Presence (telepresence) explained

Presence is a theoretical concept describing the extent to which media represent the world (in both physical and social environments).[1] Presence is further described by Matthew Lombard and Theresa Ditton as “an illusion that a mediated experience is not mediated."[2] Today, it often considers the effect that people experience when they interact with a computer-mediated or computer-generated environment.[3] The conceptualization of presence borrows from multiple fields including communication, computer science, psychology, science, engineering, philosophy, and the arts. The concept of presence accounts for a variety of computer applications and Web-based entertainment today that are developed on the fundamentals of the phenomenon, in order to give people the sense of, as Sheridan called it, “being there."

Evolution of 'presence' as a concept

The specialist use of the word “presence” derives from the term “telepresence”, coined by Massachusetts Institute of Technology professor Marvin Minsky in 1980.[4] Minsky's research explained telepresence as the manipulation of objects in the real world through remote access technology. For example, a surgeon may use a computer to control robotic arms to perform minute procedures on a patient in another room. Or a NASA technician may use a computer to control a rover to collect rock samples on Mars. In either case, the operator is granted access to real, though remote, places via televisual tools.

As technologies progressed, the need for an expanded term arose. Sheridan extrapolated Minsky’s original definition.[5] Using the shorter “presence,” Sheridan explained that the term refers to the effect felt when controlling real world objects remotely as well as the effect people feel when they interact with and immerse themselves in virtual reality or virtual environments.

Lombard and Ditton went a step further and enumerated six conceptualizations of presence:

  1. presence can be a sense of social richness, the feeling one gets from social interaction
  2. presence can be a sense of realism, such as computer-generated environments looking, feeling, or otherwise seeming real
  3. presence can be a sense of transportation. This is a more complex concept than the traditional feeling of one being there. Transportation also includes users feeling as though something is “here” with them or feeling as though they are sharing common space with another person together
  4. presence can be a sense of immersion, either through the senses or through the mind
  5. presence can provide users with the sense they are social actors within the medium. No longer passive viewers, users, via presence, gain a sense of interactivity and control
  6. presence can be a sense of the medium as a social actor.

Lombard's work discusses the extent to which 'presence' is felt, and how strong the perception of presence is regarded without the media involved.[2] The article reviews the contextual characteristics that contribute to an individual's feeling presence. The most important variables that are important in the determinants of presence are those that involve sensory richness or vividness - and the number and consistency of sensory outputs.[6] Researchers believe that the greater the number of human senses for which a medium provides stimulation, the greater the capability of the medium to produce a sense of presence. Additional important aspects of a medium are visual display characteristics (image quality, image size, viewing distance, motion and color, dimensionality, camera techniques) as well as aural presentation characteristics, stimuli for other senses (interactivity, obtrusiveness of medium, live versus recorded or constructed experience, number of people), content variables (social realism, use of media conventions, nature of task or activity), and media user variables (willingness to suspend disbelief, knowledge of and prior experience with the medium). Lombard also discusses the effects of presence, including both physiological and psychological consequences of "the perceptual illusion of nonmediation."Physiological effects of presence may include arousal, or vection and simulation sickness, while psychological effects may include enjoyment, involvement, task performance, skills training, desensitization, persuasion, memory and social judgement, or parasocial interaction and relationships.

Presence has been delineated into subtypes, such as physical-, social-, and self-presence. Lombard's working definition was "a psychological state in which virtual objects are experienced as actual objects in either sensory or nonsensory ways." Later extensions expanded the definition of "virtual objects" to specify that they may be either para-authentic or artificial. Further development of the concept of "psychological state" has led to study of the mental mechanism that permits humans to feel presence when using media or simulation technologies. One approach is to conceptualize presence as a cognitive feeling, that is, to take spatial presence as feedback from unconscious cognitive processes that inform conscious thought.[7]

Case studies

Several studies provide insight into the concept of media influencing behavior.

Presence in popular culture

See also

Further reading

Notes and References

  1. Lee. Kwan Min. Presence, Explicated. Communication Theory. February 2004. 14. 1. 27–50. 10.1093/ct/14.1.27.
  2. Lombard. Ditton. At the heart of it all: the concept of presence. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 3. 2. 0. 2. 2006 . 10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00072.x.
  3. Book: Sheridan, T. B.. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments (8)5. 1999. 241–246.
  4. Web site: Steuer. J.. Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence.. April 29, 2008. dead. https://web.archive.org/web/20060924185705/http://www.presence-research.org/papers/steuer92defining.pdf. September 24, 2006.
  5. Book: Sheridan, T. B.. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments (1). 1992. 120–126.
  6. Steuer. Jonathan. Defining virtual realities: Dimensions determining telepresence. Communication in the Age of Virtual Reality. 1995.
  7. Schubert. Thomas W.. A New Conception of Spatial Presence: Once Again, with Feeling. Communication Theory. 2009. 19. 2. 161–187. 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2009.01340.x. 55470522 .
  8. Bracken. C. Lombard, M. Social presence and children: Praise, intrinsic motivation, and learning with computers. Journal of Communication. 2004. 54. 22–37. 10.1093/joc/54.1.22.
  9. Nan. X. Anghelcev, G. . Myers, J. R. . Sar, S. . Faber, R. J. . What if a website can talk? Exploring the persuasive effects of web-based anthropomorphic agents.. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly. 2006. 83. 3. 615–631. 10.1177/107769900608300309. 144794910.
  10. Web site: Presence-Research.org. Welcome. April 29, 2008.
  11. Web site: International Society for Presence Research. About ISPR. April 29, 2008.
  12. Book: Rheingold, H. The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier.. registration. 1993. Addison-Wesley. Reading, MA. 9780201608700.
  13. Book: Turkle, S. Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the Internet.. registration. 1995. Simon & Schuster. New York, NY.
  14. Book: Weimann, G. Communicating unreality: Modern media and the reconstruction of reality.. 2000. Sage Publications, Inc.. Thousand Oaks, CA.
  15. Philipp. MC. Storrs, K. Vanman, E. Sociality of facial expressions in immersive virtual environments: A facial EMG study. Biological Psychology. 2012. 91. 1. 17–21. 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2012.05.008. 22652089. 14744015.
  16. Book: Meyrowitz, Joshua. No sense of place : the impact of electronic media on social behavior. 1986. Oxford University Press. New York. 978-0-19-504231-3. 12. printing.. registration.
  17. Book: Goffman, Erving. The presentation of self in everyday life. 1990. Penguin. Harmondsworth. 978-0140135718. Reprint..
  18. Book: McLuhan, Marshall. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. registration. 1964. McGraw Hill. New York.