Launch pad explained

A launch pad is an above-ground facility from which a rocket-powered missile or space vehicle is vertically launched.[1] The term launch pad can be used to describe just the central launch platform (mobile launcher platform), or the entire complex (launch complex). The entire complex will include a launch mount or launch platform to physically support the vehicle, a service structure with umbilicals, and the infrastructure required to provide propellants, cryogenic fluids, electrical power, communications, telemetry, rocket assembly, payload processing, storage facilities for propellants and gases, equipment, access roads, and drainage.

Most launch pads include fixed service structures to provide one or more access platforms to assemble, inspect, and maintain the vehicle and to allow access to the spacecraft, including the loading of crew. The pad may contain a flame deflection structure to prevent the intense heat of the rocket exhaust from damaging the vehicle or pad structures, and a sound suppression system spraying large quantities of water may be employed. The pad may also be protected by lightning arresters. A spaceport typically includes multiple launch complexes and other supporting infrastructure.

A launch pad is distinct from a missile launch facility (or missile silo or missile complex), which also launches a missile vertically but is located underground in order to help harden it against enemy attack.

The launch complex for liquid fueled rockets often has extensive ground support equipment including propellant tanks and plumbing to fill the rocket before launch. Cryogenic propellants (liquid oxygen oxidizer, and liquid hydrogen or liquid methane fuel) need to be continuously topped off (i.e., boil-off replaced) during the launch sequence (countdown), as the vehicle awaits liftoff. This becomes particularly important as complex sequences may be interrupted by planned or unplanned holds to fix problems.

Most rockets need to be supported and held down for a few seconds after ignition while the engines build up to full thrust. The vehicle is commonly held on the pad by hold-down arms or explosive bolts, which are triggered when the vehicle is stable and ready to fly, at which point all umbilical connections with the pad are released.

History

Precursors to modern rocketry, such as fireworks and rocket launchers, did not generally require dedicated launch pads. This was due in part to their relatively portable size, as well as the sufficiency of their casings in sustaining stresses. One of the first pads for a liquid-fueled rocket, what would later be named the Goddard Rocket Launching Site after Robert H. Goddard's series of launch tests starting in 1926, consisted of a mount situated on an open field in rural Massachusetts. The mount was compromised of a frame with a series of gasoline and liquid oxygen lines feeding into the rocket.

It wasn't until the 1930s that rockets were increasing enough in size and strength that specialized launch facilities became necessary. The Verein für Raumschiffahrt in Germany was permitted after a request for funding in 1930 to move from farms to the Berlin rocket launching site (German: Raketenflugplatz Berlin), a repurposed ammunition dump.[2]

A test stand was built for liquid-propellant rockets in Kummersdorf in 1932, where the early designs from the Aggregat series of ballistic missiles were afterwards developed. This site was also the location of the first casualties in rocket development, when Dr. Wahmke and 2 assistants were killed, and another assistant was injured. A propellant fuel tank exploded, while experimenting with mixing 90% hydrogen peroxide and alcohol, before combustion.[3] [4]

In May 1937, Dornberger, and most of his staff, moved to the Peenemünde Army Research Center on the island of Usedom on the Baltic coast which offered much greater space and secrecy. Dr. Thiel and his staff followed in the summer of 1940. Test Stand VI at Pennemünde was an exact replica to Kummersdorf's large test stand.[3] [4] It was this site which saw the development of the V-2 rocket. Test Stand VII was the principle testing facility at the Peenemünde Airfield and was capable of static firing rocket motors with up to 200 tons of thrust.

Launch pads would increase in complexity over the following decades throughout and following the Space Race. Where large volumes of exhaust gases are expelled during engine testing or vehicle launch, a flame deflector might be implemented to mitigate damage to the surrounding pad and direct exhaust. This is especially important with reusable launch vehicles to increase efficiency of launches while minimizing time spent refurbishing.

Construction

The construction of a launch pad begins with site selection, considering various geographical and logistical factors. It is often advantageous to position the launch pad on the coast, particularly with the ocean to the east, to leverage the Earth's rotation and increase the specific impulse of launches. Space programs such as Soviet space program or the French space program without this luxury may utilize facilities outside of their main territory such as the Baikonur Cosmodrome or Guiana Space Centre to launch for them. This orientation also allows for safe trajectory paths, minimizing risks to populated areas during ascent.[5]

Facilities

Transport of rockets to the pad

See main article: Mobile launcher platform. Each launch site is unique, but a few broad types can be described by the means by which the space vehicle gets to the pad.

Service structure

See main article: Service structure. A service structure is a steel framework or tower that is built on a launch pad to facilitate assembly and servicing.

An umbilical tower also usually includes an elevator which allows maintenance and crew access. Immediately before ignition of the rocket's motors, all connections between the tower and the craft are severed, and the bridges over which these connections pass often quickly swing away to prevent damage to the structure or vehicle.

Flame deflector systems

See main article: Flame deflector. A flame deflector, flame diverter or flame trench is a structure or device designed to redirect or disperse the flame, heat, and exhaust gases produced by rocket engines or other propulsion systems.[8] The amount of thrust generated by a rocket launch, along with the sound it produces during liftoff, can damage the launchpad and service structure, as well as the launch vehicle.[9] The primary goal of the diverter is to prevent the flame from causing damage to equipment, infrastructure, or the surrounding environment. Flame diverters can be found at rocket launch sites and test stands where large volumes of exhaust gases are expelled during engine testing or vehicle launch.

Sound suppression systems

See main article: Sound suppression system. Sites for launching large rockets are often equipped with a sound suppression system to absorb or deflect acoustic energy generated during a rocket launch. As engine exhaust gasses exceed the speed of sound, they collide with the ambient air and shockwaves are created, with noise levels approaching 200 db. This energy can be reflected by the launch platform and pad surfaces, and could potentially cause damage to the launch vehicle, payload, and crew. For instance, the maximum admissible overall sound power level (OASPL) for payload integrity is approximately 145 db.[10] Sound is dissipated by huge volumes of water distributed across the launch pad and launch platform during liftoff.[11] [12]

Water-based acoustic suppression systems are common on launch pads. They aid in reducing acoustic energy by injecting large quantities of water below the launch pad into the exhaust plume and in the area above the pad. Flame deflectors or flame trenches are designed to channel rocket exhaust away from the launch pad but also redirect acoustic energy away.[13]

Hydrogen burn-off systems

In rockets using liquid hydrogen as their source of propellant, hydrogen burn-off systems (HBOI), also known as radially outward firing igniters (ROFI), can be utilized to prevent the build up of free gaseous hydrogen (GH2) in the aft engine area of the vehicle prior to engine start. Too much excess hydrogen in the aft during engine start can result in an overpressure blast wave that could damage the launch vehicle and surrounding pad structures.[14]

Validating engine performance and system readiness

The Spacex launch sequence includes a hold-down feature of the launch pad that allows full engine ignition and systems check before liftoff. After the first-stage engine starts, the launcher is held down and not released for flight until all propulsion and vehicle systems are confirmed to be operating normally. Similar hold-down systems have been used on launch vehicles such as Saturn V and Space Shuttle. An automatic safe shut-down and unloading of propellant occur if any abnormal conditions are detected.[15] Prior to the launch date, SpaceX sometimes completes a test cycle, culminating in a three-and-a-half second first stage engine static firing as well.[16] [17]

See also

Notes and References

  1. Book: Wragg, David W. . A Dictionary of Aviation . 9780850451634 . first . Osprey . 1973 . 175.
  2. Web site: Highlights in German Rocket Development. https://web.archive.org/web/20070821043454/http://history.msfc.nasa.gov/german/highlights.html. 21 August 2007. 14 June 2016.
  3. Book: Dornberger . Walter . V-2 . 1954 . The Viking Press, Inc. . New York . 27–42.
  4. Book: Fleischer . Wolfgang . The Wehrmacht Weapons Testing Ground at Kummersdorf . 1997 . Schiffer Publishing Ltd. . Atglen . 9780764302732 . 9–46.
  5. Web site: National Aeronautics and Space Administration . Building KSC's Launch Complex 39 . NASA . 2024-07-12 . 2006.
  6. Web site: LAUNCH COMPLEX 39, PADS A AND B . NASA KSC . 1992 . dead . https://web.archive.org/web/20080921222509/http://www-pao.ksc.nasa.gov/kscpao/release/1985/252-85r.htm . 2008-09-21 .
  7. Web site: Cpsb Launchpad . Viswanath . 2023 . dead . 2023-06-16 . 2023-06-16 . https://web.archive.org/web/20230616125001/https://cpsblaunchpad.com/cpsb-launchpad-4/ .
  8. Web site: Moonport, CH11-7 . 2023-09-01 . www.hq.nasa.gov . 2023-09-01 . https://web.archive.org/web/20230901192218/https://www.hq.nasa.gov/pao/History/SP-4204/ch11-7.html . live .
  9. Web site: Wessels . Wessel . 2022-10-26 . The Purpose Of A Flame Trench At A Rocket Launch Site . 2023-09-01 . Headed For Space . en-US . 2023-09-01 . https://web.archive.org/web/20230901192219/https://headedforspace.com/flame-trench/ . live .
  10. Dougherty, N. S., & Guest, S. H. (2012, August 17). A correlation of scale model and flight aeroacoustic data for the Space Shuttle Vehicle. Aeroacoustics Conferences. Retrieved November 16, 2022, from https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/10.2514/6.1984-2351
  11. Lubert. Caroline Parsons. 2017. Sixty years of launch vehicle acoustics. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 142. 4 . 040004. 10.1121/1.5014084. 2017ASAJ..142.2489L. free.
  12. Walsh. E. J.. Hart. P.M.. Nov 1982. Liftoff Ignition Overpressure-A Correlation. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets. en. 19. 6. 550–556. 10.2514/3.62300. 1982JSpRo..19..550W. 0022-4650.
  13. Web site: Acoustic Loads Generated by the Propulsion System (NASA SP-8072). June 1971.
  14. Web site: Gebhardt . Chris . Heritage hardware: Testing the hydrogen burn off system for SLS . NASASpaceFlight.com . June 1, 2015.
  15. Web site: Falcon 9 Overview (2010). https://web.archive.org/web/20101222155322/http://www.spacex.com/falcon9.php. SpaceX . 8 May 2010. 22 December 2010.
  16. Web site: Clark. Stephen. Falcon 9 completes full-duration static fire. Spaceflight Now. 10 May 2015. 20 December 2014. SpaceX conducts the static fire test — that typically ends with a 3.5-second engine firing — before every launch to wring out issues with the rocket and ground systems. The exercise also helps engineers rehearse for the real launch day.. https://web.archive.org/web/20150605035551/http://spaceflightnow.com/2014/12/20/falcon-9-completes-full-duration-static-fire/. 5 June 2015. live.
  17. Web site: Clark. Stephen. Starlink satellite deployments continue with successful Falcon 9 launch. Spaceflight Now. 27 July 2020. 17 October 2020. https://web.archive.org/web/20201017190720/https://spaceflightnow.com/2020/06/13/starlink-satellite-deployments-continue-with-successful-falcon-9-launch/. live.