| Rail transport in Great Britain | |
| Infrastructure: | Network Rail (until 2024) |
| Majoroperators: |
|
| Ridership: | 1.738 billion (2019/20)[1] |
| Passkm: | 66.8abbr=onNaNabbr=on billion (2019/20)[2] |
| Length: | 15811abbr=onNaNabbr=on |
| Ellength: | 5374abbr=onNaNabbr=on |
| Nostations: | 2,576[3] [4] |
The railway system in Great Britain is the oldest railway system in the world. The first locomotive-hauled public railway opened in 1825, which was followed by an era of rapid expansion. Most of the track is managed by Network Rail, which in 2017 had a network of 15811km (9,824miles) of standard-gauge lines, of which 5374km (3,339miles) were electrified.[5] [6] In addition, some cities have separate metro, light rail and tram systems, among them the historic London Underground and the Glasgow Subway. There are also many private railways, some of them narrow-gauge, which are primarily short lines for tourists. The main rail network is connected with that of continental Europe by the Channel Tunnel and High Speed 1, opened in 1994 and 2007 respectively.
In 2019, there were 1.738 billion journeys on the National Rail network, making the British network the fifth most used in the world (Great Britain ranks 23rd in world population). Unlike a number of other countries, rail travel in the United Kingdom has enjoyed a renaissance in recent years, with passenger numbers approaching their highest ever level (see usage figures below). This has coincided with the privatisation of British Rail, but the cause of this increase is unclear. The growth is partly attributed to a shift away from private motoring due to growing road congestion and increasing petrol prices, but also to the overall increase in travel due to affluence.[7] Passenger journeys in Britain grew by 88% over the period 1997–98 to 2014 as compared to 62% in Germany, 41% in France and 16% in Spain.[8]
The United Kingdom is a member of the International Union of Railways (UIC). The UIC country code for United Kingdom is 70. The UK has the 17th largest railway network in the world; despite many lines having closed in the 20th century, due to the Beeching cuts, it remains one of the densest networks. It is one of the busiest railways in Europe, with 20% more train services than France, 60% more than Italy, and more than Spain, Switzerland, the Netherlands, Portugal and Norway combined, as well as representing more than 20% of all passenger journeys in Europe.[9] The rail industry employs 115,000 people and supports another 250,000 through its supply chain.[10]
After the initial period of rapid expansion following the first public railways in the early 19th century, from about 1900 onwards the network suffered from gradual attrition, and more severe rationalisation in the 1950s and 1960s. However, the network has again been growing since the 1980s. The UK was ranked eighth among national European rail systems in the 2017 European Railway Performance Index for intensity of use, quality of service and safety performance.[11] To cope with increasing passenger numbers, there is a large programme of upgrades to the network, including Thameslink, Crossrail, electrification of lines, in-cab signalling, new inter-city trains and new high-speed lines.
See main article: History of rail transport in Great Britain.
According to historians David Brandon and Alan Brooke, the railways brought into being our modern world:
They stimulated demand for building materials, coal, iron and, later, steel. Excelling in the bulk movement of coal, they provided the fuel for the furnaces of industry and for domestic fireplaces. Millions of people were able to travel who had scarcely ever travelled before. Railways enabled mail, newspapers, periodicals and cheap literature to be distributed easily, quickly and cheaply allowing a much wider and faster dissemination of ideas and information. They had a significant impact on improving diet....[and enabled] a proportionately smaller agricultural industry was able to feed a much larger urban population....They employed huge quantities of labour both directly and indirectly. They helped Britain to become the 'Workshop of the World' by reducing transport costs not only of raw materials but of finished goods, large amounts of which were exported....[T]oday's global corporations originated with the great limited liability railway companies....By the third quarter of the nineteenth century, there was scarcely any person living in Britain whose life had not been altered in some way by the coming of the railways. Railways contributed to the transformation of Britain from a rural to a predominantly urban society.[12]
The railways started with the local isolated wooden wagonways in 1560s using horses. These wagonways then spread, particularly in mining areas. The system was later built as a patchwork of local lines operated by small private railway companies. Over the course of the 19th and early 20th centuries, these amalgamated or were bought by competitors until only a handful of larger companies remained (see Railway Mania). The entire network was brought under government control during the First World War and a number of advantages of amalgamation and planning were revealed. However, the government resisted calls for the nationalisation of the network (first proposed by 19th century Prime Minister William Gladstone as early as the 1830s). Instead, from 1 January 1923, almost all the remaining companies were grouped into the "big four": the Great Western Railway, the London and North Eastern Railway, the London Midland and Scottish Railway and the Southern Railway companies (there were also a number of other joint railways such as the Midland and Great Northern Joint Railway and the Cheshire Lines Committee as well as special joint railways such as the Forth Bridge Railway, Ryde Pier Railway and at one time the East London Railway). The "Big Four" were joint-stock public companies and they continued to run the railway system until 31 December 1947.
The growth in road transport during the 1920s and 1930s greatly reduced revenue for the rail companies. Rail companies accused the government of favouring road haulage through the subsidised construction of roads. The railways entered a slow decline owing to a lack of investment and changes in transport policy and lifestyles. During World War II, the companies' managements joined together, effectively forming one company. A maintenance backlog developed during the war and the private sector only had two years to deal with this after the war ended. After 1945, for both practical and ideological reasons, the government decided to bring the rail service into the public sector.
See main article: History of rail transport in Great Britain 1948–1994. From the start of 1948, the "big four" were nationalised to form British Railways (latterly British Rail) under the control of the British Transport Commission. Although BR was a single entity, it was divided into six (later five) regional authorities in accordance with the existing areas of operation. Though there were few initial changes to the service, usage increased and the network became profitable. Regeneration of track and railway stations was completed by 1954. In the same year, changes to the British Transport Commission, including the privatisation of road haulage, ended the coordination of transport in Great Britain. Rail revenue fell and in 1955 the network again ceased to be profitable. The mid-1950s saw the rapid introduction of diesel and electric rolling stock, but the expected transfer back from road to rail did not occur and losses began to mount.
The desire for profitability led to a major reduction in the network during the mid-1960s, with ICI manager Dr. Richard Beeching commissioned by the government under Ernest Marples with reorganising the railways. Many branch lines (and a number of main lines) were closed because they were deemed uneconomic ("the Beeching Axe" of 1963), removing much feeder traffic from main line passenger services. In the second Beeching report of 1965, only the "major trunk routes" were selected for large-scale investment, leading many to speculate the rest of the network would eventually be closed. This was never implemented by BR.
Passenger services experienced a renaissance with the introduction of the InterCity 125 trains in the 1970s. Passenger levels fluctuated since then, increasing during periods of economic growth and falling during recessions. The 1980s saw severe cuts in government funding and above-inflation increases in fares,[13] In the early 1990s, the five geographical Regions were replaced by a Sectored organisation, in which passenger services were organised into InterCity, Network SouthEast and Regional Railways sectors.
See main article: Privatisation of British Rail, Impact of the privatisation of British Rail and History of rail transport in Great Britain 1995 to date. The Railways Act 1993[14] divided the railways up, with Railtrack taking ownership of British Rail's property portfolio, tracks, signals, bridges and tunnels, Rolling Stock Operating Companies, and train operating companies.
Passenger transport services were bundled together into franchises to facilitate cross-subsidy within franchises, with many regulations on ticket prices and types, regulated fare increases and "Parliamentary service" obligations. Companies submit bids to the franchising authority - often the Secretary of State for Transport, Passenger Transport Authority, or devolved government - competing for the lowest subsidy requirement and to invest in the railway over the lifespan of the franchise. There is also provision for subsidy between franchises, with profitable franchises demanding payments made to the government to cover a share of the losses from others. Examples of franchises include ScotRail, Great Western, and Southern Trains.
Open Access Operators are entirely free to set their own services and fares unaffected by government regulations. Examples of such operators are Lumo and Grand Central, Hull Trains and Heathrow Express. In the case of the InterCity West Coast and InterCity East Coast franchises, applicants submit bids to return the most money to the government from operating the service. This has led to franchisees collapsing when passenger growth targets are not met as promised payments to the government cannot be paid and the franchise is exited early.
In 2023, Network Rail held over £59.1billion in debt, and £1.176billion interest payments.[15] Many of these debts were incurred by Railtrack and transferred to Network Rail when it collapsed.
British Rail operations were privatised during 1994–1997. Ownership of the track and infrastructure passed to Railtrack, whilst passenger operations were franchised to individual private sector operators (originally there were 25 franchises) and the goods services sold outright (six companies were set up, but five of these were sold to the same buyer). The government said privatisation would see an improvement in passenger services and satisfaction (according to the National Rail Passenger survey) has indeed gone up from 76% in 1999 (when the survey started) to 83% in 2013 and the number of passengers not satisfied with their journey dropped from 10% to 6%.[16] Since privatisation, passenger levels have more than doubled, and have surpassed their level in the late 1940s. Train fares cost 2.7% more than under British Rail in real terms on average.[17] However, while the price of anytime and off-peak tickets has increased, the price of Advance tickets has dramatically decreased in real terms: the average Advance ticket in 1995 cost £9.14 (in 2014 prices) compared to £5.17 in 2014.[18]
Rail subsidies have increased from £bn in 1992–93 to £bn in 2015–16 (in current prices), although subsidy per journey has fallen from £ per journey to £ per journey.[19] However, this masks great regional variation, as in 2014–15 funding varied from "£1.41 per passenger journey in England to £6.51 per journey in Scotland and £8.34 per journey in Wales."
The public image of rail travel was severely damaged by a series of significant accidents after privatisation. These included the Hatfield accident, caused by a rail fragmenting due to the development of microscopic cracks. Following this, the rail infrastructure company Railtrack imposed over 1,200 emergency speed restrictions across its network and instigated an extremely costly nationwide track replacement programme. The consequent severe operational disruption to the national network and the company's spiralling costs set in motion a series of events which resulted in the collapse of the company and its replacement with Network Rail, a state-owned,[20] "not-for-profit" company, with risks underwritten by the taxpayer. According to the European Railway Agency, in 2013 Britain had the safest railways in Europe based on the number of train safety incidents.[21]
At the end of September 2003, the first part of High Speed 1, a high-speed link to the Channel Tunnel and onward to France and Belgium, was completed, significantly adding to the rail infrastructure of the country. The rest of the link, from north Kent to London St Pancras opened in 2007. A major programme of remedial work on the West Coast Main Line started in 1997 and finished in 2008.[22]
Since the 2010s, many upgrades have been under way, such as Thameslink, Crossrail, the Northern Hub and electrification of the Great Western Main Line. Electrification plans for the Midland Main Line and the Transpennine line between Manchester and Leeds have been scaled back. Construction of High Speed 2 is underway, with a projected completion date of 2026 for Phase 1 (London to Birmingham) and 2033 for Phase 2. A poll of 1,500 adults in Britain in June 2018 showed that 64% support renationalising Britain's railways.[23]
See main article: Great British Railways, Transport for Wales Rail and ScotRail Trains.
See also: List of railway lines in Great Britain and Rail transport in Wales.
Currently, six franchises are under public ownership, and thus effectively nationalised. Four of them – LNER, Northern Trains, Southeastern, and TransPennine – are operators of last resort owned by the Department for Transport, whereas Transport for Wales Rail is owned by Transport for Wales, a Welsh-Government owned company, with no current plans to re-privatise the latter. On 1 April 2022, ScotRail was put under public ownership by the Scottish Government, under Transport Scotland as ScotRail Trains operating on the same day.
The COVID-19 pandemic caused a huge fall in the number of passengers using the railways, with journeys in 2020 being about 22% of the previous year, before rising again as travel restrictions eased.[24] During 2020, all train operating companies entered into emergency measures agreements with the UK and Scottish governments.[25] Normal franchise mechanisms were amended, transferring almost all revenue and cost risk to the government, effectively 'renationalising' the network temporarily.[26]
In September 2020, the UK Government permanently got rid of the rail franchising system.[27] On 20 May 2021, the Government announced a white paper that would transform the operation of the railways. The rail network will be partly renationalised, with infrastructure and operations brought together under the state-owned public body Great British Railways. Operations will be managed on a concessions model. According to the BBC, this represents the largest shake-up in the UK's railways since privatisation.[27] On 18 November 2021, the government announced the biggest ever public investment in Britain's rail network costing £96 billion and promising quicker and more frequent rail connections in the North and Midlands: the Integrated Rail Plan includes substantially improved connections North-South as well as East-West and includes three new high speed lines.[28]
In July 2024, the new Labour government confirmed that passenger services would be brought back into public ownership upon the expiration of their contracts as part of the wider renationalisation of the rail network.[29]
See also: List of companies operating trains in the United Kingdom.
Passenger services in Great Britain were divided into regional franchises and run by mostly private (that is, non-state owned) train operating companies from 1995 to 2020. These companies bid for seven- to eight-year contracts to run individual franchises. Most contracts in England are awarded by the Department for Transport (DfT), with the exception of Merseyrail, where the franchise is awarded by the Merseyside Passenger Transport Executive. In Scotland, contracts for ScotRail, is awarded by Transport Scotland, and in Wales, contracts for Transport for Wales Rail, is awarded by Transport for Wales, although the latter is currently publicly-owned with no plans for franchising in the near future and ScotRail was brought into public ownership in 2022. Initially, there were 25 franchises, some franchises have since been combined, others nationalised. There are also a number of local or specialised rail services operated on an open access basis outside the franchise arrangements; examples include Heathrow Express and Hull Trains.
Many franchises were effectively abolished due to the financial effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. The UK government proposed a new state-owned public body, Great British Railways, which would operate a concession contract system on the network from 2023., legislation to establish the new body was said to be "unlikely" within the 2023–2024 parliamentary session.[30]
In the 2015–16 operating year, franchised services provided 1,718 million journeys totalling (64.7 billion billion passenger km) of travel, an increase over 1994–5 of 117% in journeys (from 761 million) and just over doubling the passenger miles.[31] The passenger-miles figure, after being flat from 1965 to 1995, surpassed the 1947 figure for the first time in 1998 and continues to rise steeply.
The key index used to assess passenger train performance is the Public Performance Measure, which combines figures for punctuality and reliability. From a base of 90% of trains arriving on time in 1998, the measure dipped to 75% in mid-2001 due to stringent safety restrictions put in place after the Hatfield crash in October 2000. However, in June 2015 the PPM stood at 91.2% after a period of steady increases in the annual moving average since 2003 until around 2012 when the improvements levelled off.[32]
Train fares cost 2.7% more than under British Rail in real terms on average. For some years, Britain has been said to have the highest rail fares in Europe, with peak-time and season tickets considerably higher than other countries, partly because rail subsidies in Europe are higher.[33] [34] However, passengers are also able to obtain some of the cheapest fares in Europe if they book in advance or travel at off-peak times or purchase 'day-return' tickets which cost little more than a single ticket.
UK rail operators point out rail fare increases have been at a substantially lower rate than petrol prices for private motoring.[7] The difference in price has also been blamed on the fact Britain has the most restrictive loading gauge (maximum width and height of trains that can fit through tunnels, bridges etc.) in the world which means any trains must be significantly narrower and less tall than those used elsewhere. This means British trains cannot be bought "off-the-shelf" and must be specially built to fit British standards.
Average rolling-stock age fell slightly from the third quarter of 2001–02 to 2017–18, from 20.7 years old to 19.6 years old, and recent large orders from Bombardier and its acquirer Alstom, as well as CAF, Hitachi and Stadler, brought down the average age to around 15 years by March 2021.[35] [36]
Although passengers rarely have cause to refer to either document, all travel is subject to the National Rail Conditions of Travel and all tickets are valid subject to the rules set out in a number of so-called technical manuals, which are centrally produced for the network.
Below are the estimated total number of journeys using heavy rail transport in Britain for each financial year. (This table does not include Eurostar, Underground or light rail services)
| 2004–2005 | 1,044,566,371 | ||
| 2005–2006 | 1,081,747,031 | 3.59 | |
| 2006–2007 | 1,150,271,272 | 6.77 | |
| 2007–2008 | 1,223,235,485 | 6.36 | |
| 2008–2009 | 1,271,934,558 | 3.10 | |
| 2009–2010 | 1,264,168,068 | 7.62 | |
| 2010–2011 | 1,350,664,449 | 6.84 | |
| 2011–2012 | 1,456,276,046 | 7.82 | |
| 2012–2013 | 1,497,670,627 | 2.84 | |
| 2013–2014 | 1,583,380,750 | 5.72 | |
| 2014–2015 | 1,650,407,344 | 4.23 | |
| 2015–2016 | 1,713,518,682 | 3.82 | |
| 2016–2017 | 1,727,475,717 | 0.81 | |
| 2017–2018 | 1,703,998,197 | 1.36 | |
| 2018–2019 | 1,752,982,619 | 2.87 | |
| 2019–2020 | 1,738,739,779 | 0.81 | |
| 2020–2021 | 387,885,468 | 77.69 | |
| 2021–2022 | 990,050,962 | 155.24 |
| 2002–2003 | 77.2 | 679.1 | 219.2 | 0 | 975.5 | ||
| 2003–2004 | 81.5 | 690.0 | 240.2 | 1,011.7 | 3.71 | ||
| 2004–2005 | 83.7 | 704.5 | 251.3 | 1,039.5 | 2.75 | ||
| 2005–2006 | 89.5 | 719.7 | 267.3 | 1,076.5 | 3.56 | ||
| 2006–2007 | 99.0 | 769.5 | 276.5 | 1,145.0 | 6.36 | ||
| 2007–2008 | 103.9 | 828.4 | 285.8 | 1,218.1 | 6.38 | ||
| 2008–2009 | 109.4 | 854.3 | 302.8 | 1,266.5 | 3.97 | ||
| 2009–2010 | 111.6 | 842.2 | 304.0 | 1.4 | 1,259.3 | 0.68 | |
| 2010–2011 | 117.9 | 917.6 | 318.2 | 1.8 | 1,355.6 | 7.65 | |
| 2011–2012 | 125.3 | 993.8 | 340.9 | 1.5 | 1,461.5 | 7.82 | |
| 2012–2013 | 127.7 | 1,032.4 | 340.9 | 1.7 | 1,502.6 | 2.81 | |
| 2013–2014 | 129.0 | 1,106.9 | 350.5 | 1.9 | 1,588.3 | 5.70 | |
| 2014–2015 | 134.2 | 1,154.9 | 364.7 | 2.1 | 1,655.8 | 4.25 | |
| 2015–2016 | 138.3 | 1,202.8 | 374.2 | 2.3 | 1,717.6[39] | 3.72 | |
| 2016–2017 | 143.5 | 1,196.8 | 388.7 | 2.4 | 1,731.5 | 0.80 | |
| 2017–2018 | 144.8 | 1,171.2 | 389.6 | 2.4 | 1,707.9 | 1.40 | |
| 2018–2019 | 146.7 | 1,216.9 | 392.8 | 2.5 | 1,759.9 | 3.0 |
There are 2,579 passenger railway stations on the Network Rail network. This does not include the London Underground, nor other systems which are not part of the national network, such as heritage railways. Most date from the Victorian era and a number are in or on the edge of town and city centres. Major stations lie for the most part in large cities, with the largest conurbations (e.g. Birmingham, Bristol, Cardiff, Edinburgh, Glasgow, Liverpool, and Manchester) typically having more than one main station. London is a major hub of the network, with 12 main-line termini forming a "ring" around central London. Birmingham, Leeds, Manchester, Glasgow, Bristol and Reading are major interchanges for many cross-country journeys that do not involve London. However, some important railway junction stations lie in smaller cities and towns, for example York, Crewe and Ely. Some other places expanded into towns and cities because of the railway network. Swindon, for example, was little more than a village before the Great Western Railway chose to site its locomotive works there. In many instances geography, politics or military considerations originally caused stations to be sited further from the towns they served until, with time, these issues could be overcome (for example, Portsmouth had its original station at Gosport).
See main article: High-speed rail in the United Kingdom and Inter-city rail in the United Kingdom.
High-speed inter-city rail (above 124abbr=onNaNabbr=on) was first introduced in Great Britain in the 1970s by British Rail. BR had pursued two development projects in parallel, the development of a tilting train technology, the Advanced Passenger Train (APT), and development of a conventional high-speed diesel train, the High Speed Train (HST). The APT project was abandoned, but the HST design entered service as the British Rail Classes 253, 254 and 255 trains. The prototype HST, the Class 252, reached a world speed record for diesel trains of 143.2 mph, while the main fleet entered service limited to a service speed of 125 mph, and were introduced progressively on main lines across the country, with a rebranding of their services as the InterCity 125. With electrification of the East Coast Main Line, high-speed rail in Great Britain was augmented with the introduction of the Class 91, intended for passenger service at up to 140 mph (225 km/h), and thus branded as the InterCity 225. The Class 91 units were designed for a maximum service speed of 140 mph, and running at this speed was trialled with a 'flashing green' signal aspect under the British signalling system. The trains were eventually limited to the same speed as the HST, to 125 mph, with higher speeds deemed to require cab signalling, which as of 2010 was not in place on the normal British railway network (but was used on the Channel Tunnel Rail Link). A final attempt by the nationalised British Rail at High Speed Rail was the cancelled InterCity 250 project in the 1990s for the West Coast Main Line.
Post privatisation, a plan to upgrade the West Coast Main Line to speeds of up to 140 mph with infrastructure improvements were finally abandoned, although the tilting train Class 390 Pendolino fleet designed for this maximum speed of service were still built and entered service in 2002, and operates limited to 125 mph. Other routes in the UK were upgraded with trains capable of top speeds of up to 125 mph running with the introduction between 2000 and 2005 of Class 180 Adelante DMUs and the Bombardier Voyager DEMUs (Classes 220, 221 and 222).
See main article: HS1. The first implementation of high-speed rail up to 186 mph in regular passenger service in Great Britain was the Channel Tunnel Rail Link (now known as High Speed 1), when its first phase opened in 2003 linking the British end of the Channel Tunnel at Folkestone with Fawkham Junction in Kent. This is used by international only passenger trains for the Eurostar service, using Class 373 and Class 374 trains. The line was later extended all the way into London St Pancras in 2007.
After the building of the first of a new Class 395 train fleet for use partly on High Speed 1 and parts of the rest of the UK rail network, the first domestic high-speed running over 125 mph (to about 140 mph) began in December 2009, including a special Olympic Javelin shuttle for the 2012 Summer Olympics. These services are operated by the South Eastern franchise.
See main article: Intercity Express Programme. The Intercity Express Programme for replacement of the domestic fleet of InterCity 125 and 225 trains on the existing national network was announced. In 2009 it was announced that the preferred rolling stock option for this project was the Hitachi Super Express family of multiple units, and they entered service in 2017 on the Great Western Main Line and in 2019 on the East Coast Main Line. The trains will be capable of a maximum speed of 140 mph with "minor modifications", with the necessary signalling modifications required of the Network Rail infrastructure in Britain likely to come from the phased rollout of the Europe-wide European Rail Traffic Management System (ERTMS).
See main article: High Speed 2. Following several studies and consultations on high-speed rail, in 2009 the UK Government formally announced the High Speed 2 project, establishing a company to produce a feasibility study to examine route options and financing for a new high-speed railway in the UK. This study began on the assumption the route would be a new purpose-built high-speed line connected to High-Speed 1 to the Channel tunnel and from London to the West Midlands, via Heathrow Airport, relieving traffic on the West Coast Main Line (WCML). Conventional high-speed rail technology would be used as opposed to Maglev. The rolling stock would be capable of travelling on the existing Network Rail infrastructure if required, with the route intersecting with the existing WCML and the East Coast Main Line (ECML). A cancelled second phase of the project was planned to reach further north to Manchester, Sheffield and Leeds, as well as linking into the Midland Main Line.
See main article: Northern Powerhouse Rail.
In June 2014, the chancellor of the Exchequer, George Osborne, proposed a high-speed rail link Northern Powerhouse Rail (also known as High Speed 3 or High Speed North) between Liverpool and Newcastle/Sheffield/Hull. The line would use the existing route between Liverpool and Newcastle/Hull and a new route from to Sheffield will follow the same route to Manchester Victoria and then a new line from Victoria to Sheffield, with additional tunnels and other infrastructure.
As of August 2023 the following rolling stock on the British network is capable of 125 mph or more:
| TOPS classification | Operator and name | Type | data-sort-type="number" | Recorded speed | data-sort-type="number" | Design speed | data-sort-type="number" | Speed in service |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Siemens Velaro | 374 | Eurostar e320 | EMU | 219 (352) | 200 (320) | 186 (300) | ||
| TGV TMST | 373 | Eurostar e300 | EMU | 209 (334.7) | 186 (300) | 186 (300) | ||
| Hitachi A-train AT300 | 395 | Southeastern Javelin | EMU | 157 (252)[40] | 140 (225) | 140 (225) | ||
| 800 | GWR IET, LNER Azuma | BMU | Not known | 140 (225) | 125 (200) | |||
| 801 | LNER Azuma | EMU | 140 (225) | 125 (200) | ||||
| 802 | GWR IET TransPennine Express Nova 1 Hull Trains Paragon | BMU | 140 (225) | 125 (200) | ||||
| 803 | Lumo (unnamed) | EMU | 140 (225) | 125 (200) | ||||
| 805 | Avanti West Coast Evero | BMU | 140 (225) | 125 (200) | ||||
| 807 | Avanti West Coast Evero | EMU | 140 (225) | 125 (200) | ||||
| 810 | EMR InterCity Aurora | BMU | 140 (225) | 125 (200) | ||||
| InterCity 225 | 91 + Mark 4 coaches | LNER InterCity 225 | Electric Loco | 162 (261) | 140 (225) | 125 (200) | ||
| Alstom Pendolino | 390 | Avanti West Coast Pendolino | EMU | 162 (261)[41] | 140 (225) | 125 (200) | ||
| CAF Civity | 397 | TransPennine Express Nova 2 | EMU | 125 (200) | 125 (200) | |||
| InterCity 125 | 43 (HST) + Mark 3 coaches | ScotRail Inter7City | Diesel Loco | 148 (~240) | 125 (200) | 125 (200) | ||
| Class 67 | 67 | Diesel Loco | 143 (230)[42] | 125 (200) | 125 (200) | |||
| 180 | Grand Central Adelante | DHMU | 125 (200) | 125 (200) | 125 (200) | |||
| Bombardier Voyager | 220 | CrossCountry Voyager | DEMU | 125 (200) | 125 (200) | 125 (200) | ||
| Bombardier Voyager | 221 | Avanti West Coast Super Voyager CrossCountry Voyager | DEMU | 125 (200) | 125 (200) | 125 (200) | ||
| Bombardier Voyager | 222 | EMR InterCity Meridian | DEMU | 125 (200) | 125 (200) | 125 (200) |
See main article: Rapid transit in the United Kingdom, Commuter rail in the United Kingdom, List of modern tramway and light rail systems in the United Kingdom and List of British heritage and private railways. A number of towns and cities have rapid transit networks. Underground technology is used in the Glasgow subway, Merseyrail centred on Liverpool, London Underground centred on London, London Overground and the London Docklands Light Railway centred on London, and the Tyne and Wear Metro centred on Newcastle upon Tyne.
Light rail systems in the form of trams are in Birmingham, Croydon, Manchester, Nottingham, Sheffield and Edinburgh. These systems use a combination of street running tramways and, where available, reserved right of way or former conventional rail lines in some suburbs. Blackpool has the one remaining traditional tram system. Monorails, heritage tramways, miniature railways and funiculars also exist in several places. In addition, there are a number of heritage (mainly steam) standard and narrow gauge railways, and a few industrial railways and tramways. Some lines which appear to be heritage operations sometimes claim to be part of the public transport network; the Romney, Hythe and Dymchurch Railway in Kent regularly transports schoolchildren.
Most major cities have some form of commuter rail network. These include Belfast, Birmingham, Bristol, Cardiff, Edinburgh, Glasgow, Leeds, Liverpool, London and Manchester.
See main article: Rail freight transport in Great Britain.
There are four main goods operating companies in the UK, the largest of which is DB Cargo UK (formerly DB Schenker, formerly English Welsh & Scottish (EWS)). There are also several smaller independent operators including Mendip Rail. Types of freight carried include intermodal – in essence containerised freight – and coal, metals, oil, and construction materials. The Beeching Cuts, in contrast to passenger services, greatly modernised the goods sector, replacing inefficient wagons with containerised regional hubs.[44] Freight services had been in steady decline since the 1930s, initially because of the reduction in manufacturing and then road haulage's cost advantage in combination with higher wages.[45] [46] Since 1995, however, the amount of freight carried on the railways has increased sharply due to increased reliability and competition, as well as international services.[47] In 2000, the Department for Transport's Transport Ten Year Plan called for an 80% increase in rail freight.[48]
Statistics on freight are specified in terms of the weight of freight lifted, and the net tonne kilometre, being freight weight multiplied by distance carried. 116.6 million tonnes of freight was lifted in the 2013–4 period, against 138 million tonnes in 1986–7, a decrease of 16%.[49] However, a record 22.7 billion net tonne kilometres (14 billion net ton miles) of freight movement were recorded in 2013–4, against 16.6 billion (10.1 billion) in 1986–7, an increase of 38%. Coal made up 36% of the total net tonne kilometre, though its share was declining.[50] Rail freight had increased its market share since privatisation (by net tonne kilometres) from 7.4% in 1998 to 11.1% in 2013.[51] Growth was partly due to more international services including the Channel Tunnel and Port of Felixstowe, which is containerised.[52] Nevertheless, as of 2008, network bottlenecks and insufficient investment in catering for 9' 6" high shipping containers restricted growth.
A symbolic loss to the rail freight industry in Great Britain was the custom of the Royal Mail, which from 2004 discontinued use of its 49-train fleet, and switched to road haulage after a near 170-year-preference for trains. Mail trains had long been part of the tradition of the railways in Great Britain, famously celebrated in the film Night Mail, for which W. H. Auden wrote the poem of the same name. Although Royal Mail suspended mail trains in January 2004, this decision was reversed in December of the same year, and Class 325s are now used on some routes including between London, Warrington and Scotland.
At the time of privatisation, the rolling stock of British Rail was sold to the new operators, as in the case of the freight companies, or to the three ROSCOs (rolling stock companies) which lease or hire stock to passenger and freight train operators. Leasing is relatively commonplace in transport since it enables operating companies to avoid the complication associated with raising sufficient capital to purchase assets; instead, assets are leased and paid for from ongoing revenue. Since 1994 there has been a growth in smaller spot-hire companies that provide rolling stock on short-term contracts. Many of these have grown thanks to the selling-off of locomotives by the large freight operators, especially EWS.
Unlike other major players in the privatised railway system of Great Britain, the ROSCOs are not subject to close regulation by the economic regulatory authority. They were expected to compete with one another, and they do, although not in all respects.
Since privatisation in 1995, the ROSCOs have faced criticism from several quarters – including passenger train operating companies such as GNER, Arriva and FirstGroup – on the basis they are acting as an oligopoly to keep lease prices higher than they would be in a competitive market. In 1998, Deputy Prime Minister John Prescott asked rail regulator John Swift to investigate the market's operation and make recommendations. Many believed Prescott favoured much closer regulation of the ROSCOs, perhaps bringing them into the net of contract-specific regulation, i.e., requiring every rolling stock lease to be approved by the Rail Regulator before it could be valid. Swift's report did not find major problems with the operation of what was then an infant market, and instead recommended the ROSCOs sign up to voluntary, non-binding codes of practice in relation to their future behaviour. Prescott did not like this, but he did not have the legislative time allocation to do much about it. Swift's successor as Rail Regulator, Tom Winsor, agreed with Swift and the ROSCOs were happy to go along with codes of practice, coupled with the Rail Regulator's new powers to deal with abuse of dominance and anti-competitive behaviour under the Competition Act 1998. In establishing these codes, the Rail Regulator made it clear he expected the ROSCOs to adhere to their letter and spirit. The codes of practice were duly put in place and for the next five years the Rail Regulator received no complaints about ROSCO behaviour.
In July 2004, the DFT's White Paper on the future of the railways expressed dissatisfaction with the operation of the rolling stock leasing market, and the belief there may have been excessive pricing on the part of the ROSCOs.
In June 2006, Gwyneth Dunwoody, chair of the Transport Select Committee of the House of Commons, called for an investigation into the companies.[53] Transport commentator Christian Wolmar has asserted the high cost of leasing is due to the way the franchises are distributed to the train operating companies. While the TOCs are negotiating for a franchise they have some freedom to propose different rolling stock options. It is only once they have won the franchise, however, they start negotiating with the ROSCOs. The ROSCO will know the TOC's requirements and also knows the TOC has to obtain a fixed mix of rolling stock which puts the train operating company at a disadvantage in its negotiations with the ROSCO.[54]
On 29 November 2006, following a June 2006 complaint by the DfT alleging excessive pricing by the ROSCOs, the Office of Rail Regulation (as it was then called) announced it was minded to refer the operation of the market for passenger rolling stock to the Competition Commission, citing, amongst other factors, problems in the DfT's own franchising policy as responsible for what may be regarded as a dysfunctional market. ORR said it will consult the industry and the public on what to do, and will publish its decision in April 2007. If the ORR does refer the market to the Competition Commission, there may well be a hiatus in investment in new rolling stock whilst the ROSCOs and their parent companies wait to hear what return they will be allowed to make on their train fleets. This could have the unintended consequence of intensifying the problem of overcrowding on some routes because TOCs will be unable to lengthen their trains or acquire new ones if they need the ROSCOs to co-operate in their acquisition or financing. Some commentators have suggested that such an outcome would be detrimental to the public interest. This is especially striking since the National Audit Office, in its November 2006 report on the renewal and upgrade of the West Coast Main Line, said that the capacity of the trains and the network will be full in the next few years and advocated train lengthening as an important measure to cope with sharply higher passenger numbers.
The Competition Commission conducted an investigation and published provisional findings[55] on 7 August 2008. The report was published on 7 April 2009.[56] A press release[57] summarised the recommendations as follows:
See also Rolling stock company
Three companies took over British Rail's rolling stock on privatisation:
A number of other companies have since entered the leasing market:
Spot-hire companies provide short-term leasing of rolling stock.
See also: Structure of the rail industry in the United Kingdom.
Railways in Great Britain are in the private sector, but they are subject to control by central government, and to economic and safety regulation by arms of government.
In 2006, using powers in the Railways Act 2005, the DfT took over most of the functions of the now wound up Strategic Rail Authority. The DfT now itself runs competitions for the award of passenger rail franchises, and, once awarded, monitors and enforces the contracts with the private sector franchisees. Franchises specify the passenger rail services which are to be run and the quality and other conditions (for example, the cleanliness of trains, station facilities and opening hours, the punctuality and reliability of trains) which the operators have to meet. Some franchises receive a subsidy from the DfT for doing so, and some are cash-positive, which means the franchisee pays the DfT for the contract. Some franchises start life as subsidised and, over their life, move to being cash-positive.
The other regulatory authority for the privatised railway is the Office of Rail and Road (previously the Office of Rail Regulation), which, following the Railways Act 2005, is the combined economic and safety regulator. It replaced the Rail Regulator on 5 July 2004. The Rail Safety and Standards Board still exists, however; established in 2003 on the recommendations of a public inquiry, it leads the industry's progress in health and safety matters.
The principal modern railway statutes are:
The railways are one of the most heavily unionised industrial sectors in the UK.
See Passenger transport executive
See List of companies operating trains in the United Kingdom.
This is only the earliest of the main line openings: for a more comprehensive list of the hundreds of early railways see List of early British railway companies
See main article: List of British heritage and private railways.
Many lines closed by British Railways, including many closed during the Beeching cuts, have been restored and reopened as heritage railways. A few have been relaid as narrow-gauge but the majority are standard-gauge. Most use both steam and diesel locomotives for haulage. Most heritage railways are operated as tourist attractions and do not provide regular year-round train services.
Several pressure groups are campaigning for the re-opening of closed railway lines in Great Britain. These include:
From 1995 until 2009, 27 new lines (totalling 199 track miles) and 68 stations were opened, with 65 further new station sites identified by Network Rail or government for possible construction.On 15 June 2009 the Association of Train Operating Companies (ATOC) published the report , detailing schemes around England where it believed there was a commercial business case for passenger network expansion. The published proposals involved the re-opening or new construction of 40 stations, serving communities with populations of over 15,000, including 14 schemes involving the re-opening or reconstruction of rail lines for passenger services. These would be short-lead-time local projects, to be completed in timescales ranging from 2 years 9 months to 6 years, once approved by local and regional governments, Network Rail and the Department for Transport, complementing existing long-term national projects.[74]
This is a list of towns in England that do not have any sort of rail service. Services taken into account include National Rail, tram and metro services such as the Manchester Metrolink or the Tyne and Wear Metro. The first list is of separate towns. The second is of towns that form part of larger conurbations.
| Town | Population (2019 estimate)[75] | Railway station closed | Notes | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 41,387 | 1969[76] | Proposals have been put forward for Rushden Parkway railway station on the Midland Main Line, to the west of the town. | ||
| 41,223 | 1964[77] | Proposed for reopening on the Leicester–Burton upon Trent line.[78] | ||
| 40,074 | 1963[79] | Radley railway station lies less than a mile outside the town's boundaries. | ||
| 38,849 | N/A | Benfleet is sited nearby on the mainland. | ||
| 39,535 | 1964[80] | The Northumberland Line project is reopening a railway passenger service to Newsham (on the edge of Blyth) by 2024. | ||
| 35,681 | 1968[81] | A 2009 report stated that it was feasible to reopen the Bramley Line to railway station for £12 million, as the line was extant but unused. Since then, little had been done and the cost had risen to an estimated £70 million by 2019.[82] | ||
| 30,783 | 1965 | |||
| 30,518 | 1962 | |||
| 30,319 | 1966 | |||
| 30,023 | 1967[83] | |||
| 29,975 | 1967 | |||
| 29,525 | 1965 | The town is served by the Chasewater Railway which is a heritage railway. | ||
| 28,139 | 1964[84] | The Northumberland Line project is reopening a railway passenger service to Ashington by 2024. | ||
| 27,481 | 1967[85] | |||
| 26,535 | 1964 | , there are plans afoot to reopen Portishead station. | ||
| 25,781 | 1958 | The nearest station at present is Long Buckby on the Northampton Loop. Proposals have been made to reopen Weedon railway station as a new Daventry Parkway station.[86] [87] [88] Both stations are about the same distance (about 4.5miles) from central Daventry. | ||
| 25,239 | N/A | Lies within the Borough of Fareham and is 2miles from Fareham railway station. | ||
| 22,553 | 1955 | The previous station was West Stanley railway station. | ||
| 22,032 | 1964[89] | |||
| 21,138 | 1966 | |||
| 20,789 | 1957 | |||
| 21,362 | 1969 | The town is served by a station on the Mid-Norfolk Railway, which is a heritage railway. | ||
| 21,096 | 1970[90] | |||
| 20,443 | 1929 | Previous station was Dinnington and Laughton railway station which is on a line still used for freight. | ||
| 20,402 | 1966 | The previous station was on a line in use until 2016. |
| Town | Population (2011 census) | Railway station closed | Urban area | Notes | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 79,379 | 1964[91] | The town is served by Dudley Port station, just over a mile from the town centre but outside the borough boundary. Work began in January 2020 on a £449 million 6.8miles extension of the West Midlands Metro tram system from Wednesbury to Dudley, on the formation of the old South Staffordshire line.[92] | |||
| 81,529 | 1953[93] | While Gosport does not have a railway station, Portsmouth Harbour station is a short pedestrian ferry ride away. | |||
| 75,082 | 1964[94] | Newcastle-under-Lyme lies 45 minutes on foot from Stoke-on-Trent railway station. | |||
| 67,085 | 1964 | The town previously had a station on what is now the mothballed Leamside line. It has been the subject of many reopening proposals,[95] including a potential extension of the Tyne and Wear Metro system.[96] | |||
| 64,350 | N/A | Lies within the Borough of Havant which has four stations. | |||
| 58,135 | 1958[97] | A 40-minute walk from Old Hill railway station. | |||
| 52,855 | 1969[98] | Greater Manchester Built-up Area | Lies on the Leigh-Salford-Manchester Bus Rapid Transit guided busway that links Leigh, Salford and Manchester City centre. | ||
| 45,000 | 1947[99] | Burton upon Trent Built-up area | A reopening of the Leicester–Burton upon Trent line would see a station at, south of the town. | ||
| 40,734 | N/A | ||||
| 38,813 | 1963[100] | Skelmersdale was designated as a 'new town' in 1961, with a focus on people owning cars. However, a proposal was considered by the Lancashire County Council.[101] The Department for Transport announced in July 2022 that it was rejecting the Strategic Outline Business Case, throwing the scheme into doubt.[102] | |||
| 30,184 | 1965[103] | Lies on a guided busway that links to the town to stations in Luton. | |||
| 28,480 | 1965[104] | The railway station at Willenhall, which is on a freight/diversionary line between and / railway stations, will reopen to passengers in 2023.[105] | |||
| 26,988 | 1965[106] | The station at has been proposed for reopening by 2040. It is on a freight/diversionary line between and railway stations.[107] [108] | |||
| 26,559 | N/A | South East Dorset Conurbation | |||
| 25,932 | N/A | Earley station is on the southern boundary of the parish, but separated from Woodley by the A3290 dual carriageway. Woodley is within the Borough of Wokingham, which has six stations including the aforementioned Earley. | |||
| 23,128 | 1972 | The town has a station on the East Lancashire Railway served by a heritage railway. |
. Marshall, John. The Severn Valley Railway. 1989. David St John Thomas. Newton Abbot. 164 . 0-946537-45-3. John Marshall (railway historian).