Old Tagalog Explained

Old Tagalog
Also Known As:
Tagalog: Lumang Tagalog
Region:Philippines, particularly the present-day regions of Calabarzon and Mimaropa
Era:10th century AD (developed into Classical Tagalog in 16th century; continued as modern Southern Tagalog dialects spoken in Aurora,[1] Calabarzon, and Mimaropa, most popular is the Batangas dialect.)
Familycolor:Austronesian
Fam2:Malayo-Polynesian
Fam3:Philippine
Fam4:Greater Central Philippine
Fam5:Central Philippine
Script:Baybayin
Luzon Kawi (before c. 1300)
Isoexception:historical

Old Tagalog, also known as Old Filipino (Tagalog: Lumang Tagalog; Baybayin: pre-virama:, post-virama [krus kudlit]: ; post-virama [pamudpod]:), is the earliest form of the Tagalog language during the Classical period. It is the primary language of pre-colonial Tondo, Namayan and Maynila. The language originated from the Proto-Philippine language and evolved to Classical Tagalog, which was the basis for Modern Tagalog. Old Tagalog uses the Tagalog script or Baybayin, one of the scripts indigenous to the Philippines.

Etymology

The word Tagalog is derived from the endonym or (taga-ilog, "river dweller"), composed of (tagá-, "native of" or "from") and or (ílog, "river"). Very little is known about the ancient history of the language; linguists such as David Zorc and Robert Blust speculate that the Tagalogs and other Central Philippine ethno-linguistic groups had originated in Northeastern Mindanao or the Eastern Visayas.[2] [3]

History

Old Tagalog is one of the Central Philippine languages, which evolved from the Proto-Philippine language, which comes from the Austronesian peoples who settled in the Philippines around 2200 BC.[4]

The early history of the Tagalog language remains relatively obscure, and a number of theories exist as to the exact origins of the Tagalog peoples and their language. Scholars such as Robert Blust suggest that the Tagalogs originated in northeastern Mindanao or the eastern Visayas.[5] Possible words of Old Tagalog origin are attested in the Laguna Copperplate Inscription from the 10th century, which is largely written in Old Malay.[6] The first known complete book to be written in Tagalog is the Spanish; Castilian: [[Doctrina Christiana]] (Christian Doctrine), printed in 1593. The book also used Baybayin script.[7]

The question has been raised about the origin of some words in the various languages of the Philippines and their possible connection to ancient Buddhist and Hindu culture in the region, as the language is influenced by Sanskrit, Malay, Tamil and Chinese.[8] [9]

Writing system

See main article: Baybayin. Old Tagalog was written in Baybayin, a writing system formerly used in the Philippines which belongs to the Brahmic family of scripts.

Phonology

Height! scope="col"
FrontCentralBack
Closei pronounced as //i//u pronounced as //u//
Opena pronounced as //a//
Labial! scope="col"
Dental/
Alveolar
DorsalGlottal
Nasalpronounced as /m/pronounced as /n/pronounced as /ŋ/
Stoppronounced as /p/ pronounced as /b/pronounced as /t/ pronounced as /d/pronounced as /k/ pronounced as /ɡ/pronounced as /ʔ/
Fricativepronounced as /s/pronounced as /h/
Approximantwpronounced as /l/j

See also

External links

Notes and References

  1. While Aurora is geographically northern Tagalog area which borders Bulacan & Nueva Ecija, Aurora Tagalog dialect is closely related to Tayabas Tagalog of Quezon mostly by accent & vocabulary.(Discovering Aurora in phinder.ph).
  2. Zorc, David. 1977. The Bisayan Dialects of the Philippines: Subgrouping and Reconstruction. Pacific Linguistics C.44. Canberra: The Australian National University
  3. Blust, Robert. 1991. The Greater Central Philippines hypothesis. Oceanic Linguistics 30:73–129
  4. Mijares. Armand Salvador B.. 2006. The Early Austronesian Migration To Luzon: Perspectives From The Peñablanca Cave Sites. https://web.archive.org/web/20140707050814/http://ejournal.anu.edu.au/index.php/bippa/article/viewFile/10/9. July 7, 2014 . Bulletin of the Indo-Pacific Prehistory Association. 26. 72–78.
  5. The Greater Central Philippines Hypothesis. 3623084. Blust. Robert. Oceanic Linguistics. 1991. 30. 2. 73–129. 10.2307/3623084.
  6. Postma, Antoon. (1992). The Laguna Copper-Plate Inscription: Text and Commentary. Philippine Studies vol. 40, no. 2:183–203
  7. Zorc, David. 1977. The Bisayan Dialects of the Philippines: Subgrouping and Reconstruction. Pacific Linguistics C.44. Canberra: The Australian National University
  8. Web site: Indian Origins of Filipino Customs . Vedic Empire . 2013-11-09.
  9. Web site: The Indian in the Filipino - INQUIRER.net, Philippine News for Filipinos. Globalnation.inquirer.net. 2013-11-09. dead. https://web.archive.org/web/20150621051322/http://globalnation.inquirer.net/cebudailynews/opinion/view/20091011-229561/The-Indian-in-the-Filipino. 2015-06-21.