Paired receptors explained

Paired receptors are pairs or clusters of receptor proteins that bind to extracellular ligands but have opposing activating and inhibitory signaling effects.[1] [2] [3] Traditionally, paired receptors are defined as homologous pairs with similar extracellular domains and different cytoplasmic regions, whose genes are located together in the genome as part of the same gene cluster and which evolved through gene duplication.[4] Homologous paired receptors often, but not always, have a shared ligand in common.[5] More broadly, pairs of receptors have been identified that exhibit paired functional behavior - responding to a shared ligand with opposing intracellular signals - but are not closely homologous or co-located in the genome. Paired receptors are highly expressed in the cells of the immune system, especially natural killer (NK) and myeloid cells, and are involved in immune regulation.[6]

Structure

Paired receptors are membrane proteins with extracellular domains that interact with extracellular ligands. The extracellular region may contain multiple repeating protein domains and may be members of either the immunoglobulin or C-type lectin families. The extracellular domains of homologous paired receptors are typically very similar in sequence but have different binding affinity for their shared ligands, with the inhibitory member of the pair binding more tightly.

Homologous paired receptors have characteristic differences in their transmembrane and cytoplasmic regions that distinguish the activating and inhibiting members of the pair. Inhibitory receptors have a cytoplasmic sequence typically containing at least one immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motif (ITIM). Activating receptors have a truncated cytoplasmic sequence compared to their corresponding inhibitory receptor and feature a positively charged amino acid residue in their transmembrane domain, enabling protein-protein interaction with an adaptor protein that possesses a immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif (ITAM).

Genetics and evolution

Homologous paired receptors are located in the same gene cluster and are thought to have evolved through gene duplication. Sequence features such as the presence of an ITIM-like sequence in the 3' untranslated region of some activating receptors imply that the activating members of the pair likely evolved from the inhibitory members.[7] A number of pathogens interact with the inhibitory member of a pair as a means of immune evasion or viral entry, suggesting that activating members with similar binding competencies may be an evolutionary response to this mechanism.[8] This hypothesis is known as the "counterbalance theory"[9] and these evolutionary dynamics represent an evolutionary arms race between pathogens and the host immune system.[10] The evolutionary pressures on some paired-receptor families have been described as examples of the "Red Queen" effect.

Including non-paired examples, over 300 potential immune inhibitory receptors have been identified in the human genome. There are strong indications that paired receptors are rapidly and recently evolving. These genetic regions have high levels of gene polymorphism, and the gene repertoires found in the genomes of closely related lineages vary significantly. The selective pressure experienced by the host from pathogens is thought to underlie this rapid evolution.

Although paired receptors are best characterized as part of the human and mouse immune systems, they have also been studied in other organisms. The chicken (Gallus gallus domesticus) genome contains a number of examples including a very large family, the chicken Ig-like receptors (CHIR) with over 100 members.[11] Paired receptor evolution has also been studied in Xenopus (clawed frog) species.[12] [13] The adaptive immune system is unique to jawed vertebrates, but an example of a paired receptor family has been identified in a jawless vertebrate, termed agnathan paired receptors resembling Ag receptors (APAR) in the hagfish.[14]

Expression

Expression of paired receptors is common in many types of leukocytes, especially myeloid cells and natural killer (NK) cells. Activation of NK cells is a complex regulatory process modulated by a number of different paired receptor families coexpressed in this cell type. In some cases, only one member of the pair is expressed in a cell type. Expression of the paired members in a single cell type may vary with time, or the proteins may differ in subcellular localization, resulting in variations in signaling. Expression in NK cells can be stochastic, resulting in unique variations in receptor repertoire.

Some paired receptors are expressed outside the immune system, for example in neurons, endothelium, and epithelium but in many examples, wide tissue distribution can be observed.

Function

Paired receptors transduce extracellular signals through opposing intracellular signaling pathways. Canonically, inhibitory receptors recruit phosphatases through their ITIM motifs, inhibiting the function of cells in which they are expressed. By contrast, activating receptors interact with adaptor proteins such as DAP-12 bearing an ITAM motif, which in turn recruit kinases such as Syk and ZAP70.

Ligands for paired receptors can be very diverse. They are often proteins; the best-characterized are the MHC class I molecules, but a number of other endogenous molecules have been described as ligands for at least one family of paired receptors, and in a few cases in the LILR family, even intact bacteria or viruses can serve as ligands.[15] Lipids such as phosphatidylethanolamine and phosphatidylserine, sugars and sialylated glycans, and nucleic acids can all serve as ligands for some paired receptors.

The binding affinity of paired receptors' extracellular domains for their ligands is generally fairly weak, with dissociation constants (Kd) in the micromolar (μM) range. However, the inhibitory member of a pair usually binds with higher affinity than the activating member. This can produce a competitive inhibition effect, in which the inhibitory member of the pair out-competes its activating counterpart for ligand binding; other mechanisms of interference with activation, such as disrupting dimerization, have also been described. Thus the net baseline signal from the pair is usually inhibitory, but may be modulated through differences in expression, surface density, subcellular localization, or other factors.

In NK cells, ligands for inhibitory receptors are often MHC class I (MHC-I) molecules, while those for activating receptors may include signals of abnormality or infection such as proteins from pathogens or tumors, or molecules associated with cell stress. Endogenous ligands for inhibitory receptors are better characterized than those for activating receptors. Paired receptor signaling may represent maintenance of homeostasis such that immune responses to normal host cells are inhibited, while responses to abnormal or pathogenic molecules in the environment are activating. NK activation in the absence of inhibitory receptor signals from endogenous ligands is a molecular mechanism for the missing-self hypothesis of NK activation.

Interaction with pathogens

A number of examples of molecular mimicry by pathogens, emulating natural endogenous ligands of paired receptors for immune evasion, have been described in the literature. Such interactions are particularly common with the inhibitory members of receptor pairs, bolstering the hypothesis that activating partners are a later evolutionary response to this immune escape strategy.

The first described interaction between a paired receptor and a viral protein identified ILT-2 and ILR-4 (LILRB1 and LILRB2) as targets for herpes simplex virus UL18 protein, which resembles an MHC-I molecule. Variations in susceptibility to mouse cytomegalovirus infection due to differences in Ly49-family paired receptors among mouse strains are well-characterized, and are attributed to the structural resemblance between the viral protein m157 and MHC-I molecules. The pathogenic bacterium Escherichia coli K1 exposes surface polysialic acid molecules that serve as a molecular mimic for the native ligand of the inhibitory receptor Siglec-11, but induces an opposing response through interactions with the paired activating receptor Siglec-16, exemplifying the benefit of activating receptors as defense mechanisms against molecular mimicry by pathogens.

Paired receptors are also used as viral entry receptors by a number of viruses and occasionally as entry mechanisms for other pathogens. Sialylation is common among mammalian cell-surface proteins and a number of pathogens use sialic acid - either self-synthesized or obtained from the host cell - to evade host immunity, including by interacting with inhibitory siglec receptors.

Families

There are two main groups of paired receptors, distinguished by extracellular regions containing immunoglobulin or C-type lectin domains. Nomenclature within these families is complex and has changed over time as new members were identified.[16] In general, the example of the LILR family applies; genes designated A represent the inhibitory receptor and genes designated B represent the activating receptor.

Immunoglobulin-like receptors

Immunoglobulin-like receptors are members of the immunoglobulin superfamily and have one or more 70-110 residue immunoglobulin domains (Ig) in their extracellular region, typically multiple such domains in tandem. Many of the genes encoding these proteins occur in the leukocyte receptor complex (LRC), a large gene cluster on human chromosome 19. Members of this group found in the human genome include:

C-type lectin-like receptors

C-type lectin-like receptors (CLRs) contain one or more C-type lectin (Ca2+ dependent carbohydrate-binding lectin) domains. Example pairs include:

Notes and References

  1. Lanier . Lewis L . Face off — the interplay between activating and inhibitory immune receptors . Current Opinion in Immunology . June 2001 . 13 . 3 . 326–331 . 10.1016/S0952-7915(00)00222-3. 11406364 .
  2. Kuroki . Kimiko . Furukawa . Atsushi . Maenaka . Katsumi . Molecular Recognition of Paired Receptors in the Immune System . Frontiers in Microbiology . 2012 . 3 . 429 . 10.3389/fmicb.2012.00429. 23293633 . 3533184 . free .
  3. Levi-Schaffer . Francesca . Mandelboim . Ofer . Inhibitory and Coactivating Receptors Recognising the Same Ligand: Immune Homeostasis Exploited by Pathogens and Tumours . Trends in Immunology . February 2018 . 39 . 2 . 112–122 . 10.1016/j.it.2017.10.001. 29066058 . 7106362 .
  4. Akkaya . Munir . Barclay . A. Neil . How do pathogens drive the evolution of paired receptors?: HIGHLIGHTS . European Journal of Immunology . February 2013 . 43 . 2 . 303–313 . 10.1002/eji.201242896. 23280392 . 677081 . free .
  5. Rumpret . Matevž . Drylewicz . Julia . Ackermans . Laura J. E. . Borghans . José A. M. . Medzhitov . Ruslan . Meyaard . Linde . Functional categories of immune inhibitory receptors . Nature Reviews Immunology . December 2020 . 20 . 12 . 771–780 . 10.1038/s41577-020-0352-z. 32612208 . 220293404 .
  6. Martinet . Ludovic . Smyth . Mark J. . Balancing natural killer cell activation through paired receptors . Nature Reviews Immunology . April 2015 . 15 . 4 . 243–254 . 10.1038/nri3799. 25743219 . 20825600 .
  7. Arase . Hisashi . Lanier . Lewis L. . Specific recognition of virus-infected cells by paired NK receptors: Paired NK receptors . Reviews in Medical Virology . March 2004 . 14 . 2 . 83–93 . 10.1002/rmv.422. 15027001 . 22034323 . free .
  8. Schwarz . Flavio . Landig . Corinna S . Siddiqui . Shoib . Secundino . Ismael . Olson . Joshua . Varki . Nissi . Nizet . Victor . Varki . Ajit . Paired Siglec receptors generate opposite inflammatory responses to a human‐specific pathogen . The EMBO Journal . 2017-03-15 . 36 . 6 . 751–760 . 10.15252/embj.201695581. 28100677 . 5350563 .
  9. Barclay . A. Neil . Hatherley . Deborah . The Counterbalance Theory for Evolution and Function of Paired Receptors . Immunity . November 2008 . 29 . 5 . 675–678 . 10.1016/j.immuni.2008.10.004. 19006692 . 3128988 .
  10. Miletić . Antonija . Krmpotić . Astrid . Jonjić . Stipan . The evolutionary arms race between NK cells and viruses: Who gets the short end of the stick?: HIGHLIGHTS . European Journal of Immunology . April 2013 . 43 . 4 . 867–877 . 10.1002/eji.201243101. free .
  11. Viertlboeck . Birgit C. . Hanczaruk . Matthias A. . Amann . Barbara . Bader . Sophie R. . Schmitt . Ramona . Sperling . Beatrice . Schwarz . Susanne C.N. . Schmahl . Wolfgang . Deeg . Cornelia A. . Göbel . Thomas W. . Chicken immunoregulatory Ig-like receptor families: An overview and expression details on ggTREM-A1 . Developmental & Comparative Immunology . November 2013 . 41 . 3 . 403–412 . 10.1016/j.dci.2013.04.017. 23648646 .
  12. Guselnikov . Sergey V . Ramanayake . Thaminda . Erilova . Aleksandra Y . Mechetina . Ludmila V . Najakshin . Alexander M . Robert . Jacques . Taranin . Alexander V . The Xenopus FcR family demonstrates continually high diversification of paired receptors in vertebrate evolution . BMC Evolutionary Biology . 2008 . 8 . 1 . 148 . 10.1186/1471-2148-8-148. 18485190 . 2413239 . free .
  13. Zimmermann . Wolfgang . Kammerer . Robert . Coevolution of paired receptors in Xenopus carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule families suggests appropriation as pathogen receptors . BMC Genomics . December 2016 . 17 . 1 . 928 . 10.1186/s12864-016-3279-9. 27852220 . 5112662 . free .
  14. Suzuki . Takashi . Shin-I . Tadasu . Fujiyama . Asao . Kohara . Yuji . Kasahara . Masanori . Hagfish Leukocytes Express a Paired Receptor Family with a Variable Domain Resembling Those of Antigen Receptors . The Journal of Immunology . 2005-03-01 . 174 . 5 . 2885–2891 . 10.4049/jimmunol.174.5.2885. 15728499 . free .
  15. Burshtyn . Deborah N. . Morcos . Chris . The Expanding Spectrum of Ligands for Leukocyte Ig-like Receptors . The Journal of Immunology . 2016-02-01 . 196 . 3 . 947–955 . 10.4049/jimmunol.1501937. 26802060 . free .
  16. Yamada . Eriko . McVicar . Daniel W. . Paired Receptor Systems of the Innate Immune System . Current Protocols in Immunology . May 2008 . 81 . 1 . Appendix-1X . 10.1002/0471142735.ima01xs81. 18491293 . 2771913 .
  17. Bruijnesteijn . Jesse . van der Wiel . Marit K. H. . de Groot . Nanine . Otting . Nel . de Vos-Rouweler . Annemiek J. M. . Lardy . Neubury M. . de Groot . Natasja G. . Bontrop . Ronald E. . Extensive Alternative Splicing of KIR Transcripts . Frontiers in Immunology . 2018-12-04 . 9 . 2846 . 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02846. 30564240 . 6288254 . free .
  18. Bruijnesteijn . Jesse . de Groot . Natasja G. . Bontrop . Ronald E. . The Genetic Mechanisms Driving Diversification of the KIR Gene Cluster in Primates . Frontiers in Immunology . 2020-09-11 . 11 . 582804 . 10.3389/fimmu.2020.582804. 33013938 . 7516082 . free .
  19. Lewis Marffy . Alexander L. . McCarthy . Alex J. . Leukocyte Immunoglobulin-Like Receptors (LILRs) on Human Neutrophils: Modulators of Infection and Immunity . Frontiers in Immunology . 2020-05-13 . 11 . 857 . 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00857. 32477348 . 7237751 . free .
  20. Takahashi . Shinichiro . Molecular functions of SIRPα and its role in cancer (Review) . Biomedical Reports . 2018-05-23 . 9 . 1 . 3–7 . 10.3892/br.2018.1102. 29930800 . 6006759 .
  21. Barclay . A. Neil . van den Berg . Timo K. . The Interaction Between Signal Regulatory Protein Alpha (SIRP α) and CD47: Structure, Function, and Therapeutic Target . Annual Review of Immunology . 2014-03-21 . 32 . 1 . 25–50 . 10.1146/annurev-immunol-032713-120142. 24215318 .
  22. Han . Zi-Wen . Lyv . Zhi-Wu . Cui . Bin . Wang . Ying-Ying . Cheng . Jun-Ting . Zhang . Ying . Cai . Wen-Qi . Zhou . Yang . Ma . Zhao-Wu . Wang . Xian-Wang . Peng . Xiao-Chun . Cui . Shu-Zhong . Xiang . Ying . Yang . Mo . Xin . Hong-Wu . The old CEACAMs find their new role in tumor immunotherapy . Investigational New Drugs . December 2020 . 38 . 6 . 1888–1898 . 10.1007/s10637-020-00955-w. 32488569 . 219176219 .
  23. Kuespert . Katharina . Pils . Stefan . Hauck . Christof R . CEACAMs: their role in physiology and pathophysiology . Current Opinion in Cell Biology . October 2006 . 18 . 5 . 565–571 . 10.1016/j.ceb.2006.08.008. 16919437 . 7127089 .
  24. Lenza . María Pia . Atxabal . Unai . Oyenarte . Iker . Jiménez-Barbero . Jesús . Ereño-Orbea . June . Current Status on Therapeutic Molecules Targeting Siglec Receptors . Cells . 2020-12-15 . 9 . 12 . 2691 . 10.3390/cells9122691. 33333862 . 7765293 . free .
  25. Toyonaga . Kenji . Yamasaki . Sho . Recognition of Mycobacteria by Dendritic Cell Immunoactivating Receptor . C-Type Lectins in Immune Homeostasis . Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology . 2020 . 429 . 103–115 . 10.1007/82_2020_203. 32300915 . 978-3-030-62236-7 . 215804099 .

This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Paired receptors".

Except where otherwise indicated, Everything.Explained.Today is © Copyright 2009-2024, A B Cryer, All Rights Reserved. Cookie policy.