Traction (orthopedics) explained

Traction (orthopedics)

Traction is a set of mechanisms for straightening broken bones or relieving pressure on the spine[1] and skeletal system. There are two types of traction: skin traction and skeletal traction. They are used in orthopedic medicine.

Techniques

Traction procedures have largely been replaced by more modern techniques, but certain approaches are still used today:

Skeletal traction

Although the use of traction has decreased over the years, an increasing number of orthopaedic practitioners are using traction in conjunction with bracing (see Milwaukee brace).

Harrison et al. (2005) found that mirror image (opposite posture) postural corrective exercises and a new method of lumbosacral tilt traction resulted in 50% reduction in trunk tilt and were associated with nearly resolved pain intensity in this patient population.[3] These researchers felt that their findings warranted further study in the conservative treatment of chronic low back pain and spinal disorders.

Spinal decompression

Spinal traction as a means of spinal decompression is often applied without directly touching bones as other methods of traction do. This is sometimes isolated inside-out by inflatable girdles or use of the transversus abdominis muscle. It is also done in conjunction with thigh-supported flexed-hip traction (inversion chairs, back hyperextensions) or done in conjunction with whole-leg traction (boots, tables) via inverted forms of suspension.

Traction of the spine (except the cervical) also occurs with upright suspension of the body from the arms, such as with pull-ups, dips, captain's chair, chinnings (chin up exercise) or other fitness movements with the feet dangling.

Mechanical traction in physical therapy

Mechanical traction can be used for patients with cervical and lumbar spinal disorders such as cervical radiculopathy or lumbar spinal stenosis. Lumbar traction has been widely used in the clinic, previous meta-analyses have confirmed that mechanical traction in the supine position can relieve short-term pain in patients with radiculopathy.[4] It may be applied mechanically through the use of an apparatus with two different modes: intermittent or continuous.

Physiological goals:

When mechanical traction is combined with other physical therapy modalities such as passive mobilization, massage, stretching and active exercises, it is an effective treatment for pain reduction in cervical or lumbar spine disorders. [5]

Colombo et al. (2020) found that there are better results in mechanical traction therapy when compared to manual traction therapy. Furthermore, continuous traction was found to have a greater significance than intermittent traction. The suggested delivery of traction therapy was found to be mechanical traction with continuous traction.[6]

Recent guidelines have been put forward for the use of cervical traction to treat cervical radiculopathy. Only low quality evidence has been released and the authors of these guidelines encourage researchers to intensify studies on tractions effect on cervical radiculopathy.[7] Researchers have also demonstrated lumbar traction to be advantageous in treating low back pain. [8] Three studies in 2017 confirmed an increase of nutrient and water flow into the intervertebral discs after traction treatment.[9]

Purpose

The purpose of traction is to:

In most cases traction is only one part of the treatment plan of a patient needing such therapy. The physician's order will contain:

Future

The variability of traction delivery protocols causes a gap that may be the reason for negative conclusions that traction has no positive effects. A key to the future success of traction may be finding the proper therapeutic dosage levels. Suboptimal dosage choices may be a key for the negative conclusions on traction. Different dosage levels for aspects such as traction force, traction rhythm, duration of treatment, and frequency could be the key to providing efficient effects. Proper dosage levels for any therapeutic treatment will be vital for recovery efficiency. Patients may have a “directional preference” to an axial force which may be an underlying cause for positive results. Future research is needed to discover if directional preference has a positive therapeutic effect within traction.[10]

References

  1. Book: Burke GL . The Techniques of Traction and Manipulation of the Spine . http://www.macdonaldpublishing.com/Chapter_8.html . Backache from Occiput to Coccyx .
  2. http://www0.sun.ac.za/ortho/webct-ortho/general/trac/trac-2.html Skin Traction - Lower Extremity
  3. Harrison DE, Cailliet R, Betz JW, Harrison DD, Colloca CJ, Haas JW, Janik TJ, Holland B . 6 . A non-randomized clinical control trial of Harrison mirror image methods for correcting trunk list (lateral translations of the thoracic cage) in patients with chronic low back pain . European Spine Journal . 14 . 2 . 155–62 . March 2005 . 15517424 . 3476700 . 10.1007/s00586-004-0796-z .
  4. Wang . Wenxian . Long . Feibing . Wu . Xinshun . Li . Shanhuan . Lin . Ji . 2022-06-21 . Clinical Efficacy of Mechanical Traction as Physical Therapy for Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Meta-Analysis . Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine . 2022 . 5670303 . 10.1155/2022/5670303 . 1748-670X . 9239808 . 35774300 . free .
  5. Romeo A, Vanti C, Boldrini V, Ruggeri M, Guccione AA, Pillastrini P, Bertozzi L . Cervical Radiculopathy: Effectiveness of Adding Traction to Physical Therapy-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials . Physical Therapy . 98 . 4 . 231–242 . April 2018 . 29315428 . 10.1093/physth/pzy001 . free .
  6. Colombo . Claudio . Salvioli . Stefano . Gianola . Silvia . Castellini . Greta . Testa . Marco . 2020-10-22 . Traction Therapy for Cervical Radicular Syndrome is Statistically Significant but not Clinically Relevant for Pain Relief. A Systematic Literature Review with Meta-Analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis . Journal of Clinical Medicine . 9 . 11 . 3389 . 10.3390/jcm9113389 . 2077-0383 . 7690405 . 33105668 . free .
  7. Kjaer P, Kongsted A, Hartvigsen J, Isenberg-Jørgensen A, Schiøttz-Christensen B, Søborg B, Krog C, Møller CM, Halling CM, Lauridsen HH, Hansen IR, Nørregaard J, Jørgensen KJ, Hansen LV, Jakobsen M, Jensen MB, Melbye M, Duel P, Christensen SW, Povlsen TM . 6 . National clinical guidelines for non-surgical treatment of patients with recent onset neck pain or cervical radiculopathy . European Spine Journal . 26 . 9 . 2242–2257 . September 2017 . 28523381 . 10.1007/s00586-017-5121-8 . 4048239 .
  8. Lee JH, Choi KH, Kang S, Kim DH, Kim DH, Kim BR, Kim W, Kim JH, Do KH, Do JG, Ryu JS, Min K, Bahk SG, Park YH, Bang HJ, Shin KH, Yang S, Yang HS, Yoo SD, Yoo JS, Yoon KJ, Yoon SJ, Lee GJ, Lee SY, Lee SC, Lee SY, Lee IS, Lee JS, Lee CH, Lim JY, Han JY, Han SH, Sung DH, Cho KH, Kim SY, Kim HJ, Ju W . 6 . Nonsurgical treatments for patients with radicular pain from lumbosacral disc herniation . The Spine Journal . 19 . 9 . 1478–1489 . September 2019 . 31201860 . 10.1016/j.spinee.2019.06.004 . 189898294 .
  9. Mitchell UH, Helgeson K, Mintken P . Physiological effects of physical therapy interventions on lumbar intervertebral discs: A systematic review . Physiotherapy Theory and Practice . 33 . 9 . 695–705 . September 2017 . 28715273 . 10.1080/09593985.2017.1345026 . 33228144 .
  10. Alrwaily M, Almutiri M, Schneider M . Assessment of variability in traction interventions for patients with low back pain: a systematic review . Chiropractic & Manual Therapies . 26 . 1 . 35 . 2018-09-17 . 30237870 . 6139896 . 10.1186/s12998-018-0205-z . free .

External links