Recombination (cosmology) explained

In cosmology, recombination refers to the epoch during which charged electrons and protons first became bound to form electrically neutral hydrogen atoms. Recombination occurred about years after the Big Bang (at a redshift of z = ). The word "recombination" is misleading, since the Big Bang theory does not posit that protons and electrons had been combined before, but the name exists for historical reasons since it was named before the Big Bang hypothesis became the primary theory of the birth of the universe.

Overview

Immediately after the Big Bang, the universe was a hot, dense plasma of photons, leptons, and quarks: the quark epoch. At 10⁻⁶ seconds, the Universe had expanded and cooled sufficiently to allow for the formation of protons: the hadron epoch. This plasma was effectively opaque to electromagnetic radiation due to Thomson scattering by free electrons, as the mean free path each photon could travel before encountering an electron was very short. This is the current state of the interior of the Sun. As the universe expanded, it also cooled. Eventually, the universe cooled to the point that the radiation field could not immediately ionize neutral hydrogen, and atoms became energetically favored.^[1] The fraction of free electrons and protons as compared to neutral hydrogen decreased to a few parts in .

Recombination involves electrons binding to protons (hydrogen nuclei) to form neutral hydrogen atoms. Because direct recombinations to the ground state (lowest energy) of hydrogen are very inefficient, these hydrogen atoms generally form with the electrons in a high energy state, and the electrons quickly transition to their low energy state by emitting photons. Two main pathways exist: from the 2p state by emitting a Lyman-a photon – these photons will almost always be reabsorbed by another hydrogen atom in its ground state – or from the 2s state by emitting two photons, which is very slow.

This production of photons is known as decoupling, which leads to recombination sometimes being called photon decoupling, but recombination and photon decoupling are distinct events. Once photons decoupled from matter, they traveled freely through the universe without interacting with matter and constitute what is observed today as cosmic microwave background radiation (in that sense, the cosmic background radiation is infrared and some red black-body radiation emitted when the universe was at a temperature of some 3000 K, redshifted by a factor of from the visible spectrum to the microwave spectrum).

Recombination time frames

The time frame for recombination can be estimated from the time dependence of the temperature of the cosmic microwave background (CMB).^[2] The microwave background is a blackbody spectrum representing the photons present at recombination, shifted in energy by the expansion of the universe. A blackbody is completely characterized by its temperature; the shift is called the redshift denoted by z:$$T\_\backslash text\; =\; \backslash mathrm\; \backslash times\; (1\; +\; z)$$where 2.7 K is today's temperature.

The thermal energy at the peak of the blackbody spectrum is the Boltzmann constant,, times the temperature,

k _{B} T _{CMB(z)} but simply comparing this to the ionization energy of hydrogen atoms will not consider the spectrum of energies. A better estimate evaluates the thermal equilibrium between matter (atoms) and radiation. The density of photons, η _{\gamma(E>Q} _{H)} with energy E sufficient to ionize hydrogen is the total density times a factor from the equilibrium Boltzmann distribution:$$\backslash eta\_\backslash gamma(E>Q\_H)\; =\; \backslash eta\_\backslash gamma\; \backslash exp\backslash left\; (\backslash frac\backslash right)$$At equilibrium this will approximately equal the matter (baryon) density. The ratio of photons to baryons, η , is known from several sources including measurements by the Planck satellite to be around 10⁹. Solving for z _{rec} gives value around 1100, which converts to a cosmic time value around 400,000 years.

Recombination history of hydrogen

The cosmic ionization history is generally described in terms of the free electron fraction x_e as a function of redshift. It is the ratio of the abundance of free electrons to the total abundance of hydrogen (both neutral and ionized). Denoting by n_e the number density of free electrons, n_H that of atomic hydrogen and n_p that of ionized hydrogen (i.e. protons), x_e is defined as

x _{e} = (n _{e})/(n _{p} + n _{H}) .

Since hydrogen only recombines once helium is fully neutral, charge neutrality implies n_e = n_p, i.e. x_e is also the fraction of ionized hydrogen.

Rough estimate from equilibrium theory

It is possible to find a rough estimate of the redshift of the recombination epoch assuming the recombination reaction

p + e ^{-} \longleftrightarrow H + \gamma is fast enough that it proceeds near thermal equilibrium. The relative abundance of free electrons, protons and neutral hydrogen is then given by the Saha equation:(n _{p} n _{e})/(n _{H}) = \left( (m _{e} k _{B} T)/(2 \pi \hbar ^{2}) \right) ^{(3)/(2)} \exp\left( - (E _{I})/(k _{B} T) \right), where m_e is the mass of the electron, k_B is the Boltzmann constant, T is the temperature, ħ is the reduced Planck constant, and E_I = 13.6 eV is the ionization energy of hydrogen. Charge neutrality requires n_e = n_p, and the Saha equation can be rewritten in terms of the free electron fraction x_e:({x ^{2} _{e})/() } = (n_\text + n_\text)^ \left(\frac\right)^\frac \exp\left(-\frac\right).

All quantities in the right-hand side are known functions of z, the redshift: the temperature is given by, and the total density of hydrogen (neutral and ionized) is given by .

Solving this equation for a 50 percent ionization fraction yields a recombination temperature of roughly, corresponding to redshift z = .

Effective three-level atom

In 1968, physicists Jim Peebles in the US and Yakov Borisovich Zel'dovich and collaborators^[3] in the USSR independently computed the non-equilibrium recombination history of hydrogen. The basic elements of the model are the following.

• Direct recombinations to the ground state of hydrogen are very inefficient: each such event leads to a photon with energy greater than 13.6 eV, which almost immediately re-ionizes a neighboring hydrogen atom.
• Electrons therefore only efficiently recombine to the excited states of hydrogen, from which they cascade very quickly down to the first excited state, with principal quantum number .
• From the first excited state, electrons can reach the ground state n = 1 through two pathways:
  • Decay from the 2p state by emitting a Lyman-α photon. This photon will almost always be reabsorbed by another hydrogen atom in its ground state. However, cosmological redshifting systematically decreases the photon frequency, and there is a small chance that it escapes reabsorption if it gets redshifted far enough from the Lyman-α line resonant frequency before encountering another hydrogen atom.
  • Decay from the 2s state by emitting two photons. This two-photon decay process is very slow, with a rate^[4] of 8.22 s⁻¹. It is however competitive with the slow rate of Lyman-α escape in producing ground-state hydrogen.
• Atoms in the first excited state may also be re-ionized by the ambient CMB photons before they reach the ground state. When this is the case, it is as if the recombination to the excited state did not happen in the first place. To account for this possibility, Peebles defines the factor C as the probability that an atom in the first excited state reaches the ground state through either of the two pathways described above before being photoionized.

This model is usually described as an "effective three-level atom" as it requires keeping track of hydrogen under three forms: in its ground state, in its first excited state (assuming all the higher excited states are in Boltzmann equilibrium with it), and in its ionized state.

Accounting for these processes, the recombination history is then described by the differential equation

(d x _{e})/(dt) = - C\left( \alpha _{B(T)} n _{p} x _{e} - 4 ( 1- x _{e)} \beta ^{- E _{21} /T} _{B (T)e} \right), where is the "case B" recombination coefficient to the excited states of hydrogen, is the corresponding photoionization rate and E₂₁ = 10.2 eV is the energy of the first excited state. Note that the second term in the right-hand side of the above equation can be obtained by a detailed balance argument. The equilibrium result given in the previous section would be recovered by setting the left-hand side to zero, i.e. assuming that the net rates of recombination and photoionization are large in comparison to the Hubble expansion rate, which sets the overall evolution timescale for the temperature and density. However, is comparable to the Hubble expansion rate, and even gets significantly lower at low redshifts, leading to an evolution of the free electron fraction much slower than what one would obtain from the Saha equilibrium calculation. With modern values of cosmological parameters, one finds that the universe is 90% neutral at .

Modern developments

The simple effective three-level atom model described above accounts for the most important physical processes. However it does rely on approximations that lead to errors on the predicted recombination history at the level of 10% or so. Due to the importance of recombination for the precise prediction of cosmic microwave background anisotropies,^[5] several research groups have revisited the details of this picture over the last two decades.

The refinements to the theory can be divided into two categories:

• Accounting for the non-equilibrium populations of the highly excited states of hydrogen. This effectively amounts to modifying the recombination coefficient α_B.
• Accurately computing the rate of Lyman-α escape and the effect of these photons on the 2s–1s transition. This requires solving a time-dependent radiative transfer equation. In addition, one needs to account for higher-order Lyman transitions. These refinements effectively amount to a modification of Peebles' C factor.

Modern recombination theory is believed to be accurate at the level of 0.1%, and is implemented in publicly available fast recombination codes.^{[6] [7]}

Primordial helium recombination

Helium nuclei are produced during Big Bang nucleosynthesis, and make up about 24% of the total mass of baryonic matter. The ionization energy of helium is larger than that of hydrogen and it therefore recombines earlier. Because neutral helium carries two electrons, its recombination proceeds in two steps. The first recombination,

He ^{2+} + e ^{-} \longrightarrow He ^{+} + \gamma proceeds near Saha equilibrium and takes place around redshift z ≈ 6000.^[8] The second recombination, He ^{+} + e ^{-} \longrightarrow He + \gamma , is slower than what would be predicted from Saha equilibrium and takes place around redshift z ≈ 2000.^[9] The details of helium recombination are less critical than those of hydrogen recombination for the prediction of cosmic microwave background anisotropies, since the universe is still very optically thick after helium has recombined and before hydrogen has started its recombination.

Primordial light barrier

Prior to recombination, photons were not able to freely travel through the universe, as they constantly scattered off the free electrons and protons. This scattering causes a loss of information, and "there is therefore a photon barrier at a redshift" near that of recombination that prevents us from using photons directly to learn about the universe at larger redshifts. Once recombination had occurred, however, the mean free path of photons greatly increased due to the lower number of free electrons. Shortly after recombination, the photon mean free path became larger than the Hubble length, and photons traveled freely without interacting with matter. For this reason, recombination is closely associated with the last scattering surface, which is the name for the last time at which the photons in the cosmic microwave background interacted with matter. However, these two events are distinct, and in a universe with different values for the baryon-to-photon ratio and matter density, recombination and photon decoupling need not have occurred at the same epoch.

See also

• Chronology of the universe
• Age of the universe
• Big Bang

Bibliography

• Web site: AST 376 Cosmology—Lecture Notes: Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) . live . Bromm . Volker . 17 April 2014 . Austin, Texas . . https://web.archive.org/web/20181223065116/http://www.as.utexas.edu/astronomy/education/spring14/bromm/secure/notes_apr_17.pdf . 23 December 2018 . 1 January 2020.
• Book: Longair, Malcolm. Galaxy Formation. Springer. 2008. 978-3-540-73477-2.
• Book: Maoz, Dan . 2016 . Astrophysics in a Nutshell . 2nd . Princeton, New Jersey; Oxford, UK . en . . 978-0-691-16479-3 . 2015956047 . 950932058.
• Book: Padmanabhan, Thanu . Structure formation in the universe . . 1993 . 978-0-521-42486-8 .
• Peebles . P. J. E. . Recombination of the Primeval Plasma . . 153 . 1 . 1968 . 10.1086/149628 . 1968ApJ...153....1P.
• Book: Ryden, Barbara . Introduction to Cosmology . . 2003 . 978-0-8053-8912-8 .
• Tanabashi . M. . . 2018 . Review of Particle Physics . . College Park, Maryland . . 98 . 3 . 1–708 . 10.1103/PhysRevD.98.030001 . 10020536 . 2018PhRvD..98c0001T . 1550-7998 . 7814919666 . . free. 10044/1/68623 . free .
• Zeldovich . Y. B. . Kurt, V. G. . Syunyaev, R. A. . Recombination of Hydrogen in the Hot Model of the Universe . Zhurnal Eksperimental'noi i Teoreticheskoi Fiziki . 55 . 278 . 1968 . 1968ZhETF..55..278Z.

Notes and References

1. "Going forward in time now, the temperature declined, and at T ~ 3000 K, few of the photons in the radiation field, even in its high-energy tail, had the energy required to ionize a hydrogen atom. Most of the electrons and protons then recombined. Once this happened, at a time t_rec = 380,000 yr after the Big Bang, the major source of opacity disappeared, and the Universe became transparent to radiation of most frequencies."

2. The derivation in this section is from
3. 1969JETP...28..146Z. Recombination of Hydrogen in the Hot Model of the Universe. Zel'Dovich. Ya. B.. Kurt. V. G.. Syunyaev. R. A.. Soviet Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics. 1969. 28. 146.
4. 1984A&A...138..495N. The hydrogenic 2s–1s two-photon emission. Nussbaumer. H.. Schmutz. W.. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 1984. 138. 2. 495.
5. 10.1103/PhysRevD.52.5498. Effect of physical assumptions on the calculation of microwave background anisotropies. 1995. Hu. Wayne. Scott. Douglas. Sugiyama. Naoshi. White. Martin. 9168355. Physical Review D. 52. 10. 5498–5515. 10019080. astro-ph/9505043. 1995PhRvD..52.5498H.
6. Web site: CosmoRec: Cosmological recombination module. Chluba. J.. Vasil. G..
7. Web site: HyRec: A code for primordial hydrogen and helium recombination including radiative transfer . 31 December 2019 . 20 July 2014 . https://web.archive.org/web/20140720081108/https://www.sns.ias.edu/~yacine/hyrec/hyrec.html . dead .
8. 10.1103/PhysRevD.77.083008. Primordial helium recombination. III. Thomson scattering, isotope shifts, and cumulative results. 2008. Switzer. Eric R.. Hirata. Christopher M.. 119504365. Physical Review D. 77. 8. 083008. astro-ph/0702145. 2008PhRvD..77h3008S.
9. 10.1103/PhysRevD.77.083006. Primordial helium recombination. I. Feedback, line transfer, and continuum opacity. 2008. Switzer. Eric R.. Hirata. Christopher M.. 9425660. Physical Review D. 77. 8. 083006. astro-ph/0702143. 2008PhRvD..77h3006S.