Interpretive dance is a family of modern dance styles that began around 1900 with Isadora Duncan. It used classical concert music but marked a departure from traditional concert dance, as a rebellion against the strict rules of classical ballet.[1] [2] [3] It seeks to translate human emotions, conditions, situations or fantasies into movement and dramatic expression, as opposed to following a specific dance style or telling a linear story. It may also adapt traditional ethnic movements into more modern expressions.[4]
The roots of interpretive dance can be traced back to the work of Isadora Duncan and Ruth St. Denis in the early 1900s. Duncan rejected the rigid technique and restrictive costumes of ballet in favor of more natural, flowing movements performed barefoot and in loose-fitting tunics.[5] St. Denis was influenced by Eastern dance and spirituality, incorporating elements like bare feet and elaborate costumes into her performances.
Other pioneers of interpretive dance in the early-to-mid 20th century included Martha Graham, who developed her own expressive technique[6] and frequently explored psychological and social themes; Doris Humphrey, who experimented with fall and recovery;[7] and Merce Cunningham, who embraced chance procedures and avant-garde music.[8]
Interpretive dance is characterized by:
While it was - and most often, still is - thought of as a performing art, interpretive dance does not have to be performed with music. It often includes grandiloquent movements of the arms, turns and drops to the floor.
The pioneering work of the early interpretive dancers paved the way for the development of modern dance as a major genre in the 20th century. Many contemporary dance styles and choreographic techniques have roots in interpretive dance, even if the term itself is used less frequently today. The effect of interpretive dance can be seen in many Broadway musicals as well as in other media.