Rabi problem explained

The Rabi problem concerns the response of an atom to an applied harmonic electric field, with an applied frequency very close to the atom's natural frequency. It provides a simple and generally solvable example of light–atom interactions and is named after Isidor Isaac Rabi.

Classical Rabi problem

In the classical approach, the Rabi problem can be represented by the solution to the driven damped harmonic oscillator with the electric part of the Lorentz force as the driving term:

\ddot{x} _{a} + (2)/(\tau _{0}) • x _{a} + \omega ^{2} _{a} x _{a} = (e)/(m) E(t, r _{a),}

where it has been assumed that the atom can be treated as a charged particle (of charge e) oscillating about its equilibrium position around a neutral atom. Here x_a is its instantaneous magnitude of oscillation,

\omega _{a} its natural oscillation frequency, and \tau _{0} its natural lifetime:(2)/(\tau _{0}) = (2 e ^{2} \omega ^{2} _{a})/(3 m c ^{3}) ,

which has been calculated based on the dipole oscillator's energy loss from electromagnetic radiation.

To apply this to the Rabi problem, one assumes that the electric field E is oscillatory in time and constant in space:

E = E ^{i\omega t} _{0 [e} + e ^{-i\omega} ] = 2 E _{0} \cos \omega t,

and x_a is decomposed into a part u_a that is in-phase with the driving E field (corresponding to dispersion) and a part v_a that is out of phase (corresponding to absorption):

x _{a} = x _{0} (u _{a} \cos \omega t + v _{a} \sin \omega t).

Here x₀ is assumed to be constant, but u_a and v_a are allowed to vary in time. However, if the system is very close to resonance (

\omega ≈ \omega _{a} ), then these values will be slowly varying in time, and we can make the assumption that • u _{a} \ll \omega u _{a} , • v _{a} \ll \omega v _{a} and \ddot{u} _{a} \ll \omega ^{2} u _{a} , \ddot{v} _{a} \ll \omega ^{2} v _{a} .

With these assumptions, the Lorentz force equations for the in-phase and out-of-phase parts can be rewritten as

• u = - \delta v - (u)/(T) , • v = \delta u - (v)/(T) + \kappa E _{0,}

where we have replaced the natural lifetime

\tau _{0} with a more general effective lifetime T (which could include other interactions such as collisions) and have dropped the subscript a in favor of the newly defined detuning \delta = \omega - \omega _{a} , which serves equally well to distinguish atoms of different resonant frequencies. Finally, the constant\kappa \stackrel{ def }\ \frac

has been defined.

These equations can be solved as follows:

u(t; \delta) = [u _{0} \cos \delta t - v _{0} \sin \delta t] e ^{-t/T} + \kappa E _{0} \int ^{t} _{0} dt' \sin \delta(t - t') e ^{-(t-t')/T} , v(t; \delta) = [u _{0} \cos \delta t + v _{0} \sin \delta t] e ^{-t/T} - \kappa E _{0} \int ^{t} _{0} dt' \cos \delta(t - t') e ^{-(t-t')/T} .

After all transients have died away, the steady-state solution takes the simple form

x _{a(t)} = (e)/(m) E _{0} \left( (e ^{i\omega})/(\omega ^{2} _{a} - \omega ^{2} + 2 i\omega/T) + c.c. \right),

where "c.c." stands for the complex conjugate of the opposing term.

Two-level atom

Semiclassical approach

See also: optical Bloch equations. The classical Rabi problem gives some basic results and a simple to understand picture of the issue, but in order to understand phenomena such as inversion, spontaneous emission, and the Bloch–Siegert shift, a fully quantum-mechanical treatment is necessary.

The simplest approach is through the two-level atom approximation, in which one only treats two energy levels of the atom in question. No atom with only two energy levels exists in reality, but a transition between, for example, two hyperfine states in an atom can be treated, to first approximation, as if only those two levels existed, assuming the drive is not too far off resonance.

The convenience of the two-level atom is that any two-level system evolves in essentially the same way as a spin-1/2 system, in accordance to the Bloch equations, which define the dynamics of the pseudo-spin vector in an electric field:

• u = - \delta v, • v = \delta u + \kappa E w, • w = - \kappa E v,

where we have made the rotating wave approximation in throwing out terms with high angular velocity (and thus small effect on the total spin dynamics over long time periods) and transformed into a set of coordinates rotating at a frequency

\omega .

There is a clear analogy here between these equations and those that defined the evolution of the in-phase and out-of-phase components of oscillation in the classical case. Now, however, there is a third term w, which can be interpreted as the population difference between the excited and ground state (varying from −1 to represent completely in the ground state to +1, completely in the excited state). Keep in mind that for the classical case, there was a continuous energy spectrum that the atomic oscillator could occupy, while for the quantum case (as we've assumed) there are only two possible (eigen)states of the problem.

These equations can also be stated in matrix form:

(d)/(dt) \begin{bmatrix} u \\ v \\ w \\ \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} 0 & - \delta & 0 \\ \delta & 0 & \kappa E \\ 0 & - \kappa E & 0 \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} u \\ v \\ w \\ \end{bmatrix}.

It is noteworthy that these equations can be written as a vector precession equation:

(d \rho)/(dt) = \Omega x \rho ,

where

\rho = (u, v, w) is the pseudo-spin vector, and \Omega = ( - \kappa E, 0 , \delta) acts as an effective torque.

As before, the Rabi problem is solved by assuming that the electric field E is oscillatory with constant magnitude E₀:

E = E _{0} (e ^{i\omega} + c.c. ) . In this case, the solution can be found by applying two successive rotations to the matrix equation above, of the form\begin{bmatrix} u \ v \ w \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} \cos \chi & 0 & \sin\chi \\ 0 & 1 & 0 \\ - \sin\chi & 0 & \cos\chi \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} u' \ v' \ w' \end{bmatrix}

and

\begin{bmatrix} u' \ v' \ w' \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & \cos \Omega t & \sin\Omega t \\ 0 & - \sin\Omega t & \cos\Omega t \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} u'' \ v'' \ w'' \end{bmatrix},

where

\tan \chi = (\delta)/(\kappa E _{0}) , \Omega(\delta) = \sqrt{\delta ^{2} + (\kappa E ^{2 }.} _{0 )}

Here the frequency

\Omega(\delta) is known as the generalized Rabi frequency, which gives the rate of precession of the pseudo-spin vector about the transformed u axis (given by the first coordinate transformation above). As an example, if the electric field (or laser) is exactly on resonance (such that \delta = 0 ), then the pseudo-spin vector will precess about the u axis at a rate of \kappa E _{0} . If this (on-resonance) pulse is shone on a collection of atoms originally all in their ground state (w = −1) for a time \Delta t = \pi/\kappa E _{0} , then after the pulse, the atoms will now all be in their excited state (w = +1) because of the \pi (or 180°) rotation about the u axis. This is known as a \pi -pulse and has the result of a complete inversion.

The general result is given by

\begin{bmatrix} u \ v \ w \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} ((\kappa E ^{2} _{0 )} + \delta ^{2} \cos \Omega t)/(\Omega ^{2}) & - (\delta)/(\Omega) \sin{\Omega t} & - (\delta \kappa E _{0})/(\Omega ^{2}) ( 1- \cos \Omega t) \\ (\delta)/(\Omega) \sin\Omega t & \cos \Omega t & (\kappa E _{0})/(\Omega) \sin \Omega t \\ (\delta \kappa E _{0})/(\Omega ^{2}) ( 1 - \cos \Omega t) & - (\kappa E _{0})/(\Omega) \sin{\Omega t} & (\delta ^{2} + (\kappa E ^{2} _{0 )} \cos \Omega t)/(\Omega ^{2}) \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} u _{0} \ v _{0} \ w _{0 \end{bmatrix}.}

The expression for the inversion w can be greatly simplified if the atom is assumed to be initially in its ground state (w₀ = −1) with u₀ = v₀ = 0, in which case

w(t; \delta) = -1 + (2 (\kappa E ^{2} _{0 )})/((\kappa E ^{2} _{0 )} + \delta ^{2}) \sin ^{2} \left( (\Omega t)/(2) \right).

Rabi Problem in time-dependent perturbation theory

In the quantum approach, the periodic driving force can be considered as periodic perturbation and, therefore, the problem can be solved using time-dependent perturbation theory, with

H(t) = H ^{0} + H ^{1(t),}

where

H ^{0} is the time-independent Hamiltonian that gives the original eigenstates, and H ^{1(t)} is the time-dependent perturbation. Assume at time t , we can expand the state as\phi(t) = \sum _{n} d _{n(t)} e ^{- i E _{n} t/\hbar} |n\rangle,

where

|n\rangle represents the eigenstates of the unperturbed states. For an unperturbed system, d _{n(t)} = d _{n(0)} is a constant.Now, let's calculate d _{n(t)} under a periodic perturbation H ^{1(t)} = H ^{1} e ^{-i\omega} . Applying operator i\hbar \partial/\partial t - H ^{0} - H ^{1} on both sides of the previous equation, we can get0 = \sum _{n} [i\hbar • d _{n} - H ^{1} e ^{-i\omega} d _{n]} e ^{- iE ^{0} _{n} t/\hbar} |n\rangle,

and then multiply both sides of the equation by

\langle m| e ^{iE ^{0} _{m} t/\hbar} :i\hbar • d _{m} = \sum _{n} \langle m | H ^{1} |n\rangle e ^{i(\omega _{mn} - \omega)t} d _{n.}

When the excitation frequency is at resonance between two states

|m\rangle and |n\rangle , i.e. \omega = \omega _{mn} , it becomes a normal-mode problem of a two-level system, and it is easy to find that d _{m,n} (t) = d _{m,n,+} ( 0 ) e ^{i\Omega} + d _{m,n,-} ( 0 ) e ^{-i\Omega} ,

where

\Omega = (\langle m | H ^{1} |n\rangle)/(\hbar) .

The possibility of being in the state m at time t is

P _{m} = d ^{*} _{m(t)} d _{m(t)} = d ^{2 ( 0 )} _{m, -} + d ^{2 ( 0 )} _{m, +} + 2 d _{m,-} ( 0 ) d _{m,+} ( 0 ) \cos ( 2 \Omega t).

The value of

d _{m,\pm} ( 0 ) depends on the initial condition of the system.

An exact solution of spin-1/2 system in an oscillating magnetic field is solved by Rabi (1937). From their work, it is clear that the Rabi oscillation frequency is proportional to the magnitude of oscillation magnetic field.

Quantum field theory approach

In Bloch's approach, the field is not quantized, and neither the resulting coherence nor the resonance is well explained.

for the QFT approach, mainly Jaynes–Cummings model.

See also

• Rabi cycle
• Rabi frequency
• Vacuum Rabi oscillation

References

• Book: Allen . L . Eberly. J. H.. Optical resonance and two-level atoms . Dover . New York . 1987 . 978-0-486-65533-8 . 17233252 .
• Rabi . I. I. . Space Quantization in a Gyrating Magnetic Field . Physical Review . American Physical Society (APS) . 51 . 8 . 1937-04-15 . 0031-899X . 10.1103/physrev.51.652 . 652–654. 1937PhRv...51..652R .