Dual object explained

In category theory, a branch of mathematics, a dual object is an analogue of a dual vector space from linear algebra for objects in arbitrary monoidal categories. It is only a partial generalization, based upon the categorical properties of duality for finite-dimensional vector spaces. An object admitting a dual is called a dualizable object. In this formalism, infinite-dimensional vector spaces are not dualizable, since the dual vector space V doesn't satisfy the axioms.[1] Often, an object is dualizable only when it satisfies some finiteness or compactness property.[2]

A category in which each object has a dual is called autonomous or rigid. The category of finite-dimensional vector spaces with the standard tensor product is rigid, while the category of all vector spaces is not.

Motivation

Let V be a finite-dimensional vector space over some field K. The standard notion of a dual vector space V has the following property: for any K-vector spaces U and W there is an adjunction HomK(UV,W) = HomK(U, VW), and this characterizes V up to a unique isomorphism. This expression makes sense in any category with an appropriate replacement for the tensor product of vector spaces. For any monoidal category (C, ⊗) one may attempt to define a dual of an object V to be an object VC with a natural isomorphism of bifunctors

HomC((–)1V, (–)2) → HomC((–)1, V ⊗ (–)2)For a well-behaved notion of duality, this map should be not only natural in the sense of category theory, but also respect the monoidal structure in some way. An actual definition of a dual object is thus more complicated.

In a closed monoidal category C, i.e. a monoidal category with an internal Hom functor, an alternative approach is to simulate the standard definition of a dual vector space as a space of functionals. For an object VC define V to be

\underline{Hom

}_C(V, \mathbb_C), where 1C is the monoidal identity. In some cases, this object will be a dual object to V in a sense above, but in general it leads to a different theory.

Definition

Consider an object

X

in a monoidal category

(C,,I,\alpha,λ,\rho)

. The object

X*

is called a left dual of

X

if there exist two morphisms

η:I\toXX*

, called the coevaluation, and

\varepsilon:X*X\toI

, called the evaluation, such that the following two diagrams commute:

The object

X

is called the right dual of

X*

. This definition is due to .

Left duals are canonically isomorphic when they exist, as are right duals. When C is braided (or symmetric), every left dual is also a right dual, and vice versa.

If we consider a monoidal category as a bicategory with one object, a dual pair is exactly an adjoint pair.

Examples

Rn

(for example, a compact smooth manifold), then the corresponding pointed spectrum Σ(M+) is dualizable. This is a consequence of Spanier–Whitehead duality, which implies in particular Poincaré duality for compact manifolds.[1]

End(C)

of endofunctors of a category

C

is a monoidal category under composition of functors. A functor

F

is a left dual of a functor

G

if and only if

F

is left adjoint to

G

.[3]

Categories with duals

A monoidal category where every object has a left (respectively right) dual is sometimes called a left (respectively right) autonomous category. Algebraic geometers call it a left (respectively right) rigid category. A monoidal category where every object has both a left and a right dual is called an autonomous category. An autonomous category that is also symmetric is called a compact closed category.

Traces

Any endomorphism f of a dualizable object admits a trace, which is a certain endomorphism of the monoidal unit of C. This notion includes, as very special cases, the trace in linear algebra and the Euler characteristic of a chain complex.

See also

References

Notes and References

  1. Kate . Ponto . Michael . Shulman. Michael Shulman (mathematician). Traces in symmetric monoidal categories . . 32 . 3 . 2014 . 248–273 . 1107.6032. 2011arXiv1107.6032P . 10.1016/j.exmath.2013.12.003 . free .
  2. Book: Becker . James C. . Gottlieb . Daniel Henry . James . I.M. . History of topology . North Holland . 1999 . 725–745 . A history of duality in algebraic topology . 978-0-444-82375-5 . http://www.math.purdue.edu/~gottlieb/Bibliography/53.pdf.
  3. See for example Book: Nikshych. D.. Pavel Etingof . Etingof. P.I.. Gelaki. S.. Ostrik. V. . Exercise 2.10.4 . [{{GBurl|Z6XLDAAAQBAJ|pg=PR7}} Tensor Categories ]. American Mathematical Society . Mathematical Surveys and Monographs . 205 . 2016 . 978-1-4704-3441-0 . 41 .