Nonclassical ion explained

Nonclassical carbocations are stabilized by charge delocalization from contributions of neighbouring or bonds, which can form bridged intermediates or transition states.[1] [2] Nonclassical ions have been extensively studied with the 2-norbornyl system, which as “naked” ion unambiguously exhibit such a bridged structure. The landmark of nonclassical ions are unexpectedly fast solvolysis rates and large differences between epimeric esters. Such behaviour is not restricted to 2-norbornyl esters, as has been shown with some cyclopentyl and steroidal esters with the tosyloxy leaving group.[3] Substitution reactions of secondary esters occur by SN2- or SN1-like mechanisms.[4] [5] [6] Only in highly polar solvents such as hexafluoroisopropanol (HFIP) of low nucleophilicity one can expect a nearly same uniform SN1-like mechanism. The solvolysis of several cyclopentyl and steroidal esters show that large solvolysis rates and differences between epimers can occur which surpass those of the 2-norbornyl system. In these cases a vicinal C–C or C–H bond can lead to significant delocalization of the positive charge, if these bonds are close to antiperiplanar to the leaving group, and the migration leads to a more stable tertiary carbocation. The reaction products in these cases always result from the migration of the neighbouring bond.

The reaction of epimeric esters can be severely slowed by steric hindrance of solvation.

Solvolysis of cyclopropylcarbinyl, cyclobutyl and homoallyl esters are also characterized by very large rates, and have been shown to occur via a common nonclassical ion structure in the form of a bicyclobutonium ion.[7] [8]

See also

Notes and References

  1. Brown, H. C. (with commentary by P. v. R. Schleyer) The Nonclassical Ion Problem; Plenum Press:  New York /Springer 1977 https://www.springer.com/de/book/9781461341208
  2. Moss, R.A. The 2-norbornyl cation: a retrospective J. Phys. Org. Chem. 2014, 27, 374-379 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/poc.3290
  3. Schneider, H.-J. The Controversy about Nonclassical Ions – Abandoned too Early? J. Phys. Org. Chem. 2018,https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/poc.3846
  4. Anslyn, E.V., Dougherty, D.A Modern Physical Organic Chemistry University Science Books 2005http://www.uscibooks.com/adfm_new.pdf
  5. Sykes P. A guide book to mechanism in organic chemistry 6th Ed., New Delhi: Orient Longman, 1986, p. 111 ffhttp://about.mdma.ch/picproxie_docs/000536454-Guidebook_to_Mechanism_in_Organic_Chemistry.pdf
  6. Capon, B., McManus, S. P. Neighboring Group Participation Vol. 1, Plenum, New York, 1976 https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/bfm%3A978-1-4684-0826-3%2F1.pdf
  7. Saunders, M., Laidig, K.E., Wiberg, K.B., Schleyer Structures, energies, and modes of interconversion of ions J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1988, 110, 7652–7659 https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/ja00231a012
  8. Siehl, H. U. The Conundrum of the (C4H7) Cation: Bicyclobutonium and Related Carbocations Adv. Phys. Org. Chem., 2018, 52, 1-47 https://www.elsevier.com/books/advances-in-physical-organic-chemistry/williams/978-0-12-815211-9