Partially ordered ring explained

\leq

on the underlying set A that is compatible with the ring operations in the sense that it satisfies:x \leq y \text x + z \leq y + zand0 \leq x \text 0 \leq y \text 0 \leq x \cdot yfor all

x,y,z\inA

.[1] Various extensions of this definition exist that constrain the ring, the partial order, or both. For example, an Archimedean partially ordered ring is a partially ordered ring

(A,\leq)

where partially ordered additive group is Archimedean.[2]

An ordered ring, also called a totally ordered ring, is a partially ordered ring

(A,\leq)

where

\leq

is additionally a total order.

An l-ring, or lattice-ordered ring, is a partially ordered ring

(A,\leq)

where

\leq

is additionally a lattice order.

Properties

The additive group of a partially ordered ring is always a partially ordered group.

The set of non-negative elements of a partially ordered ring (the set of elements

x

for which

0\leqx,

also called the positive cone of the ring) is closed under addition and multiplication, that is, if

P

is the set of non-negative elements of a partially ordered ring, then

P+P\subseteqP

and

PP\subseteqP.

Furthermore,

P\cap(-P)=\{0\}.

The mapping of the compatible partial order on a ring

A

to the set of its non-negative elements is one-to-one; that is, the compatible partial order uniquely determines the set of non-negative elements, and a set of elements uniquely determines the compatible partial order if one exists.

If

S\subseteqA

is a subset of a ring

A,

and:

0\inS

S\cap(-S)=\{0\}

S+S\subseteqS

SS\subseteqS

then the relation

\leq

where

x\leqy

if and only if

y-x\inS

defines a compatible partial order on

A

(that is,

(A,\leq)

is a partially ordered ring).

In any l-ring, the

|x|

of an element

x

can be defined to be

x\vee(-x),

where

x\veey

denotes the maximal element. For any

x

and

y,

|x \cdot y| \leq |x| \cdot |y|holds.[3]

f-rings

An f-ring, or Pierce - Birkhoff ring, is a lattice-ordered ring

(A,\leq)

in which

x\wedgey=0

[4] and

0\leqz

imply that

zx\wedgey=xz\wedgey=0

for all

x,y,z\inA.

They were first introduced by Garrett Birkhoff and Richard S. Pierce in 1956, in a paper titled "Lattice-ordered rings", in an attempt to restrict the class of l-rings so as to eliminate a number of pathological examples. For example, Birkhoff and Pierce demonstrated an l-ring with 1 in which 1 is not positive, even though it is a square. The additional hypothesis required of f-rings eliminates this possibility.

Example

Let

X

be a Hausdorff space, and

l{C}(X)

be the space of all continuous, real-valued functions on

X.

l{C}(X)

is an Archimedean f-ring with 1 under the following pointwise operations:[f + g](x) = f(x) + g(x)[fg](x) = f(x) \cdot g(x)[f \wedge g](x) = f(x) \wedge g(x).

From an algebraic point of view the rings

l{C}(X)

are fairly rigid. For example, localisations, residue rings or limits of rings of the form

l{C}(X)

are not of this form in general. A much more flexible class of f-rings containing all rings of continuous functions and resembling many of the properties of these rings is the class of real closed rings.

Properties

|xy|=|x||y|

in an f-ring.

Formally verified results for commutative ordered rings

IsarMathLib, a library for the Isabelle theorem prover, has formal verifications of a few fundamental results on commutative ordered rings. The results are proved in the ring1 context.[6]

Suppose

(A,\leq)

is a commutative ordered ring, and

x,y,z\inA.

Then:
by
The additive group of

A

is an ordered group
OrdRing_ZF_1_L4

x\leqyifandonlyifx-y\leq0

OrdRing_ZF_1_L7

x\leqy

and

0\leqz

imply

xz\leqyz

and

zx\leqzy

OrdRing_ZF_1_L9

0\leq1

ordring_one_is_nonneg
xy= xyOrdRing_ZF_2_L5
x+y\leq x+ yord_ring_triangle_ineq

x

is either in the positive set, equal to 0 or in minus the positive set.
OrdRing_ZF_3_L2
The set of positive elements of

(A,\leq)

is closed under multiplication if and only if

A

has no zero divisors.
OrdRing_ZF_3_L3
If

A

is non-trivial (

01

), then it is infinite.
ord_ring_infinite

Further reading

Notes and References

  1. Anderson . F. W. . Lattice-ordered rings of quotients . Canadian Journal of Mathematics . 434 - 448. 10.4153/cjm-1965-044-7 . 17.
  2. Johnson . D. G. . December 1960 . A structure theory for a class of lattice-ordered rings . Acta Mathematica . 104 . 3 - 4 . 163 - 215 . 10.1007/BF02546389. free .
  3. Book: Henriksen, Melvin . Melvin Henriksen

    . Melvin Henriksen . A survey of f-rings and some of their generalizations . 1 - 26 . Ordered Algebraic Structures: Proceedings of the Curaçao Conference Sponsored by the Caribbean Mathematics Foundation, June 23 - 30, 1995 . 1997 . W. Charles Holland and Jorge Martinez . 0-7923-4377-8 . Kluwer Academic Publishers . the Netherlands.

  4. \wedge

    denotes infimum.
  5. Hager . Anthony W. . Jorge Martinez . 2002 . Functorial rings of quotients - III: The maximum in Archimedean f-rings . Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra . 169 . 51 - 69. 10.1016/S0022-4049(01)00060-3. free .
  6. Web site: IsarMathLib . 2009-03-31.