Irritant contact dermatitis explained

Irritant contact dermatitis

Irritant contact dermatitis is a form of contact dermatitis that can be divided into forms caused by chemical irritants and those caused by physical irritants.

Chemical

Chemical irritant contact dermatitis is either acute or chronic, which is usually associated with strong and weak irritants respectively.[1] The following definition is provided by Mathias and Maibach (1978):[2] The mechanism of action varies. Detergents, surfactants, extremes of pH, and organic solvents all directly affect the barrier properties of the epidermis. These effects include removing fat emulsion, defatting of dermal lipids, inflicting cellular damage on the epithelium, and increasing the transepidermal water loss by damaging the horny layer water-binding mechanisms and damaging the DNA, which causes the layer to thin. Concentrated irritants have an acute effect, but this is not as common as the accumulative, chronic effect of irritants whose deleterious effects build up with subsequent doses (ESCD 2006).

Chemical irritants are often strong alkalis as found in drain cleaners and soap with lye residues. Many other chemical compounds can also cause contact dermatitis.

Physical

Physical irritant contact dermatitis is a less-researched form of irritant contact dermatitis[3] due to its various mechanisms of action and a lack of a test for its diagnosis.

A complete patient history combined with negative allergic patch testing is usually necessary to reach a correct diagnosis.[4] The simplest form of physical irritant contact dermatitis results from prolonged rubbing, although the diversity of implicated irritants is far wider.[5] Examples include paper friction, fiberglass, and scratchy clothing.

Low humidity

Low humidity from air conditioning was found to be the most common cause of physical irritant contact dermatitis.[3] To the lay person a definition of low humidity being a physical irritant can be confusing because low humidity is a deficit (or absence) of an elemental substance, whereas all other irritants implicated in contact dermatitis are in concentrations of relative abundance. So the irritant is actually a lack of water vapour. This confusion is further compounded with the use of the term contact implying 'touching' (as is the case with all other forms of physical irritant contact dermatitis) whereas in the case of low humidity physical irritant contact dermatitis there is an absence of contact with water vapour.

Plants

Many plants cause irritant contact dermatitis through their spines or irritant hairs. Some plants such as the buttercup, spurge, and daisy act by chemical means. The sap of these plants contains a number of alkaloids, glycosides, saponins, anthraquinones, and (in the case of plant bulbs) irritant calcium oxalate crystals – all of which can cause crystal irritant contact dermatitis.

Butternut squash and acorn squash have been known to cause an allergic reaction in many individuals, especially in food preparation where the squash skin is cut and exposed to the epidermis. Food handlers and kitchen workers often take precautions to wear rubber or latex gloves when peeling butternut and acorn squash to avoid temporary butternut squash (Cucurbita moschata) dermatitis[6] A contact dermatitis reaction to butternut or acorn squash may result in orange and cracked skin, a sensation of "tightness", "roughness" or "rawness".

Arthropods

Some species of insects and spiders possess urticating hairs, including the caterpillars of the hickory tussock moth, the saddleback moth, the buck moth, and most species of tarantula from North and South America.[7] These hairs produce irritant contact dermatitis in a similar way to the way that plant hairs do.

Treatment

A humidifier can be used to prevent low indoor humidity during winter (especially with indoor heating), and dry season.

Notes and References

  1. Web site: HSE Guidance Notes. Guidance Note MS 24 - Health Surveillance of occupational skin disease. . Health and Safety Executive (HSE) . Government of the United Kingdom .
  2. Mathias CG, Maibach HI . Dermatotoxicology monographs I. Cutaneous irritation: factors influencing the response to irritants . Clinical Toxicology . 13 . 3 . 333–346 . 1978 . 369770 . 10.3109/15563657808988241 .
  3. Morris-Jones R, Robertson SJ, Ross JS, White IR, McFadden JP, Rycroft RJ . Dermatitis caused by physical irritants . The British Journal of Dermatology . 147 . 2 . 270–275 . August 2002 . 12174098 . 10.1046/j.1365-2133.2002.04852.x . 8444176 .
  4. Web site: Contact Dermatitis and Related Conditions. https://web.archive.org/web/20120910233200/http://www.clevelandclinicmeded.com/medicalpubs/diseasemanagement/dermatology/contact-dermatitis-and-related-conditions/ . 10 September 2012 . Taylor JS, Amado A . The Cleveland Clinic Foundation .
  5. Web site: Skotnicki-Grant S . The Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal . Allergic Contact Dermatitis versus Irritant Contact Dermatitis . May 2008 . https://web.archive.org/web/20120429041737/http://www.wsiat.on.ca/english/mlo/allergic.htm . 29 April 2012 .
  6. Potter TS, Hashimoto K . Butternut squash (Cucurbita moschata) dermatitis . Contact Dermatitis . 30 . 2 . 123 . February 1994 . 8187500 . 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1994.tb00588.x . 22081617 .
  7. Bertani . Rogério . Guadanucci . José Paulo Leite . 2013 . Morphology, evolution and usage of urticating setae by tarantulas (Araneae: Theraphosidae) . Zoologia (Curitiba) . 30 . 4 . 403–418 . 10.1590/S1984-46702013000400006 . amp . free .