Cartan subalgebra explained

ak{h}

of a Lie algebra

ak{g}

that is self-normalising (if

[X,Y]\inak{h}

for all

X\inak{h}

, then

Y\inak{h}

). They were introduced by Élie Cartan in his doctoral thesis. It controls the representation theory of a semi-simple Lie algebra

ak{g}

over a field of characteristic

0

.

\operatorname{ad}(x):ak{g}\toak{g}

is semisimple (i.e., diagonalizable). Sometimes this characterization is simply taken as the definition of a Cartan subalgebra.[1] pg 231

In general, a subalgebra is called toral if it consists of semisimple elements. Over an algebraically closed field, a toral subalgebra is automatically abelian. Thus, over an algebraically closed field of characteristic zero, a Cartan subalgebra can also be defined as a maximal toral subalgebra.

Kac–Moody algebras and generalized Kac–Moody algebras also have subalgebras that play the same role as the Cartan subalgebras of semisimple Lie algebras (over a field of characteristic zero).

Existence and uniqueness

Cartan subalgebras exist for finite-dimensional Lie algebras whenever the base field is infinite. One way to construct a Cartan subalgebra is by means of a regular element. Over a finite field, the question of the existence is still open.

For a finite-dimensional semisimple Lie algebra

akg

over an algebraically closed field of characteristic zero, there is a simpler approach: by definition, a toral subalgebra is a subalgebra of

akg

that consists of semisimple elements (an element is semisimple if the adjoint endomorphism induced by it is diagonalizable). A Cartan subalgebra of

akg

is then the same thing as a maximal toral subalgebra and the existence of a maximal toral subalgebra is easy to see.

In a finite-dimensional Lie algebra over an algebraically closed field of characteristic zero, all Cartan subalgebras are conjugate under automorphisms of the algebra, and in particular are all isomorphic. The common dimension of a Cartan subalgebra is then called the rank of the algebra.

For a finite-dimensional complex semisimple Lie algebra, the existence of a Cartan subalgebra is much simpler to establish, assuming the existence of a compact real form.[2] In that case,

ak{h}

may be taken as the complexification of the Lie algebra of a maximal torus of the compact group.

If

ak{g}

is a linear Lie algebra (a Lie subalgebra of the Lie algebra of endomorphisms of a finite-dimensional vector space V) over an algebraically closed field, then any Cartan subalgebra of

ak{g}

is the centralizer of a maximal toral subalgebra of

ak{g}

. If

ak{g}

is semisimple and the field has characteristic zero, then a maximal toral subalgebra is self-normalizing, and so is equal to the associated Cartan subalgebra. If in addition

akg

is semisimple, then the adjoint representation presents

akg

as a linear Lie algebra, so that a subalgebra of

akg

is Cartan if and only if it is a maximal toral subalgebra.

Examples

ak{gl}n

, the Lie algebra of

n x n

matrices
over a field, is the algebra of all diagonal matrices.

n x n

matrices

ak{sl}n(C)

, it has the Cartan subalgebra \mathfrak = \left\ where d(a_1,\ldots,a_n) = \begina_1 & 0 & \cdots & 0 \\0 & \ddots & & 0 \\\vdots & & \ddots & \vdots \\0 & \cdots & \cdots &a_n\end For example, in

ak{sl}2(C)

the Cartan subalgebra is the subalgebra of matrices \mathfrak = \left\ with Lie bracket given by the matrix commutator.

ak{sl}2(R)

of

2

by

2

matrices of trace

0

has two non-conjugate Cartan subalgebras.

ak{sl}2n(C)

of

2n

by

2n

matrices of trace

0

has a Cartan subalgebra of rank

2n-1

but has a maximal abelian subalgebra of dimension

n2

consisting of all matrices of the form

\begin{pmatrix}0&A\ 0&0\end{pmatrix}

with

A

any

n

by

n

matrix. One can directly see this abelian subalgebra is not a Cartan subalgebra, since it is contained in the nilpotent algebra of strictly upper triangular matrices (or, since it is normalized by diagonal matrices).

Cartan subalgebras of semisimple Lie algebras

akg

over an algebraically closed field of characteristic 0, a Cartan subalgebra

akh

has the following properties:

akh

is abelian,

\operatorname{ad}:ak{g}\toak{gl}(ak{g})

, the image

\operatorname{ad}(akh)

consists of semisimple operators (i.e., diagonalizable matrices).(As noted earlier, a Cartan subalgebra can in fact be characterized as a subalgebra that is maximal among those having the above two properties.)

These two properties say that the operators in

\operatorname{ad}(akh)

are simultaneously diagonalizable and that there is a direct sum decomposition of

ak{g}

as

ak{g}=

*}
oplus
λ\inak{h

ak{g}λ

where

ak{g}λ=\{x\inak{g}:ad(h)x=λ(h)x,forh\inak{h} \}

.

Let

\Phi=\{λ\inak{h}*\setminus\{0\}|ak{g}λ\ne\{0\}\}

. Then

\Phi

is a root system and, moreover,

ak{g}0=akh

; i.e., the centralizer of

ak{h}

coincides with

ak{h}

. The above decomposition can then be written as:

ak{g}=ak{h}\left(oplusλak{g}λ \right)

As it turns out, for each

λ\in\Phi

,

ak{g}λ

has dimension one and so:

\dimak{g}=\dimak{h}+\#\Phi

.

See also Semisimple Lie algebra#Structure for further information.

Decomposing representations with dual Cartan subalgebra

Given a Lie algebra

ak{g}

over a field of characteristic and a Lie algebra representation\sigma: \mathfrak\to \mathfrak(V) there is a decomposition related to the decomposition of the Lie algebra from its Cartan subalgebra. If we setV_\lambda = \with

λ\inak{h}*

, called the weight space for weight

λ

, there is a decomposition of the representation in terms of these weight spaces V = \bigoplus_ V_\lambda In addition, whenever

Vλ\{0\}

we call

λ

a weight of the

ak{g}

-representation

Classification of irreducible representations using weights

See main article: Theorem of the highest weight. But, it turns out these weights can be used to classify the irreducible representations of the Lie algebra

ak{g}

. For a finite dimensional irreducible

ak{g}

-representation there exists a unique weight

λ\in\Phi

with respect to a partial ordering on

ak{h}*

. Moreover, given a

λ\in\Phi

such that

\langle\alpha,λ\rangle\inN

for every positive root there exists a unique irreducible representation This means the root system

\Phi

contains all information about the representation theory of

Splitting Cartan subalgebra

See main article: Splitting Cartan subalgebra.

Over non-algebraically closed fields, not all Cartan subalgebras are conjugate. An important class are splitting Cartan subalgebras: if a Lie algebra admits a splitting Cartan subalgebra

ak{h}

then it is called splittable, and the pair

(ak{g},ak{h})

is called a split Lie algebra; over an algebraically closed field every semisimple Lie algebra is splittable. Any two splitting Cartan algebras are conjugate, and they fulfill a similar function to Cartan algebras in semisimple Lie algebras over algebraically closed fields, so split semisimple Lie algebras (indeed, split reductive Lie algebras) share many properties with semisimple Lie algebras over algebraically closed fields.

Over a non-algebraically closed field not every semisimple Lie algebra is splittable, however.

Cartan subgroup

A Cartan subgroup of a Lie group is one of the subgroups whose Lie algebra is a Cartan subalgebra. The identity component of a subgroup has the same Lie algebra. There is no standard convention for which one of the subgroups with this property is called the Cartan subgroup, especially in the case of disconnected groups. A Cartan subgroup of a compact connected Lie group is a maximal connected Abelian subgroup (a maximal torus). Its Lie algebra is a Cartan subalgebra.

For disconnected compact Lie groups there are several inequivalent definitions of a Cartan subgroup. The most common seems to be the one given by David Vogan, who defines a Cartan subgroup to be the group of elements that normalize a fixed maximal torus and fix the fundamental Weyl chamber. This is sometimes called the large Cartan subgroup. There is also a small Cartan subgroup, defined to be the centralizer of a maximal torus. These Cartan subgroups need not be abelian in general.

Examples of Cartan Subgroups

References

Notes

References

Notes and References

  1. Book: Hotta, R. (Ryoshi). D-modules, perverse sheaves, and representation theory. 2008. Birkhäuser. Takeuchi, Kiyoshi, 1967-, Tanisaki, Toshiyuki, 1955-. 978-0-8176-4363-8. English. Boston. 316693861.
  2. Chapter 7