Mountain pass theorem explained

The mountain pass theorem is an existence theorem from the calculus of variations, originally due to Antonio Ambrosetti and Paul Rabinowitz.[1] Given certain conditions on a function, the theorem demonstrates the existence of a saddle point. The theorem is unusual in that there are many other theorems regarding the existence of extrema, but few regarding saddle points.

Statement

The assumptions of the theorem are:

I

is a functional from a Hilbert space H to the reals,

I\inC1(H,R)

and

I'

is Lipschitz continuous on bounded subsets of H,

I

satisfies the Palais–Smale compactness condition,

I[0]=0

,

I[u]\geqa

if

\Vertu\Vert=r

, and

v\inH

with

\Vertv\Vert>r

such that

I[v]\leq0

.If we define:

\Gamma=\{g\inC([0,1];H)\vertg(0)=0,g(1)=v\}

and:

c=infg\in\Gammamax0\leqI[g(t)],

then the conclusion of the theorem is that c is a critical value of I.

Visualization

The intuition behind the theorem is in the name "mountain pass." Consider I as describing elevation. Then we know two low spots in the landscape: the origin because

I[0]=0

, and a far-off spot v where

I[v]\leq0

. In between the two lies a range of mountains (at

\Vertu\Vert=r

) where the elevation is high (higher than a>0). In order to travel along a path g from the origin to v, we must pass over the mountains—that is, we must go up and then down. Since I is somewhat smooth, there must be a critical point somewhere in between. (Think along the lines of the mean-value theorem.) The mountain pass lies along the path that passes at the lowest elevation through the mountains. Note that this mountain pass is almost always a saddle point.

For a proof, see section 8.5 of Evans.

Weaker formulation

Let

X

be Banach space. The assumptions of the theorem are:

\Phi\inC(X,R)

and have a Gateaux derivative

\Phi'\colonX\toX*

which is continuous when

X

and

X*

are endowed with strong topology and weak* topology respectively.

r>0

such that one can find certain

\|x'\|>r

with

max(\Phi(0),\Phi(x'))<inf\limits\|x\|=r\Phi(x)=:m(r)

.

\Phi

satisfies weak Palais–Smale condition on

\{x\inX\midm(r)\le\Phi(x)\}

.

\overlinex\inX

of

\Phi

satisfying

m(r)\le\Phi(\overlinex)

. Moreover, if we define

\Gamma=\{c\inC([0,1],X)\midc(0)=0,c(1)=x'\}

then

\Phi(\overlinex)=infc\in\Gammamax0\le\Phi(c(t)).

For a proof, see section 5.5 of Aubin and Ekeland.

Further reading

Notes and References

  1. Dual variational methods in critical point theory and applications. Journal of Functional Analysis. 10.1016/0022-1236(73)90051-7. 14. 4. 349–381. 1973. Ambrosetti. Antonio. Rabinowitz. Paul H..