Jobless recovery explained

A jobless recovery or jobless growth is an economic phenomenon in which a macroeconomy experiences growth while maintaining or decreasing its level of employment. The term was coined by the economist Nick Perna in the early 1990s.[1] [2]

Causes

Economists are still divided about the causes and cures of a jobless recovery: some argue that increased productivity through automation has allowed economic growth without reducing unemployment. Other economists state that blaming automation is an example of the luddite fallacy[3] and that jobless recoveries stem from structural changes in the labor market, leading to unemployment as workers change jobs or industries.[4]

Industrial consolidation

Some have argued that the recent lack of job creation in the United States is due to increased industrial consolidation and growth of monopoly or oligopoly power.[5] The argument is twofold: firstly, small businesses create most American jobs, and secondly, small businesses have more difficulty starting and growing in the face of entrenched existing businesses (compare infant industry argument, applied at the level of industries, rather than individual firms).

Population growth vs. employment growth

In addition to employment growth, population growth must also be considered concerning the perception of jobless recoveries. Immigrants and new entrants to the workforce will often accept lower wages, causing persistent unemployment among those who were previously employed.[6] [7]

Surprisingly, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) does not offer data-sets isolated to the working-age population (ages 16 to 65). Including retirement age individuals in most BLS data-sets may tend to obfuscate the analysis of employment creation in relation to population growth. Additionally, incorrect assumptions about the term, Labor force, might also occur when reading BLS publications, millions of employable persons are not included within the official definition. The Labor force, as defined by the BLS,[8] is a strict definition of those officially unemployed (U-3),[9] and those who are officially employed (1 hour or more).[10]

The following table and included chart depicts year-to-year employment growth in comparison to population growth for those persons under 65 years of age. As such, baby boomer retirements are removed from the data as a factor for consideration. The table includes the Bureau of Labor Statistics, Current Population Survey, for the Civilian noninstitutional population and corresponding Employment Levels, dating from 1948 and includes October 2013, the age groups are 16 years & over, and 65 years & over. The working-age population is then determined by subtracting those age 65 and over from the Civilian noninstitutional population and Employment Levels respectively. Isolated into the traditional working-age subset, growth in both employment levels and population levels are totaled by decade, an employment percentage rate is also displayed for comparison by decade.

When examined, by decade, the first decade of the 2000s, the United States suffered a 5% jobless rate when compared to the added working age population.

See also

External links

Notes and References

  1. News: INDUSTRY ADOPTS POLITICAL PLANKS FOR NEW DEAL WAR; OLD ORDER IS UPHELD. 10 November 2013. New York Times. 6 December 1935. Pay Articles from December 1935 Part 7 - Site Map - The New York ....
  2. Web site: Jobless Recovery: The New Normal Since 1990 Investopedia. Smith. Lisa. 2010-08-17. en-US. 2016-08-17.
  3. Book: Easterly, William . William Easterly . The Elusive Quest for Growth: Economists' Adventures and Misadventures in the Tropics . 2001 . . . 0-262-55042-3 . 53–54 . registration .
  4. Web site: Has Structural Change Contributed to a Jobless Recovery? . Federal Reserve Bank of New York . Erica L. Groshen . Simon Potter . Aug 2003 . 9 . 8 .
  5. http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2010/1003.lynn-longman.html Who Broke America’s Jobs Machine? Why creeping consolidation is crushing American livelihoods.
  6. Web site: Camerota Ph.D.. Stephen A.. A Jobless Recovery?: Immigrant Gains and Native Losses. Center for Immigration Studies. 2 March 2014. October 2004. Between March of 2000 and 2004, the number of unemployed adult natives increased by 2.3 million, while the number of employed adult immigrants increased by 2.3 million..
  7. Web site: Peri. Giovanni. Immigration, Labor Markets, and Productivity. Cato Journal, Vol. 32, No. 1 (Winter 2012).. 2 March 2014. In this case firms pay immigrants less than their marginal productivity, increasing the firms’ profits. Such cost-savings on immigrants act as an increase in productivity for firms.. dead. https://web.archive.org/web/20121009010623/http://www.cato.org/pubs/journal/cj32n1/cj32n1-4.pdf. 9 October 2012.
  8. Web site: Glossary. Labor Force. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2 March 2014. Labor force (Current Population Survey) The labor force includes all persons classified as employed or unemployed in accordance with the definitions contained in this glossary..
  9. Web site: Economic News Release. HOUSEHOLD DATA Table A-15. Alternative measures of labor underutilization. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2 March 2014.
  10. Web site: BLS Information. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs). Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2 March 2014.
  11. Web site: Bureau of Labor Statistics. Current Population Survey. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 9 November 2013.