Natural fertility explained

Natural fertility is the fertility that exists without birth control or other medical interventions. The control is the number of children birthed to the parents and is modified as the number of children reaches the maximum. Natural fertility tends to decrease as a society modernizes. Women in a pre-modernized society typically have given birth to a large number of children by the time they are 50 years old, while women in post-modernized society only bear a small number by the same age.[1] However, during modernization natural fertility rises, before family planning is practiced.[2]

Historical populations have traditionally honored the idea of natural fertility by displaying fertility symbols.[3]

Birth control

Natural fertility is a concept developed by the French historical demographer Louis Henry to refer to the level of fertility that would prevail in a population that makes no conscious effort to limit, regulate, or control fertility, so that fertility depends only on physiological factors affecting fecundity. In contrast, populations that practice birth control will have lower fertility levels as a result of delaying first births (a lengthened interval between menarche and first pregnancy), extended intervals between births, or stopping child-bearing at a certain age. Such control does not assume the use of artificial means of fertility regulation or modern contraceptive methods but can result from the use of traditional means of contraception or pregnancy prevention (e.g., coitus interruptus). Many social norms or practices affect fertility regulation including celibacy, the age at marriage and the timing and frequency of sexual intercourse, including periods of prescribed sexual abstinence. Breastfeeding has also been used to space births in areas without birth control.[4] Ansley Coale and other demographers have developed several methods for measuring the extent of such fertility control, in which the idea of a natural level of fertility is an essential component.[5]

When women have access to birth control, they can better plan their pregnancies. This leads to better health outcomes and enhances their lives and those of their families. Birth control has dramatically improved the ability of all women to participate actively and with dignity in economies across the world.[6] Birth control allows many women to delay childbearing until they believe they are emotionally, physically and financially ready to be a parent. Children who are born in an unplanned pregnancy tend to occur outside relationships. Birth Control has been the main tool to prevent unplanned births, and with greater access to birth control unplanned pregnancies have declined.[7]

Proximate determinants

Proximate determinants describe variables that affect a female's fertility. There are seven proximate determinants of natural fertility, four of which affect the inter-birth interval:[8]

Factors like the age at which a woman marries and the inter-birth interval are influenced by social factors like education, religion, and wealth. Educated women tend to delay childbirth and have fewer offspring.[9] In sub-Saharan Africa where gender disparities in education are more prevalent, fertility rates are the highest in the world.[10] Globally, 58 million girls do not attend primary school. Half of those girls live in sub-Saharan Africa; this disparity only widens as the level of education increases.[11] Prevalence of child marriage is an attributing factor to the fertility rates in India as women ages 20–24 reported that they had never used contraception prior to giving birth or within their first year of marriage. Child marriage in India primarily occurs in girls living in poor socioeconomic conditions. Furthermore, women married as minors in South Asia, where half of child marriages occur, reveal having high numbers of unwanted pregnancies than their counterparts that married as adults.[12]

Practicing natural fertility

Populations in practice

Reasons for practice

Common reasons communities or individuals will practice natural fertility include concerns about developing medical conditions (including future infertility), pre-existing health conditions (including PCOS), cost of birth control, religious prohibition, lack of availability of birth control, and lack of information about birth control methods. Location also tends to be a factor in regards to the availability of both contraceptives and education on sexual practice. For example, less developed areas, including, but not limited to those extending throughout inland Africa lack access to the drugs necessary to control fertility or informative lessons describing their correct usage.[14]

Influences on natural fertility rates

Fertile window

The number of children born to one woman can vary dependent on her window from menarche to menopause. The average window of fertility is from 13.53 to 49.24.[15] Taking into consideration lactational amenorrhea and the period between conception and birth, the average woman is capable of experiencing around 20 births. However, if the duration of lactation is cut short due to use of a formula substitute or the woman has multiple births, the number of offspring could exceed 20.

Male contribution

Natural fertility is not only influenced by women and their conscious or unconscious decisions, but also their male counterparts. Even if a woman does not take contraceptives, lacks knowledge of family planning, or does not practice regulated fertility, she might not be able to conceive. Over the past half century, there has been an increase in scientific data supporting the decline in male sperm count.[16] The decrease is attributed to various environmental toxins that are accumulating as the planet continues to industrialize. If sperm count remains above 60 million per ejaculate, fertility remains normal. But sperm counts are continuing to drop. At such low levels, the sperm often are incapable of successfully fertilizing the egg. A decline in male fertility often means a decline in natural fertility, as fertility is carried by both sexes.

Preconditions for fertility decline

Ansley J. Coale developed a theory to predict when a population's fertility would begin to decline. His theory focused on three specific aspects. First, a couple must make conscious choice to control their fertility. This is closely related to secularization as some religions prohibit means of contraception. Second, there must be a benefit to controlling fertility that results in the desire for a smaller family. For example, as more regions move away from agriculture children are no longer needed to help with labor and fertility rates and family size tend to decrease. Third, the couple must be able to control fertility. This means that access to contraceptives or other means of limiting fertility must be available.[17]

Coale's preconditions for fertility decline is interrelated to the Demographic Transition, a theory of the transition of societies from an agricultural to an industrial system. A more modernized society has lower mortality and fertility rates while a less modernized society tends to have higher mortality and fertility rates.[18] Developing countries in the early stages of the demographic transition are characterized by high fertility and mortality rates which can be attributed to the lack of medical interventions like birth control and modern technology.[19] Communicable diseases and contaminated resources like water and consequently food, plague developing countries. As a consequence, people of all ages die in masses. Coale's theory favored a fertility decline as a smaller population would allow for a more beneficial spread of resources and keep the number of ill individuals concentrated to a smaller group. In addition, Coale viewed the development of Europe's infrastructure during the Industrial Revolution as a mark in its transition in the demographic transition. Mortality and fertility rates declined with their improved standard of living. Infant mortality rates are indicative of fertility rates as couples decide to have a lot children knowing that a number of them will die so that even after those children die, they have sufficient kids to aid in agricultural work. Conversely, developed countries in the later stages of the demographic transition experience lower fertility and mortality rates due to the accessibility of contraception, the pursuit of higher education in women, and marriage at a later age.

Coale's theory can be observed in sub-Saharan Africa as countries residing within this region have fertility levels that are declining at a much slower rate than before and have one of the highest projected population growths compared to other areas of the world. Individuals inhabiting sub-Saharan Africa have slowly rejected Coale's second precondition for fertility decline which, as stated before, is willingness. They are resistant and unwilling to accept the integration of modern forms of contraception. This can be attributed to the influence of religion and the values it imposes on culture even in individuals who don't practice any religion.[20] To add on, the society they live in encourages young marriages and values large families. Despite the discrepancy between preferred child bearing and natural fertility, women in Africa have reported they don't use any form of contraception to prevent pregnancies.[21] All of these factors have contributed to the slowing down of fertility decline in Africa. As of now, an uninterrupted African baby boom is to be expected.[22]

References

Notes
  • Bibliography
  • Notes and References

    1. Book: Coale, Ansley J. . Demographic Transition . Social Economics . 1989-01-01 . Palgrave Macmillan UK . The New Palgrave . 16–23 . 10.1007/978-1-349-19806-1_4 . Eatwell . John . Milgate . Murray . Newman . Peter . vanc . 978-0-333-49529-2 .
    2. Romaniuk A . Increase in natural fertility during the early stages of modernization: evidence from an African case study, Zaire . Population Studies . 34 . 2 . 293–310 . 1980-07-01 . 11636724 . 10.1080/00324728.1980.10410391 .
    3. Book: Watcher, Kenneth W. . Essential Demographic Methods. Harvard University Press. 2013. vanc .
    4. Hull V, Simpson M. 1985-01-01. Breastfeeding child health and child-spacing: cross-cultural perspectives.. Popline . 3 . 2 . 63–65 . United States Agency for International Development (USAID) .
    5. See, e.g., Anderson . Barbara A. . Silver . Brian D. . 1992 . A simple measure of fertility control . Demography . 29 . 3 . 343–56 . 10.2307/2061822 . 2061822 . 1426433 . free .
    6. Richards C . Protecting and Expanding Access to Birth Control . The New England Journal of Medicine . 374 . 9 . 801–3 . March 2016 . 26962898 . 10.1056/nejmp1601150 .
    7. Web site: The Promise of Birth Control . Haskins . Ron . Isabel . Sawhill . Sara . McLanahan . vanc . Future of Children Fall 2015: 1. General Reference Center GOLD. . 28 March 2017 .
    8. Book: Wood, James W. . Dynamics of Human Reproduction: Biology, Biometry, Demography . vanc . Aldine Transaction . December 31, 1994 . 978-0-202-01180-6 . Piscataway, New Jersey . registration .
    9. Web site: Data Highlights. Reading. Brigid Fitzgerald . vanc . May 12, 2011. Earth Policy.
    10. Cleland. John G.. Ndugwa. Robert P.. Zulu. Eliya M. . vanc . November 4, 2010. Family planning in sub-Saharan Africa: progress or stagnation?. Bulletin of the World Health Organization . 89. 2 . 137–143. 10.2471/blt.10.077925. 0042-9686 . 21346925 . 3040375.
    11. Web site: The World's Women 2015. United Nations Statistics Division . unstats.un.org .
    12. Raj A, Saggurti N, Balaiah D, Silverman JG . Prevalence of child marriage and its effect on fertility and fertility-control outcomes of young women in India: a cross-sectional, observational study . Lancet . 373 . 9678 . 1883–9 . May 2009 . 19278721 . 2759702 . 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60246-4 .
    13. Konner . Melvin . Shostak . Marjorie . 1987 . Timing And Management Of Birth Among The !Kung . Cultural Anthropology . American Anthropological Association . 2 . 1 . 11–28 . 10.1525/can.1987.2.1.02a00030 . 1548-1360 . 2023-04-14 . eHRAF. free .
    14. News: Population explosion. The Economist. 0013-0613. 2016-03-04.
    15. Thomas F, Renaud F, Benefice E, de Meeüs T, Guegan JF . International variability of ages at menarche and menopause: patterns and main determinants . Human Biology . 73 . 2 . 271–90 . April 2001 . 11446429 . 10.1353/hub.2001.0029 . 41465935 . 10.1.1.418.1084 . 12330919 .
    16. Web site: Sperm Count Updated. Martin. Robert . vanc . May 21, 2013. Psychology Today. Sussex Publishers, LLC. March 3, 2016.
    17. Book: Coale . Ansley J. . Watkins . Susan Cotts . vanc . The decline of fertility in Europe: the revised proceedings of a Conference on the Princeton European Fertility Project . 1986 . Princeton University Press . Princeton, N.J. . 978-0-691-09416-8 .
    18. Coale . Ansley J. . vanc . The Demographic Transition . https://web.archive.org/web/20180412145917/https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/df8a/265f7e735fe3bc302d625d7ddc27139f85f7.pdf . dead . 2018-04-12 . Pakistan Development Review . 1984 . 23 . 4 . 531–552 . 10.30541/v23i4pp.531-552 . 2024-05-20 . 12280194 . 39280113 .
    19. Nargund G . Declining birth rate in Developed Countries: A radical policy re-think is required . Facts, Views & Vision in ObGyn . 1 . 3 . 191–3 . 2009 . 25489464 . 4255510 .
    20. News: Religion, contraception and abortion factsheet. 2013-06-15. FPA. 2018-03-15 .
    21. Web site: Family Planning in West Africa – Population Reference Bureau. www.prb.org . 2018-04-05.
    22. News: What to do about Africa's dangerous baby boom . 2024-03-21 . The Economist . 0013-0613.