Protostome Explained
Protostomia is the clade of animals once thought to be characterized by the formation of the organism's mouth before its anus during embryonic development. This nature has since been discovered to be extremely variable among Protostomia's members, although the reverse is typically true of its sister clade, Deuterostomia.[1] [2] Well known examples of protostomes are arthropods, molluscs, annelids, flatworms and nematodes. They are also called schizocoelomates since schizocoely typically occurs in them.
Together with the Deuterostomia and Xenacoelomorpha, these form the clade Bilateria, animals with bilateral symmetry, anteroposterior axis and three germ layers.[3]
Protostomy
See also: embryological origins of the mouth and anus.
In animals at least as complex as earthworms, the first phase in gut development involves the embryo forming a dent on one side (the blastopore) which deepens to become its digestive tube (the archenteron). In the sister-clade, the deuterostomes, the original dent becomes the anus while the gut eventually tunnels through to make another opening, which forms the mouth. The protostomes (from Greek Greek, Ancient (to 1453);: πρωτο- 'first' + Greek, Ancient (to 1453);: στόμα 'mouth') were so named because it was once believed that in all cases the embryological dent formed the mouth while the anus was formed later, at the opening made by the other end of the gut.[4] [1] It is now known that the fate of the blastopore among protostomes is extremely variable; while the evolutionary distinction between deuterostomes and protostomes remains valid, the descriptive accuracy of the name protostome is disputable.
Protostome and deuterostome embryos differ in several other ways. Many protostomes (the Spiralia clade) undergo spiral cleavage during cell division instead of radial cleavage.[5] Spiral cleavage happens because the cells' division planes are angled to the polar major axis, instead of being parallel or perpendicular to it.Another difference is that secondary body cavities (coeloms) generally form by schizocoely, where the coelom forms out of a solid mass of embryonic tissue splitting away from the rest, instead of by enterocoelic pouching, where the coelom would otherwise form out of in-folded gut walls.[6]
Evolution
The common ancestor of protostomes and deuterostomes was evidently a worm-like aquatic animal of the Ediacaran. The two clades diverged about 600 million years ago. Protostomes evolved into over a million species alive today, compared to ca. 73,000 deuterostome species.[7]
Protostomes are divided into the Ecdysozoa (e.g. arthropods, nematodes) and the Spiralia (e.g. molluscs, annelids, platyhelminths, and rotifers). A modern consensus phylogenetic tree for the protostomes is shown below.[8] [9] [10] [11] [12] The timing of clades radiating into newer clades is given in mya (millions of years ago); less certain placements are indicated with dashed lines.[13]
See also
External links
Notes and References
- Book: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/230766195 . The mouth, the anus, and the blastopore - open questions about questionable openings . Animal Evolution — Genomes, Fossils, and Trees . 2009 . M. J. Telford . D. T. J. Littlewood . Hejnol . A. . Martindale . M. Q. . 33–40.
- 10.1038/s41559-016-0005 . The developmental basis for the recurrent evolution of deuterostomy and protostomy . Nature Ecology & Evolution. 1 . 0005. 2016 . Martín-Durán. José M. . Passamaneck . Yale J. . Martindale . Mark Q. . Hejnol. Andreas. 1 . 28812551 . 90795 .
- Hejnol . A. . Obst . M. . Stamatakis . A. . Ott . M. . Rouse . G. W. . Edgecombe . G. D. . etal . 2009 . Assessing the root of bilaterian animals with scalable phylogenomic methods . Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences . 276 . 1677. 4261–4270 . 10.1098/rspb.2009.0896 . 19759036 . 2817096.
- Book: Peters . Kenneth E. . Walters . Clifford C. . Moldowan . J. Michael . The Biomarker Guide: Biomarkers and isotopes in petroleum systems and Earth history . 2 . 2005 . Cambridge University Press . 978-0-521-83762-0 . 717.
- Valentine . James W. . July 1997 . Cleavage patterns and the topology of the metazoan tree of life . PNAS . The National Academy of Sciences . 94 . 8001–8005 . 1997PNAS...94.8001V . 10.1073/pnas.94.15.8001 . 9223303 . 21545 . 15. free .
- Book: Safra, Jacob E. . The New Encyclopædia Britannica, Volume 1; Volume 3 . 2003 . Encyclopædia Britannica . 978-0-85229-961-6 . 767.
- The Invertebrate tree of life, Giribet & Edgecombe, 2020; p.155
- Gregory D. . Edgecombe . Gonzalo . Giribet . Casey W. . Dunn . Andreas . Hejnol . Reinhardt M. . Kristensen . Ricardo C. . Neves . Greg W. . Rouse . Katrine . Worsaae . Martin V. . Sørensen . 10.1007/s13127-011-0044-4 . Higher-level metazoan relationships: recent progress and remaining questions . June 2011 . Organisms, Diversity & Evolution . 11 . 2 . 151–172 . 32169826 .
- Fröbius . Andreas C. . Funch . Peter . 2017-04-04 . Rotiferan Hox genes give new insights into the evolution of metazoan bodyplans . Nature Communications . 8 . 1 . 9 . 10.1038/s41467-017-00020-w. 28377584 . 2017NatCo...8....9F . 5431905 .
- Smith . Martin R.. Ortega-Hernández. Javier . Hallucigenia's onychophoran-like claws and the case for Tactopoda . Nature . 514. 7522 . 363–366 . 10.1038/nature13576 . 25132546. 2014. 2014Natur.514..363S. 205239797.
- Web site: Palaeos Metazoa: Ecdysozoa . palaeos.com . 2017-09-02.
- Yamasaki . Hiroshi . Fujimoto . Shinta . Miyazaki . Katsumi . June 2015 . Phylogenetic position of Loricifera inferred from nearly complete 18S and 28S rRNA gene sequences . Zoological Letters . 1 . 18 . 10.1186/s40851-015-0017-0. 26605063 . 4657359 . free .
- Peterson . Kevin J.. Cotton. James A.. Gehling . James G. . Pisani . Davide . 2008-04-27 . The Ediacaran emergence of bilaterians: congruence between the genetic and the geological fossil records . Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences . 363 . 1496 . 1435–1443 . 10.1098/rstb.2007.2233 . 18192191 . 2614224.