Interdisciplinary bedside rounds explained

In the domain of hospital medicine, interdisciplinary bedside rounds are a collaborative approach to patient care that involves the participation of the bedside nurse, primary provider, and the patient.^[1] They are often joined by family members and allied health professionals such as the patient's pharmacist and case manager.

During interdisciplinary bedside rounds, these participants visit the patient's bedside together — a type of short, interdisciplinary care team meeting. The rounds are typically conducted for all of a provider's patients on a hospital unit, one after another, with each patient's primary nurse joining for his or her patients.

Unlike conventional hospital care in which medical professionals treat patients independently and with minimal coordination, Interdisciplinary Bedside Rounds aim to foster real-time collaboration by having the whole care team converge at a patient's bedside to discuss their care and discharge plans.

This approach, by design, seeks to mitigate the risks associated with uncoordinated care, such as miscommunication, oversight, errors, and delays. Research on hospital teams show that teams make fewer mistakes than do individuals, and that team members know their responsibilities and those of their team members.^{[2] [3] [4]}

Goals

Interdisciplinary bedside rounds aim to achieve several healthcare goals by embedding them into daily care routines:

• Patient-centered care^[5]
• Interprofessional collaboration through interdisciplinary care planning^[6]
• Enhanced trust between care team members and an enhanced doctor-patient relationship^[7]
• Reduction of common medical errors using interdisciplinary accountability for patient safety and evidence-based medicine^[8]

Comparison with multidisciplinary rounds and medical rounds

Although IBRs, multidisciplinary rounds (MDRs), and medical rounds all aspire to enhance patient outcomes through collaboration, the three models diverge in their structure, focus, and execution.^[9]

• Multidisciplinary rounds occur away from the patient's bedside, rarely include the primary bedside nurse, and usually focus on discharge coordination and select patient care topics.
• Medical rounds (also known as ward rounds or safari rounds) refer to physician-led rounds at the patient's bedside that may or may not include any other professions or disciplines. They may be conducted alone or by a team of physicians.
• Interdisciplinary bedside rounds occur at the patient's bedside, involve the primary bedside nurse, and focus on all aspects of patient care and discharge.

Multidisciplinary rounds (MDRs)

Definition: In MDRs, the healthcare team discusses patients outside the patient's presence, typically at a centralized location such as a nursing station or conference room.

Participants: MDRs are often brief "run the list" huddles between lead provider, case manager, and charge nurse, with a primary focus on discharge planning. Bedside nurses on the unit rarely attend MDRs, and if they do, they rarely have an active role.

Impact: Apart from these huddles, care providers in an MDR model largely function independently, leading to potential gaps in shared comprehension and decision-making, with different groups of health care professionals often working in isolation and with the illusion of teamwork.^{[10] [11]}

Timing: MDRs can occur in the morning and/or afternoon

• Morning MDRs focus on patients to discharge that day
• Afternoon MDRs focus on patients to be discharged the following day.

The actual execution of MDRs can vary from hospital to hospital and unit to unit. There is no official academic definition of multidisciplinary rounds.

Medical rounds

Definition: In medical rounds, also known as ward rounds, attending rounds, and safari rounds, the lead provider rounds on his or her patient at the bedside. When conducted on a teaching unit with residents and interns, the focus is on medical education for the trainees.

Participants: Medical rounds can be conducted alone, or with a team of physicians, including junior doctors and medical students. If bedside nurses and other allied health professionals join, it is typically to observe and listen in.

Timing: Medical rounds typically occur in the morning

The actual execution of ward rounds can vary from hospital to hospital, unit to unit, physician to physician, and even day to day. Attending rounds have been called "The HumptyDumptification of Medical Discourse" because of the nonstandard nature of what is covered.^[12]

Interdisciplinary bedside rounds (IBRs)

In contrast, interdisciplinary bedside rounds aim to foster an integrated and collaborative approach to patient care. These rounds take place at the patient's bedside and involve the lead provider, multiple other healthcare professionals, and the patient and their family.

During IBRs, the different professions engage in a collective dialogue, fostering a more comprehensive understanding of the patient's condition, needs, and care plan. The inclusion of the patient and their family in the conversation also ensures that the care plan is tailored to the patient's needs and preferences. Inputs shared forward from multiple stakeholders are readily synthesized together to form a cohesive plan of care.

Multiple studies have found that interdisciplinary teams consistently outperform multidisciplinary teams across most evaluated metrics.^[13] However, implementing successful IBRs can be challenging, leading to mixed outcomes.^{[14] [13]}

Comparison and consequences

MDRs, due to their absence of real-time, all-inclusive communication, can potentially result in missed cues, misinterpretations, and delays that negatively affect patient outcomes and satisfaction.

Conversely, IBRs aim to minimize these hazards by promoting shared decision-making,^[15] enhancing interprofessional communication, and placing the patient at the heart of their care. These factors collectively contribute to improved care coordination, patient satisfaction, and overall care outcomes.

Implementation challenges and solutions

IBRs can be more challenging to implement than MDRs, and these challenges have been studied in detail.^{[16] [17]} The IBR literature includes solutions that hospital units have seen work for them.^{[18] [19] [20]}

• Challenge: Creating transparency into the quality and quantity of daily IBRs to ensure accountability
• Published solution: Physicians at Berkshire Medical Center in Pittsfield, Massachusetts, reported success when adopting software to track IBR quality and quantity of care service delivery.^[21]
• Challenge: A lack of unit-oriented lead providers with most of their patients on the unit (also known as "geographic rounding)
• Published solution: Several studies describe successful implementation of geographic rounds.^{[22] [23] [24]} Bryson et al. reported improvements:
  • 87% of physicians reporting geography had a positive impact on the overall quality of care,
  • Geography increased time spent with patient/caregivers to discuss plan of care (p < 0.001),
  • Improved communication with nurses (p = 0.0009),
  • Increased sense of teamwork with nurses/case managers (p < 0.001).
• Challenge: IBRs take longer than MDRs and require more coordination to execute well.
• Published solution: Al Halabi et al reported a 22.3% reduction in rounding time by relocating patient beds to a common location.^[25] Stein et al. utilized a 'SIBR rounds manager', usually the unit charge nurse, to manage the team's progress from patient-to-patient and ensure that physicians did not waste time searching for the next nurse or for the next eligible patient.^[26]

Structured interdisciplinary bedside rounds (SIBR rounds)

A well-known model of IBRs is structured interdisciplinary bedside rounds, abbreviated as SIBR rounds and pronounced "cyber."

SIBR follows a six-step process to create a shared mental model of who says what, when, and in what sequence when a care team enters the patient's room together. This structure is designed to ensure role clarity, consistency, efficiency, and sense-making.

History and development of SIBR

The concept of SIBR was developed by hospitalist and quality expert Dr. Jason Stein and colleagues at Emory University Hospital in the early 2010s.

The SIBR model and its inventors have won several US national awards from the Society of Hospital Medicine and attracted international attention.^{[27] [28] [29]} The insights were recognized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Innovation Center.

Numerous studies of various SIBR units have shown substantial improvements for clinical,^[30] throughput,^[31] cost and patient/staff experience and engagement outcomes,^[32] with some having failed to achieve desired outcomes.^{[33] [34]}

Notes and References

1. Gonzalo JD, Kuperman E, Lehman E, Haidet P . Bedside interprofessional rounds: Perceptions of benefits and barriers by internal medicine nursing staff, attending physicians, and housestaff physicians. . J Hosp Med . 9 . 10 . 646–651. August 2014 . 25130404 . 10.1002/jhm.2245 .
2. Smith-Jentsch KA, Salas E, Baker DP . Training team performance-related assertiveness. . Pers Psychol . 49 . 4 . 909–936. December 1996 . 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1996.tb02454.x .
3. Volpe CE, Cannon-Bowers JA, Salas E, Spector PE . The impact of cross-training on team functioning: An empirical investigation. . Hum. Factors . 38 . 1 . 87–100. March 1996 . 8682521 . 10.1518/001872096778940741 . 43030853 .
4. Salas E, Sims DE, Burke CS . Is there a "Big Five" in Teamwork? . Small Group Research . 36 . 5 . 555–599. October 2005 . 10.1177/1046496405277134 . 143395088 .
5. Cao . Victor . Tan . Laren D. . Horn . Femke . Bland . David . Giri . Paresh . Maken . Kanwaljeet . Cho . Nam . Scott . Loreen . Dinh . Vi A. . Hidalgo . Derrek . Nguyen . H. Bryant . January 2018 . Patient-Centered Structured Interdisciplinary Bedside Rounds in the Medical ICU . Critical Care Medicine . en . 46 . 1 . 85–92 . 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002807 . 29088002 . 42618135 . 0090-3493.
6. Schwartz . Jeremy I . Gonzalez-Colaso . Rosana . Gan . Geliang . Deng . Yanhong . Kaplan . Michael H . Vakos . Patricia-Ann . Kenyon . Kathleen . Ashman . Amy . Sofair . Andre N . Huot . Stephen J . Chaudhry . Sarwat I . 2021-01-12 . Structured interdisciplinary bedside rounds improve interprofessional communication and workplace efficiency among residents and nurses on an inpatient internal medicine unit . Journal of Interprofessional Care . en . 1–8 . 10.1080/13561820.2020.1863932 . 33433262 . 231584694 . 1356-1820.
7. Clay-Williams . Robyn . Plumb . Jennifer . Luscombe . Georgina M. . Hawke . Catherine . Dalton . Hazel . Shannon . Gabriel . Johnson . Julie . May 2018 . Improving Teamwork and Patient Outcomes with Daily Structured Interdisciplinary Bedside Rounds: A Multimethod Evaluation . Journal of Hospital Medicine . en . 13 . 5 . 311–317 . 10.12788/jhm.2850 . 29698537 . 13862109 . 1553-5592. free .
8. Cox . Elizabeth D. . Jacobsohn . Gwen C. . Rajamanickam . Victoria P. . Carayon . Pascale . Kelly . Michelle M. . Wetterneck . Tosha B. . Rathouz . Paul J. . Brown . Roger L. . 2017-05-01 . A Family-Centered Rounds Checklist, Family Engagement, and Patient Safety: A Randomized Trial . Pediatrics . en . 139 . 5 . 10.1542/peds.2016-1688 . 0031-4005 . 5404725 . 28557720.
9. O'Hare . James A. . July 2008 . Anatomy of the ward round . European Journal of Internal Medicine . en . 19 . 5 . 309–313 . 10.1016/j.ejim.2007.09.016. 18549930 .
10. Körner . Mirjam . Lippenberger . Corinna . Becker . Sonja . Reichler . Lars . Müller . Christian . Zimmermann . Linda . Rundel . Manfred . Baumeister . Harald . April 2014 . McDermott . Aoife M . Knowledge integration, teamwork and performance in health care . Journal of Health Organization and Management . en . 30 . 2 . 227–243 . 10.1108/JHOM-12-2014-0217 . 27052623 . 1477-7266.
11. West . Michael A. . Lyubovnikova . Joanne . 2013-03-15 . Illusions of team working in health care . Journal of Health Organization and Management . en . 27 . 1 . 134–142 . 10.1108/14777261311311843 . 23734481 . 1477-7266.
12. Körner . Mirjam . August 2018 . Interprofessional teamwork in medical rehabilitation: a comparison of multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary team approach . Clinical Rehabilitation . en . 24 . 8 . 745–755 . 10.1177/0269215510367538 . 20530646 . 4150666 . 0269-2155.
13. Ratelle . John T . Sawatsky . Adam P . Kashiwagi . Deanne T . Schouten . Will M . Erwin . Patricia J . Gonzalo . Jed D . Beckman . Thomas J . West . Colin P . April 2019 . Implementing bedside rounds to improve patient-centred outcomes: a systematic review . BMJ Quality & Safety . en . 28 . 4 . 317–326 . 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007778 . 30224407 . 52286940 . 2044-5415.
14. Heip . Tine . Van Hecke . Ann . Malfait . Simon . Van Biesen . Wim . Eeckloo . Kristof . January 2022 . The Effects of Interdisciplinary Bedside Rounds on Patient Centeredness, Quality of Care, and Team Collaboration: A Systematic Review . Journal of Patient Safety . en . 18 . 1 . e40–e44 . 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000695 . 1549-8425 . 8719516 . 32398542.
15. Basic . David . Huynh . Elizabeth . Gonzales . Rinaldo . Shanley . Chris . 2018-11-08 . Structured interdisciplinary bedside rounds, in-hospital deaths, and new nursing home placements among older inpatients . Clinical Interventions in Aging . English . 13 . 2289–2294 . 10.2147/CIA.S171508 . 6233858 . 30519010 . free .
16. O'Leary . Kevin J . Killarney . Audrey . Hansen . Luke O . Jones . Sasha . Malladi . Megan . Marks . Kelly . M Shah . Hiren . December 2016 . Effect of patient-centred bedside rounds on hospitalised patients' decision control, activation and satisfaction with care . BMJ Quality & Safety . en . 25 . 12 . 921–928 . 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004561 . 26628552 . 46595605 . 2044-5415.
17. Walton . Victoria . Hogden . Anne . Long . Janet C. . Johnson . Julie K. . Greenfield . David . 2019-12-11 . How Do Interprofessional Healthcare Teams Perceive the Benefits and Challenges of Interdisciplinary Ward Rounds . Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare . English . 12 . 1023–1032 . 10.2147/JMDH.S226330 . 6912018 . 31849478 . free .
18. Pannick . Samuel . Wachter . Robert M . Vincent . Charles . Sevdalis . Nick . 2016-10-18 . Rethinking medical ward quality . BMJ . 355 . en . i5417 . 10.1136/bmj.i5417 . 27756729 . 32871706 . 1756-1833. 10044/1/41514 . free .
19. Martin . Graham P. . Finn . Rachael . November 2011 . Patients as team members: opportunities, challenges and paradoxes of including patients in multi-professional healthcare teams: Patients as team members . Sociology of Health & Illness . en . 33 . 7 . 1050–1065 . 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2011.01356.x. 21668454 . free . 2381/10028 . free .
20. Lopez . Merrick . Vaks . Yana . Wilson . Michele . Mitchell . Kenneth . Lee . Christina . Ejike . Janeth . Oei . Grace . Kaufman . Danny . Hambly . Jamie . Tinsley . Cynthia . Bahk . Thomas . Samayoa . Carlos . Pappas . James . Abd-Allah . Shamel . May 2019 . Impacting Satisfaction, Learning, and Efficiency Through Structured Interdisciplinary Rounding in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: A Quality Improvement Project . Pediatric Quality & Safety . en . 4 . 3 . e176 . 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000176 . 2472-0054 . 6594789 . 31579875.
21. Grogean . Thomas S . DeMarco . William . April 2023 . More data, fewer problems: Reducing variability of structured interdisciplinary rounds . Journal of Hospital Medicine . en . 18 . S1 . 10.1002/jhm.13090 . 1553-5592.
22. Bryson . Christine . Boynton . Greta . Stepczynski . Anna . Garb . Jane . Kleppel . Reva . Irani . Farzan . Natanasabapathy . Siva . Stefan . Mihaela S . 2017-08-08 . Geographical assignment of hospitalists in an urban teaching hospital: feasibility and impact on efficiency and provider satisfaction . Hospital Practice . en . 45 . 4 . 135–142 . 10.1080/21548331.2017.1353884 . 2154-8331 . 6954492 . 28707548.
23. Loertscher . Laura . Wang . Lian . Sanders . Shelley Schoepflin . 2021-07-04 . The impact of an accountable care unit on mortality: an observational study . Journal of Community Hospital Internal Medicine Perspectives . en . 11 . 4 . 554–557 . 10.1080/20009666.2021.1918945 . 2000-9666 . 8221162 . 34211668.
24. Radhakrishnan . Nila S . Lukose . Kiran . Cartwright . Richard . Sleiman . Andressa . Matey . Nicholas . Lim . Duke . LeGault . Tiffany . Pollard . Sapheria . Gravina . Nicole . Southwick . Frederick S . December 2022 . Prospective application of the interdisciplinary bedside rounding checklist 'TEMP' is associated with reduced infections and length of hospital stay . BMJ Open Quality . en . 11 . 4 . e002045 . 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002045 . 2399-6641 . 9723909 . 36588303.
25. Al Halabi . Anas . Habas . Elmukhtar . Farfar . Khalifa L . Ghazouani . Hafedh . Alfitori . Gamal . Abdulla . Moza A . Borham . Abdelsalam M . Khan . Fahmi Y . 2023-04-21 . Time Spent on Medical Round Activities, Distance Walked, and Time-Motion in the General Medicine Department at Hamad General Hospital in Qatar . Cureus . 15 . 4 . e37935 . en . 10.7759/cureus.37935 . free . 2168-8184 . 10200253 . 37220459.
26. Stein . Jason . Payne . Christina . Methvin . Amanda . Bonsall . Joanna M. . Chadwick . Liam . Clark . Diaz . Castle . Bryan W. . Tong . David . Dressler . Daniel D. . January 2015 . Reorganizing a hospital ward as an accountable care unit: Reorganizing a Hospital Ward . Journal of Hospital Medicine . en . 10 . 1 . 36–40 . 10.1002/jhm.2284. 25399928 .
27. Web site: Shank . Brendon . May 5, 2015 . Society of Hospital Medicine Names 2015 Excellence Award Winners . June 8, 2023 . The Hospitalist.
28. Web site: Caldwell . Gordon . June 23, 2022 . Dr Gordon Caldwell - Tweet . June 8, 2023 . Twitter.
29. https://www.cec.health.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/258226/year-in-review-2013-14.pdf Clinical Excellence Commission
30. Basic . David . Huynh . Elizabeth T. . Gonzales . Rinaldo . Shanley . Christopher G. . March 2021 . Twice-Weekly Structured Interdisciplinary Bedside Rounds and Falls among Older Adult Inpatients . Journal of the American Geriatrics Society . en . 69 . 3 . 779–784 . 10.1111/jgs.17007 . 33395498 . 230666210 . 0002-8614.
31. Sunkara . Padageshwar R . Islam . Tareq . Bose . Abhishek . Rosenthal . Gary E . Chevli . Parag . Jogu . Hanumantha . Tk . Luqman Arafath . Huang . Chi-Cheng . Chaudhary . Dipendra . Beekman . Daniel . Dutta . Abhishek . Menon . Suma . Speiser . Jaime L . July 2020 . Impact of structured interdisciplinary bedside rounding on patient outcomes at a large academic health centre . BMJ Quality & Safety . en . 29 . 7 . 569–575 . 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009936 . 2044-5415 . 10189805 . 31810994.
32. Gausvik . Christian . Lautar . Ashley . Miller . Lisa . Pallerla . Harini . Schlaudecker . Jeffrey . January 2015 . Structured nursing communication on interdisciplinary acute care teams improves perceptions of safety, efficiency, understanding of care plan and teamwork as well as job satisfaction . Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare . 8 . en . 33–37 . 10.2147/JMDH.S72623 . 1178-2390 . 4298312 . 25609978 . free .
33. Huynh . Elizabeth . Basic . David . Gonzales . Rinaldo . Shanley . Chris . 2017 . Structured interdisciplinary bedside rounds do not reduce length of hospital stay and 28-day re-admission rate among older people hospitalised with acute illness: an Australian study . Australian Health Review . en . 41 . 6 . 599–605 . 10.1071/AH16019 . 27883874 . 0156-5788. free .
34. Jala . Sheila . Giaccari . Sarah . Passer . Melissa . Bertmar . Carin . Day . Susan . Griffith . Dayna . Krause . Martin . January 2019 . "In Safe Hands" – A costly integrated care program with limited benefits in stroke unit care . Journal of Clinical Neuroscience . en . 59 . 84–88 . 10.1016/j.jocn.2018.10.135. 30409533 . 53217177 .