Liability insurance crisis explained

The liability insurance crisis in the United States of America refers to a volatile economic period during the mid-1980s. During these years, until about 1990, rising insurance premiums and an unavailability of coverage for several types of liability insurance led to a crisis that has been attributed, among others, to the expansion of tort doctrines for insurer liability and the McCarran-Ferguson exemption from antitrust laws.

Impact

During the period from 1984 to 1987, premiums for general liability increased from about $6.5 billion to approximately $19.5 billion.^[1] In addition to increases in premium, many insurers took the following measures to limit the number and cost of claims: 1) changed policy coverage from an occurrence to a claims-made basis; 2) expanded exclusions; 3) raised deductibles; and 4) lowered policy limits on a per-claim basis, and 5) introduced the notion of aggregate total exposure.

The resulting crisis adversely affected a diverse range of organizations, including municipalities, social service providers and pharmaceutical, aircraft, sports equipment, and medical device companies.^[2] Many organizations in the nonprofit and government sector could no longer offer social, medical or recreational services due to the prohibitive cost or unavailability of liability coverage.

Reaction to the crisis was widespread in the public media.^[3] Public policy advocates expressed concern about the impact on human services. In California, for example, testimony was given before the California Assembly regarding the significant loss of human service programs such as foster care, group homes, and health services caused by soaring premiums and widespread policy cancellation.^[4]

Causes

Various theories among academics, government, insurers, consumers, and regulators have been put forth regarding the causes of the crisis.^[5]

1. Collusion: the argument that the crisis was engineered by insurance companies themselves, through price-fixing and/or manipulation of insurance reserve accounts.
2. Losses: Decrease in interest rates and investment returns forced insurance companies to raise premiums in order to make up for the loss of profitability.
3. Litigation: Proliferation of tort litigation and large settlements drove the cost of liability insurance premiums to excessive levels.
4. Reinsurance: Disruption of supply in reinsurance markets cited as a contributing factor.

Tort reform and alternative insurance

As a result of widespread economic disruption, a large number of states adopted tort reforms to limit the dramatic surge in insurance losses and premiums.^[6] Congress enacted legislation that expanded the ability of companies prone to similar risks to join together and either form their own insurance risk pool or purchase insurance collectively.^[7] Some states, such as Vermont and Hawaii, enacted laws to encourage the development of alternative methods to manage risk, such as captive insurance or risk retention groups.

External links

• Medical Malpractice Liability Insurance and the McCarran-Ferguson Act
• Siegelman, Adverse Selection in Insurance Markets: An Exaggerated Threat
• Alternative Insurance
• Tort Liability, Insurance Rates, and the Insurance Cycle
• Reinsurance and the Liability Insurance Crisis
• Insurance Thought Leadership

Notes and References

1. Gene C. Lai et al.“On Liability Insurance Crisis.” Proceedings of the Risk Theory Society, Revised October 1996. Based on data from the A.M. Best Company.
2. George L. Priest.“The Current Insurance Crisis and Modern Tort Law.” (1987). Faculty Scholarship Series. Paper 578. http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/57
3. “Sorry, Your Policy Is Cancelled.” Time, Mar. 24, 1986; Various: N.Y. Times, Feb. 15,1986, at 1, col. 1; Toronto Globe & Mail, Feb. 21, 1986,at B2, col. 1; N.Y.Times, Feb. 1, 1986, at 1, col. 5; Wall St. J., Feb. 3, 1986, a t5, col. 1; 8. N.Y. Times, Mar. 26, 1986, at C12, col.4; 9. Wall St. J., supra note 1.
4. Testimony of Pamela Davis, Graduate Researcher, University of California at Berkeley. Interim Hearing of California Assembly Select Committee on Insurance, Sacramento, October 8, 1986.
5. For a detailed discussion of the controversial theories as to the source of the commercial liability crisis, see: (Clarke et al 1988, Harrington and Litan 1988, Lacey 1988, Winter 1988, Cummins and Danzon 1991, Gron 1990, Harrington and Danzon 1991, Lai and Witt 1992, Doherty and Garven 1995)
6. W. Kip Viscus et al.“The Effect of 1980s Tort Reform Legislation on General Liability and Medical Malpractice.” Insurance Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 6:165-186 (1993)
7. Risk Retention Amendments of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-563, 100 Stat. 3170