A mycoparasite is an organism with the ability to parasitize fungi.
Mycoparasites might be biotrophic or necrotrophic, depending on the type of interaction with their host.[1]
Various plants may be considered mycoparasites, in that they parasitize and acquire most of their nutrition from fungi during a part or all of their life cycle. These include many orchid seedlings, as well as some plants that lack chlorophyll such as Monotropa uniflora. Mycoparasitic plants are more precisely described as myco-heterotrophs.
Some bacteria live on or within fungal cells as parasites or symbionts.
Some viruses, called mycoviruses live on or within fungal cells as parasites or symbionts.
Many mycoparasites are fungi, though not all fungicolous fungi are parasites (some are commensals or saprobes.[2]) Biotrophic mycoparasites acquire nutrients from living host cells. Necrotrophic mycoparasites rely on dead host cells, which they might first kill with toxins or enzymes (saprophytic growth).[3]
Biotrophic mycoparasites get nutrients from living host cells and growth of these parasites is greatly influenced by the metabolism of the host.[4] Biotrophic mycoparasites tend to show high host specificity, and often form specialized infection structures. Necrotrophic mycoparasites can be aggressively antagonistic, invading the host fungus and killing, then digesting components of its cells. Necrotrophic parasites tend to have low host specificity, and are relatively unspecialized in their mechanism of parasitism.
Balanced mycoparasites have little or no destructive effect on the host, whereas destructive mycoparasites have the opposite effect.[5] Biotrophic mycoparasites are generally considered to be balanced mycoparasites; necrotrophic mycoparasites use toxins or enzymes to kill host cells, therefore necrotrophic mycoparasites are usually considered to be destructive mycoparasites. However, in some combinations, the parasite may live during its early development as a biotroph, then kill its host and act more like destructive mycoparasites in late stages of parasitization.
The four main steps of mycoparasitism include target location; recognition; contact and penetration; and nutrient acquisition.[6]
Many research indicate that hyphal growth direction, spore germination, and bud tube elongation of mycoparasitic fungi may exhibit tropism in response to detection of a potential host.[7] This tropic recognition reaction is thought to arise from detection of signature chemicals of the host; the direction of the concentration gradient determines the growth direction of the parasite.[8] As the mycoparasitic interaction is host-specific and not merely a contact response, it is likely that signals from the host fungus are recognized by mycoparasites such as Trichoderma and provoke transcription of mycoparasitism-related genes.[9] [10]
When mycoparasites contact their fungal host, they will recognize each other. This recognition between mycoparasites and their host fungi may be related to the agglutinin on the cell surface of the mycohost. Carbohydrate residues on the cell wall of mycoparasites might bind to lectins on the surface of the host fungi to achieve mutual recognition.[11]
Once a mycoparasitic fungus and its host recognize each other, both may exhibit changes in external form and internal structure.[12] [13] Different mycoparasitic fungi form different structures when interacting with their hosts. For example, the hyphae of some mycoparasitic fungi form specialized contact cells resembling haustoria on the hyphae of their hosts; others may coil around the hyphae of their host fungus or penetrate then grow inside host hyphae.[14] Nectrophic mycoparasites may kill host hyphae with toxins or enzymes before invading them.
Mycoparasitic fungi can be important controls of plant disease fungi in natural systems and in agriculture, and may play a role in integrated pest management (IPM) as biological controls [15]
Some Trichoderma species have been developed as biocontrols of a range of commercially important diseases, and have been applied in the United States, India, Israel, New Zealand, Sweden, and other countries to control plant diseases caused by Rhizoctonia solani, Botrytis cinerea, Sclerotium rolfsii, Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, Pythium spp., and Fusarium spp. as a promising alternative to chemical pesticides.[16] [17]
Further study of mycoparasitism may drive discovery off more bioactive compounds including biopesticides and biofertilizers.[18]
AQ10 biofungicide | Ampelomyces quisqualis isolate M-10 | Ecogen, Inc. Israel | |
Anti-Fungus | Trichoderma spp. | Grondortsmettingen De Cuester, Belgium | |
Biofungus | Trichoderma spp. | Grondortsmettingen DeCuester n. V.Belgium | |
Bas-derma | Trichoderma viride | Basarass Biocontrol Res. Lab., India | |
Binab T | Trichoderma harzianum(ATCC 20476) and Trichoderma polysporum (ATCC 20475) | Bio-Innovation AB, UK | |
Bioderma | Trichoderma viride/T. harzianum | Biotech International Ltd., India | |
Biofox C | Fusarium oxysporum (Non- pathogenic) | S. I. A. P. A., Italy | |
Prestop, Prirnastop | Gliocladium catenulatum | Kemira Agro. Oy, Finland | |
Root Pro, Root Prota to Soilgard | Trichoderma harzianum/Gliocladium virens strainGL-21 | Efal Agr, Israel Thermo Trilogy, USA | |
Root shield, Plant shield, T-22 Planter box | Trichoderma harzianum Rifai strain KRL-AG (T-22) | Bioworks Inc., USA | |
Supresivit | Trichoderma harzianum | Borregaard and Reitzel, Czech Republic | |
T-22 G, T-22 HB | Trichoderma harzianumstrain KRL-AG2 | THT Inc., USA | |
Trichodex, Trichopel | Trichoderma harzianum | Makhteshim Chemical Works Ltd., USA | |
Trichopel, Trichoject, Trichodowels, Trichoseal | Trichoderma harzianumand Trichoderma viride | Agrimm Technologies Ltd., New Zealand | |
Trichopel | Trichoderma harzianumand Trichoderma viride | Agrimm Technologies Ltd., New Zealand | |
Trichoderma 2000 | Trichoderma sp. | Myocontrol Ltd., Israel | |
Tri-control | Trichoderma spp. | Jeypee Biotechs, India | |
Trieco | Trichoderma viride | Ecosense Labs Pvt. Ltd.,Mumbai, India | |
TY | Trichoderma sp. | Mycocontrol, Israel |