%20(Merdiban)%20Method.pdf. 2014-02-01.
  5. Book: Zilfi, Madeline. Women in the Ottoman Empire: Middle Eastern women in the early Modern Era. 1997. BRILL. 978-90-04-10804-2. 179.
  6. Book: Faroqhi, Quataert. An economic and social history of the Ottoman Empire. 1997. Cambridge University Press. 978-0-521-57455-6. 532.
  7. Book: Ágoston, Gábor. Guns for the sultan: military power and the weapons industry in the Ottoman Empire. 2005. Cambridge University Press. 978-0-521-84313-3. 116.
  8. Acun. Fatma. The Other Side of the Coin: Tax Exemptions within the Context of Ottoman Taxation History. Bulgarian Historical Review. 2002. 1. 2.
  9. Canbakal. Hülya. The Ottoman State and Descendants of the Prophet in Anatolia and the Balkans (c. 1500-1700). Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient. 2009. 52. 3. 542–578. 10.1163/156852009X458241.