Geopotential height explained

Geopotential height or geopotential altitude is a vertical coordinate referenced to Earth's mean sea level (assumed zero geopotential) that represents the work involved in lifting one unit of mass over one unit of length through a hypothetical space in which the acceleration of gravity is assumed constant.[1] In SI units, a geopotential height difference of one meter implies the vertical transport of a parcel of one kilogram; adopting the standard gravity value (9.80665 m/s2), it corresponds to a constant work or potential energy difference of 9.80665 joules.

Geopotential height differs from geometric height (as given by a tape measure) because Earth's gravity is not constant, varying markedly with altitude and latitude; thus, a 1-m geopotential height difference implies a different vertical distance in physical space: "the unit-mass must be lifted higher at the equator than at the pole, if the same amount of work is to be performed".[2] It is a useful concept in meteorology, climatology, and oceanography; it also remains a historical convention in aeronautics as the altitude used for calibration of aircraft barometric altimeters.[3]

Definition

Geopotential is the gravitational potential energy per unit mass at elevation

Z

:

\Phi(Z)=

Zg(\phi,Z)dZ
\int
0
where

g(\phi,Z)

is the acceleration due to gravity,

\phi

is latitude, and

Z

is the geometric elevation.[1]

Geopotential height may be obtained from normalizing geopotential by the acceleration of gravity:

{H}=

\Phi
g0

 =

1
g0
Zg(\phi,Z)dZ
\int
0
where

g0

= 9.80665 m/s2, the standard gravity at mean sea level.[4] Expressed in differential form,

{g0}{dH}={g}{dZ}

Role in planetary fluids

Geopotential height plays an important role in atmospheric and oceanographic studies.The differential form above may be substituted into the hydrostatic equation and ideal gas law in order to relate pressure to ambient temperature and geopotential height for measurement by barometric altimeters regardless of latitude or geometric elevation:

{dP}={-g}{\rho}{dZ}={-g0}{\rho}{dH}=

-g0 P
RT

{dH}

dP
P

=-

g0
RT

{dH}

where

P

and

T

are ambient pressure and temperature, respectively, as functions of geopotential height, and

R

is the specific gas constant. For the subsequent definite integral, the simplification obtained by assuming a constant value of gravitational acceleration is the sole reason for defining the geopotential altitude.[5]

Usage

Geophysical sciences such as meteorology often prefer to express the horizontal pressure gradient force as the gradient of geopotential along a constant-pressure surface, because then it has the properties of a conservative force. For example, the primitive equations that weather forecast models solve use hydrostatic pressure as a vertical coordinate, and express the slopes of those pressure surfaces in terms of geopotential height.

A plot of geopotential height for a single pressure level in the atmosphere shows the troughs and ridges (highs and lows) which are typically seen on upper air charts. The geopotential thickness between pressure levels – difference of the 850 hPa and 1000 hPa geopotential heights for example – is proportional to mean virtual temperature in that layer. Geopotential height contours can be used to calculate the geostrophic wind, which is faster where the contours are more closely spaced and tangential to the geopotential height contours.

The National Weather Service defines geopotential height as:

See also

Further reading

Notes and References

  1. Web site: NASA Technical Report R-459: Defining Constants, Equations, and Abbreviated Tables of the 1976 Standard Atmosphere. May 1976 . https://web.archive.org/web/20170307211228/https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19760017709.pdf . 2017-03-07 . Minzner . R. A. . Reber . C. A. . Jacchia . L. G. . Huang . F. T. . Cole . A. E. . Kantor . A. J. . Keneshea . T. J. . Zimmerman . S. P. . Forbes . J. M. .
  2. Book: Bjerknes, V. . V. Bjerknes . Dynamic Meteorology and Hydrography: Part [1]-2, [and atlas of plates] ]. Carnegie Institution of Washington . Carnegie Institution of Washington publication . v. 1 . 1910 . 2023-10-05 . 13.
  3. Book: Anderson, John. 2007. Introduction to Flight. McGraw-Hill Science/Engineering/Math. 109.
  4. Web site: NASA Technical Report R-459: Defining Constants, Equations, and Abbreviated Tables of the 1976 Standard Atmosphere. May 1976 . https://web.archive.org/web/20170307211228/https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19760017709.pdf . 2017-03-07 . Minzner . R. A. . Reber . C. A. . Jacchia . L. G. . Huang . F. T. . Cole . A. E. . Kantor . A. J. . Keneshea . T. J. . Zimmerman . S. P. . Forbes . J. M. .
  5. Book: Anderson, John. 2007. Introduction to Flight. McGraw-Hill Science/Engineering/Math. 116.