Quantum steering explained

In physics, in the area of quantum information theory and quantum computation, quantum steering is a special kind of nonlocal correlation, which is intermediate between Bell nonlocality and quantum entanglement. A state exhibiting Bell nonlocality must also exhibit quantum steering, a state exhibiting quantum steering must also exhibit quantum entanglement. But for mixed quantum states, there exist examples which lie between these different quantum correlation sets. The notion was initially proposed by Erwin Schrödinger,[1] [2] and later made popular by Howard M. Wiseman, S. J. Jones, and A. C. Doherty.[3]

Definition

In the usual formulation of quantum steering, two distant parties, Alice and Bob, are considered, they share an unknown quantum state

\rho

with induced states

\rhoA

and

\rhoB

for Alice and Bob respectively. Alice and Bob can both perform local measurements on their own subsystems, for instance, Alice and Bob measure

x

and

y

and obtain the outcome

a

and

b

. After running the experiment many times, they will obtain measurement statistics

p(a,b|x,y)

, this is just the symmetric scenario for nonlocal correlation. Quantum steering introduces some asymmetry between two parties, viz., Bob's measurement devices are trusted, he knows what measurement his device carried out, meanwhile, Alice's devices are untrusted. Bob's goal is to determine if Alice influences his states in a quantum mechanical way or just using some of her prior knowledge of his partial states and by some classical means. The classical way of Alice is known as the local hidden states model which is an extension of the local variable model for Bell nonlocality and also a restriction for separable states model for quantum entanglement.

Mathematically, consider Alice having the measurement

M=\{X1,,Xn\}

, where the elements

Xi

make up a POVM and the set

\{a1,,an\}

are the corresponding outcomes. Then Bob's local state assemblage (a set of positive operators) corresponding to Alice's measurement

M

is
l{S}=\{\rho
a1|M
,,\rho
an|M

\}

with
n
\sum
i=1

p(ai|M)\rho

ai|M

=\rhoB

where the probability

p(ai|M)=Tr(\rho

ai|M

)

.

Similar to the case of quantum entanglement, we define first un-steerable states. We introduce the local hidden state assemblage

l{A}=\{\sigmaλ\}

for which

\sumλp(λ)=\sumλTr(\sigmaλ)=1

and

\sumλp(λ)\sigmaλ=\rhoB

.We say that a state is un-steerable if for an arbitrary POVM measurement

M=\{X1,,Xn\}

and state assemblage
l{S}=\{\rho
a1|M
,,\rho
an|M

\}

, there exists a local hidden state assemblage

l{A}=\{\sigmaλ\}

such that
\rho
ai|M

=\sumλp(λ)p(ai|M,λ)\sigmaλ

for all

ai

.

A state is called a steering state if it is not un-steerable.

Local hidden state model

Let us do some comparison among Bell nonlocality, quantum steering, and quantum entanglement. By definition, a Bell nonlocal which does not admit a local hidden variable model for some measurement setting, a quantum steering state is a state which does not admit a local hidden state model for some measurement assemblage and state assemblage, and quantum entangled state is a state which is not separable. They share a great similarity.

p(a,b|x,y)=\sumλp(a|x,λ)p(b|y,λ)p(λ)

p(a,b|x,y)=\sumλp(a|x,λ)Tr(Fb|y\sigmaλ)p(λ)

p(a,b|x,y)=\sumλTr(Ea|x\chiλ)Tr(Fb|y\sigmaλ)p(λ)

Notes and References

  1. Schrödinger. E.. October 1936. Probability relations between separated systems. Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society. 32. 3. 446–452. 10.1017/s0305004100019137. 1936PCPS...32..446S. 0305-0041.
  2. Schrödinger. E.. October 1935. Discussion of Probability Relations between Separated Systems. Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society. 31. 4. 555–563. 10.1017/s0305004100013554. 1935PCPS...31..555S. 0305-0041.
  3. Wiseman. H. M.. Jones. S. J.. Doherty. A. C.. 2007. Steering, Entanglement, Nonlocality, and the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox. Physical Review Letters. 98. 14. 140402. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.140402. 17501251. 0031-9007. quant-ph/0612147. 2007PhRvL..98n0402W.