Common Security and Defence Policy explained

Common Security and Defence Policy
(European Defence Union)
Founded:1999 (as the European Security and Defence Policy)
Current Form:2009 (Treaty of Lisbon)
Headquarters:Military (MPCC) and Civilian (CPCC) Planning and Conduct Capabilities, Kortenberg building, Brussels, Belgium
Website:eeas.europa.eu
Chief Minister:Josep Borrell
Chief Minister Title:High Representative
Minister:LTG Esa Pulkkinen
Minister Title:Director General of the Military Staff
Commander:GEN Robert Brieger
Commander Title:Chairman of the Military Committee
Active:1,410,626 (2016)[1]
Reserve:2,330,803
Amount:€223.4 billion ($249.3 billion) (2018)
Percent Gdp:1.5% (2020)[2]
History:History of the Common Security and Defence Policy

The Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP) is the European Union's (EU) course of action in the fields of defence and crisis management, and a main component of the EU's Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP).

The CSDP involves the deployment of military or civilian missions to preserve peace, prevent conflict and strengthen international security in accordance with the principles of the United Nations Charter. Military missions are carried out by EU forces established with secondments from the member states' armed forces. The CSDP also entails collective self-defence amongst member states as well as a Permanent Structured Cooperation (PESCO) in which 26 of the 27 national armed forces pursue structural integration. The CSDP structure – headed by the Union's High Representative (HR/VP), Josep Borrell, and sometimes referred to as the European Defence Union (EDU) in relation to its prospective development as the EU's defence arm[3] [4] [5] – comprises:

The EU command and control structures are much smaller than the North Atlantic Treaty Organization's (NATO) Command Structure (NCS), which has been established for territorial defence. It has been agreed that NATO's Allied Command Operations (ACO) may be used for the conduct of the EU's missions. The MPCC, established in 2017 and to be strengthened in 2020, is the EU's first permanent military OHQ. In parallel, the newly established European Defence Fund (EDF) marks the first time the EU budget is used to finance multinational defence projects.

Decisions relating to the CSDP are proposed by the High Representative, adopted by the Foreign Affairs Council, generally requiring unanimity, to be then implemented by the High Representative.

History

See main article: History of the Common Security and Defence Policy. The post-war period saw several short-lived or ill-fated initiatives for European defence integration intended to protect against potential Soviet or German aggression: The Western Union (WU, also referred to as the Brussels Treaty Organisation, BTO) and the proposed European Defence Community (EDC) were respectively cannibalised by the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) and rejected by the French Parliament. The largely dormant Western European Union (WEU) succeeded the WU's remainder in 1955.

In 1970 the European Political Cooperation (EPC) brought about the European Communities' (EC) initial foreign policy coordination. Opposition to the addition of security and defence matters to the EPC led to the reactivation of the WEU in 1984 by its member states, which were also EC member states.

European defence integration gained momentum soon after the end of the Cold War, partly as a result of the EC's failure to prevent the Yugoslav Wars. In 1992, the WEU was given new tasks, and the following year the Treaty of Maastricht founded the EU and replaced the EPC with the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) pillar. In 1996 NATO agreed to let the WEU develop a so-called European Security and Defence Identity (ESDI).[6] The 1998 St. Malo declaration signalled that the traditionally hesitant United Kingdom was prepared to provide the EU with autonomous defence structures.[7] This facilitated the transformation of the ESDI into the European Security and Defence Policy (ESDP) in 1999, when it was transferred to the EU. In 2003 the EU deployed its first CSDP missions, and adopted the European Security Strategy identifying common threats and objectives. In 2009, the Treaty of Lisbon introduced the present name, CSDP, while establishing the EEAS, the mutual defence clause and enabling a subset of member states to pursue defence integration within PESCO. In 2011 the WEU, whose tasks had been transferred to the EU, was dissolved. In 2016 a new security strategy was introduced, which along with the Russian annexation of Crimea, the British withdrawal from the EU and the election of Trump as US president have given the CSDP a new impetus.

Deployments

See main article: List of military and civilian missions of the European Union. The first deployment of European troops under the ESDP, following the 1999 declaration of intent, was in March 2003 in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (FYROM, today: North Macedonia). Operation Concordia used NATO assets and was considered a success and replaced by a smaller police mission, EUPOL Proxima, later that year. Since then, there have been other small police, justice and monitoring missions. As well as in the FYROM, the EU has maintained its deployment of peacekeepers in Bosnia and Herzegovina, as part of Operation Althea.[8]

Between May and September 2003 EU troops were deployed to the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) during "Operation Artemis" under a mandate given by UN Security Council Resolution 1484 which aimed to prevent further atrocities and violence in the Ituri Conflict and put the DRC's peace process back on track. This laid out the "framework nation" system to be used in future deployments. The EU returned to the DRC during July–November 2006 with EUFOR RD Congo, which supported the UN mission there during the country's elections.

Geographically, EU missions outside the Balkans and the DRC have taken place in Georgia, Indonesia, Sudan, Palestine, and UkraineMoldova. There is also a judicial mission in Iraq (EUJUST Lex). On 28 January 2008, the EU deployed its largest and most multi-national mission to Africa, EUFOR Tchad/RCA.[9] The UN-mandated mission involves troops from 25 EU states (19 in the field) deployed in areas of eastern Chad and the north-eastern Central African Republic in order to improve security in those regions. EUFOR Tchad/RCA reached full operation capability in mid-September 2008, and handed over security duties to the UN (MINURCAT mission) in mid-March 2009.[10]

The EU launched its first maritime CSDP operation on 12 December 2008 (Operation Atalanta). The concept of the European Union Naval Force (EU NAVFOR) was created on the back of this operation, which is still successfully combatting piracy off the coast of Somalia almost a decade later. A second such intervention was launched in 2015 to tackle migration problems in the southern Mediterranean (EUNAVFOR Med), working under the name Operation SOPHIA.

Most of the CSDP missions deployed so far are mandated to support security sector reforms (SSR) in host-states. One of the core principles of CSDP support to SSR is local ownership. The EU Council defines ownership as "the appropriation by the local authorities of the commonly agreed objectives and principles".[11] Despite EU's strong rhetorical attachment to the local ownership principle, research shows that CSDP missions continue to be an externally driven, top-down and supply-driven endeavour, resulting often in the low degree of local participation.[12]

Structure

See main article: Structure of the Common Security and Defence Policy. The CSDP involves military or civilian missions being deployed to preserve peace, prevent conflict and strengthen international security in accordance with the principles of the United Nations Charter. Military missions are carried out by EU forces established with contributions from the member states' armed forces. The CSDP also entails collective self-defence amongst member states as well as a Permanent Structured Cooperation (PESCO) in which 26 of the 27 national armed forces pursue structural integration. The CSDP structure, headed by the Union's High Representative (HR/VP), Josep Borrell, comprises:

While the EU has a command and control (C2) structure, it has no standing permanent military structure along the lines of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization's (NATO) Allied Command Operations (ACO), although it has been agreed that ACO resources may be used for the conduct of the EU's CSDP missions. The MPCC, established in 2017 and to be strengthened in 2020, does however represent the EU's first step in developing a permanent military headquarters. In parallel, the newly established European Defence Fund (EDF) marks the first time the EU budget is used to finance multinational defence projects. The CSDP structure is sometimes referred to as the European Defence Union (EDU), especially in relation to its prospective development as the EU's defence arm.[3] [4] [5]

Decisions relating to the CSDP are proposed by the HR/VP, adopted by the FAC, generally requiring unanimity, and then implemented by the HR/VP.

Strategy

See main article: European Union Global Strategy. The European Union Global Strategy (EUGS) is the updated doctrine of the EU to improve the effectiveness of the CSDP, including the defence and security of the members states, the protection of civilians, cooperation between the member states' armed forces, management of immigration, crises etc. Adopted on 28 June 2016,[13] it replaces the European Security Strategy of 2003. The EUGS is complemented by a document titled "Implementation Plan on Security and Defense" (IPSD).[14] Deterrence theory is applied to deter aggressors as one of the core mandates of Common Security and Defence Policy, yet lacks credibility due to insufficient resources.[15]

Forces

See main article: Defence forces of the European Union. A new Action Plan on military mobility and cyber resilience was released 10 November 2022.[16]

National

The CSDP is implemented using civilian and military contributions from member states' armed forces, which also are obliged to collective self-defence based on Treaty on European Union (TEU).

Five EU states host nuclear weapons: France has its own nuclear programmes, while Belgium, Germany, Italy and the Netherlands host US nuclear weapons as part of NATO's nuclear sharing policy. Combined, the EU possesses 300 warheads, and hosts between 90 and 130 US warheads. Italy hosts 70-90 B61 nuclear bombs, while Germany, Belgium, and the Netherlands 10-20 each one.[17] The EU has the third largest arsenal of nuclear weapons, after the United States and Russia.

Expenditure and personnel

The following table presents the military expenditures of the members of the European Union in euros (€). The combined military expenditure of the member states amounted to €223.4 billion in 2018.[18] This represents 1.4% of European Union GDP. European military expenditure includes spending on joint projects such as the Eurofighter Typhoon and joint procurement of equipment. The European Union's combined active military forces in 2016 totaled 1,410,626 personnel.

In a speech in 2012, Swedish General Håkan Syrén criticised the spending levels of European Union countries, saying that in the future those countries' military capability will decrease, creating "critical shortfalls".[19]

Guide to table:

Member stateExpenditure (€ mn.)Per capita (€)% of GDPOperations & maintenance expenditure (€ mn.)Active military personnelLand troops prepared for deployed and sustained operationsReserve personnel
2,673 301 0.74 574 24,190 1,100950,000
5,672 349 1.1 680 27,789 1,2933,300
1,140 109 1.56 118 30,218 1,1683,000
950 149 1.5 154 14,862 79618,343
470 409 1.83 63 20,000 075,000
3,310 184 1.46 474 23,036 6723,236
748 363 2.31 158 6,178 10060,000
4,873 523 2.15 919 7,515 1,738900,000
49,700 609 1.79 10,201 208,251 17,00038,550
57,300 489 1.53 177,608 29,200
7,086 393 3.82 504 106,624 2,432
2,200 122 1.66 492 23,846 1,00020,000
780 191 0.31 103 9,500 8501,778
26,310 339 1.6 1,583 181,116 18,300
758 243 2.23 132 5,686 753,000
1,028 256 2.13 145 14,350 26,000
389 484 0.56 30 824 57
54 122 0.51 8 1,808 30
12,900 507 1.5 2,144 40,196 1,5005,046
11,940 226 2.2 1,918 106,500 6075,400
3,975 235 1.6 142 32,726 1,698
5,590 185 2.0 277 69,542 2,96150,000
1,520 183 1.75 198 13,152 846
548 204 1.04 72 6,342 7071,000
15,660 231 1.2 1,891 120,812 7,41015,150
5,620 460 1.1 1,973 14,500 75034,500
222,194 365 1.50 1,287,171 2,330,803

Naval forces

The combined component strength of the naval forces of member states is some 514 commissioned warships. Of those in service, 4 are fleet carriers. The EU also has 4 amphibious assault ships and 20 amphibious support ships in service. Of the EU's 49 submarines, 10 are nuclear-powered submarines while 39 are conventional attack submarines.

Operation Atalanta (formally European Union Naval Force Somalia) is the first ever (and still ongoing) naval operation of the European Union. It is part of a larger global action by the EU in the Horn of Africa to deal with the Somali crisis. As of January 2011 twenty-three EU nations participate in the operation.

France and Italy have blue-water navies.[20]

Guide to table:

Member statedata-sort-type="number" style="background-color:#ffc0c0; width:7.6%;" Fleet carrierdata-sort-type="number" style="background-color:#ffc0c0; width:7.6%;" Amphibious assault shipdata-sort-type="number" style="background-color:#ffc0c0; width:7.6%;" Amphibious support shipdata-sort-type="number" style="background-color:#f3f781; width:7.6%;" Destroyerdata-sort-type="number" style="background-color:#f3f781; width:7.6%;" Frigate data-sort-type="number" style="background-color:#f3f781; width:7.6%;" Corvettedata-sort-type="number" style="background-color:#c0ffc0; width:7.6%;" Patrol vesseldata-sort-type="number" style="background-color:#ddfbff; width:7.6%;" Anti-mine shipdata-sort-type="number" style="background-color:#c0c0ff; width:7.6%;" Missile sub.data-sort-type="number" style="background-color:#c0c0ff; width:7.6%;" Attack sub.data-sort-type="number" style="width:7.6%;" Totaldata-sort-type="number" style="width:7.6%;" Tonnage
0 0
[21] 2 2 5 9 10,009
1 4 3 1 10 18 15,160
5 2 7 2,869
550
00
[22] 5 4 9 18 51,235
3 3 2,000
4 4 12 20 5,429
[23] 1 3 13 11 20 18 4 6 76 319,195
[24] 3 7 5 8 15 6 44 82,790
[25] 9 13 33[26] 4 1170 138,565
0 0
[27] 8 8 11,219
[28] 2+1 (1) 3 4 16 5 11 10 8 59 303,411
5 5 3,025
[29] 4 4 8 5,678
0 0
<--verified in 08.2020-->[30] 2 2 1,419
2 4 2 4 6 4 22 116,308
[31] 5 2 1 3 19 3 28 19,724
[32] 5 7 7 2 23 34,686
[33] 3 7 6 5 21 23,090
0 0
[34] 1 12435
<--verified in 11.2018-->[35] 1 (1) 25 623 6 3 46 148,607
[36] 6 11 5 22 14,256
4 4 22 34 75 38 156136 4 48514 ~516 1,309,110 ~1,309,110

Land forces

Combined, the member states of the European Union maintain large numbers of various land-based military vehicles and weaponry.

Guide to table:

Member stateMain battle tankArmoured fighting vehicleArtilleryAttack helicopterMilitary logistics vehicle
56 364 90
521 155 27
362 681 1,035 12
[37] 75 283 127 10
134 169 234 15 398
123 501 182 24
46 229 56 12
[38] 74
200 1,080 722 25
450 6,256 349 283 10,746
815 1,774 401 158
1,622 2,187 1,920 29
90 634 358 471
[39] 107 36
1,176 3,145 1,446 107 10,921
[40] 88 96
16 634 135 21
[41] 1,675 3,110 1,580 83
220 425 377
857 1,272 1,273 23
30 327 68
76 52 63
484 1,007 811 27
120 978 268
[42] 8,413 25,421 11,259 822

Air forces

The air forces of EU member states operate a wide range of military systems and hardware. This is primarily due to the independent requirements of each member state and also the national defence industries of some member states. However such programmes like the Eurofighter Typhoon and Eurocopter Tiger have seen many European nations design, build and operate a single weapons platform. 60% of overall combat fleet was developed and manufactured by member states, 32% are US-origin, but some of these were assembled in Europe, while remaining 8% are soviet-made aircraft. As of 2014, it is estimated that the European Union had around 2,000 serviceable combat aircraft (fighter aircraft and ground-attack aircraft).[43]

The EUs air-lift capabilities are evolving with the future introduction of the Airbus A400M (another example of EU defence cooperation). The A400M is a tactical airlifter with strategic capabilities.[44] Around 140 are initially expected to be operated by 5 member states (Luxembourg, France, Germany, Spain and Belgium).

Guide to tables:

red for combat aircraft, green for aerial refueling aircraft, and grey for strategic and tactical transport aircraft.
Fighter and ground-attack
Member state
15 15
52 (34 ordered) 52
(10 ordered) 11 6 Su-25 17
(12 ordered) 12
12 (24 ordered) 28
33 4 (23 ordered) 33
62 (64 ordered) 62
135 (134 ordered) 97 232
134 (38) (35 ordered) 81 245
6 (18[45]) 42 153[46] 234
14 14
94 30 (108 ordered) 71 281[47]
29 26 (26 ordered) 55
48 (32 ordered) 23 103
25 25
17 16 MiG-21 33
(12 ordered) 10 10
68 (20 ordered) 84 12 Harrier II164
94 (70 ordered) 94
311 141 139 120 357 146 60 (346) 152 44 243 1,713
Aerial refueling and transport
Member state//
3 8 PC-6 11
9 7 3 ERJ-135/145 19
2 1 1 L-410 & 1 PC-12 5
1 BN-2 1
4 4 L-410 8
4 4
2 An-28/M28 2
3 3 Learjet 35 & 6 PC-12NG 12
2 14 16 15 27 15 92
4 42 31 76
13 8 21
4 4
2 3
16 12 38
3 1 4
1 1
2 BNT-2 CC2/B
2 King Air 200
4
4 6
5 16 20
6 7 13
2 7 2 11
25 Let L-410 Turbolet7
4
2 7 21 6 37
7 1 KC-130H 8
Shared within EU 3 (6) part of MMF3
54 16 0 83 107 30 81 16 60 41 391

Multinational

Established at Union level

The Helsinki Headline Goal Catalogue is a listing of rapid reaction forces composed of 60,000 troops managed by the European Union, but under control of the countries who deliver troops for it.

Forces introduced at Union level include:

Provided through Article 42.3 TEU

This section presents an incomplete list of forces and bodies established intergovernmentally amongst a subset of member states. These organisations will deploy forces based on the collective agreement of their member states. They are typically technically listed as being able to be deployed under the auspices of NATO, the United Nations, the European Union (EU) through Article 42.3 of TEU, the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe, or any other international entity.

However, with the exception of the Eurocorps, very few have actually been deployed for any real military operation, and none under the CSDP at any point in its history.

Land Forces:

Aerial:

Naval:

Participation, relationship with NATO

Out of the 27 EU member states, 23 are also members of NATO. Another four NATO members are EU applicants—Albania, Montenegro, North Macedonia and Turkey. Two others—Iceland and Norway—have opted to remain outside of the EU, however participate in the EU's single market. The memberships of the EU and NATO are distinct, and some EU member states are traditionally neutral on defence issues. Several EU member states were formerly members of the Warsaw Pact. Denmark had an opt-out from the CSDP, however voted in a referendum in 2022 to begin to participate in the policy area.

The Berlin Plus agreement is the short title of a comprehensive package of agreements made between NATO and the EU on 16 December 2002.[64] These agreements were based on conclusions of NATO's 1999 Washington summit, sometimes referred to as the CJTF mechanism,[65] and allowed the EU to draw on some of NATO's military assets in its own peacekeeping operations.

See also

Defence-related EU initiatives

Pan-European defence organisations (intergovernmental)

Regional, integorvernmental defence organisations in Europe

Atlanticist intergovernmental defence organisations

Further reading

External links

Notes and References

  1. http://www.eda.europa.eu/info-hub/defence-data-portal Defence Data Portal
  2. Web site: Defence Data 2019-2020: Key findings and analysis . European Defence Agency. p.3
  3. Web site: Texts adopted - Tuesday, 22 November 2016 - European Defence Union – P8_TA(2016)0435. www.europarl.europa.eu.
  4. European Commission welcomes first operational steps towards a European Defence Union. European Commission .
  5. Web site: Archived copy . 18 June 2018 . https://web.archive.org/web/20171225235344/http://www.eppgroup.eu/document/119334 . 25 December 2017 . dead .
  6. Web site: Glossary of summaries - EUR-Lex. eur-lex.europa.eu.
  7. Web site: EU to spend €1.5bn a year on joint defence. EUobserver. 7 June 2017 .
  8. Christopher S. Chivvis, "Birthing Athena. The Uncertain Future of ESDP", Focus stratégique, Paris, Ifri, March 2008.
  9. http://www.consilium.europa.eu/showPage.aspx?id=1366&lang=en "EUFOR Tchad/RCA"
  10. Benjamin Pohl (2013). "The logic underpinning EU crisis management operations"., European Security, 22(3): 307–325,, p. 311.
  11. Web site: EU Concept for ESDP support to Security Sector Reform.
  12. 'Here is your mission, now own it!' The rhetoric and practice of local ownership in EU interventions. Filip. Ejdus. 2 October 2017. European Security. 26. 4. 461–484. 10.1080/09662839.2017.1333495. free. 1983/d77fa2b0-82f5-4bc7-82f8-0d796a02c2cd. free.
  13. EEAS (June 2016) Shared Vision, Common Action: A Stronger Europe A Global Strategy for theEuropean Union’s Foreign And Security Policy
  14. Council of the European Union (2016) Implementation Plan on Security and Defence
  15. The Credibility of European Union Military Operations' Deterrence Postures . 10.1080/13533312.2017.1370581 . 2018 . Nováky . Niklas I. M. . International Peacekeeping . 25 . 2 . 191–216 .
  16. Tim Martin (11 November 2022) European Commission launches new defense package, with military mobility and cyber focus Action Plan on Military Mobility 2.0
  17. Web site: USAF Report: "Most" Nuclear Weapon Sites in Europe Do Not Meet US Security Requirements » FAS Strategic Security Blog. https://web.archive.org/web/20130310160809/http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2008/06/usaf-report-%E2%80%9Cmost%E2%80%9D-nuclear-weapon-sites-in-europe-do-not-meet-us-security-requirements.php. dead. 10 March 2013. 10 March 2013.
  18. https://www.eda.europa.eu/docs/default-source/brochures/eda-defence-data-2017-2018 Defence Data 2017–2018
  19. News: Some EU states may no longer afford air forces-general . Adrian . Croft . Reuters . 19 September 2012 . 31 March 2013.
  20. Todd, Daniel; Lindberg, Michael (1996). Navies and Shipbuilding Industries: The Strained Symbiosis. Greenwood Publishing Group. pp. 56–57.
  21. http://www.mil.be/navycomp/index.asp?LAN=nl Marinecomponent Hoofdpagina
  22. Jane's Fighting Ships 2009
  23. "French Navy Ship List (defense.gouv.fr)".Navy Ship List, 22 October 2011.
  24. Offizieller Internetauftritt der Marine. www.marine.de. Retrieved on 17 December 2011.
  25. http://www.hellenicnavy.gr/ Πολεμικό Ναυτικό – Επίσημη Ιστοσελίδα
  26. Web site: Πολεμικό Ναυτικό - Επίσημη Ιστοσελίδα - Αρχική. www.hellenicnavy.gr. 9 November 2019. https://web.archive.org/web/20200203043220/http://www.hellenicnavy.gr/el/. 3 February 2020. dead.
  27. http://www.military.ie/ Home | Defence Forces
  28. http://www.marina.difesa.it/uominimezzi/navi/Pagine/Homepage.aspx Marina Militare
  29. Lithuanian Armed Forces :: Structure » Navy . Kariuomene.kam.lt (21 January 2010). Retrieved on 17 December 2011.
  30. Web site: P61-P62 (Offshore) . . https://web.archive.org/web/20200616022813/https://afm.gov.mt/en/equipment/maritimevessells/Pages/P61-P62.aspx . 16 June 2020.
  31. Marynarka Wojenna . Mw.mil.pl. Retrieved on 17 December 2011.
  32. http://www.marinha.pt/PT/Pages/homepage.aspx Marinha Portuguesa
  33. Fortele Navale Române. Navy.ro. Retrieved on 17 December 2011.
  34. http://www.rtvslo.si/slovenija/slovensko-obalo-bo-varovala-kresnica/90464 Slovensko obalo bo varovala "Kresnica" :: Prvi interaktivni multimedijski portal, MMC RTV Slovenija
  35. http://www.armada.mde.es/ArmadaPortal/page/Portal/ArmadaEspannola/buquessuperficie/prefLang-en/ Presentación Buques de Superficie – Ships – Armada Española
  36. http://www.forsvarsmakten.se/en/Organisation/The-Royal-Swedish-Navy/ The Swedish Navy – Försvarsmakten
  37. Web site: Braniteljski portal | ...Ne pitaj što domovina može učiniti za tebe, nego što ti možeš učiniti za Domovinu . 3 August 2015 . https://web.archive.org/web/20160304220832/http://arhiv.braniteljski-portal.hr//hrvatska/13624 . 4 March 2016 . dead .
  38. Web site: Eesti hangib Soomest haubitsaid.
  39. Web site: The Artillery Corps. www.military.ie . https://web.archive.org/web/20150703164107/https://www.military.ie/en/army/organisation/army-corps/artillery/ . 2015-07-03.
  40. Web site: Lithuania.
  41. Web site: The Armed Forces of the Republic of Poland . 27 July 2018 . 3 March 2016 . https://web.archive.org/web/20160303124236/http://washington.mfa.gov.pl/en/about_the_embassy/waszyngton_us_a_en_embassy/waszyngton_us_a_en_military_attach/waszyngton_us_a_109 . dead .
  42. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/279983/2013.pdf Ministry of Defence - Vehicle & Aircraft Holdings within the scope of the Conventional Armed Forces in Europe Treaty: Annual: 2013 edition
  43. https://www.flightglobal.com/reports/world-air-forces-2020/135665.article - Flight International
  44. http://www.raf.mod.uk/equipment/a400m.cfm "RAF – A400m."
  45. Web site: 12 September 2021. France confirms deal with Greece for six more Rafale fighter jets. 6 October 2021. France 24. en.
  46. Book: The military balance 2021. 2021. James Hackett, International Institute for Strategic Studies. 978-1-000-41545-2. Abingdon, Oxon. 1239962384.
  47. Web site: Aeronautica Militare.
  48. Web site: Choose a language - Consilium . 10 January 2018 . 28 April 2017 . https://web.archive.org/web/20170428231839/http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cmsUpload/Battlegroups.pdf . dead .
  49. News: Europe in a foreign field. The Economist. 19 January 2013.
  50. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/6441417.stm New force behind EU foreign policy
  51. http://www.forumoneurope.ie/eng/index.asp?docID=567 Value of EU 'Battlegroup' plan stressed by Annan
  52. Web site: In Defence of Europe - EPSC - European Commission. EPSC. 31 March 2016.
  53. Web site: Permanent Structured Cooperation (PESCO) first collaborative PESCO projects.
  54. Web site: Project outlines.
  55. Web site: European Defence: What's in the CARDs for PESCO?.
  56. News: EU unveils military pact projects. 10 December 2017. Jacopo. Barigazzi. Politico. 29 December 2017.
  57. Web site: Eurocorps' official website / History. 23 February 2008 .
  58. 10.1080/09662839.2012.747511. The European Gendarmerie Force: A solution in search of problems?. European Security. 22. 1–20. 2013. Arcudi. Giovanni. Smith. Michael E.. 153388488. free.
  59. Web site: Eindhoven regelt internationale militaire luchtvaart.
  60. Web site: Claude-France Arnould Visits EATC Headquarters . Eda.europa.eu . 19 February 2016.
  61. http://www.euromarfor.org/images/stories/EUROMARFOR_arte_final.pdf EUROMARFOR – At Sea for Peace pamphlet
  62. Book: Biscop, Sven . Euro-Mediterranean security: a search for partnership . 2003 . . 978-0-7546-3487-4 . 53 .
  63. http://www.euromarfor.org/images/stories/pdfs/retrospectiva_29ago11.pdf EUROMARFOR Retrospective – Portuguese Command
  64. NATO, Berlin Plus agreement, 21 June 2006.Web site: SHAPE Information . 19 August 2007 . dead . https://web.archive.org/web/20070817094713/http://www.nato.int/shape/news/2003/shape_eu/se030822a.htm . 17 August 2007 .
  65. [The Heritage Foundation]
  66. Web site: Finabel information folder: "Finabel: Contributing to European Army Interoperability since 1953". https://web.archive.org/web/20110720160258/http://espace-finabel.eu/public/images/stories/Finabel/Finabel_UK-midres.pdf. dead. 20 July 2011.