Opposition proceeding explained

An opposition proceeding is an administrative process available under the patent and trademark law of many jurisdictions which allows third parties to formally challenge the validity of a pending patent application ("pre-grant opposition"), of a granted patent ("post-grant opposition"), or of a trademark.

Patents

European Patent Office

See main article: Opposition procedure before the European Patent Office. In the context of the proceedings at the European Patent Office (EPO), third parties may challenge the validity of a granted European patent by filing a post-grant opposition under the European Patent Convention (EPC). The term for filing an opposition with the EPO is nine months from the publication of the mention of the grant of the European patent in the European Patent Bulletin.

France

Opposition proceedings may be filed against French patents granted since April 1, 2020.[1] [2] The term for filing an opposition with the National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI) is nine months from the grant of the French patent.[1] An opposition may be filed by a strawman.[2]

United States

Under United States patent law, an opposition proceeding is called a reexamination. Post-grant review provisions of the new patent law may affect a potential patent infringement defendant's strategies in filing a declaratory judgment action. Subsequent to the Leahy–Smith America Invents Act (2011), any third party can challenge the validity of an issued patent using either post-grant review under 35 U.S.C. § 321 or inter partes review under 35 U.S.C. § 311. Both proceedings became effective September 16, 2012.[3]

Trademarks

In the case of trademarks, third parties may use opposition proceedings to "oppose" the acceptance of a trademark application after it has been accepted and published for opposition purposes. If an opposition is defeated the trademark will proceed to registration. Some jurisdictions operate a "post-grant" opposition system, whereby opposition is not possible until after registration (e.g. Japan).

Canada

In Canada, any third party can file a statement of opposition to stop a trademark from being registered for at least one of the reasons set out in the Trademarks Act and Trademarks Regulations.[4] A statement of opposition can only be filed during the two-month period after a trademark application is approved by the Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO) and advertised in the Trademarks Journal.[5] The trademark applicant and opponent then submit pleadings, evidence and arguments to the Trademarks Opposition Board (an administrative body within CIPO), which hears and makes decisions in opposition proceedings.[4] [5] [6] The Board can either refuse the trademark application (in whole or in part) or reject the opposition.[5] This decision can be appealed to the Federal Court of Canada by both the trademark applicant and opponent.[4] [5]

See also

External links

Notes and References

  1. Web site: Loi PACTE : nouvelle procédure d’opposition brevet . PACTE Act: new patent opposition proceedings . inpi.fr . INPI . 22 February 2020 . 17 February 2020.
  2. Web site: Teyssèdre . Laurent . 1 an d'opposition aux brevets français . Le Blog du Droit Européen des Brevets . 27 February 2022 . French . 1 year of opposition to French patents . 23 February 2022.
  3. Web site: Post-Grant Review Aspect of New Patent Law . The National Law Review . Andrews Kurth LLP. January 23, 2012 . September 14, 2012.
  4. Web site: Opposition Proceedings—Canadian Intellectual Property Office. Government of Canada. 2020-06-30.
  5. Web site: Practice in trademark opposition proceedings—Canadian Intellectual Property Office. Government of Canada. 2019-09-24.
  6. Web site: Trademarks Opposition Board—Canadian Intellectual Property Office. Government of Canada. 2019-08-30.