Natural-law argument explained

The Natural-law argument for the existence of God states that the observation of governing laws and existing order in the universe indicates the existence of a superior being who enacted these laws.[1] The argument was popularised by Isaac Newton, René Descartes, and Robert Boyle.[2] The argument of natural laws as a basis for God was changed by Christian figures such as Thomas Aquinas, in order to fit biblical scripture and establish a Judeo-Christian teleological law. Bertrand Russell criticized the argument, arguing that many of the things considered to be laws of nature, in fact, are human conventions.[3]

Notes and References

  1. Web site: The Natural Law Argument . www.mit.edu.
  2. Book: Harrison . Peter . Roberts . Jon H. . Science without God? rethinking the history of scientific naturalism . 2019 . Oxford University Press . Oxford, United Kingdom . 9780198834588 . First.
  3. https://users.drew.edu/~jlenz/br-essay-wnc.html Why I Am Not A Christian, Bertrand Russell, 1927