Matrimonial regime explained

Matrimonial regimes, or marital property systems, are systems of property ownership between spouses providing for the creation or absence of a marital estate and if created, what properties are included in that estate, how and by whom it is managed, and how it will be divided and inherited at the end of the marriage. Matrimonial regimes are applied either by operation of law or by way of prenuptial agreement in civil-law countries, and depend on the lex domicilii of the spouses at the time of or immediately following the wedding. (See e.g. Quebec Civil Code and French Civil Code, arts. 431-492.).

In most common law jurisdictions, the default and only matrimonial regime is separation of property, though some US states, known as community property states, are an exception. Also, in England, the birthplace of common law, pre-nuptial agreements were until recently completely unrecognized, and although the principle of separation of property prevailed, Courts are enabled to make a series of orders upon divorce regulating the distribution of assets.

Civil-law and bijuridical jurisdictions, including Quebec, Louisiana, France, South Africa, Italy, Germany, Switzerland, and many others, have statutory default matrimonial regimes, in addition to or, in some cases, in lieu of regimes that can only be contracted by prenuptial agreements. Generally, couples marry into some form of community of property by default, or instead contract out under separation of property or some other regime through a prenuptial agreement passed before a civil-law notary or other public officer solemnizing the marriage. Many civil law jurisdictions also have other established systems of dividing property, such as separation of property[1] [2] [3] [4] and the participation regime[5] [6] [7] that spouses can decide to adopt.

Five countries, including the Netherlands, have signed on to the Hague Convention on the Law applicable to Matrimonial Property Regimes, which entered into force on 1 September 1992, which allows spouses to choose not only the regimes offered by their country, but also any regime in force in the country where at least one is a citizen or resident or where marital real estate is situated.

Coverture

Coverture (sometimes spelled couverture) was a legal doctrine whereby, upon marriage, a woman's legal rights were subsumed by those of her husband. Coverture was enshrined in the common law of England and the United States throughout most of the 19th century. The idea was described in William Blackstone's Commentaries on the Laws of England in the late 18th century.

Under traditional English common law an adult unmarried woman was considered to have the legal status of feme sole, while a married woman had the status of feme covert. These are English spellings of medieval Anglo-Norman phrases (the modern standard French spellings would be French: femme seule and French: femme couverte, literally).

A feme sole had the right to own property and make contracts in her own name. A feme covert was not recognized as having legal rights and obligations distinct from those of her husband in most respects. Instead, through marriage a woman's existence was incorporated into that of her husband, so that she had very few recognized individual rights of her own. A married woman could not own property, sign legal documents or enter into a contract, obtain an education against her husband's wishes, or keep a salary for herself. If a wife was permitted to work, under the laws of coverture she was required to relinquish her wages to her husband.

This situation persisted until the mid-to-late 19th century, when married women's property acts started to be passed in many English-speaking legal jurisdictions, setting the stage for further reforms.

Separate property systems

Separate property systems are based on the premise that marriage is solely an interpersonal union

Community property systems

See main article: Community property. Community property is premised on the theory that marriage creates an economic community between the spouses (who may be same- or opposite-sex) and that the marital property attaches to that interpersonal community, rather than to the spouses themselves. There are several types of community property systems.

Participation system

The participation system is a system of property division among spouses introduced in many civil law jurisdictions. In Spanish it is known as Spanish; Castilian: régimen de participación, in French French: participation aux acquêts, and in German German: Zugewinngemeinschaft or German: Errungenschaftsbeteiligung.

The participation system is hybrid matrimonial regime with separation of property during the marriage, along with a right of each spouse to participate in a percentage of profits from acquests (property acquired during marriage) at the time of marital dissolution.

In Germany, it was introduced with the Equality Act of 1957. In Germany and Switzerland, this regime is particularly widespread and is the default regime in the absence of a marriage contract.[7] In France, it was introduced by a 1965 law, inspired by the German model.[6] [9] The participation system is also available in Spain, Portugal and many Latin American countries.[5]

See also

Notes and References

  1. Web site: Código Civil de la Nación Argentina. 16 December 2014. Infojus.
  2. Web site: Código Civil de España. 18 December 2014. Boletín Oficial del Estado.
  3. Web site: Código Civil Federal de México. 16 December 2014. Cámara de Diputados de México. https://web.archive.org/web/20150319041944/http://www.diputados.gob.mx/LeyesBiblio/pdf/2_241213.pdf. 19 March 2015.
  4. Web site: Código Civil de Ecuador. 15 December 2014. Planalto.
  5. Book: Ramos Pazos, René. Derecho de Familia. Editorial Jurídica de Chile. Santiago. 158–160. 2007.
  6. Eficacia real del régimen de participación en los gananciales y su influencia en nuestros tribunales de justicia. Herrera Araya. Gloria. Santiago, Chile. 2008. 17 February 2015. https://web.archive.org/web/20160304190713/http://www.tesis.uchile.cl/tesis/uchile/2008/de-herrera_g/pdfAmont/de-herrera_g.pdf. 2016-03-04. University of Chile.
  7. Book: Gerhard, Ute. Frauen in der geschichte des rechts (Las mujeres en la Historia del Derecho). C. H. Beck. Múnich, Alemania. German. 1999. 3-406-42866-5.
  8. American Law Institute. Principles of the law of family dissolution: Analysis and recommendations. § 4.02 (May 2022 Update).
  9. Web site: Código Civil de Francia. 18 December 2014. Legifrance.