Territorial waters explained

Territorial waters are informally an area of water where a sovereign state has jurisdiction, including internal waters, the territorial sea, the contiguous zone, the exclusive economic zone, and potentially the extended continental shelf (these components are sometimes collectively called the maritime zones^[1]). In a narrower sense, the term is often used as a synonym for the territorial sea.^[2]

Vessels have different rights and duties when passing through each area defined by the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), one of the most ratified treaties. States cannot exercise their jurisdiction in waters beyond the exclusive economic zone, which are known as the high seas.^[3]

Baseline

See main article: Baseline (sea). Normally, the baseline is the low-water line along the coast as marked on large-scale charts that the coastal state recognizes. This is either the low-water mark closest to the shore or an unlimited distance from permanently exposed land, provided that some portion of elevations exposed at low tide but covered at high tide (such as mud flats) is within 3frac=8NaNfrac=8 of permanently exposed land.

Straight baselines can alternatively be defined connecting fringing islands along a coast, across the mouths of rivers, or with certain restrictions across the mouths of bays. In this case, a bay is defined as "a well-marked indentation whose penetration is in such proportion to the width of its mouth as to contain land-locked waters and constitute more than a mere curvature of the coast. An indentation is not, however, regarded as a bay unless its area is as large as, or larger than, that of the semi-circle whose diameter is a line drawn across the mouth of that indentation". The baseline across the bay must also be no more than 24nmi in length.

Internal waters

See main article: Internal waters. Internal waters are landward of the baseline. The coastal state has sovereignty over internal waters, enforce domestic law on vessels in internal waters, including to prohibit innocent passage.^[4] Lakes, rivers and bays are considered internal waters.^[5]

"Archipelagic waters" within the outermost islands of an archipelagic state, such as Indonesia or the Philippines, are also internal waters, but the state must allow innocent passage through them. However, archipelagic states can limit innocent passage to designated sea lanes within these waters. Each island in the archipelago can have its own baseline.^[5]

Territorial sea

Territorial sea is a belt of coastal waters extending at most 12nmi from the baseline (usually the mean low-water mark) of a coastal state.^[6] The territorial sea is sovereign territory, although foreign ships (military and civilian) are allowed innocent passage through it, or transit passage for straits; this sovereignty also extends to the airspace over and seabed below. In international law, adjustment of these boundaries is called maritime delimitation.

A state's territorial sea extends up to 12nmi from its baseline. If this overlaps with another state's territorial sea, the border is taken as the median point between the states' baselines, unless the states agree otherwise. A state can also choose to claim a smaller territorial sea.

Conflicts have occurred when a coastal nation claims an entire gulf as its territorial waters while other nations only recognize the more restrictive definitions of the UNCLOS. Claims that draw the baseline at more than 24 nautical miles (two 12 nm limits) are judged excessive by the US. Two conflicts occurred in the Gulf of Sidra where Libya drew a line in excess of and claimed the entire enclosed gulf as its territorial waters. The US exercised freedom of navigation rights, resulting in the 1981 and 1989 Gulf of Sidra incidents.

Contiguous zone

The contiguous zone is a band of water extending farther from the outer edge of the territorial sea to up to 24nmi from the baseline. Inside, a state can exercise limited control to prevent or punish "infringement of its customs, fiscal, immigration or sanitary laws and regulations within its territory or territorial sea".

The zone is typically wide. However, it can be wider when a state claims a territorial sea of less than 12 nautical miles, or narrower if it would otherwise overlap with another state's contiguous zone. Unlike the territorial sea, there is no standard rule for resolving such conflicts and states must negotiate a compromise. The US invoked a contiguous zone out to 24 nmi from the baseline on 29 September 1999.^[7]

Exclusive economic zone

See main article: Exclusive economic zone. An exclusive economic zone (EEZ) extends from the baseline to at most 200nmi and therefore includes the contiguous zone.^[8] A coastal nation has control of all economic resources inside its exclusive economic zone, including fishing, mining, oil exploration, and pollution of those resources. However, it cannot prohibit passage or loitering above, on, or under the surface of the sea that complies with the laws and regulations adopted by the coastal state in accordance with the provisions of the UN Convention, within that portion of its exclusive economic zone beyond its territorial sea.

Before the convention, coastal nations arbitrarily extended their territorial waters to attempt to control activities that are now regulated by the exclusive economic zone, such as offshore oil exploration or fishing rights (see Cod Wars).

The EEZ is still popularly, but incorrectly, regarded as coastal nation's territorial waters.

Extended continental shelf

Definition

Article 76 of the UN convention^[9] defines continental shelf of coastal countries. For the physical geographical definition, see the article continental shelf.

A state's continental shelf extends to the outer edge of the continental margin but at least from the baselines of the territorial sea if the continental margin does not stretch that far. Coastal states can explore and exploit the seabed and the natural resources on or beneath it. However, other states may lay cables and pipelines if authorized by the coastal state. The outer limit of a country's continental shelf cannot stretch beyond of the baseline or beyond from the isobath, which is a line connecting the depths of the seabed at 2,500 meters.

The outer edge of the continental margin for the purposes of this article is defined as:

*a series of lines joining points not more than apart where the thickness of sedimentary rocks is at least 1% of the height of the continental shelf above the foot of the continental slope; or

*a series of lines joining points not more than 60 nautical miles apart that is not more than 60 nautical miles from the foot of the continental margin.The foot of the continental slope is determined as the point of maximum change in the gradient at its base.

The portion of the continental shelf beyond the 200 nautical mile limit is also known as the extended continental shelf. Countries wishing to delimit their outer continental shelf beyond 200 nautical miles have to submit scientific information for the basis of their claim to the UN Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf. The Commission then validates or makes recommendations on the scientific basis for the extended continental shelf claim. The scientific judgement of the Commission shall be final and binding. Validated extended continental shelf claims overlapping any demarcation between two or more parties are decided by bilateral or multilateral negotiation, not by the commission.

Countries have ten years after ratifying UNCLOS to lodge their submissions to extend their continental shelf beyond 200 nautical miles, or by 13 May 2009 for countries where the convention was ratified before 13 May 1999. As of 1 June 2009, 51 submissions have been lodged with the commission, of which eight have been deliberated by the commission and have had recommendations issued. The eight are (in the order of date of submission): Russian Federation; Brazil; Australia; Ireland; New Zealand; the joint submission by France, Ireland, Spain and the United Kingdom; Norway and Mexico.

For the full list, see below.

Rights over the continental shelf

Articles 77 to 81 define the rights of a country over its continental shelf.

A coastal nation has control of all resources on or under its continental shelf, living or not, but no control over any living organisms above the shelf that are beyond its exclusive economic zone. This gives it the right to conduct hydrocarbon exploration and drilling works.

Background

Territorial waters claims by coastal states in 1960^[10]

Breadth claim	Number of states
3-mile limit	26
4-mile limit	3
5-mile limit	1
6-mile limit	16
9-mile limit	1
10-mile limit	2
12-mile limit	34
More than 12-miles	9
Unspecified	11

From the eighteenth century until the mid twentieth century, the territorial waters of the British Empire, the United States, France and many other nations were three nautical miles (5.6 km) wide. Originally, this was the distance of a cannon shot, hence the portion of an ocean that a sovereign state could defend from shore. However, Iceland claimed 2nmi, Norway and Sweden claimed 4nmi, and Spain claimed 6nmi during this period. During incidents such as nuclear weapons testing and fisheries disputes some nations arbitrarily extended their maritime claims to as much as 50nmi or even 200nmi. Since the late 20th century the "12 mile limit" has become almost universally accepted. The United Kingdom extended its territorial waters from NaNnmi in 1987.

During the League of Nations Codification Conference in 1930, the issue of establishing international legislation on territorial waters was raised, but no agreement was reached.^[11]

Claims by legislation to the adjacent continental shelf and fishing was first made by the United States government immediately following the Second World War. On 28 September 1945, US President Harry S. Truman issued two proclamations that established government control of natural resources in areas adjacent to the coastline. One of these proclamation was titled "Policy of the United States With Respect to the Natural Resources of the Subsoil and Sea Bed of the Continental Shelf", and stipulated in its operative clause:

the Government of the United States regards the natural resources of the subsoil and sea bed of the continental shelf beneath the high seas but contiguous to the coasts of the United States as appertaining to the United States, subject to its jurisdiction and control.^[12]

The second proclamation was titled "Policy of the United States With Respect to Coastal Fisheries in Certain Areas of the High Seas", and stated in its operative clause:

the Government of the United States regards it as proper to establish conservation zones in those areas of the high seas contiguous to the coasts of the United States wherein fishing activities have been or in the future may be developed and maintained on a substantial scale.^[13]

Following the US presidential proclamation, the issue of legally determining territorial waters by international agreement was raised, and in its first session in 1949, the International Law Commission of the United Nations added the subject to its agenda.

The important issue of the breadth of territorial waters could not be resolved at either the UNCLOS I (1956-1958) or UNCLOS II (1960) conferences, with neither the two major contenders of a 3-mile or 12-mile limit reaching the required two-thirds support. This lack of agreement had the potential to lead to serious international disputes.^[10] It was only at the UNCLOS III (1973-1982) conference, whose provisions did not come into force until 1994, that this issue was resolved at twelve nautical miles.

Miscellaneous

Pirate radio broadcasting from artificial marine fixtures or anchored ships can be controlled by the affected coastal nation or other nations wherever that broadcast may originate, whether in the territorial sea, exclusive economic zone, the continental shelf or even on the high seas.^[14]

Thus a coastal nation has total control over its internal waters, slightly less control over territorial waters, and ostensibly even less control over waters within the contiguous zones. However, it has total control of economic resources within its exclusive economic zone as well as those on or under its continental shelf.

Throughout this article, distances measured in nautical miles are exact legal definitions, while those in kilometres are approximate conversions that are not stated in any law or treaty.

Federal nations, such as the United States, divide control over certain waters between the federal government and the individual states. (See tidelands.)

Territorial sea claim

See main article: List of territorial disputes. Maritime controversies involve two dimensions: (a) territorial sovereignty, which are a legacy of history; and (b) relevant jurisdictional rights and interests in maritime boundaries, which are mainly due to differing interpretations of the law of the sea.^[15]

• 6nmi: Greece (in Aegean sea),^[16] Turkey (in Aegean sea)^[17]
• 12nmi: Albania, Algeria, Angola, Antigua and Barbuda, Argentina, Australia, Bahamas, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belgium, Belize, Brazil, Brunei, Bouvet Island,^[18] Bulgaria, Cambodia, Cameroon, Canada, Cape Verde, Chile, People's Republic of China, Republic of China, Colombia, Comoros, Cook Islands, Costa Rica, Côte d'Ivoire, Croatia, Cuba, Cyprus, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Denmark,^[19] Djibouti, Dominica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador,^[20] Egypt, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Estonia, Faroe Islands,^[21] Fiji, Finland, France, Gabon, Gambia, Georgia, Germany, Ghana, Greece (in Ionian sea), Grenada, Guatemala, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Guyana, Haiti, Honduras, Iceland,^[22] India, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Ireland, Israel, Jamaica, Japan, Jordan,^[23] Kenya, Kiribati, Kuwait, Latvia, Lebanon, Liberia,^[24] Libya, Lithuania, Madagascar, Malaysia, Maldives, Malta, Marshall Islands, Mauritania, Mauritius, Mexico, Micronesia, Monaco, Montenegro, Morocco, Mozambique, Myanmar, Namibia, Nauru, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Nigeria, Niue, Norway,^[25] Oman, Pakistan, Palau,^[26] Panama, Papua New Guinea, Poland, Portugal, Qatar, Republic of Korea, Romania, Russia, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Samoa, São Tomé and Príncipe, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, Singapore, Solomon Islands, South Africa, Spain, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Suriname, Sweden, Syria, Thailand, Timor-Leste, Tonga, Trinidad and Tobago, Turkey (in Black sea and Mediterranean), Tuvalu, Ukraine, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom, United Republic of Tanzania, United States of America, Uruguay, Vanuatu, Venezuela, Vietnam, Yemen.
• 12 nautical miles/DLM: Slovenia.
• 13nmi: Italy-Tunisia^[27]
• 15nmi: Azerbaijan, Iran (Caspian Sea), Kazakhstan, Russia (Caspian Sea), Turkmenistan^[28]
• 30nmi: Togo.^[29]
• 200nmi: Benin, El Salvador, Peru, Somalia.^[29]

Special cases

• Australia: A treaty with Papua New Guinea defines the territorial sea boundaries between the islands of Aubusi, Boigu and Moimi and Papua New Guinea on the one hand and the islands of Dauan, Kaumag and Saibai and Papua New Guinea on the other hand, as well as a section of the border of the territorial sea of Saibai. The territorial seas of the islands known as Anchor Cay, Aubusi Island, Black Rocks, Boigu Island, Bramble Cay, Dauan Island, Deliverance Island, East Cay, Kaumag Island, Kerr Islet, Moimi Island, Pearce Cay, Saibai Island, Urnagain Island and Turu Cay do not extend beyond 3 nautical miles from the baselines.
• Belize: 3 nautical miles limit applies from the mouth of Sarstoon River to Ranguana Caye.
• Cameroon: See article 45 of Law 96-06 of 18 January 1996 on the revision of the Constitution of 2 June 1972.
• Denmark: Act No. 200 of 7 April 1999 on the delimitation of the territorial sea does not apply to the Faroe Islands (the act applies to the Faroe Islands from 1 June 2002) and Greenland but may become effective by Royal Decree for those parts of the Kingdom of Denmark with the amendments dictated by the special conditions prevailing in the Faroe Islands and Greenland. As far as Greenland is concerned, the outer limit of the external territorial waters may be measured at a distance shorter than 12nmi from the baselines.
• Estonia: In some parts of the Gulf of Finland, defined by coordinates.
• Finland: Extends, with certain exceptions, to 12nmi, unless defined by geographical coordinates. In the Gulf of Finland, there is a strip of international waters regardless of the 12 nmi limit: the outer limit of the territorial sea shall at no place be closer to the midline than 3nmi.^[30] Bogskär, a remote island, has only 3nmi territorial waters.^[31]
• Greece: 10nmi limit applies for the purpose of regulating civil aviation (See also Aegean dispute)
• India: 13nmi limit includes Andaman, Nicobar Lakshadweep and SriLanka.
• Japan: 3nmi limit applies to the Soya Strait, the Tsugaru Strait, the eastern and western channels of the Korea Strait and the Osumi Straits only.
• New Zealand: 12nmi limit includes Tokelau.
• Papua New Guinea: 3nmi in certain areas.

• Peru: The 200nmi territorial sea is called "Maritime Dominion" in article 54 of the 1993 Constitution: "... In its maritime dominion, Peru exercises sovereignty and jurisdiction, without prejudice to the freedoms of international communication, in accordance with the law and the treaties ratified by the State ..."
• The Philippines claims a rectangle, defined by coordinates; the total claim extends beyond 12 nautical miles.
• Turkey: 6nmi in the Aegean Sea, 12nmi in the Black and Mediterranean Seas.^{[32] [33]}
• United Kingdom and British Crown: The limit remains at 3nmi in some of its overseas territories: British Indian Ocean Territory, Gibraltar, Montserrat and Pitcairn; the limit is now at 12nmi in the United Kingdom and its overseas territories of Anguilla, Bermuda, British Virgin Islands, Cayman Islands, Falkland Islands, Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha, South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands, and Turks and Caicos Islands, as well as in the Crown Dependencies (i.e. Isle of Man and the Bailiwick of Jersey, and the Bailiwick of Guernsey).^[34]

Contiguous zone claims

• None: Albania, the Bahamas, Barbados, Belize, Benin, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Brunei, Cameroon, Colombia, Comoros, Congo, Cook Islands, Costa Rica, Côte d'Ivoire, Croatia, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Ecuador, El Salvador, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Estonia, Fiji, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Grenada, Guatemala, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Guyana, Iceland, Indonesia, Iran, Ireland, Israel, Jordan, Kenya, Kiribati, Kuwait, Latvia, Lebanon, Libya, Lithuania, Macedonia, Malaysia, Mauritius, Micronesia, Monaco, Montenegro, Nigeria, Niue, Papua New Guinea, Peru, the Philippines, São Tomé and Príncipe, Singapore, Slovenia, Solomon Islands, Somalia, Suriname, Sweden, Togo, Tonga, Turkey, Ukraine, United Kingdom, Tanzania
• 14nmi: Finland
• 15nmi: Venezuela
• 18nmi: Bangladesh, Gambia, Saudi Arabia, Sudan
• 24nmi: Algeria, Angola, Antigua and Barbuda, Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Bulgaria, Cambodia, Canada, Cape Verde, Chile, People's Republic of China, Cuba, Cyprus, Denmark, Djibouti, Dominica, Dominican Republic, Egypt, France, Gabon, Ghana, Haiti, Honduras, India, Iran, Jamaica, Japan, Liberia, Madagascar, Maldives, Malta, Marshall Islands, Mauritania, Mexico, Morocco, Mozambique, Myanmar, Namibia, Nauru, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Norway, Oman, Pakistan, Palau, Panama, Poland, Portugal, Qatar, Republic of Korea, Romania, Russia, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Samoa, Senegal, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, South Africa, Spain, Sri Lanka, Syria, Thailand, Timor-Leste, Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia, Tuvalu, United Arab Emirates, United States of America, Uruguay, Vanuatu, Vietnam, Yemen
• 30nmi: Italy
• 50nmi: Democratic People's Republic of Korea; 50 nautical miles Military Boundary Zone. Army Command Announcement of 1 August 1977.^{[35] [36]}

Extended continental shelf claims

As of 13 May 2009, 51 submissions by 44 countries have been lodged for claims over their extended continental shelf. Some countries have multiple submissions and joint submissions with other countries. Recommendations have been given for 8 of the submissions.

Submissions with recommendations

List with date of submission and adoption of recommendation by the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf.

• United Kingdom – Ascension Island (submission: 9 May 2008; recommendation: 15 April 2010) (application to extend beyond 200NM failed)^[37]
• Australia (15 November 2004, 9 April 2008)^[38]
• Barbados (submission: 8 May 2008; recommendation: 15 April 2010)
• Brazil (17 May 2004, 4 April 2007)
• France – in respect of the areas of French Guiana and New Caledonia (22 May 2007, 2 September 2009)
• Joint submission by France, Ireland, Spain and the United Kingdom – in the area of the Celtic Sea and the Bay of Biscay (19 May 2006, 24 March 2009)
• Ireland – Porcupine Abyssal Plain (25 May 2005, 5 April 2007)^{[39] [40]}
• Mexico – in respect of the western polygon in the Gulf of Mexico (13 December 2007, 31 March 2009)
• New Zealand (19 April 2006, 22 August 2008)^{[41] [42]}
• Norway – in the North East Atlantic and the Arctic (27 November 2006, 27 March 2009)
• Russia (20 December 2001, 27 June 2002)

Other submissions

List in order of date of submission, with date of submission.^[43]

• Canada - Canada's Extended Continental Shelf Program (2003 - ongoing) to include Atlantic and Arctic Ocean as part of shelf the UN Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf (CLCS) including the North Pole^{[44] [45]}
• France – areas of the French Antilles and the Kerguelen Islands (5 February 2009)
• Indonesia – North west of Sumatra Island (16 June 2008)
• Japan (12 November 2008)
• Joint submission by the Republic of Mauritius and the Republic of Seychelles – in the region of the Mascarene Plateau (1 December 2008)
• Suriname (5 December 2008)
• Myanmar (16 December 2008)
• Somalia (17 April 2009)^[46]
• Yemen – in respect of south east of Socotra Island (20 March 2009)
• United Kingdom – in respect of Hatton Rockall Area (31 March 2009)
• Ireland – in respect of Hatton-Rockall Area (31 March 2009)
• Uruguay (7 April 2009)
• Philippines – in the Benham Plateau region (8 April 2009)
• The Cook Islands – concerning the Manihiki Plateau^[47] (16 April 2009)
• Fiji (20 April 2009)
• Argentina (21 April 2009)
• Ghana (28 April 2009)
• Iceland – in the Ægir Basin area and in the western and southern parts of Reykjanes Ridge (29 April 2009)
• Denmark – in the area north of the Faroe Islands (29 April 2009)
• Pakistan (30 April 2009)
• Norway – in respect of Bouvetøya and Dronning Maud Land (4 May 2009)
• South Africa – in respect of the mainland of the territory of the Republic of South Africa (5 May 2009)
• Joint submission by the Federated States of Micronesia, Papua New Guinea and Solomon Islands – concerning the Ontong Java Plateau (5 May 2009)
• Joint submission by Malaysia and Viet Nam – in the southern part of the South China Sea (6 May 2009)
• Joint submission by France and South Africa – in the area of the Crozet Archipelago and the Prince Edward Islands (6 May 2009)
• Kenya (6 May 2009)
• Mauritius – in the region of Rodrigues Island (6 May 2009)
• Vietnam – in North Area (of the South China Sea) (7 May 2009)
• Nigeria (7 May 2009)
• Seychelles – concerning the Northern Plateau Region (7 May 2009)
• France – in respect of La Réunion Island and Saint-Paul and Amsterdam Islands (8 May 2009)
• Palau (8 May 2009)
• Côte d'Ivoire (8 May 2009)
• Sri Lanka (8 May 2009)
• Portugal (11 May 2009)
• United Kingdom – in respect of the Falkland Islands, and of South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands (11 May 2009)
• Tonga (11 May 2009)
• Spain – in respect of the area of Galicia (11 May 2009)
• India (11 May 2009)
• Trinidad and Tobago (12 May 2009)
• Namibia (12 May 2009)
• Cuba (1 June 2009)
• Angola (6 December 2013)

See also

• Aegean dispute
• Baseline (sea)
• Boundary delimitation
• Exclusive economic zone
• Freedom of navigation
• Freedom of the seas
• Internal waters
• International waters
• Intra fauces terra
• Littoral zone
• Maritime boundary
• Ocean colonization
• Territorial claims in the Arctic
• Territorial disputes in the South China Sea

External links

• UN Convention on the Law of the Sea

Notes and References

1. Book: IAEA . Revised exposé des motifs of the Paris convention as amended by the protocols of 1964, 1982 and 2004. . 2020 . 5–6 . IAEA .
2. Web site: Territorial waters international law. 29 July 2020. Encyclopedia Britannica. en.
3. Book: Law of the Sea: A Policy Primer . 2017 .
4. Bardin . Anne . Coastal State's Jurisdiction over Foreign Vessels . Pace International Law Review . 2002 . 14 . 1 . 27 . 10.58948/2331-3536.1188 . 159298818 . free .
5. Book: Churchill . R. R. . Lowe . A. V. . The Law of the Sea . 1988 . Manchester University Press . Manchester . 0719026342 . 2.
6. Web site: UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON THE LAW OF THE SEA. 27 April 2016.
7. Web site: New Action to Protect & Preserve U.S. Shores & Oceans. 27 April 2016. 12 April 2016. https://web.archive.org/web/20160412215203/http://clinton4.nara.gov/CEQ/990902a.html. dead.
8. Web site: PREAMBLE TO THE UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON THE LAW OF THE SEA. 27 April 2016.
9. Web site: PREAMBLE TO THE UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON THE LAW OF THE SEA. 27 April 2016.
10. The Seizure and Recovery of the S.S. Mayaguez: Legal Analysis of United States Claims, Part 1 . Major Thomas E. Behuniak . Military Law Review . 82 . Department of the Army . Fall 1978 . 0026-4040 . 114–121 . 21 July 2014 . dead . https://web.archive.org/web/20161228203240/https://www.jagcnet.army.mil/DOCLIBS/MILITARYLAWREVIEW.NSF/20a66345129fe3d885256e5b00571830/b3197adca4437e4d85256e5b0057ee6a/$FILE/MLR%2027-100-82%2019781001.pdf . 28 December 2016 .
11. Yearbook of the International Law Commission, 1949, p. 43
12. text in Department of State Bulletin, September 30, 1945, p. 485
13. text in Department of State Bulletin, September 30, 1945, p. 486
14. Web site: PREAMBLE TO THE UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON THE LAW OF THE SEA. 27 April 2016.
15. Ji, Guoxing. (1995). http://escholarship.org/uc/item/7rq2b069 "Maritime Jurisdiction in the Three China Seas" (abstract), UC Berkeley: UC Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation; retrieved 15 November 2010.
16. Web site: Αιγιαλίτιδα ζώνη – Casus belli - Ειδικότερα κείμενα . www1.mfa.gr . 30 June 2022 . https://web.archive.org/web/20111025140858/http://www1.mfa.gr/zitimata-ellinotourkikon-sheseon/eidikotera-keimena/aigialitida-zoni-casus-belli.html . 25 October 2011 . dead.
17. Web site: Turkey Maritime claims - Geography.
18. Web site: Lov om Norges territorialfarvann og tilstøtende sone §7.
19. Web site: Lov om afgrænsning af søterritoriet – retsinformation.dk. 27 April 2016.
20. http://cancilleria.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/adhesion_convemar_declaracion_adhesion.pdf Accession of Ecuador to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS)
21. Web site: Lógasavn . 27 April 2016.
22. Web site: 41/1979: Lög um landhelgi, efnahagslögsögu og landgrunn. Alþingi. 27 April 2016.
23. https://marineregions.org/gazetteer.php?p=details&id=49203 Jordanian 12 NM, Flanders Marine Institute (2019). Maritime Boundaries Geodatabase: Territorial Seas (12NM)
24. http://emansion.gov.lr/doc/Executive_Order_No._48.pdf Executive order no. 48
25. Web site: Lov om Norges territorialfarvann og tilstøtende sone §2.
26. Web site: Fishing - Title 27 . www.paclii.org.
27. Web site: Legge 3 giugno 1978 n. 347 .
28. Web site: Convention on the Legal Status of the Caspian Sea . President of Russia.
29. Web site: Table of claims to maritime jurisdiction. 15 July 2011 . www.un.org . 28 October 2020.
30. Act amending the Act on the Limits of the Territorial Waters of Finland (981/95)
31. Web site: Laki Suomen aluevesien rajoista 463/1956 - Ajantasainen lainsäädäntö - FINLEX ® . 27 April 2016.
32. Web site: DoD Issuances Website: 404 Error Page . 27 April 2016 . dead . https://web.archive.org/web/20120920202457/http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/20051m_062305/turkey.doc . 20 September 2012 .
33. Web site: LIMITS IN THE SEAS NO. 32 STRAIGHT BASELINES : TURKEY. U.S. Department of State. 18 June 2016. en. 25 March 1971.
34. Web site: PO Box 23. St Peter Port. 30 July 2019. THE BAILIWICK OF GUERNSEY'S TERRITORIAL WATERS HAVE BEEN EXTENDED FROM 3 TO 12 NAUTICAL MILES WITH EFFECT FROM 23rd JULY . 29 December 2020 . www.guernseylawofficers.gg . en.
35. The 50-Mile Military Boundary Zone of North Korea . Park . Choon-ho . American Journal of International Law . 72 . 4 . October 1978 . 866–875 . 10.1017/S0002930000142095 . 149681176 . 25 November 2017.
36. News: Would North Korea Shoot Down a US B-1B Bomber? Yes. Could It? . Panda . Ankit . The Diplomat . 26 September 2017 . 25 November 2017.
37. https://www.un.org/Depts/los/clcs_new/submissions_files/gbr08/gbr_asc_isl_rec_summ.pdf Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf
38. http://minister.ret.gov.au/TheHonMartinFergusonMP/Pages/UNCONFIRMSAUSTRALIA’SRIGHTSOVEREXTRA.aspx UN confirms Australia’s rights over extra 2.5 million square kilometres of seabed.
39. Web site: Ireland extends its underwater territory. 23 October 2007. RTE.ie. 27 April 2016.
40. News: Ireland can extend territorial waters. 7 April 2007. The Irish Times. 27 April 2016.
41. http://www.mfat.govt.nz/Media-and-publications/Features/990-NZ-extended-seabed-claim.php UN confirms NZ’s extended seabed claim
42. Web site: Submission by New Zealand . United Nations Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf . 8 April 2009 . 29 May 2009.
43. Web site: Submissions, through the Secretary-General of the United Nations, to the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf, pursuant to article 76, paragraph 8, of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of 10 December 1982 . United Nations Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf . 30 October 2009 . 9 December 2009.
44. Web site: Canada's Extended Continental Shelf Program.
45. Web site: Continental Shelf - Submission by the Canada .
46. Web site: Continental shelf of Somalia.
47. Gronewold, Nathanial. A Peek Inside the U.N.'s Continental Shelf Commission, New York Times, 14 September 2009.