In geography, a pole of inaccessibility is the farthest (or most difficult to reach) location in a given landmass, sea, or other topographical feature, starting from a given boundary, relative to a given criterion. A geographical criterion of inaccessibility marks a location that is the most challenging to reach according to that criterion. Often it refers to the most distant point from the coastline, implying the farthest point into a landmass from the shore, or the farthest point into a body of water from the shore. In these cases, a pole of inaccessibility is the center of a maximally large circle that can be drawn within an area of interest only touching but not crossing a coastline. Where a coast is imprecisely defined, the pole will be similarly imprecise.
The northern pole of inaccessibility, sometimes known as the Arctic pole, is located on the Arctic Ocean pack ice at a distance farthest from any landmass. The original position was wrongly believed to lie at 84°3′N 174°51′W. It is not clear who first defined this point, but it may have been Sir Hubert Wilkins, who wished to traverse the Arctic Ocean by aircraft in 1927. He was finally successful in 1928. In 1968 Sir Wally Herbert came very close to reaching what was then considered to be the position by dogsled, but by his own account, Across the Top of the World, did not make it due to the flow of sea ice.[1] In 1986, an expedition of Soviet polar scientists led by Dmitry Shparo claimed to reach the original position by foot during a polar night.
In 2005, explorer Jim McNeill asked scientists from The National Snow and Ice Data Center and Scott Polar Research Institute to re-establish the position using modern GPS and satellite technology. This was published as a paper in the Polar Record, Cambridge University Press in 2013. McNeill launched his own, unsuccessful attempt to reach the new position in 2006, while measuring the depth of sea-ice for NASA.[2] In 2010 he and his Ice Warrior team were thwarted again by the poor condition of the sea ice.[3]
The new position lies at, 1,008 km (626 mi) from the three closest landmasses: It is 1,008 km from the nearest land, on Henrietta Island in the De Long Islands, at Arctic Cape on Severnaya Zemlya, and on Ellesmere Island. It is over 200 km from the originally accepted position.[4] Due to constant motion of the pack ice, no permanent structure can exist at this pole. As of February 2021, McNeill said that, as far as he could ascertain, no one had reached the new position of the Northern Pole of Inaccessibility - certainly not from the last landfall across the ocean's surface. It remains an important scientific transect.
The southern pole of inaccessibility is the point on the Antarctic continent most distant from the Southern Ocean. A variety of coordinate locations have been given for this pole. The discrepancies are due to the question of whether the "coast" is measured to the grounding line or the edges of ice shelves, the difficulty of determining the location of the "solid" coastline, the movement of ice sheets and improvements in the accuracy of survey data over the years, as well as possible topographical errors.
The point commonly referred to as the pole of inaccessibility is the site of the Soviet Union research station mentioned below, which was constructed at [5] (though some sources give [6]). This lies 1301km (808miles) from the South Pole, at an elevation of 3718m (12,198feet). Using different criteria, the Scott Polar Research Institute locates this pole at .[7]
Using recent datasets and cross-confirmation between the adaptive gridding and B9-Hillclimbing methods discussed below, Rees et al. (2021) identify two poles of inaccessibility for Antarctica: an "outer" pole defined by the edge of Antarctica's floating ice shelves and an "inner" pole defined by the grounding lines of these sheets. They find the Outer pole to be at, 1590.4km (988.2miles) from the ocean, and the Inner pole to be at, 1179.4km (732.8miles) from the grounding lines.
The southern pole of inaccessibility is far more remote and difficult to reach than the geographic South Pole. On 14 December 1958, the 3rd Soviet Antarctic Expedition for International Geophysical Year research work, led by Yevgeny Tolstikov, established the temporary Pole of Inaccessibility Station (Russian: полюс недоступности,) at . A second Russian team returned there in 1967. Today, a building still remains at this location, marked by a bust of Vladimir Lenin that faces towards Moscow, and protected as a historical site.
On 11 December 2005, at 7:57 UTC, Ramón Hernando de Larramendi, Juan Manuel Viu, and Ignacio Oficialdegui, members of the Spanish Transantarctic Expedition, reached for the first time in history the southern pole of inaccessibility at, updated that year by the British Antarctic Survey. The team continued their journey towards the second southern pole of inaccessibility, the one that accounts for the ice shelves as well as the continental land, and they were the first expedition to reach it, on 14 December 2005, at . Both achievements took place within an ambitious pioneer crossing of the eastern Antarctic Plateau that started at Novolazarevskaya Station and ended at Progress Base after more than 4500km (2,800miles). This was the fastest polar journey ever achieved without mechanical aid, with an average rate of around 90km (60miles) per day and a maximum of 311km (193miles) per day, using kites as their power source.[8] [9] [10] [11]
On 4 December 2006, Team N2i, consisting of Henry Cookson, Rupert Longsdon, Rory Sweet and Paul Landry, embarked on an expedition to be the first to reach the historic pole of inaccessibility location without direct mechanical assistance, using a combination of traditional man hauling and kite skiing. The team reached the old abandoned station on 19 January 2007, rediscovering the forgotten statue of Lenin left there by the Soviets some 48 years previously.[12] The team found that only the bust on top of the building remained visible; the rest was buried under the snow. The explorers were picked up from the spot by a plane from Vostok base, flown to Progress Base and taken back to Cape Town on the Akademik Fyodorov, a Russian polar research vessel.[13]
On 27 December 2011, Sebastian Copeland and partner Eric McNair-Laundry also reached the southern pole of inaccessibility. They were the first to do so without resupply or mechanical support, departing from Novolazarevskaya Station on their way to the South Pole to complete the first East/West crossing of Antarctica through both poles, over .[14]
As mentioned above, due to improvements in technology and the position of the continental edge of Antarctica being debated, the exact position of the best estimate of the pole of inaccessibility may vary. However, for the convenience of sport expeditions, a fixed point is preferred, and the Soviet station has been used for this role. This has been recognized by Guinness World Records for Team N2i's expedition in 2006–2007.[15]
The oceanic pole of inaccessibility, also known as Point Nemo, is located at roughly [16] and is the place in the ocean that is farthest from land. It represents the solution to the "longest swim" problem.[17] The problem entails finding such a place in the world ocean where, if a person fell overboard while on a ship at sea, they would be as far away from any land in any direction as possible. It lies in the South Pacific Ocean, and is equally distant from the three closest land vertices which are each roughly 2688km (1,670miles) away. Those vertices are Pandora Islet of the Ducie Island atoll (an island of the Pitcairn Islands) to the north; Motu Nui (adjacent to Easter Island) to the northeast; and Maher Island (near the larger Siple Island, off the coast of Marie Byrd Land, Antarctica) to the south.[16] The exact coordinates of Point Nemo depend on what the exact coordinates of these three islands are, since the nature of the "longest swim" problem means that the ocean point is equally far from each.[17]
The area is so remote that, since no regular marine or air traffic routes are within, sometimes the closest human beings are astronauts aboard the International Space Station when it passes overhead.[18]
The antipode of Point Nemo – the point on the surface of the Earth that is diametrically opposite of it – is located at roughly, in the Aktobe region of western Kazakhstan, roughly 50 km (30 miles) SSE of the town of Shubarkuduk.
Point Nemo is relatively lifeless; its location within the South Pacific Gyre blocks nutrients from reaching the area, and being so far from land it gets little nutrient run-off from coastal waters.[19]
To the west the region of the South Pacific Ocean is also the site of the geographic center of the water hemisphere, at near New Zealand's Bounty Islands. The geographic center of the Pacific Ocean lies further north-west where the Line Islands begin, west from Starbuck Island at .[20]
Point Nemo was first identified by Croatian survey engineer in 1992.[18] In 2022, Lukatela recalculated the coordinates of Point Nemo using OpenStreetMap data as well as Google Maps data in order to compare those results with the coordinates he first calculated using Digital Chart of the World data.[17]
The point and the areas around it have attracted literary and cultural attention, and the point itself has become known as Point Nemo, a reference to Jules Verne's Captain Nemo from the 1870 novel Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Seas.[16] The novel was a childhood favorite of Lukatela's, and such, he named it after Captain Nemo.[16] [21] The general area plays a major role in the 1928 short story "The Call of Cthulhu" by H. P. Lovecraft, as holding the location of the fictional city of R'lyeh, although this story was written 66 years before the identification of Point Nemo.
The wider area is also known as a "spacecraft cemetery" because hundreds of decommissioned satellites, space stations, and other spacecraft have been made to fall there upon re-entering the atmosphere, to lessen the risk of hitting inhabited locations[22] or maritime traffic. The International Space Station (ISS) is planned to crash into Point Nemo in 2031.[23] [24]
The Eurasian pole of inaccessibility (EPIA) is located in northwestern China, near the Kazakhstan border. It is also the furthest possible point on land from the ocean, given that Eurasia (or even merely Asia alone) is the largest continent on Earth.
Earlier calculations suggested that it is 2645km (1,644miles) from the nearest coastline, located at, approximately 320km (200miles) north of the city of Ürümqi, in the Xinjiang Autonomous Region of China, in the Gurbantünggüt Desert. The nearest settlements to this location are Hoxtolgay Town at, about 50km (30miles) to the northwest, Xazgat Township at, about 20km (10miles) to the west, and Suluk at, about 10km (10miles) to the east.
However, the previous pole location disregards the Gulf of Ob as part of the oceans, and a 2007 study proposes two other locations as the ones farther from any ocean (within the uncertainty of coastline definition): EPIA1 and EPIA2, located respectively at 2,510±10 km (1,560±6 mi) and 2,514±7 km (1,562±4 mi) from the oceans. These points lie in a close triangle about the Dzungarian Gate, a significant historical gateway to migration between the East and West. EPIA2 is located near a settlement called K̂as K̂îr Su in a region named K̂îzîlk̂um (قىزىلقۇم) in the, Burultokay County.
Elsewhere in Xinjiang, the location 43.6811°N 87.3311°W in the southwestern suburbs of Ürümqi (Ürümqi County) was designated by local geography experts as the "center point of Asia" in 1992, and a monument to this effect was erected there in the 1990s. The site is a local tourist attraction.[25]
Coincidentally, the continental and oceanic poles of inaccessibility have a similar radius; the Eurasian poles EPIA1 and EPIA2 are about 178km (111miles) closer to the ocean than the oceanic pole is to land.
In Africa, the pole of inaccessibility is at, 1814km (1,127miles) from the coast, near the town of Obo in the Central African Republic and close to the country's tripoint with South Sudan and the Democratic Republic of the Congo.
In North America, the continental pole of inaccessibility is on the Pine Ridge Reservation in southwest South Dakota about 11km (07miles) north of the town of Allen, 1650km (1,030miles) from the nearest coastline at . The pole was marked in 2021 with a marker that represents the 7 Lakota Values and the four colors of the Lakota Medicine Wheel.[26]
In South America, the continental pole of inaccessibility is in Brazil at, near Arenápolis, Mato Grosso, 1504km (935miles) from the nearest coastline. In 2017, the Turner Twins became the first adventurers to trek to the South American Pole of Inaccessibility.[27] In 2019, it turns out there is a second South American PIA to the north, its position varying greatly between the two coastline datasets used.
In Australia, the continental pole of inaccessibility is located at 920km (570miles) from the nearest coastline, approximately 161 km (100 miles) west-northwest of Alice Springs. The nearest town is Papunya, Northern Territory, about 30km (20miles) to the southwest of both locations.
As detailed below, several factors determine how a pole is calculated using computer modeling.
Poles are calculated with respect to a particular coastline dataset. Currently used datasets are the GSHHG (Global Self-consistent, Hierarchical, High-resolution Geography Database) as well as OpenStreetMap (OSM) planet dumps. The GSHHG claims 500-meter precision for 90% of identifiable coastal features, while the volunteer-build OSM give no such guarantee but nevertheless "have characteristics suggesting accuracy".
Next, a distance function must be determined for calculating distances between coastlines and potential Poles. Some works tended to project data onto planes or perform spherical calculations; more recently, other works have used different algorithms and high-performance computing with ellipsoidal calculations.
Finally, an optimization algorithm must be developed. Several works use the 2007 adaptive grid method of Garcia-Castellanos and Lombardo. In this method, a rectangular grid of, e.g., 21×21 points is created. Each point's distance from the coastline is determined and the point farthest from the coast identified. The grid is then recentered on this point and shrunk by some factor. This process iterates until the grid becomes very small (e.g. at 100-meter precision). Some authors claim this method could sink into a local minimum. A more recent method from 2019, B9-Hillclimbing by Barnes, uses a polyhedron in 3D space to find initial points evenly spaced by 100 kilometers. These points are then grouped; the more "unique" points are subject to numerical optimization (hill climbing, simulated annealing) for the farthest distance, accelerated by a 3D Cartesian point cloud. Rees (2021) shows that the two methods agree with each other to meter level.
To date there has been no meta-study of the various works, and the algorithms and datasets they use. However, successive works have compared themselves with previous calculations and claimed improvement. For example, the GC & L article from 2007 was able to find hundred-kilometer errors in the "traditional" Eurasian PIA in Crane & Crane, 1987. Rees using the same method updated the arctic PIA by over 200 kilometers. Barnes, which improved upon the method and the dataset used, was able to improve the GC & L South American PIA by 50 kilometers, showing that bad coastline data caused an error of 57 kilometers in their reported PIA-to-coast distance.
Poles of Inaccessibility, as determined by some authors, are listed in the table below. This list is incomplete and may not capture all works done to date.
| Pole | Location | Distance from coast (km) | Dataset | Projection | Method | Reference | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Africa | 1,814 | GSHHS 1996 | Sphere | Adaptive Grid | Garcia (2007) | ||
| Africa | 1,814.5158 | GSHHG v2.3.6 (L1) | WGS84 | B9-Hillclimbing | Barnes (2019) | ||
| Africa | 1,815.4150 | OpenStreetMap | WGS84 | B9-Hillclimbing | Barnes (2019) | ||
| Antarctica | 1,301 | ? Traditional | ? | ? | Soviet site (1958) | ||
| Antarctica | 1,136.2129 | GSHHG v2.3.6 (L1+L6). Erroneous. | WGS84 | B9-Hillclimbing | Barnes (2019) | ||
| Antarctica | 1,273.2928 | GSHHG v2.3.6 (L1+L5). Erroneous. | WGS84 | B9-Hillclimbing | Barnes (2019) | ||
| Antarctica | 1,590.36 | ADDv7.2 "Outer" | WGS84 | B9-Hillclimbing | Rees (2021) | ||
| Antarctica | 1,179.40 | ADDv7.2 "Inner" | WGS84 | B9-Hillclimbing | Rees (2021) | ||
| Arctic Pole | 1,008 | GSHHG 2014 | WGS84 | Adaptive Grid | Rees (2014) | ||
| Arctic Pole | 1,008.9112 | OpenStreetMap | WGS84 | B9-Hillclimbing | Barnes (2019) | ||
| Arctic Pole | 1,007.6777 | GSHHG v2.3.6 (L1) | WGS84 | B9-Hillclimbing | Barnes (2019) | ||
| Atlantic Ocean | 2,033.8849 | OpenStreetMap | WGS84 | B9-Hillclimbing | Barnes (2019) | ||
| Atlantic Ocean | 2,033.5187 | GSHHG v2.3.6 (L1) | WGS84 | B9-Hillclimbing | Barnes (2019) | ||
| Australia | 928 | GSHHS 1996 | Sphere | Adaptive Grid | Garcia (2007) | ||
| Australia | not claimed | SF53-13 | ? | Planar map | Geoscience Australia (2014)[28] | ||
| Australia | 925.4459 | GSHHG v2.3.6 (L1) | WGS84 | B9-Hillclimbing | Barnes (2019) | ||
| Australia | 921.9290 | OpenStreetMap | WGS84 | B9-Hillclimbing | Barnes (2019) | ||
| Eurasia 1 | 2,514 | GSHHS 1996 | Sphere | Adaptive Grid | Garcia (2007) | ||
| Eurasia 1 | 2,513.9415 | GSHHG v2.3.6 (L1) | WGS84 | B9-Hillclimbing | Barnes (2019) | ||
| Eurasia 1 | 2,509.9536 | OpenStreetMap | WGS84 | B9-Hillclimbing | Barnes (2019) | ||
| Eurasia 2 | 2,510 | GSHHS 1996 | Sphere | Adaptive Grid | Garcia (2007) | ||
| Eurasia 2 | 2,509.9685 | GSHHG v2.3.6 (L1) | WGS84 | B9-Hillclimbing | Barnes (2019) | ||
| Eurasia 2 | 2,505.2134 | OpenStreetMap | WGS84 | B9-Hillclimbing | Barnes (2019) | ||
| Great Britain | 108 | GSHHS 1996 | Sphere | Adaptive Grid | Garcia (2007) | ||
| Great Britain | 114.4462 | OpenStreetMap | WGS84 | B9-Hillclimbing | Barnes (2019) | ||
| Great Britain | 108.0925 | GSHHG v2.3.6 (L1) | WGS84 | B9-Hillclimbing | Barnes (2019) | ||
| Greenland | 469 | GSHHS 1996 | Sphere | Adaptive Grid | Garcia (2007) | ||
| Greenland | 471.9905 | GSHHG v2.3.6 (L1) | WGS84 | B9-Hillclimbing | Barnes (2019) | ||
| Greenland | 474.2257 | OpenStreetMap | WGS84 | B9-Hillclimbing | Barnes (2019) | ||
| Indian Ocean | 1,940.8913 | OpenStreetMap | WGS84 | B9-Hillclimbing | Barnes (2019) | ||
| Indian Ocean | 1,943.3848 | GSHHG L1 | WGS84 | B9-Hillclimbing | Barnes (2019) | ||
| Madagascar | 260 | GSHHS 1996 | Sphere | Adaptive Grid | Garcia (2007) | ||
| Madagascar | 259.5957 | GSHHG v2.3.6 (L1) | WGS84 | B9-Hillclimbing | Barnes (2019) | ||
| Madagascar | 264.0657 | OpenStreetMap | WGS84 | B9-Hillclimbing | Barnes (2019) | ||
| North America | 1,639 | GSHHS 1996 | Sphere | Adaptive Grid | Garcia (2007) | ||
| North America | 1,639.6549 | GSHHG v2.3.6 (L1) | WGS84 | B9-Hillclimbing | Barnes (2019) | ||
| North America | 1,643.7562 | OpenStreetMap | WGS84 | B9-Hillclimbing | Barnes (2019) | ||
| Pacific Ocean (Point Nemo) | 2,690 | GSHHS 1996 | Sphere | Adaptive Grid | Garcia (2007) | ||
| Pacific Ocean (Point Nemo) | 2,701.1721 | OpenStreetMap | WGS84 | B9-Hillclimbing | Barnes (2019) | ||
| Pacific Ocean (Point Nemo) | 2,704.7991 | GSHHG v2.3.6 (L1) | WGS84 | B9-Hillclimbing | Barnes (2019) | ||
| South America | 1,517 | GSHHS 1996 | Sphere | Adaptive Grid | Garcia (2007) | ||
| South America 1 | 1,490.5321 | GSHHG v2.3.6 (L1) | WGS84 | B9-Hillclimbing | Barnes (2019) | ||
| South America 1 | 1,511.6636 | OpenStreetMap | WGS84 | B9-Hillclimbing | Barnes (2019) | ||
| South America 2 | 1,467.2206 | OpenStreetMap | WGS84 | B9-Hillclimbing | Barnes (2019) | ||
| South America 2 | 1,476.4901 | GSHHG v2.3.6 (L1) | WGS84 | B9-Hillclimbing | Barnes (2019) |
ArcGIS personnel wrote a 2015 page with their calculations based on a flat Earth. The results are too inaccurate to be included here.
